Proteomic dissection of DNA polymerization

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 197-211

  Beck, Jennifer L ^a   Urathamakul, Thitima ^a   Watt, Stephen J ^a   Sheil, Margaret M ^a   Schaeffer, Patrick M ^b   Dixon, Nicholas E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

DNA polymerase; DNA repair; DNA replication; Electrospray ionization; Mass spectrometry; Molecular machine; Protein protein complex; Replisome; TAP tag

Indexed keywords

DNA; RECOMBINANT DNA;

CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; MACROMOLECULE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; POLYMERIZATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; STOICHIOMETRY;

ANIMALS; DNA; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 33745590415     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.3.2.197     Document Type: Review

References (167)

1. Watson JD. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737-738 (1953).
2. Watson JD, Crick FH. Genetic implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 171, 964-967 (1953).
3. Bessman MJ, Kornberg A, Lehman IR et al. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 21, 197-198 (1956).
4. Gefter ML, Molineux IJ, Kornberg T et al. Deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in cell-free extracts III. Catalytic properties of deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 3321-3326 (1972).
5. Kornberg T, Gefter ML. Purification and DNA synthesis in cell-free extracts: properties of DNA polymerase II. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68, 761-764 (1971).
6. Patel PH, Suzuki M, Adman E et al. Prokaryotic DNA polymerase I: evolution, structure, and "base flipping" mechanism for nucleotide selection. J. Mol. Biol. 308, 823-837 (2001).
7. Garg P, Burgers PMJ. DNA polymerases that propagate the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40, 115-128 (2005). • Provides a good overview of the current understanding of eukaryotic replication.
8. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 317-353 (2005).
9. Robins P, Pappin DJC, Wood RD et al. Structural and functional homology between mammalian DNase IV and the 5′-nuclease domain of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28535-28538 (1994).
10. Kornberg T, Gefter ML. Deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in cell-free extracts IV. Purification and catalytic properties of deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase III. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 5369-5375 (1972).
11. Kornberg A, Baker T. DNA Replication, 2nd Ed. WH Freeman and Co, NY, USA (1992).
12. Delarue M, Poch O, Tordo N et al. An attempt to unify the structure of polymerases. Protein Eng. 3, 461-467 (1990).
13. Ohmori H, Friedberg EC, Fuchs RPP et al. The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol. Cell 8, 7-8 (2001).
14. Burgers PMJ, Koonin EV, Bruford E et al. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases: proposal for a revised nomenclature. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43487-43490 (2001).
15. Johnson R, Kondratick C, Prakash S et al. hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science 285, 263-265 (1999).
16. 2C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli Pol V. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8919-8924 (1999).
17. Wagner J, Gruz P, Kim SR et al. The dinB gene encodes a novel E. coli DNA polymerase, DNA Pol IV, involved in mutagenesis. Mol. Cell 4, 281-286 (1999).
18. Grabowski B, Kelman Z. Archeal DNA replication: eukaryal proteins in a bacterial context. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57, 487-516 (2003). •• Compares the structures and functions of replication proteins of eukaryotes, prokaryotes and the archea.
19. Steitz TA. DNA- and RNA-dependent DNA polymerases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3, 31-38 (1993).
20. Kunkel TA. DNA replication fidelity. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 16895-16898 (2004). •• Explains how the different fidelity of various DNA polymerases relates to their roles in the cell.
21. Hogg M, Wallace SS, Doublie S. Bumps in the road: how replicative DNA polymerases see DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 86-93 (2005).
22. Idriss HT, Al-Assar O, Wilson SH. DNA polymerase β. Intl J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 34, 321-324 (2002).
23. Longley MJ, Graziewicz MA, Bienstock RJ et al. Consequences of mutations in human DNA polymerase γ. Gene 354, 125-131 (2005).
24. Friedberg EC, Wagner R, Radman M. Molecular biology: specialized DNA polymerases, cellular survival, and the genesis of mutations. Science 296, 1627-1630 (2002).
25. Kunkel TA. Considering the cancer consequences of altered DNA polymerase function. Cancer Cell 3, 105-110 (2003).
26. Bignold LP. The cell-type-specificity of inherited predispositions to tumours: review and hypothesis. Cancer Lett. 216, 127-146 (2004).
27. Cleaver JE. Cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum and related disorders of DNA repair. Nature Rev. Cancer 5, 564-573 (2005).
28. Srivastava VK, Busbee DL. Replicative enzymes and aging: importance of DNA polymerase a function to the events of cellular aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 1, 443-463 (2002).
29. Vijg J, Calder RB. Transcripts of aging. Trends Genet. 20, 221-224 (2004).
30. Cheok CF, Wu L, Garcia PL et al. The Bloom's syndrome helicase promotes the annealing of complementary single-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 3932-3941 (2005).
31. De Lucia P, Cairns J. Isolation of an E. coli strain with a mutation affecting DNA polymerase. Nature 224, 1164-1166 (1969).
32. Sutton MD, Smith BT, Godoy VG et al. The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 479-497 (2000).
33. McHenry CS. Chromosomal replicases as asymmetric dimers: studies of subunit arrangement and functional consequences. Mol. Microbiol. 49, 1157-1165 (2003).
34. Kong XP, Onrust R, O'Donnell M et al. Three-dimensional structure of the β subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: a sliding DNA clamp. Cell 69, 425-437 (1992). • First structure of a sliding clamp protein.
35. Hamdan S, Carr PD, Brown SE et al. Structural basis for proofreading during replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Structure 10, 535-546 (2002).
36. Jeruzalmi D, O'Donnell M, Kuriyan J. Crystal structure of the processivity clamp loader gamma (γ) complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Cell 106, 429-441 (2001).
37. Gulbis JM, Kazmirski SL, Finkelstein J et al. Crystal structure of the χ:ψ subassembly of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase clamp-loader complex. Eur. J. Biochem. 271, 439-449 (2004).
38. Neylon C, Brown SE, Kralicek AV et al. Interaction of the Escherichia coli replication terminator protein (Tus) with DNA: a model derived from DNA-binding studies of mutant proteins by surface plasmon resonance. Biochemistry 39, 11989-11999 (2000).
39. Loo JA. Studying noncovalent protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 16, 1-23 (1997). • Provides an overview of the developments in applications of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for studying noncovalent complexes.
40. Fuller RS, Funnell BE, Kornberg A. The DnaA protein complex with the E. coli chromosomal replication origin (oriC) and other DNA sites. Cell 38, 889-900 (1984).
41. Messer W. The bacterial replication initiator DnaA. DnaA and oriC, the bacterial mode to initiate DNA replication. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26, 355-374 (2002).
42. Messer W, Blaesing F, Jakimowicz D et al. Bacterial replication initiator DnaA. Rules for DnaA binding and roles of DnaA in origin unwinding and helicase loading. Biochimie 83, 5-12 (2001).
43. LeBowitz JH, McMacken R. The Escherichia coli DnaB replication protein is a DNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4738-4748 (1986).
44. San Martin MC, Stamford NPJ, Dammerova N, Dixon NE, Carazo JM. Three-dimensional structure of the DnaB helicase oligomer from Escherichia coli by electron microscopy and image processing. Proc. Intl Congress on Electron Microscopy, Paris, France 3A, 545-546 (1994).
45. San Martin MC, Radermacher M, Wolpensinger B et al. Three-dimensional reconstructions from cryoelectron microscopy images reveal an intimate complex between helicase DnaB and its loading partner DnaC. Structure 6, 501-509 (1998).
46. Bramhill D, Kornberg A. A model for initiation at origins of DNA replication. Cell 54, 915-918 (1988).
47. Jiang Y, Yao S, Helinski D et al. Functional analysis of two putative chromosomal replication origins from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Plasmid (2006) (In Press).
48. Davey MJ, Jeruzalmi D, Kuriyan J et al. Motors and switches: AAA+ machines within the replisome. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 826-835 (2002).
49. Davey MJ, Fang L, McInerney P et al. The DnaC helicase loader is a dual ATP/ADP switch protein. EMBO J. 21, 3148-3159 (2002).
50. Mastsumoto T, Morimoto Y, Shibata N et al. Roles of functional loops and the C-terminal segment of a single-stranded DNA binding protein elucidated by X-ray structure analysis. J. Biochem. 127, 329-335 (2000).
51. Oakley AJ, Loscha KV, Schaeffer PM et al. Crystal and solution structures of the helicase-binding domain of Escherichia coli primase. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 11495-11504 (2005).
52. Soultanas P. The bacterial helicase-primase interaction: a common structural/functional module. Structure 13, 839-844 (2005).
53. Benkovic SJ, Valentine AM, Salinas F. Replisome-mediated DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 181-208 (2001).
54. Johnson A, O'Donnell M. Cellular DNA replicases: components and dynamics at the replication fork. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 283-315 (2005). •• Comprehensive review of the current knowledge of DNA replication.
55. Schaeffer PM, Headlam MJ, Dixon NE. Protein-protein interactions in the eubacterial replisome. IUBMB Life 57, 5-12 (2005).
56. Taft-Benz SA, Schaaper RM. The ø subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III: a role in stabilizing the ε proofreading subunit. J. Bacteriol. 186, 2774-2780 (2004).
57. Levin DS, Vijayakumar S, Liu X et al. A conserved interaction between the replicative clamp loader and DNA ligase in eukaryotes: implications for Okazaki fragment joining. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 55196-55201 (2004).
58. Turner J, Hingorani MM, Kelman Z et al. The internal workings of a DNA polymerase clamp-loading machine. EMBO J. 18, 771-783 (1999).
59. Williams CR, Snyder AK, Kuzmic P et al. Mechanism of loading the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III sliding clamp: I. Two distinct activities for individual ATP sites in the γ complex. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4376-4385 (2004).
60. Snyder AK, Williams CR, Johnson A et al. Mechanism of loading the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III sliding clamp: II. Uncoupling the β and DNA binding activities of the γ complex. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4386-4393 (2004).
61. Jeruzalmi D, Yurieva O, Zhao Y et al. Mechanism of processivity clamp opening by the δ subunit wrench of the clamp loader complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Cell 106, 417-428 (2001).
62. Hingorani MM, O'Donnell M. ATP binding to the Escherichia coli clamp loader powers opening of the ring-shaped clamp of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24550-24563 (1998).
63. Goedken ER, Levitus M, Johnson A et al. Fluorescence measurements on the E.coli DNA polymerase clamp loader: implications for conformational changes during ATP and clamp binding. J. Mol. Biol. 336, 1047-1059 (2004).
64. Bloom LB, Turner J, Kelman Z et al. Dynamics of loading the β sliding clamp of DNA polymerase III onto DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30699-30708 (1996).
65. Bertram JG, Bloom LB, Hingorani MM et al. Molecular mechanism and energetics of clamp assembly in Escherichia coli. The role of ATP hydrolysis when γ complex loads β on DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28413-28420 (2000).
66. Ason B, Handayani R, Williams CR et al. Mechanism of loading the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III β sliding clamp on DNA. Bona fide primer/templates preferentially trigger the γ complex to hydrolyse ATP and load the clamp. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 10033-10040 (2003).
67. Kamada K, Ohsumi K, Horiuchi T et al. Structure of a replication- terminator protein complexed with DNA. Nature 383, 598-603 (1996).
68. Neylon C, Kralicek AV, Hill TM et al. Replication termination in Escherichia coli: structure and antihelicase activity of the Tus-Ter complex. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69, 501-526 (2005).
69. MacAlpine DM, Rodriguez HK, Bell SP. Coordination of replication and transcription along a Drosophila chromosome. Genes Dev. 18, 3094-3105 (2004).
70. Schwob E. Flexibility and governance in eukaryotic DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7, 680-690 (2004).
71. Gilbert DM. In search of the holy replicator. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 848-855 (2004).
72. Aladjem MI, Fanning E. The replicon revisited: an old model learns new tricks in metazoan chromosomes. EMBO Rep. 5, 686-691 (2004).
73. Bell SP, Dutta A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 333-374 (2002).
74. Aggarwal BD, Calvi BR. Chromatin regulates origin activity in Drosophila follicle cells. Nature 430, 372-376 (2004).
75. Bell SP, Stillman B. ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex. Nature 357, 128-134 (1992).
76. Laskey RA, Madine MA. A rotary pumping model for helicase function of MCM proteins at a distance from replication forks. EMBO Rep. 4, 26-30 (2003).
77. Hyrien O, Marheineke K, Goldar A. Paradoxes of eukaryotic DNA replication: MCM proteins and the random completion problem. Bioessays 25, 116-125 (2003).
78. Sclafani RA, Fletcher RJ, Chen XS. Two heads are better than one: regulation of DNA replication by hexameric helicases. Genes Dev. 18, 2039-2045 (2004).
79. Stillman B. Origin recognition and the chromosome cycle. FEBS Lett. 579, 877-884 (2005).
80. Adachi Y, Usukura J, Yanagida M. A globular complex formation by Nda1 and the other five members of the MCM protein family in fission yeast. Genes Cells 2, 467-479 (1997).
81. Robinson NP, Bell SD. Origins of DNA replication in the three domains of life. FEBS J. 272, 3757-3766 (2005).
82. Iyer LM, Leipe DD, Koonin EV et al. Evolutionary history and higher order classification of AAA+ ATPases. J. Struct. Biol. 146, 11-31 (2004).
83. Shiomi Y, Usukura J, Masamura Y et al. ATP-dependent structural change of the eukaryotic clamp-loader protein, replication factor C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14127-14132 (2000).
84. Miyachi K, Fritzler MJ, Tan EM. Autoantibody to a nuclear antigen in proliferating cells. J. Immunol. 121, 2228-2234 (1978).
85. Tan CK, Castillo C, So AG et al. An auxiliary protein for DNA polymerase-d from fetal calf thymus. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12310-12316 (1986).
86. Krishna TS, Kong XP, Gary S et al. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA. Cell 79, 1233-1243 (1994).
87. Yao N, Turner J, Kelman Z et al. Clamp loading, unloading and intrinsic stability of the PCNA, β and gp45 sliding clamps of human, E. coli and T4 replicases. Genes Cells 1, 101-113 (1996).
88. Conaway RC, Lehman IR. A DNA primase activity associated with DNA polymerase α from Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2523-2527 (1982).
89. Conaway RC, Lehman IR. Synthesis by the DNA primase of Drosophila melanogaster of a primer with a unique chain length. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 4585-4588 (1982).
90. Morrison A, Araki H, Clark AB et al. A third essential DNA polymerase in S. cerevisiae. Cell 62, 1143-1151 (1990).
91. Hiom K. DNA repair: how to PIKK a partner. Curr. Biol. 15, 473-475 (2005).
92. Michel B, Grompone G, Flores M-J et al. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12783-12788 (2004). • Interesting discussion of the processes that occur when the replisome encounters damaged DNA.
93. Bunting KA, Roe SM, Pearl LH. Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the β-clamp. EMBO J. 22, 5883-5892 (2003).
94. Maga G, Huebscher U. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. J. Cell Sci. 116, 3051-3060 (2003). •• Provides an insight into the many roles of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in replication, repair and other processes.
95. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan G-L et al. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419, 135-141 (2002).
96. Kannouche PL, Wing J, Lehmann AR. Interaction of human DNA polymerase η with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 14, 491-500 (2004).
97. Haracska L, Johnson RE, Unk I et al. Physical and functional interactions of human DNA polymerase η with PCNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 7199-7206 (2001).
98. Haracska L, Johnson RE, Unk I et al. Targeting of human DNA polymerase ι to the replication machinery via interaction with PCNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14256-14261 (2001).
99. Haracska L, Unk I, Johnson RE et al. Stimulation of DNA synthesis activity of human DNA polymerase κ by PCNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 784-791 (2002).
100. Nowak MA, Komarova NL, Sengupta A et al. The role of chromosomal instability in tumor initiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16226-16231 (2002).
101. Loeb LA, Loeb KR, Anderson JP. Multiple mutations and cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 776-781 (2003).
102. Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L. Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Polη. Science 283, 1001-1004 (1999).
103. Lehmann AR, Kirk-Bell S, Arlett CF et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum cells with normal levels of excision repair have a defect in DNA synthesis after UV-irradiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 219-223 (1975).
104. Masutani C, Kusumoto R, Yamada A et al. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η. Nature 399, 700-704 (1999).
105. Martin GM, Oshima J, Gray MD et al. What geriatricians should know about the Werner syndrome. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 47, 1136-1144 (1999).
106. Hickson ID. RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome. Nature Rev. Cancer 3, 169-178 (2003).
107. Gray MD, Shen J-C, Kamath-Loeb AS et al. The Werner syndrome protein is a DNA helicase. Nature Genet. 17, 100-103 (1997).
108. Shen J-C, Gray MD, Oshima J et al. Characterization of Werner syndrome protein DNA helicase activity: directionality, substrate dependence and stimulation by replication protein A. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 2879-2885 (1998).
109. Huang S, Li B, Gray MD et al. The premature aging syndrome protein, WRN, is a 3′→5′ exonuclease. Nature Genet. 20, 114-116 (1998).
110. Ozgenc A, Loeb LA. Current advances in unraveling the function of the Werner syndrome protein. Mutation Res. 577, 237-251 (2005). • Overview of our current knowledge of the molecular basis for Werner's syndrome.
111. Pichierri P, Franchitto A, Rosselli F. BLM and the FANC proteins collaborate in a common pathway in response to stalled replication forks. EMBO J. 23, 3154-3163 (2004).
112. Macris MA, Lumir K, Bussen W et al. Biochemical characterization of the RECQ4 protein, mutated in Routhmund-Thomson syndrome. DNA Repair 5, 172-180 (2006).
113. Srivastava VK, Busbee DL. Replicative enzymes, DNA polymerase α (Pol α), and in vitro aging. Exp. Gerontol. 38, 1285-1297 (2003).
114. Mann M, Hendrickson RC, Pandey A. Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 437-473 (2001).
115. Shevchenko A, Chernushevich I, Wilm M et al. De novo peptide sequencing by nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry using triple quadrupole and quadrupole/time-of-flight instruments. Methods Mol. Biol. 146, 1-16 (2000).
116. Wilm M, Shevchenko A, Houthaeve T et al. Femtomole sequencing of proteins from polyacrylamide gels by nano-electrospray mass spectrometry. Nature 379, 466-469 (1996).
117. Shevchenko A, Loboda A, Shevchenko A et al. MALDI quadrupole time-of-flight: a powerful tool for proteomic research. Anal. Chem. 72, 2132-2141 (2000).
118. Krutchinsky AN, Zhang W, Chait BT. Rapidly switchable matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization and electrospray quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry for protein identification. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 493-504 (2000).
119. Medzihradszky KF, Campbell JM, Baldwin MA et al. The characteristics of peptide collision-induced dissociation using a high-performance MALDI-TOF/TOF tandem mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 72, 552-558 (2000).
120. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
121. Noirot-Gros M-F, Dervyn E, Wu LJ et al. An expanded view of bacterial DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8342-8347 (2002).
122. Phizicky EM, Fields S. Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 94-123 (1995).
123. Fujise K, Zhang D, Liu J et al. Regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle progression by MCL1. Differential role of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39458-39465 (2000).
124. Glick BR, Pasternak JJ. Molecular Biotechnology: Principles and Applications of Recombinant DNA, 2nd Ed. ASM Press, Washington DC, USA (1998).
125. Loor G, Zhang S-J, Zhang P et al. Identification of DNA replication and cell cycle proteins that interact with PCNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 5041-5046 (1997).
126. Hughes P, Tratner I, Ducoux M et al. Isolation and identification of the third subunit of mammalian DNA polymerase δ by PCNA-affinity chromatography of mouse FM3A cell extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2108-2114 (1999).
127. Terpe K. Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 60, 523-533 (2003).
128. Gottschalk A, Tang J, Puig O et al. A comprehensive biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast U1 snRNP reveals five novel proteins. RNA 4, 374-393 (1998).
129. Rigaut G, Shevchenko A, Rutz B et al. In the laboratory: a generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nature Biotechnol. 17, 1030-1032 (1999).
130. Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24, 218-229 (2001). • Details of the tandem affinity purification tag method for identifying binding partners of bait proteins.
131. Gavin A-C, Bosche M, Krause R et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
132. Zeghouf M, Li J, Butland G et al. Sequential peptide affinity (SPA) system for the identification of mammalian and bacterial protein complexes. J. Proteome Res. 3, 463-468 (2004).
133. Dziembowski A, Seraphin B. Recent developments in the analysis of protein complexes. FEBS Lett. 556, 1-6 (2004).
134. Tanaka K, Waki H, Ido Y et al. Protein and polymer analyses up to m/z 100,000 by laser ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2, 151-153 (1988).
135. Karas M, Hillenkamp F. Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons. Anal. Chem. 60, 2299-2301 (1988). • Development of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.
136. Wong SF, Meng CK, Fenn JB. Multiple charging in electrospray ionization of poly(ethylene glycols). J. Phys. Chem. 92, 546-550 (1988). • Development of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
137. Ohta S, Shiomi Y, Sugimoto K et al. A proteomics approach to identify proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-binding proteins in human cell lysates. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40362-40367 (2002).
138. 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by affinity chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 337, 1176-1184 (2005).
139. Shevchenko A, Schaft D, Roguev A et al. Deciphering protein complexes and protein interaction networks by tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry analytical perspective. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 204-212 (2002).
140. Butland G, Peregrin-Alvarez JM, Li J et al. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433, 531-537 (2005). •• Describes a method for isolating protein interaction networks in Escherichia coli, including those present in low abundance.
141. Maki H, Horiuchi T, Kornberg A. The polymerase subunit of DNA polymerase III of Escherichia coli I. amplification of the dnaE gene product and polymerase activity of the α subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 12982-12986 (1985).
142. Nakayama H. RecQ family helicases: roles as tumor suppressor proteins. Oncogene 21, 9008-9021 (2002).
143. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature Biotechnol. 17, 994-999 (1999).
144. Ranish JA, Yi EC, Leslie DM et al. The study of macromolecular complexes by quantitative proteomics. Nature Genet. 33, 349-355 (2003).
145. Tackett AJ, DeGrasse JA, Sekedat MD et al. I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions. J. Proteome Res. 4, 1752-1756 (2005).
146. Magdalena Coman M, Jin M, Ceapa R et al. Dual functions, clamp opening and primer-template recognition, define a key clamp loader subunit. J. Mol. Biol. 342, 1457-1469 (2004).
147. Alekseev OM, Richardson RT, Pope MR et al. Mass spectrometry identification of NASP binding partners in HeLa cells. Proteins 61, 1-5 (2005).
148. Xi J, Zhuang Z, Zhang Z et al. Interaction between the T4 helicase-loading protein (gp59) and the DNA polymerase (gp43): a locking mechanism to delay replication during replisome assembly. Biochemistry 44, 2305-2318 (2005).
149. Steen H, Jensen ON. Analysis of protein-nucleic acid interactions by photochemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 21, 163-182 (2002).
150. Deterding LJ, Prasad R, Mullen GP et al. Mapping of the 5′-2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate lyase active site in DNA polymerase β by mass spectrometry. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10463-10471 (2000).
151. Lavrik OI, Khlimankov DY, Khodyreva SN. The eukaryotic replication complex and its affinity modification analysis. Mol. Biol. 37, 477-485 (2003).
152. Khodyreva SN, Lavrik OI. Photoaffinity labeling technique for studying DNA replication and DNA repair. Curr. Med. Chem. 12, 641-655 (2005).
153. Dezhurov SV, Khodyreva SN, Plekhanova ES et al. A new highly efficient photoreactive analogue of dCTP. Synthesis, characterization, and application in photoaffinity modification of DNA binding proteins. Bioconjug. Chem. 16, 215-222 (2005).
154. Lavrik OI, Prasad R, Sobol RW et al. Photoaffinity labeling of mouse fibroblast enzymes by a base excision repair intermediate: evidence for the role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 25541-25548 (2001).
155. Wan KX, Shibue T, Gross ML. Non-covalent complexes between DNA-binding drugs and double-stranded oligonucleotides: a study by ESI ion-trap mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 300-307 (2000).
156. Ding J, Anderegg RJ. Specific and nonspecific dimer formation in the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of oligonucleotides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 6, 159-164 (1995).
157. Potier N, Donald LJ, Chernushevich I et al. Study of a noncovalent Trp repressor: DNA operator complex by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 7, 1388-1395 (1998). • Early example of an intact DNA-protein complex detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
158. Kapur A, Beck JL, Brown SE et al. Use of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to study binding interactions between a replication terminator protein and DNA. Protein Sci. 11, 147-157 (2002). • Describes the analysis of a specific DNA-protein interaction by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
159. Heck AJR, van den Heuvel RHH. Investigation of intact protein complexes by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev 23, 368-389 (2004). • Good general review on the state-of-play of analysis of large, intact macromolecular complexes by mass spectrometry.
160. Kennaway CK, Benesch JLP, Gohlke U et al. Dodecameric structure of the small heat shock protein Acr1 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 33419-33425 (2005).
161. Yu X, VanLoock MS, Poplawski A et al. The Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum MCM protein can form heptameric rings. EMBO Rep. 3, 792-797 (2002).
162. Kelman LM, Kelman Z. Archea: an archetype for replication initiation studies? Microbiology 48, 605-615 (2003).
163. Sobott F, Hernandez H, McCammon MG et al. A tandem mass spectrometer for improved transmission and analysis of large macromolecular assemblies. Anal. Chem. 74, 1402-1407 (2002).
164. Robinson CV. Characterization of multiprotein complexes by mass spectrometry. In Protein-protein Interactions. Golemis EA, Adams PD (Eds), Cold Spring Habor Laboratory Press, NY, USA, 317-327 (2005).
165. Sopher BL, McCammon MG, Hernandez H et al. The flight of macromolecular complexes in a mass spectrometer. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, Series A: Mathematical Phys. Eng. Sci. 363, 379-391 (2005).
166. Videler H, Ilag LL, McKay ARC et al. Mass spectrometry of intact ribosomes. FEBS Lett. 579, 943-947 (2005).
167. Ruotolo BT, Giles K, Campuzano I et al. Evidence for macromolecular protein rings in the absence of bulk water. Science 310, 1658-1661 (2005). • Demonstration of the maintenance of protein quaternary structure in vacuo.