Automated protein structure homology modeling: A progress report

Pharmacogenomics

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 405-416

  Kopp, Jürgen ^a   Schwede, Torsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Automated comparative modeling; Homology modeling server; Protein model database; Protein structure; SWISS MODEL repository

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; ANTIVIRUS AGENT; CAPTOPRIL; CASEIN KINASE II; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE INHIBITOR;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; AUTOANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG RESEARCH; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG STRUCTURE; DRUG TARGETING; EXPERIMENTATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SEQUENCE DATABASE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 3142758686     PISSN: 14622416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1517/14622416.5.4.405     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Kubinyi H: Structure-based design of enzyme inhibitors and receptor ligands. Curr. Opin. Drug Dev. 1, 4-15 (1998).
2. Klebe G: Recent developments in structure-based drug design. J. Mol. Med. 78, 269-281 (2000).
3. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z et al.: The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242 (2000).
4. Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH et al.: UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D115-D119 (2004) (Database issue).
5. Daggett V, Fersht A: The present view of the mechanism of protein folding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 497-502 (2003).
6. Vila JA, Ripoll DR, Scheraga HA: Atomically detailed folding simulation of the B domain of staphylococcal protein a from random structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14812-14816 (2003).
7. Bradley P, Chivian D, Meiler J et al.: Rosetta predictions in CASP5: successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation. Proteins 53(Suppl. 6), 457-468 (2003).
8. Chothia C, Lesk AM: The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5, 823-826 (1986).
9. Rost B: Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12, 85-94 (1999).
10. Bates PA, Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ: Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. Proteins (Suppl. 5), 39-46 (2001).
11. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA et al.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402 (1997).
12. Eddy SR: Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14, 755-763 (1998).
13. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R: Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14, 846-856 (1998).
14. Koretke KK, Russell RB, Lupas AN: Fold recognition without folds. Protein Sci. 11, 1575-1579 (2002).
15. John B, Sali A: Detection of homologous proteins by an intermediate sequence search. Protein Sci. 13, 54-62 (2004).
16. Tramontano A, Morea V: Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5. Proteins 53(Suppl. 6), 352-368 (2003).
17. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J: T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302, 205-217 (2000).
18. Yang AS, Honig B: An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance. J. Mol. Biol. 301, 665-678 (2000).
19. Sunyaev SR, Bogopolsky GA, Oleynikova NV, Vlasov PK, Finkelstein AV, Roytberg MA: From analysis of protein structural alignments toward a novel approach to align protein sequences. Proteins 54, 569-582 (2004).
20. Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A: Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci. 9, 1753-1773 (2000).
21. Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B: Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7432-7437 (2002).
22. Deane CM, Blundell TL: CODA: a combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variable regions of protein models. Protein Sci. 10, 599-612 (2001).
23. Moult J: The current state of the art in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7, 422-427 (1996).
24. Koehl P, Levitt M: A brighter future for protein structure prediction. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 108-111 (1999).
25. Flohil JA, Vriend G, Berendsen HJ: Completion and refinement of 3-D homology models with restricted molecular dynamics: application to targets 47, 58, and 111 in the CASP modeling competition and posterior analysis. Proteins 48, 593-604 (2002).
26. Sutcliffe MJ, Haneef I, Carney D, Blundell TL: Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins, Part I: three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng. 1, 377-384 (1987).
27. Peitsch MC: ProMod and Swiss-Model: internet-based tools for automated comparative protein modelling. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24, 274-279 (1996).
28. Guex N, Peitsch MC: SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18, 2714-2723 (1997).
29. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC: SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3381-3385 (2003).
30. Sali A, Blundell TL: Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815 (1993).
31. Eswar N, John B, Mirkovic N et al.: Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3375-3380 (2003).
32. Lund O, Frimand K, Gorodkin J et al.: Protein distance constraints predicted by neural networks and probability density functions. Protein Eng. 10, 1241-1248 (1997).
33. Sanchez R, Sali A: Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 206-214 (1997).
34. Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE: Errors in protein structures. Nature 381, 272 (1996).
35. Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU: VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol. 277, 396-404 (1997).
36. Melo F, Feytmans E: Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. J. Mol. Biol. 277, 1141-1152 (1998).
37. Lambert C, Leonard N, De Bolle X, Depiereux E: ESyPred3D: Prediction of proteins 3D structures. Bioinformatics 18, 1250-1256 (2002).
38. Koh IY, Eyrich VA, Marti-Renom MA et al.: EVA: Evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3311-3315 (2003).
39. Rychlewski L, Fischer D, Elofsson A: LiveBench-6: large-scale automated evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Proteins 53(Suppl. 6), 542-547 (2003).
40. Golovin A, Oldfield TJ, Tate JG et al.: E-MSD: an integrated data resource for bioinformatics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D211-D216 (2004) (Database issue).
41. Peitsch MC, Wilkins MR, Tonella L, Sanchez JC, Appel RD, Hochstrasser DF: Large-scale protein modelling and integration with the SWISS-PROT and SWISS-2DPAGE databases: the example of Escherichia coli. Electrophoresis 18, 498-501 (1997).
42. Sanchez R, Sali A: Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13597-13602 (1998).
43. Kopp J, Schwede T: The SWISS-MODEL Repository of annotated three-dimensional protein structure homology models. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D230-D234 (2004) (Database issue).
44. Pieper U, Eswar N, Braberg H et al.: MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D217-D222 (2004) (Database issue).
45. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK et al.: The InterPro Database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 315-318 (2003).
46. Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, Bairoch A: ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3784-3788 (2003).
47. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T: Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V. Proteins 53(Suppl. 6), 334-339 (2003).
48. Fischer D, Rychlewski L, Dunbrack RL Jr, Ortiz AR, Elofsson A: CAFASP3: the third critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins 53(Suppl. 6), 503-516 (2003).
49. Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Fiser A, Rost B, Sali A: Reliability of assessment of protein structure prediction methods. Structure (Camb.) 10, 435-440 (2002).
50. Kubinyi H: Chance favors the prepared mind-from serendipity to rational drug design. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res. 19, 15-39 (1999).
51. Vangrevelinghe E, Zimmermann K, Schoepfer J, Portmann R, Fabbro D, Furet P: Discovery of a potent and selective protein kinase CK2 inhibitor by high-throughput docking. J. Med. Chem. 46, 2656-2662 (2003).
52. Evers A, Gohlke H, Klebe G: Ligand-supported homology modelling of protein binding-sites using knowledge-based potentials. J. Mol. Biol. 334, 327-345 (2003).
53. Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G: Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 295, 337-356 (2000).
54. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R: Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 267, 727-748 (1997).
55. Mordasini T, Curioni A, Bursi R, Andreoni W: The binding mode of progesterone to its receptor deduced from molecular dynamics simulations. Chembiochem. 4, 155-161 (2003).
56. Anand K, Ziebuhr J, Wadhwani P, Mesters JR, Hilgenfeld R: Coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro) structure: basis for design of anti-SARS drugs. Science 300, 1763-1767 (2003).
57. Anand K, Palm GJ, Mesters JR, Siddell SG, Ziebuhr J, Hilgenfeld R: Structure of coronavirus main proteinase reveals combination of a chymotrypsin fold with an extra alpha-helical domain. EMBO J. 21, 3213-3224 (2002).
58. Ellis C: A common cure for SARS? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 5009 (2003).
59. Roden DM, George AL Jr: The genetic basis of variability in drug responses. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 37-44 (2002).
60. Lewis DF, Gillam EM, Everett SA, Shimada T: Molecular modelling of human CYP1B1 substrate interactions and investigation of allelic variant effects on metabolism. Chem. Biol. Interact. 145, 281-295 (2003).
61. Kirton SB, Baxter CA, Sutcliffe MJ: Comparative modelling of cytochromes P450. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54, 385-406 (2002).
62. Williams PA, Cosme J, Ward A, Angove HC, Matak Vinkovic D, Jhoti H: Crystal structure of human cytochrome P450 2C9 with bound warfarin. Nature 424, 464-468 (2003).
63. Schoch GA, Yano JK, Wester MR, Griffin KJ, Stout CD, Johnson EF: Structure of human microsomal cytochrome P450 2C8: evidence for a peripheral fatty acid binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 9497-9503 (2004).
64. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R et al.: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
65. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A et al.: Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183 (2002).
66. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J et al.: CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions. Proteins 52, 2-9 (2003).
67. + channel: a computational approach based on experimental distance restraints extracted from thermodynamic mutant cycles. Biophys. J. 83, 2595-2609 (2002).
68. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C: Completeness in structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 559-566 (2001).
69. Melo F, Sanchez R, Sali A: Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 11, 430-448 (2002).
70. John B, Sali A: Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3982-3992 (2003).
71. Contreras-Moreira B, Fitzjohn PW, Offman M, Smith GR, Bates PA: Novel use of a genetic algorithm for protein structure prediction: searching template and sequence alignment space. Proteins 53(Suppl. 6), 424-429 (2003).
72. Sali A, Glaeser R, Earnest T, Baumeister W: From words to literature in structural proteomics. Nature 422, 216-225 (2003).
73. Weiss MA, Ellenberger T, Wobbe CR, Lee JP, Harrison SC, Struhl K: Folding transition in the DNA-binding domain of GCN4 on specific binding to DNA. Nature 347, 575-578 (1990).
74. Wright PE, Dyson HJ: Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 321-331 (1999).
75. Dyson HJ, Wright PE: Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 54-60 (2002).
76. Radivojac P, Obradovic Z, Smith DK et al.: Protein flexibility and intrinsic disorder. Protein Sci. 13, 71-80 (2004).
77. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT: Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 635-645 (2004).
78. Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T et al.: Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289, 739-745 (2000).
79. + conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69-77 (1998).
80. Archer E, Maigret B, Escrieut C, Pradayrol L, Fourmy D: Rhodopsin crystal: new template yielding realistic models of G-protein-coupled receptors? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 24, 36-40 (2003).