Multimodal Reading and Comprehension in Online Environments

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 899-940

  Wyatt Smith, Claire ^a   Elkins, John ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145139066     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-37     Document Type: Chapter

References (137)

1. AFP. (2006). One billion people have Internet access. Retrieved June 14, 2006 from http:// www.Breitbart.com/news/na/060518163500.mk2075cs.html
2. Alessi, S. M., Anderson, T. H., and Goetz, E. T. (1979). An investigation of lookbacks during studying. Discourse Processes, 2, 97-212.
3. Anderson-Inman, L., and Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based concept mapping, a tool for negotiating meaning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(8), 6-13.
4. Andrews, R. (2003). Where next in research on ICT and literacies? Joint IFTE issue. English in Australia, 139 and Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 12(1), 58-67.
5. Andrews, R. (Ed.). (2004). The impact of ICT on literacy education. London: Routledge Falmer.
6. Barton, D., and Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
7. Beavis, C. (2002). Critical engagement: Literacy, curriculum, and ICTs. Idiom, 38(2), 42-50, VATE Melbourne.
8. Beavis, C., Nixon, H., and Atkinson, S. (2005). LAN cafes: Cafes, places of gathering, or sites of informal teaching and learning? Education, Communication, and Information, 5(1), 41-60.
9. Bigum, C., and Green, B. (1993). Technologizing literacy or interrupting the dream of reason. In A. Luke and P. Gilbert (Eds.), Literacy in contexts: Australian perspectives and issues (pp. 4-28). St. Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
10. Bliss, J., and Saljo, R. (1999). The human-technological dialectic. In J. Bliss, R. Saljo, and P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning (pp. 1-13). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Bousted, M., and Ozturk, A. (2004). ‘It came alive outside my head.' Developing literacies through comparison: The reading of classic text and moving image. Literacy, 38(1), 52-57.
13. Bruce, B. (2003) Literacy in the Information Age: Inquiring into meaning-making with new technologies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. Bruce, B. C. (2000) Credibility of the web: Why we need dialectical reading. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(1), 97-109.
15. Burbules, N. (2001). Paradoxes of the Web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49, 441-453.
16. Carrington, V. (2005). Txting: The end of civilization (again)? Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 161-175.
17. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society, and culture, Vol 1. The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society, and culture, Vol 2. The power of identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19. Castells, M. (1998). The information age: Economy, society, and culture, Vol 3. The end of the millennium. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20. Castleton, G., and Wyatt-Smith, C. (2005). Investigating digital curricular literacies: Resolving dilemmas of researching multimodal technologically mediated literacy practices. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 54, 144-156.
21. Chandler-Olcott, K., and Mahar, D. (2003). “Tech-savviness” meets multiliteracies: Exploring adolescent girls’ technology-mediated literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 356-385.
22. Coiro, J., and Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257.
23. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
24. Cope, B., and Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
25. de Ridder, I. (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension and the reading process? Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 123-146.
26. Educational Testing Service [ETS]. (2004). Iskills assessment (The former ICT Literacy Assessment). Retrieved June 16, 2007, from http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.1488512ecfd5b8849a77b13bc3921509/?vgnextoid=fde9af5e44df4010VgnVCM100 00022f95190RCRDandvgnextchannel=cd7314ee98459010VgnVCM10000022f95190R CRD
27. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
28. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
29. Freebody, P., and Luke, A. (1990). “Literacies” programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect, 5(3), 7-16.
30. Freebody, P., and Luke, A. (1999). A map of possible practices: Further notes on the four resources model. Practically Primary, 4(2), 5-8.
31. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
32. Gee, J. P. (1991). What is literacy? In C. Mitchell and K. Weiler (Eds.), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 77-102). New York: Bergin and Garvey.
33. Gee, J. P. (2000). Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(5), 412-423.
34. Gee, J. P. (2003). Power up! What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave.
35. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London:Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
36. Gibson, N. (2005). Production, Inc ! Queensland, Australia: Smart Classrooms ICT Teacher Awards. Retrieved June 29, 2006, from http://education.qld.gov.au/smartclassrooms/ teacherawards/2005awards.html
37. Green, B. (1988). Subject-specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 156-179.
38. Green, B. (1999). The new literacy challenge? Literacy Learning: Secondary Thoughts, 7(1), 36-46.
39. Goldsborough, R. (1998, January). Teaching healthy scepticism about information on the Internet. Technology and Learning, 32.
40. Haas, C., and Wearden, S. (2003). E-Credibility: Building common ground in web environments.L1 - Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 169-184.
41. Hamilton, W. (Trans.). (1973). Plato. (1973). Phaedrus and Letters VII and VIII. Translated by W. Hamilton. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
42. Hasan, R., and Williams, G. (1966). Literacy, everyday talk, and society. In R. Hasan and G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society. London: Longman.
43. Healy, A., and Honan, E. (2004). Text next: New resources for literacy learning. Sydney, Australia:Primary English Teaching Association.
44. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Heath, S. B., and Mangiola, L. (1991). Children of promise: Literate activity in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
46. Hinchman, K., Alvermann, D., Boyd, F., Brozo, W., and Vacca, R. (2004). Supporting older student’s in-and out-of-school literacies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(4), 304.
47. Huffaker, D. (2004). Gender similarities and differences in online identity and language use among teenage bloggers. Unpublished master’s thesis, Georgetown University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Washington, DC.
48. Ito, M. (2003, March). A new set of social rules for a newly wireless society. Retrieved June 22, 2007, from www.ojr.org/japan/wireless/1043770650.php
49. Jewitt, C. (2003) Re-thinking assessment: Multimodality, literacy, and computer-mediated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 10(1), 83-102.
50. Johnson, D., and Kress, G. (2003). Globalization, literacy, and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 10(1), 5-14.
51. Johnson, D. L., and Liu, L. (2000). First steps toward a statistically generated technology integrated model. In D. L. Johnson, C. Maddux, and L. Liu (Eds.), Integration of technology into the classroom: Case studies (pp. 3-12). New York, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.
52. Johnston, P. (2003). Assessment conversations. The Reading Teacher, 57(1), 90-92.
53. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., and Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology. A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
54. Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., and Harvey, A. (2003). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 10(1), 15-26.
55. Kapit, W., and Elson, L. M. (2001). The anatomy colouring book. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.
56. Karchmer, R. A., Mallette, M. H., Kara-Soteriou, J., and Leu, D. J., Jr. (Eds.). (2005). Innovative approaches to literacy education: Using the Internet to support new literacies.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
57. Katz, I. R. (2005). Beyond technical competence: Literacy in information and communication technology. An issue paper from ETS. Retrieved July 5, 2007 from http://search. live.com/previewx.aspx?q=%22higher+education+without+ICT+literacy+skills%22andF ORM=CBPWandfirst=1andnoredir=1
58. Kaufmann, W. (1977). The art of reading. In W. Kaufmann (Ed.), The future of the humanities (pp. 47-83). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
59. Kimber, K., and Wyatt-Smith, C. (2006). Using and creating knowledge with new technologies:A case for students-as-designers. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(1), 19-34.
60. Kimber, K., Pillay, H., and Richards, C. (2001). Learning through ICT: An analysis of the quality of knowledge developed through computer-mediated learning tools. In P. Singh and E. McWilliam (Eds.), Designing educational research: Theories, methods and practice:, Faculty of education postgraduate student conference proceedings (pp. 95-114) Flaxton, Australia: PostPressed.
61. Kramarski, B., and Feldman, Y. (2000). Internet in the classroom: Effects on reading comprehension, motivation, and metacognitive awareness. Educational Media International, 37, 149-155.
62. Kress, G. (1985). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
63. Kress, G. (1997). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication:The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen:Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
64. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London/New York: Routledge.
65. Kress, G., and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourses. London: Arnold.
66. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., and Terwel, J. (2005). The Web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information.Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285-328.
67. Kymes, A. (2005). Teaching online comprehension strategies using think-alouds. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(6), 492-500.
68. Lanham, R. (1994). The economics of attention. Proceedings of 124th Annual Meeting, Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved June 2, 2000 from http://sunsite.berkeley. edu/ARL/Proceedings/124/ ps2econ.html
69. Lanham, R. (1997, Spring). The economics of attention. Retrieved August 18, 2004, from http://www.rhetoricainc.com
70. Lankshear, C., and Bigum, C. (1998, July). Literacies and technologies in school settings:Findings from the field. Paper presented at the Australian Literacy Educators National Conference, Canberra, Australia.
71. Lankshear, C., and Bigum, C. (1999). Literacies and new technologies in school settings. Curriculum Studies, 7(3), 445-465.
72. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2001a). New technologies, social practices, and the challenge of mindsets. Paper presented at the AERA Conference, Seattle, WA. Retrieved June 22, 2007 from http://www.geocities.com/c.lankshear/mindsets.html
73. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2003a). New literacies: Changing knowledge in the classroom.Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
74. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2003b). Planning pedagogy for i-mode: from flogging to blogging via wi-fi. Paper presented at the IFTE Conference, Melbourne.
75. Lankshear, C., and McLaren, P. (Eds.). (1993). Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern.Albany: State University of New York Press.
76. Lepani, B. (1998, December). The challenge of the digital age. Paper presented at the Third National Information Literacy Conference, Canberra, Australia.
77. Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 111, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Leu, D. J., Castek, J., Hartman, D. K., Coiro, J., Henry, L. A., Kulikowich, J. M., et al., (2005, June). Evaluating the development of scientific knowledge and new forms of reading comprehension during online learning. Final report to the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory/Learning Point Associates, Albany, NY.
79. Leu, D. J., Jr., and Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 109-127.
80. Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., and Cammack, D. W. (2004). Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell and N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
81. Luke, A. (1998). Literacy teaching as work in new times. Language Arts, 75(4), 305-314.
82. Luke, A., Freebody, P., and Land, R. (2000). Literate futures: Review of literacy education.Brisbane, Australia: The State of Queensland.
83. Luke, C. (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope, and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies - Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 69-92). London/New York: Routledge.
84. Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 397-403.
85. Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. -F., Epstein, I., and Fayard, P. (2003). Reading and understanding a science report through paper and hypertext. Science Communication, 25, 99-128.
86. Markhan, (2003). Images of Internet: Tool, place, way of being. Paper presented at the fourth annual conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR), Toronto, Canada.
87. Martin, A. (2004). Review of the book ‘New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning.' Journal of eLiteracy, 1, 61-65.
88. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
89. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York:Cambridge University Press.
90. McCarthy, L. P., and Fishman, S. M. (1991) Boundary conversations: Conflicting ways of knowing in philosophy and interdisciplinary research. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 419-469.
91. Mercer, N., and Wegerif, R. (1997). Is ‘exploratory talk’ productive talk? In R. Wegerif and P. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Computers and talk in the primary school (pp. 79-101). Clevedon:Multilingual Matters Ltd.
92. Meredyth, D., Russell, N., Blackwood, L., Thomas, J., and Wise, P. (1999). Real time computers, change, and schooling. Retrieved May 14, 2003, from http://detya.gov.au/archive/ schools/Publicatgions/1999/realtime.pdf
93. Merchant, G. (2001). Teenagers in cyberspace: An investigation of language use and language change in internet classrooms. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 293-306.
94. Millard, E. (2003). Towards a literacy of fusion: New times, new teaching and learning?Reading, Literacy, and Language, 37(1), 3-8.
95. Miller, G. A., and Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257(3), 94-99.
96. Mitra, S. (2004, September). The hole in the wall. Dataquest, Retrieved June 22, 2007 from http://www.dqindia.com/content/industrymarket/2004/104092301.asp#i
97. Morgan, W., and Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2000). Improper accountability: Towards a theory of critical literacy and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 7(1), 124-142.
98. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
99. New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-37). London: Routledge.
100. Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., and Hlemonnierr, F. (2003). Crossing boundaries: Multimedia technology and pedagogical innovation in a high school class. Language Learning and Technology, 7(1), 28-45.
101. Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184-202.
102. Pressley, M., and Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
103. RAND Reading Study Group [RRSG]. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards an RandD program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
104. Reinking, D. (2005). Multimedia learning of reading. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 355-374). New York: Cambridge University Press.
105. Reinking, D., and Rickman, S. S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 395-411.
106. Rheingold, H. (2003). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. New York: Basic Books.
107. Rouet, J-F. (1993). Cognitive processing of hyperdocuments: When does nonlinearity help? Paper presented at ACM conference on Hypertext, Milan, Italy. Retrieved July 5, 2007 from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=168466.168508
108. Royer, J. M., Greene, B. A., and Sinatra, G. M. (1987). The sentence verification technique: A practical procedure teachers can use to develop their own reading and listening comprehension tests. Journal of Reading, 30, 414-423.
109. Savery, J. R., and Duffy, T. M. (1995, September/October). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 31-38.
110. Scrimshaw, P. (1997). Computers and the teacher’s role. In B. Somekh and N. Davis (Eds.), Using information technology effectively in teaching and learning. Studies in pre-service and in-service teacher education (pp. 100-113). London/New York: Routledge.
111. Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Retrieved June 23, 2007 from www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/lit_ reviews/Informal_Learning_Review.pdf
112. Selfe, C. L., and Hawisher, G. E. (2004) Literate lives in the information age. Mahwah, NJ:. Lawrence Erlbaum.
113. Smolin, L., and Lawless, K. (2003). Becoming literate in the technological age: New responsibilities and tools for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 56(6), 570-577.
114. Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., and Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-436.
115. Steinkuehler, C. A., Black, R. W., and Clinton, K. A. (2005). Researching literacy as tool, place, and way of being. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 7-12.
116. Stockl, H. (2004). In between modes: Language and image in printed media. In E. Ventola, C. Charles, and M. Kaltenberger (Eds.), Perspectives on mutlimodality (pp. 9-30). Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
117. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
118. Street, B. (Ed.). (1993). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge, New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
119. Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in education, development, and ethnography. London: Longman.
120. Street, B. (2000). Contexts for literacy work: The ʼnew orders’ and the ʼnew literacy studies’. In J. Crowther, M. Hamilton, and L. Tett (Eds.), Powerful literacies (pp. 13-22). London:NIACE.
121. Street, B. (2001). Literacy demands of the Curriculum in the Post-Compulsory Years. In J. Cumming and C. M. Wyatt-Smith (Eds.). Literacy and the Curriculum: Success in senior secondary schooling (pp. 146-156). Melbourne Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
122. Sunderland-Smith, W., Snyder, I., and Angus, L. (2003). The digital divide: Differences in computer use between home and school on low socio-economic households. L1 - Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 5-19.
123. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The Reading Teacher, 55(7), 662-669.
124. Tan Wee Hin, L., and Subramaniam, R. (2005). Handbook of research on literacy in technology at the K-12 level. Singapore: Idea Group Reference.
125. Thorne, S. (2003, April). The Internet as artifact: Immediacy, evolution, and educational contingencies or “The wrong tool for the right job? " Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
126. Tiene, D. (2002). Addressing the global digital divide and its impact on educational opportunity.Education Media International, 39(3/4), 211-222.
127. Tunbridge, N. (1995, September). The cyberspace cowboy. Australian Personal Computer (pp. 64-68).
128. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
129. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing dimensions of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
130. Unsworth, L., Martin, J. R., Painter, C., and Gill, T. (in press). Image/text relations in book and computer-based versions of literary narratives for children: Towards a functional intermodal semiotic description.
131. Wells, G. (2002). Inquiry as an orientation for learning, teaching, and teacher education. In G. Wells, and Claxtohn (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 197-210). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishing.
132. Williamson, B., and Facer, K. (2004). More than ‘just a game’: The implications for schools of children’s computer games and communities. Unpublished draft paper, Bristol. Retrieved April 1, 2004, from the NESTA FutureLab Web site: http://www.nestafuturelab. org/research/draft_articles.htm
133. Windschitl, M. (2000). Using the WWW for teaching and learning in K-12 classrooms: What are the interesting research questions? Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 3(1), 89-96.
134. Winne, P. H. (2006). How software technologies can improve research on learning and bolster school reform. Educational Psychologist, 41, 5-17.
135. Wyatt-Smith, C. M., and Kimber, K. (2005) Valuing and evaluating digitally-mediated texts:Rethinking what counts. English in Education, 39(2), 22-43.
136. Yelland, N. (2001). Teaching and learning with information and communication technologies (ICT) for numeracy in the early childhood and primary years of schooling. Report prepared for the Research and Evaluation Branch Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra, Australia.
137. Zembylas, M., and Vrasidas, C. (2005). Globalization, information, communication technologies, and the prospect of a global village: Promises of inclusion or electronic colonization.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 68-83.