Valuing and evaluating student-generated online multimodal texts: Rethinking what counts

English in Education

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 22-43

  Wyatt Smith, Claire ^a   Kimber, Kay ^b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Brisbane Girls Grammar School   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment; Criteria; Multimodal; Online; Quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 77049128446     PISSN: 04250494     EISSN: 17548845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-8845.2005.tb00615.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bruce, B.C., (2000) ‘Credibility of the web: Why we need dialectical reading’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34 (1), 97-109.
2. Bush, G., (2001) Announcement of Education Bill (1st bill sent to Congress, Jan 23, cited athttp:www.issues2000.orgGeorgeWBush.htmEducation (accessed 25 May 2002).
3. Chen, P., & McGrath, D., (2003) ‘Knowledge Construction and Knowledge Representation in High School Students Design of Hypermedia.
4. Documents, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12 (1), 36-61.
5. Haas, C., & Wearden, S.T., (2003) ‘E-credibility: Building common ground in web environments L1 - Education Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 169-184.
6. Jewitt, C., (2003) ‘Re-thinking Assessment: multimodality, literacy and computer-mediated learning’, Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 10 (1), 83-102.
7. Johnson, D., (2003) ‘Activity Theory, Mediated Action and Literacy: assessing how children make meaning in multiple modes’, Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 10 (1), 103-129.
8. Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K. L., and Wilson, B. G., (1999) Learning with Technology. A constructivist perspective, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
9. Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., and Harvey, A., (2003) ‘Assessing Multiliteracies and the New Basics’, Assessment in Education; principles, policy & practice, 10 (1), 15-26.
10. Kirkwood, M., (2000) ‘Infusing Higher-Order Thinking and Learning to Learn into Content Instruction: a case study of secondary computing studies in Scotland’, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32 (4), 509-535.
11. Leu, D.J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., and Cammack, D. W., (2004) ‘Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies’, in R. B.Ruddell & N.Unrau (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.), pp.1580-1615, International Reading Association, Newark, [Online] New Literacies, Reading Online, Available from: http:www.readingonline.orgnewliteracieslit_index.aspHREFleu [18 August, 2004].
12. Leu, D.J., & Kinzer, C. K., (2000) ‘The Convergence of Literacy Instruction with Networked Technologies for Information and Communication’, Reading Research Quarterly, 25 (1), 108-127.
13. Luke, C., (2000) ‘Cyber-schooling and Technological Change: multiliteracies for new times’, in B.Cope & M.Kalantzis (eds.), Multiliteracies - Literacy learning and the design of social futures, London and New York: Routledge.
14. Luke, C., (2003) ‘Pedagogy, Connectivity, Multimodality, and Interdisciplinarity’, Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (3), 397-403.
15. McCrindle, M., (2004) ‘Educating Generation Y’, Independent Education, November, 15-21.
16. Sadler, D.R., (1987) ‘Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards’, Oxford Review of Education, 13, 191-209.
17. Selfe, C.L., and Hawisher, G.E., (2004) Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Snyder, I., (1996) Hypertext: The Electronic Labyrinth, Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
19. Snyder, I., (2002) Silicon Literacies, London: Falmer-Routledge.