Behavioral Pricing

Handbook of Consumer Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 659-681

  Liu, Maggie Wenjing ^a   Soman, Dilip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145837994     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809570-36     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Adaval, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2002). Automatic construction and use of contextual information for product and price evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 572-589.
2. Ailawadi, K. L., Lehmann, D. R., & Neslin, S. A. (2001). Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Pro.cter and Gamble’s value pricing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 44-61.
3. Alba, J. W., & Mela, C. F. (1999). The effect of discount frequency and depth on consumer price judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(92) 99-105.
4. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of Automaticity: Awareness, intention, effi ciency and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull(Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670-675.
6. Biswas, A., Pullig, C., Yagci, M. I., & Dean, D. H. (2002). Consumer evaluation of low price guarantees: The moderating role of reference price and store image. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 107-119.
7. Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 474-492.
8. Büyükkurt, K. (1986). Integration of serially sampled price information: Modeling and some fi ndings. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 357-373.
9. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Drazen Prelec (2004). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Working paper.
10. Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 187-200.
11. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information-processing and the use of source versus messages cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
12. Chakravarti, D., Krish, R., Paul, P., & Srivastava, J. (2002). Partitioned presentation of multicomponent bundle prices: Evaluation, choice and underlying processing effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 215-230.
13. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A Benefi t Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81.
14. Chernev, A. (2003). Reverse pricing and online price elicitation strategies in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1/2), 51-63.
15. Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1) 64-75.
16. Cronley, M. L., Posavac, S. S., Meyer, T, Kardes, F. R., & Kellaris, J. J. (2005). A selective hypothesis testing perspective on price-quality inference inference-based choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(2):159-169
17. Dhar, S. K, González-Vallejo, C., & Soman, D. (1995). Brand promotions as a lottery. Marketing Letters, 6(3), 221-233.
18. Dhar, S. K, González-Vallejo, C., & Soman, D. (1999). Modeling the effects of advertised price claims: Tensile versus precise claims. Marketing Science, 18(2), 154-178.
19. Dodson, J. A., Tybout, A. M., & Sternthal, B. (1978) Impact of deals and deal retraction on brand switching. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(1), 72-82.
20. Dolan, R. J., & Simon, H. (1996), Power pricing. New York: The Free Press.
21. Dreze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2004). Using Combined-Currency Prices to Lower Consumers’ Perceived Cost. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 59-73.
22. Fisher, I. (1928). The money illusion. New York: Adelphi.
23. Gourville, J. T. (1998). Pennies-a-day: The effect of temporal reframing on transaction evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 395-409.
24. Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (1998). Payment depreciation: The behavioral effects of temporally separating payments from consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 160-175.
25. Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2002). Pricing and the psychology of consumption. Harvard Business Review, (September), 90-96.
26. Greenleaf, E. A. (2004). Reserves, regret, and rejoicing in open English auctions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 264-274.
27. Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, A. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues:The moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 148-156.
28. Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 45-60.
29. Gupta, S., & Cooper, L. G. (1992). The discounting of discounts and promotion thresholds. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 401-412.
30. Heath, C., & Soll, J. B.(1996). Mental budgeting and consumer decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(1), 40-52.
31. Heath, T. B., & Chatterjee, S. (1995). Mental accounting and changes in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 90-97.
32. Herr, P. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 67-76.
33. Heyman, J. E., & Mellers, B. A. (2007). Perceptions of fair pricing. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes(Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177-191.
35. Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90-98.
36. Jacobson, R., & Obermiller C. (1990). The Formation of Expected Future Price: A Reference Price for Forward-Looking Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4) 420-433.
37. Janiszewski, C., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1999). A range of theory account of price perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 353-369.
38. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
39. Kalwani, M. U., Yim, C. K., Rinne, H. J., & Sugita, Y. (1990). A price expectations model of customer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 251-263.
40. Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., Kellaris, J. J., & Posavac, S. S. (2004). The role of selective information processing in price-quality inference Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 368-374.
41. Krishna, A. (1994). The effect of deal knowledge on consumer purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1), 76-92.
42. Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. R. (1992). Asymmetric response to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 387-403.
43. Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1990). Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness:An acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 54-68.
44. Lichtenstein, D. R., Burton, S., & Johnson, E. J.(1991). The effect of semantic cueson consumer perceptions of reference price aids. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 380-392.
45. Liefeld, J., & Heslop, L. A. (1985). Reference prices and deception in newspaper advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 868-877.
46. Liu, W. (2005). Utility blindness: Why do we fall for the deal? Working Paper. University of Toronto.
47. Luce, D. R. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
48. Luce, M. F., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1999). Emotional trade-off diffi culty and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 143-160.
49. Mazumdar, T., & Jun, S. Y. (1993). Consumer evaluations of multiple versus single price change. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 441-450.
50. Mayhew, G. E., & Winer, R. S. (1992). An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 62-71.
51. McGraw, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Taboo trade-off s, relational framing, and the acceptability of xxchanges. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 2-16.
52. Mobley, M. F., Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1988).An investigation of individual responses to tensile price claims. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 273-280.
53. Morwitz, V. G., Greenleaf, E. A., & Johnson, E. J. (1998). Divide and prosper: Consumers’ reactions to partitioned prices. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 453-464.
54. Niedrich, R. W., Sharma, S., & Wedell, D. H. (2001). Reference Price and Price Perceptions: A Comparison of Alternative Models. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3) 339-355.
55. Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (2004). Attribute-task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 205-219.
56. Nunes, J. C., & Boatwright, P. (2004). Incidental prices and their effect on willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 457-467.
57. Nunes, J. C., & Park, C. W. (2003). Incommensurate resources: Not just more of the aame. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 26-38.
58. Okada, E. M. (2001). Trade-ins, mental accounting, and product replacement decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 433-447.
59. Okada, E. M. & Hoch, S. J. (2004). Spending time versus spending money. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 313-324.
60. Pelham, B., Sumarta, T., & Myaskovsky, L. (1994). The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 103-133.
61. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69-81.
62. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness:The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
63. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4-29.
64. Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 253-265.
65. Rao, A. R., & Sieben, W. A. (1992).The effect of prior knowledge on price acceptability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 256-271.
66. Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2002). Effect of face value on product valuation in foreign currencies. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 335-348.
67. Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192-202.
68. Schwarz, N. (2004). Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348.
69. Shafir, E., Diamond, P., & Tversky, A. (1997). Money illusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics,112, 342-374.
70. Simon, H. A. (1956).Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129-138.
71. Simonson, I., Carmon, Z., & O’Curry, S. (1994). Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features and sales promotion on brand choice. Marketing Science, 13(1), 23-41.
72. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Trade-off contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281-295.
73. Simonson, S. E., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49(1-2) 11-36.
74. Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 460-475
75. Soman, D. (2004). Framing, loss aversion and mental accounting. forthcoming In N. Harvey & D. Koehler (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision Making Research
76. Soman, D., & Gourville, J. T. (2001). Transaction decoupling: How price bundling affects the decision to consume. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 30-45.
77. Srivastava, J., & Lurie, N. (2001). A consumer perspective on price-matching refund policies: Effect on price perceptions and search eehavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 296-308.
78. Stiving, M., & Winer, R. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57-68.
79. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
80. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science,4, 199-204.
81. Thaler, R. (1999). Mental Accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206.
82. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty-Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
83. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(30), 453-458.
84. Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Shmuel, S. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95(3), 371.
85. Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O., & Weilbaker, D. C. (1988). The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference priceson consumer perceptions and price dearch. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 95-110.
86. Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-338.
87. Wertenbroch, K., Soman, D., & Chattopadhyay A. (in press). Currency numerosity effects on the perceived value of transactions. Journal of Consumer Research.
88. Zeithaml, V. A. (1982). Consumer response to in-store price information environments. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 357-370.