From words to literature in structural proteomics

Nature

Volumn 422, Issue 6928, 2003, Pages 216-225

  Sali, Andrej ^a   Glaeser, Robert ^b   Earnest, Thomas ^c   Baumeister, Wolfgang ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MOLECULES;

STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN;

CROSS LINKING; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MACROMOLECULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; CRYSTALLIZATION; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 0037435031     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01513     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Alberts, B. The cell as a collection of protein machines - preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell 92, 291-294 (1998).
2. Baumeister, W. & Steven, A. C. Macromolecular electron microscopy in the era of structural genomics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 624-631 (2000).
3. Sali, A. & Kuriyan, J. Challenges at the frontiers of structural biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, M20-M24 (1999).
4. Orengo, C. A. et al. The CATH protein family database: a resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes. Proteomics 2, 11-21 (2002).
5. Govindarajan, S., Recabarren, R. & Goldstein, R. A. Estimating the total number of protein folds. Proteins 35, 408-414 (1999).
6. Marcotte, E. M., Pellegrini, M., Thompson, M. J., Yeates, T. O. & Eisenberg, D. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402, 83-86 (1999).
7. Mewes, H. W. et al. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acid. Res. 30, 31-34 (2002).
8. Costanzo, M. C. et al. YPD, PombePD and WormPD: model org anism volumes of the BioKnowledge library, an integrated resource for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 75-79 (2001).
9. von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403 (2002).
10. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
11. Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627 (2000).
12. Aloy, P. & Russell, R. B. Potential artefacts in protein-interaction networks. FEBS Lett. 530, 253-254 (2002).
13. Gavin, A. C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
14. Aloy, P. & Russell, R. B. The third dimension for protein interactions and complexes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 633-638 (2002).
15. Jansen, R., Greenbaum, D. & Gerstein, M. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 2, 37-46 (2002).
16. Ge, H., Liu, Z., Church, G. M. & Vidal, M. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature Genet. 4, 482-486 (2001).
17. Edwards, A. M. et al. Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet. 10, 529-536 (2002).
18. Kumar, A. & Snyder, M. Protein complexes take the bait. Nature 415, 123-124 (2002).
19. Abbott, A. The society of proteins. Nature 417, 894-896 (2002).
20. Westbrook, J. et al. The Protein Data Bank: unifying the archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 245-248 (2002).
21. Cramer, P., Bushnell, D. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II at 2.8 Ångstrom resolution. Science 292, 1863-1876 (2001).
22. Ban, N., Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Moore, P. B. & Steitz, T. A. The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å resolution. Science 289, 905-920 (2000).
23. Harms, J. et al. High resolution structure of the large ribosomal subunit from a mesophilic eubacterium. Cell 107, 679-688 (2001).
24. Wimberly, B. T. et al. Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature 407, 327-339 (2000).
25. Yusupov, M. M. et al. Crystal structure of the ribosome at 5.5 Å resolution. Science 292, 883-896 (2001).
26. Abola, E., Kuhn, P., Earnest, T. & Stevens, R. C. Automation of X-ray crystallography. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 973-977 (2000).
27. Snell, G. et al. Automatic sample mounting and alignment system for biological crystallography. J. Synchrotron Radiat. (in the press).
28. Burley, S. K. et al. Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project. Nature Genet. 23, 151-157 (1999).
29. Vitkup, D., Melamud, E., Moult, J. & Sander, C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 559-566 (2001).
30. Structural genomics. Nature Struct. Biol. 7(Suppl.), 927-994 (2000).
31. Frank, J. Three-dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies (Academic, London, 1996).
32. Henderson, R. Baldwin, J. M. & Ceska, T. A. Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 213, 899-929 (1990).
33. Kuhlbrandt, W., Wang, D. N. & Fujiyoshi, Y. Atomic model of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography. Nature 367, 614-621 (1994).
34. Grigorieff, N., Ceska, T. A., Downing, K. H., Baldwin, J. M. & Henderson, R. Electron crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 259, 393-421 (1996).
35. Nogales, E., Wolf, S. G. & Downing, K. H. Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. Nature 391, 199-203 (1998).
36. Mitsuoka, K. et al. The structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 3.0 Å resolution based on electron crystallography: implication of the charge distribution. J. Mol. Biol. 286, 861-882 (1999).
37. Murata, K. et al. Structural determinants of water permeation through aquaporin-1. Nature 407, 599-605 (2000).
38. Lowe, J., Li, H., Downing, K. H. & Nogales, E. Refined structure of αβ-tubulin at 3.5 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 313, 1045-1057 (2001).
39. Conway, J. F. et al. Visualization of a 4-helix bundle in the hepatitis B virus capsid by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 386, 91-94 (1997).
40. Bottcher, B., Wynne, S. A. & Crowther, R. A. Determination of the fold of the core protein of hepatitis B virus by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 386 88-91 (1997).
41. Li, H. L., DeRosier, D. J., Nicholson, W. V., Nogales, E. & Downing, K. H. Microtubule structure at 8 Å resolution. Structure 10, 1317-1328 (2002).
42. Rockel, B., Peters, J., Kuhlmorgen, B., Glaeser, R. M. & Baumeister, W. A giant protease with a twist: the TPP II complex from Drosophila studied by electron microscopy. EMBO J. 21, 5979-5984 (2002).
43. Henderson, R. The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules. Q. Rev. Biophys. 28, 171-193 (1995).
44. Carragher, B. et al. Leginon: an automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. J. Struct. Biol 132, 33-45 (2000).
45. Zhang, P. J., Beatty, A., Milne, J. L. S. & Subramaniam, S. Automated data collection with a Tecnai 12 electron mikroscope: applications for molecular imaging by cryomicroscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 135, 251-261, (2001).
46. Zhu, Y. X., Carragher, B., Kriegman, D. J., Milligan, R. A. & Potter, C. S. Automated identification of filaments in cryoelectron microscopy images. J. Struct. Biol. 135, 302-312 (2001).
47. Rossmann, M. G., Bernal, R. & Pletnev, S. V. Combining electron microscopic with X-ray crystallographic structures. J. Struct. Biol. 136, 190-200 (2001).
48. Wriggers, W. & Birmanns, S. Using Situs for flexible and rigid-body fitting of multiresolution single-molecule data. J. Struct. Biol. 133, 193-202 (2001).
49. Volkmann, N. & Hanein, D. Quantitative fitting of atomic models into observed densities derived by electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 125, 176-184 (1999).
50. Chacon, P. & Wriggers, W. Multi-resolution contour-based fitting of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 317, 375-384 (2002).
51. Malhotra, A., Tan, R. K. & Harvey, S. C. Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit: a molecular mechanics approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 1950-1954 (1990).
52. Aloy, P. et al. A complex prediction: three-dimensional model of the yeast exosome. EMBO Rep. 3, 628-635 (2002).
53. Spahn, C. M. et al. Structure of the 80S ribosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae-tRNA-ribosome and subunit-subunit interactions. Cell 107, 373-386 (2001).
54. Baumeister, W. Electron tomography: towards visualizing the molecular organization of the cytoplasm. Clin. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 679-684 (2002).
55. Baumeister, W., Grimm, R. & Walz, J. Electron tomography of molecules and cells. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 81-85 (1999).
56. Medalia, O. et al. Macromolecular architecture in eukaryotic cells visualized by cryoelectron tomography. Science 298, 1209-1213 (2002).
57. Grunewald, K., Medalia, O., Gross, A., Steven, A. & Baumeister, W. Prospects of electron cryotomography to visualize macromolecular complexes inside cellular compartments: implications of crowding. Biophys. Chem. (in press).
58. Bohm, J. et al. Toward detecting and identifying macromolecules in a cellular context: template matching applied to electron tomograms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14245-14250 (2000).
59. Frangakis, A. S. et al. Identification of macromolecular complexes in electron cryotomograms of phantom cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14153-14158 (2002).
60. Grimm, R. et al. Electron tomography of ice-embedded prokaryotic cells. Biophys. J. 74, 1031-1042 (1998).
61. Plitzko, J. et al. In vivo veritas electron cryotomography of cells. Trends Biotechnol. 20, S40-S44 (2002).
62. Koster, A. J. et al. Perspectives of molecular and cellular electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 120, 276-308 (1997).
63. Glaeser, R. M. Electron crystallography: present excitement, a nod to the past, anticipating the future. S. Struct. Biol. 128, 3-14 (1999).
64. Zhang, G. Y. et al. Crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus core RNA polymerase at 3.3 Å resolution. Cell 98, 811-824 (1999).
65. Fiaux, J., Bertelsen, E. B., Horwich, A. L. & Wuthrich, K. NMR analysis of a 900K GroEL-GroES complex. Nature 418, 207-211 (2002).
66. Yee, A. et al. An NMR approach to structural proteomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1825-1830 (2002).
67. 15N NMR relaxation in Abl SH(32). Biochemistry 38, 10225-10230 (1999).
68. Nakanishi, T. et al. Determination of the interface of a large protein complex by transferred cross-saturation measurements. J. Mol. Biol. 318, 245-249 (2002).
69. Pellecchia, M., Sem, D. S. & Wuthrich, K. NMR in drug discovery. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 211-219 (2002).
70. Frank, J. Single-particle imaging of macromolecules by cryo-electron microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31, 303-319 (2002).
71. Volkmann, N. A novel three-dimensional variant of the watershed transform for segmentation of electron density maps. J. Struct. Biol. 138, 123-129 (2002).
72. Rout, M. P. et al. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol 148, 635-651 (2000).
73. Rappsilber, J., Siniossoglou, S., Hurt, E. C. & Mann, M. A generic strategy to analyze the spatial organization of multi-protein complexes by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 72, 267-275 (2000).
74. Young, M. M. et al. High throughput protein fold identification by using experimental constraints derived from intramolecular cross-links and mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5802-5806 (2000).
75. Neubauer, G. et al. Identification of the proteins of the yeast U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex by mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 385-390 (1997).
76. Neubauer, G. et al. Mass spectrometry and EST-database searching allows characterization of the multi-protein spliceosome complex. Nature Genet. 20, 46-50 (1998).
77. Houry, W. A., Frishman, D., Eckerskorn, C., Lottspeich, F. & Hartl, F. U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 402, 147-154 (1999).
78. Ho, Y. et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183 (2002).
79. Miras, I., Schaeffer, F., Beguin, P. & Alzari, P. M. Mapping by site-directed mutagenesis of the region responsible for cohesin-dockerin interaction on the surface of the seventh cohesin domain of Clostridium thermocellum CipA. Biochemistry 41, 2115-2119 (2002).
80. Wells, J. A. Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. Methods Enzymol. 202, 390-411 (1991).
81. Jin, L., Cohen, F. E. & Wells, J. A. Structure from function: screening structural models with functional data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 113-117 (1994).
82. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W. & Brown, P. O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467-470 (1995).
83. Lockhart, D. J. & Winzeler, E. A. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 405, 827-836 (2000).
84. Baker, D. & Sali, A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294, 93-96 (2001).
85. Bonneau, R. & Baker, D. Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30, 173-189 (2001).
86. Bonneau, R. et al. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 65-78 (2002).
87. Marti-Renom, M. A. et al. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 291-325 (2000).
88. Domingues, F. S., Lackner, P., Andreeva, A. & Sippl, M. J. Structure-based evaluation of sequence comparison and fold recognition alignment accuracy. J. Mol. Biol 297, 1003-1013 (2000).
89. Pieper, U., Eswar, N., Stuart, A. C., Ilyin, V. A. & Sali, A. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 255-259 (2002).
90. Smith, G. R. & Sternberg, M. J. E. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 28-35 (2002).
91. Strynadka, N. C. J. et al. Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a β-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 β-lactamase. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 233-239 (1996).
92. Enright, A. J., Iliopoulos, I., Kyrpides, N. C. & Ouzounis, C. A. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature 402, 86-90 (1999).
93. Overbeek, R., Fonstein, M., D'Souza, M., Pusch, G. D. & Maltsev, N. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2896-2901 (1999).
94. Goh, C. S., Bogan, A. A., Joachimiak, M., Walther, D. & Cohen, F. E. Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol. 299, 283-293 (2000).
95. Pazos, F. & Valencia, A. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng. 14, 609-614 (2001).
96. Pazos, F. & Valencia, A. In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins 47, 219-227 (2002).
97. Lichtarge, O., Bourne, H. R. & Cohen, F. E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257, 342-358 (1996).
98. Lappe, M., Park, J., Niggemann, O. & Holm, L. Generating protein interaction maps from incomplete data: application to fold assignment. Bioinformatics 17, S149-S156 (2001).
99. Aloy, P. & Russell, R. B. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5896-5901 (2002).