Rosetta Predictions in CASP5: Successes, Failures, and Prospects for Complete Automation

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2003, Pages 457-468

  Bradley, Philip ^a   Chivian, Dylan ^a   Meiler, Jens ^a   Misura, Kira M S ^a   Rohl, Carol A ^a,b   Schief, William R ^a   Wedemeyer, William J ^a,c   Schueler Furman, Ora ^a   Murphy, Paul ^a   Schonbrun, Jack ^a   Strauss, Charles E M ^a,d   Baker, David ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^c Michigan State University   (United States)

^d LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Fragment insertion; Full atom refinement; Protein structure prediction; ROSETTA

Indexed keywords

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; AUTOMATION; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CASP5 TARGET; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFERENCE PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; ROSETTA FRAGMENT INSERTION PROTOCOL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FERREDOXINS; METHYLTRANSFERASES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

INSERTION SEQUENCES;

EID: 10744226366     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10552     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
2. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins Function, and Genetics 1999;34:82-95.
3. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using Rosetta. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:171-176.
4. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Chivian D, Rohl C, Strauss CEM, Baker D. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 2001;45 Suppl 5:119-126.
5. Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Tsai J, Baker D. Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2002;11:1937-1944.
6. Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Bonneau R, Baker D. Distributions of beta sheets in proteins with application to structure prediction. Proteins 2002;48:85-97.
7. Meiler J. JUFO: Secondary structure prediction for proteins. www.jens-meiler.de/jufo.html 2002.
8. Meiler J, Müller M, Zeidler A, Schmäschke F. Generation and evaluation of dimension reduced amino acid parameter representations by artificial neural networks. J Mol Model 2001;7(9):360-369.
9. Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Conserved residue clustering and protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003;52:225-235.
10. Ortiz AR, Strauss CEM, Olmea O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 2002;11:2606-2611.
11. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3389-3402.
12. Lundstroem J, Rychlewski L, Bujnicki J, Elofsson A. Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci 2001;10:2354-2362.
13. Bonneau R, Strauss CEM, Baker D. Improving the performance of Rosetta using multiple sequence alignment information and global measures of hydrophobic core formation. Proteins 2001;43:1-11.
14. Tsai J, Bonneau R, Rohl C, Baker D. An impared protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003;53:76-87.
15. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981;147:195-197.
16. Dunbrack RL, Cohen FE. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci 1997;6:1661-1681.
17. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 10383-10388.
18. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:13-21
19. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000;16:776-785.
20. Rohl CA, Strauss CEM, Chivian D, Baker D. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with Rosetta. Proteins 2003. In Press.
21. Meiler J, Baker D. Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure. PNAS 2003. In Press.