Internet in the classroom: Effects on reading comprehension, motivation and metacognitive awareness;L’internet dans la classe et les effets sur la compéhension dans la lecture, la motivation et la conscience meta-cognitive;Internet im Klassenzimmer: Ein uss auf Leseverständniss, Motivation und metakognitives Bewußtsein

Educational Media International

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 149-155

  Kramarski, Bracha ^a   Feldman, Yael ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17444364990     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980050184709     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Armbruster, BB, Echols, GH, and Brown, AL. 1982. Role of metacognition in reading: a development perspective. Volta Review, 84 (5): 45–56.
2. Baker, J. 1998. Computers, the internet and student writing. English Teachers Journal, 52: 30–31.
3. Baker, L, and Brown, AL. 1984. “ Metacognitive skills and reading ”. In Handbook of Reading Research, Edited by: Pearson, PD. New York: Longman.
4. Carrell, PL. 1989. Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modem Language Journal, 73 (2): 121–134.
5. Fabos, B, and Young, MD. 1999. Telecommunication in the classroom: rhetoric versus reality. Review of Educational Research, 69 (3): 217–259.
6. Fetterman, DM. 1998. Webs of meaning: computer and internet resources for educational research and instruction. Educational Researcher, 27 (3): 22–30.
7. Finnemann, MD. 1998. The world wide web and foreign language teaching. Eric/Cll News Bulletin, 20 (1): 6–8.
8. Flavell, JH. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34: 906–911.
9. Garner, R, and Alexander, P. 1981. Strategic processing of text: an investigation of the effect on adult questionanswering performance. Journal of Educational Research, 75: 144–148.
10. Hellebrandt, J. 1999. Virtual collaborations in the Spanish class: from e-mail to web design and CD-ROM development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20 (1): 59–70.
11. Hess, B, Duggan, A, Morgan, D, Kim, S, and Wilson, K. Measuring student's attitude towards educational use of the internet. paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, 22 April. Canada, Montreal
12. Huffman, D. 1995. Learning for the real world. Technology and Learning, 15 (6): 22–28.
13. Kramarski, B. 1999. The study of graphs by computers: is easier better?. Educational Media International., 2: 203–209.
14. Lee, L. 1997. Using internet tools as an enhancement of c2 teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 30 (3): 410–427.
15. Masui, C, and DeCorte, E. 1999. Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: orienting and self-judging, two powerful and training learning tools. Learning and Instruction, 9 (6): 517–542.
16. Mayer, RE. 1998. Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 26: 5–19.
17. Mevarech, ZR, and Kramarski, B. 1997. IMPROVE: a multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (2): 365–395.
18. Palincsar, AS, and AL, Brown. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1: 117–175.
19. Polya, G. 1957. How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method, second, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
20. Pressley, M, Harris, KR, and Marks, MB. 1992. But good strategy instructors are constructivists. Educational Psychology Review, 4 (1): 3–31.
21. Salomon, G, Globerson, T, and Guterman, E. 1989. The computer of proximal development: internalizing reading-related metacognition from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 620–627.
22. Smith, M. 1995. The battle over bilingual education. Electronic Learning, 15 (1): 30–38.
23. Schraw, G, and Dennison, RS. 1994. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19: 460–475.