Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 214-257

  Coiro, Julie ^a   Dobler, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247872821     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2     Document Type: Review

References (168)

1. AFFLERBACH, P. (2000). Verbal reports and protocol analysis. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 163-180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. AGGER, G. (1999, Summer). Intertextuality revisited: Dialogues and negotiations in media studies. Canadian Aesthetics Journal, 4. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from www.uqtr.ca/AE/vol_4/gunhild.htm#top
3. ALEXANDER, P.A., & JETTON, T.L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. ALEXANDER, P.A., KULIKOWICH, J.M., & SCHULZE, S.K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 313-337.
5. ANDERSON, R. (1994). Role of readers' schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 448-468). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
6. ANDERSON, R.C., & PEARSON, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
7. ARMBRUSTER, B.B. (1984). The problem of "inconsiderate texts." In G.G. Duffy, L.R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 202-217). New York: Longman.
8. AZEVEDO, R., & CROMLEY, J.G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523-535.
9. BAKER, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Researchbased best practices (pp. 77-95). New York: Guilford.
10. BAKER, L., & BROWN, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
11. BAKER, L., & WIGFIELD, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452-477.
12. BALCYTIENE, A. (1999). Exploring individual processes of knowledge construction with hypertext. Instructional Science, 27, 303-328.
13. BARTLETT, F.C. (1995). Remembering - A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1932)
14. BECK, I.L. (1989). Reading and reasoning. The Reading Teacher, 42, 676-82.
15. BECK, I.L., PERFETTI, C.A., & MCKEOWN, M.G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506-521.
16. BECKER, H.J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: A national survey. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations [CRITO]. Retrieved December 30, 2006, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/ TLC/FlNDINGS/internet-use/
17. BIANCAROSA, G., & SNOW, C.E. (2004). Reading next - A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved October 15, 2005, from www.all4ed. org/publications/ ReadingNext/ReadingNext.pdf
18. BILAL, D. (2000). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 646-665.
19. BOLTER, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of wiriting. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. BRANSFORD, J.D., BARCLAY, J.R., & FRANKS, J.J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
21. BROCH, E. (2000). Children's search engines from an information search process perspective. School Library Media Research, 3. Retrieved February 8, 2005, from www.ala.org/aasl/SLMR/childrens main.htmh link updated, retrieved December 21, 2006, from www.ala.org/arasl/ aaslpubsandjournals/ slmrb/slmrcontents/volume32000/childrens.htm
22. BROOKES, G. (1988). Exploring the world through reading & writing. Language Arts, 65, 245-253.
23. BROWN, G.T.L. (2003, September/October). Searching informational texts: Text and task characteristics that affect performance. Reading Online, 7(2). Retrieved March 10, 2005, from www.readingonline/ articles/brown.html
24. BURBULES, N.C., & CALLISTER, T.A., JR. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview.
25. CAIN, K., OAKHILL, J.V., BARNES, M.A., & BRYANT, P.E. (2001). Comprehension skills, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29, 850-859.
26. CANEY, D. (1999). Inside/outside intertextuality. Paper presented at the On/Off+Across: Language, Identity, and Technology conference, University of Westminster, England. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from www.overthere.com.au/ digital/textfields.html
27. CARR, M., & CLAXTON, G. (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 9, 9-37.
28. CHANDLER-OLCOTT, K., & MAHAR, D. (2003). "Techsavviness" meets multiliteracies: Exploring adolescent girls' technologymediated literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 356-385.
29. CHAPMAN, J.W., & TUNMER, W.E. (1995). Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154-167.
30. COIRO, J. (2003a). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56, 458-464. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=/electronic/rt/ 2-03_Column/index.html
31. COIRO, J. (2003b). Rethinking comprehension strategies to better prepare students for critically evaluating content on the Internet. The NERA Journal, 39, 29-34.
32. COIRO, J., & DOBLER, E. (2004). Investigating how less-skilled and skilled renders use cognitive reading strategies while reading on the Internet. Paper presented at the 54th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
33. COIRO, J., KNOBEL, M., LANKSHEAR, C., & LEU, D.J., JR. (Eds.), (in press). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. COPE, B., & KALANTZIS, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Roudedge.
35. CSIKSZENTHMIHALYI, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
36. DEDE, C.J., & PALUMBO, D.B. (1991). Implications of hypermedia for cognition and communication. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 9, 15-28.
37. DREHER, M.J. (2002). Children searching and using information text: A critical part of comprehension. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 289-304). New York: Guilford.
38. DUKE, N.K., (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202-224.
39. DUKE, N.K., & PEARSON, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
40. EAGLETON, M.B. (2003, December). Essential literacies in the digital age: Adolescents' Internet inquiry strategies. Paper presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
41. EAGLETON, M.B., & DOBLER, E. (2007). Reading the Web: Strategies for Internet inquiry. New York: Guilford.
42. EAGLETON, M.B., GUINEE, K., & LANGLAIS, K. (2003). Teaching Internet literacy strategies: The hero inquiry project. Voices From the Middle, 10, 28-35.
43. ENGLERT, C.S., & HIEBERT, E.H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 65-74.
44. FIDEL, R., DAVIES, R.K., DOUGLASS, M.H., HOLDER, J.K., HOPKINS, C.J., KUSHNER, E.J., MIYAGISHIMA, B.K., &TONEY, C.D. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50, 24-37.
45. FLOWER, L. (1987). The role of task representation in readingto write (Tech. Rep. No. 6). Berkeley, CA: National Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, University of California at Berkeley.
46. FOLTZ, P.W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J.-F. Rouet, J.J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. GARNHAM, A., & OAKHILL, J.V. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In B.K. Britton & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313-339). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. GARRISON, B.M., & HYNDS, S. (1991). Non-traditional learners' written and dialogic response to literature. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Literary research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives (4lst yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 313-332). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
49. GEE.J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
50. GIROUX, H.A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
51. GLASER, B.G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
52. GLASER, B.G., & STRAUSS, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies far qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
53. GOLDMAN, S.R. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23, 357-398.
54. GOLDMAN, S.R., & RAKESTRAW, J.A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 311-335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. GRAESSER, A., GOLDING, J.M., & LONG, D.L. (1991). Narrative representation and comprehension. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 171-204). White Plains, NY: Longman.
56. GRAESSER, A.C., SINGER, M., & TRABASSO, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
57. GUTHRIE, J.T., & ALVERMANN, D.E. (Eds.). (1999). Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications. New York: Teachers College Press.
58. GUTHRIE, J.T., & DREHER, M.J. (1990). Literacy as search: Explorations via computer. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 65-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. GUTHRIE, J.T., & MOSENTHAL, P. (1987). Literacy as multidimensional: Locating information and reading comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 22, 279-297.
60. GUTHRIE, J.T., & WIGFIELD, A. (Eds.). (1997). Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
61. GUZZETTI, B.J., & GAMBOA, M. (2004). Zines for social justice: Adolescent girls writing on their own. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 408-436.
62. HACKER, D. (1998). Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 165-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. HARTMAN, D.K. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 520-561.
64. HENRY, L.A. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 59, 614-627.
65. HILL, J., & HANNAFIN, M. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45, 37-64.
66. HILL, J.R., REEVES, T.C., GRANT, M.M., & WANG, S.K. (2000). Year one report: Athens Academy laptop evaluation. Athens: University of Georgia.
67. HORNER, S.L., & SHEWRY, C.S. (2002). Becoming an engaged, self-regulated reader. Theory Into Practice, 41, 102-109.
68. ILLINOIS MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE ACADEMY. (2006). 21st Century Information Fluency Project. Aurora: Author. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://21cif.imsa.edu/rcsources/materials/difcore
69. INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION SCIENCES. (2002). What Works Clearinghouse. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from http://www.whatworks.ed.gov/TopicAbstract.asp?tid=01
70. INTERNATIONAL ICT LITERACY PANEL. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework far ICT literacy. Princeton, NJ: Author. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from www.eis.org/Media/Tests/ Information_and_Communication_Technology_Literacy/ictreport.pdf
71. INTERNATIONAL READING ASSOCIATION. (2001). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum (Position statement). Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved March 16, 2005, from www.reading. org/positions/technology.html: link updated, retrieved December 14, 2006, from www.reading.org/ resources/issues/positions_technology.html
72. JOHNSTON, P. (2005). Literacy assessment and the future. The Reading Teacher, 58, 684-686.
73. JONASSEN, D.H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
74. KALANTZIS, M., COPE, B., & HARVEY, A. (2003). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, a-Practice, 10, 15-26.
75. KAMIL, M.L., & INTRATOR, S. (1998). Quantitative trends in publication of research on technology and reading, writing, and literacy. In T. Shanahan & F.V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 47th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 385-396). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
76. KEATLEY, C. (1999). Elementary language immersion students: Changes in reading comprehension strategies across grades. The NCLRC Language Resource, 3(1). Retrieved May 5, 2005, from www.nclrc.org/ caidlr31.htm: link updated, retrieved December 21, 2006, from www.nclrc.org/aboutteaching/ inst_highlights.html
77. KINTSCH, W., & KINTSCH, E. (2005). Comprehension. In S.G. Paris & S.A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 71-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. KINTSCH, W., & VAN DIJK, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
79. KINTSCH, W., & VIPOND, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L-G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 329-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. KINZER, C.K., & LEANDER, K.M. (2003). Reconsidering the technology/language arts divide: Electronic and print-based environments. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J.R. Squire, & J.M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 546-565). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. KLEINER, A., & LEWIS, L. (2003). Internet access in public schools and classrooms: 1994-2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ frss/publications/ 2004011. link updated, retrieved December 21, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2004011
82. KRESS, G. (2004). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
83. KRESS, G., & VAN LEEUWEN, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.
84. KRISTEVA, J. (1986). Word, dialogue, and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 35-61). New York: Columbia University Press.
85. KUMBRUCK, C. (1998). Hypertext reading: Novice vs. expert reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 21, 160-172.
86. KYMES, A. (2005). Teaching online comprehension strategies using think-alouds. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48, 492-500.
87. LANDOW, G.P. (1994). What's a critic to do? Critical theory in the age of hypertext. In G.P. Landow (Ed.), Hyper/Text/Theory (pp. 1-48). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
88. LANKSHEAR, C., & KNOBEL, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
89. LEMKE, J.L. (1989). Social semiotics: A new model for literacy education. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 289-309). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
90. LENHART, A., RAINIE, L., & LEWIS, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
91. LENHART, A., SIMON, M., & GRAZIANO, M. (2001). The Internet and education: Findings of the Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
92. LEON, J.A., ESCUDERO, L, & VAN DEN BROEK, P. (2000, July). Genre of the text and the activation of elaborative inferences: A crosscultural study based on thinking-aloud tasks. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Lyon, France.
93. LEU, D.J.JR. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. LEU, D.J., JR. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 310-336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
95. LEU, D.J., JR. (2005). New literacies, reading research, and the challenges of change: A deictic perspective of our research worlds. Presidential address presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
96. LEU, D.J., JR., CASTEK, J., HARTMAN, D., COIRO, J., HENRY, L., KULIKOWICH, J., & LYVER, S. (2005). Evaluating the development of scientific knowledge and new forms of reading comprehension during online learning (Final report presented to the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory/Learning Point Associates). Retrieved May 15, 2006, from www.newliteracies.uconn.edu/ncrel.html
97. LEU, D.J., JR., & KINZER, C.K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
98. LEU, D.J., JR., KINZER, C.K., COIRO, J., & CAMMACK, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Retrieved October 15, 2005, from www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lilindex.asp?HREF=/ newliteracies/leu
99. LEU, D.J.JR., & REINKING, D. (2005). Developing Internet comprehension strategies among poor, adolescent students at risk to become dropouts. Grant proposal accepted by the Institute of Education Sciences, 2005-2008.
100. LYONS, D., HUFFMAN, J., KRAJCIK, J., & SOLOWAY, E. (1997, March). An investigation of the use of the World Wide Web far online inquiry in a science classroom. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.
101. MCGINLEY, W., & TIERNEY, R.J. (1989). Traversing the topical landscape: Reading and writing as ways of knowing. Written Communication, 6, 243-269.
102. MCKENNA, M.C., KEAR, D.J., & ELLSWORTH, R.A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934-956.
103. MEANS, M.L., & VOSS, J.F. (1985). Star Wars: A developmental study of expert and novice knowledge structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 746-757.
104. MERRIAM, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. London: Jossey-Bass.
105. MEYER, B.J.F. (1985). Organizational aspects of text: Effects on reading comprehension. InJ. Flood (Ed.), Promoting reading comprehension (pp. 113-138). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
106. MEYER, B.J.F., BRANDT, D.M., & BLUTH, G.J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
107. MOSENTHAL, P.B., & KIRSCH, I.S. (1991). Toward an explanatory model of document literacy. Discourse Processes, 14, 147-180.
108. MURRAY, J.D., KLIN, C.M., & MYERS, J.L. (1993). Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 464-473.
109. MYERS, J., HAMMETT, R., & MCKILLOP, A.M. (1998). Opportunities for critical literacy and pedagogy in student-authored hypermedia. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a posttypographic world'(pp. 63-78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
110. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (2000). Stats in brief: Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools.. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/ 2000090.pdf
111. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
112. NIELSEN, J. (2002, April 14). Kid's corner: Website usability for children. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from www.useit.com/alertbox/200204l4.html
113. NIELSEN/NETRATINGS. (2004, March 18). Three out of four Americans have access to the Internet, according to Nielsen/NetRatings . Retrieved March 10, 2005 from http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/ pr/pr-040318.pdf
114. OLSON, G.M., MACK, R.L., & DUFFY, S.A. (1981). Cognitive aspects of genre. Poetics, 10, 283-315.
115. OTTER, M., & JOHNSON, H. (2000). Lost in hyperspace: Metrics and mental models. Interacting With Computers, 13, 1-40.
116. PALINCSAR, A., DALTON, B., MAGNUSSON, S., DEFRANCE, N., GUPTI-LOMANGINO, A., & HAPGOOD, S. (2004). Investigating verbal protocols for what they reveal about upper elementary students' text processing across narrative and informational texts. Paper presented at the 54th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
117. PARIS, S.G., LIPSON, M.Y., & WIXSON, K.K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
118. PARIS, S.G., WASIK, B.A., & TURNER, J.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). White Plains, NY: Longman.
119. PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY SKILLS. (2002). Learing for the 21st century. Tucson, AZ: Author. Retrieved December 21, 2006, from www.21stcenturyskills.org/images/stories/otherdocs/p21up_Report, pdf
120. PEARSON, P.D., & DOLE, J.A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. The Elementary School Journal 88, 151-165.
121. PEARSON, P.D., ROEHLER, L.R., DOLE, J.A., & DUFFY, G.G. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In S.J. Samuels & A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 145-199). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
122. POTTS, G.R., KEENAN, J.M., & GOLDING, J.M. (1988). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 399-415.
123. PRESSLEY, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L., Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. 3, pp. 545-562). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
124. PRESSLEY, M., & AFFLERBACH, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
125. PRESSLEY, M.P., & HILDEN, K. (2004). Verbal protocols of reading. In N.K. Duke & M.H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 308-321). New York: Guilford.
126. PRESSLEY, M., JOHNSON, C.J., SYMONS, S., MCGOLDRICK, J.A., & KURITA, J.A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
127. PROTOPSALTIS, A., & BOUKI, V. (2004). Cognitive aspects of Web-based hypertext: An experimental approach. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 1, 1268-1276.
128. QUELLMALZ, E., & KOZMA, R. (2003). Designing assessments of learning with technology. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 389-08.
129. RAND READING STUDY GROUP. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA RAND. Retrieved July 22, 2004, from www.rand.org/miilti/ achievementforall/reading/ readreport.html: link updated, retrieved December 21, 2006, from www.rand.org/pubs/monograph-reports/ 2005/MR1465.pdf
130. REINKING, D. (1992). Differences between electronic and printed texts: An agenda for research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 11-24.
131. REINKING, D. (1997). Me and my hypertext :) A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). The Reading Teacher, 50, 626-643.
132. REINKING, D. (1998). Introduction: Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
133. REINKING, D., MCKENNA, M.C., LABBO, L.D., & KIEFFER, R.F. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
134. ROUET, J.-F., & LEVONEN, J.J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J.-F. Rouet, J.J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
135. ROWE, S. (2004). Discourse in activity and activity as discourse. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 79-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
136. RUMELHART, D.E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
137. SALOMON, G. (1994). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
138. SCHACTER,J., CHUNG, G.K., & DORR, A. (1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840-849.
139. SINGER, M., & FERREIRA, F. (1983). Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 437-448.
140. SINGER, M., HARKNESS, D., & STEWART, S.T. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199-228.
141. SNYDER, I. (1996). Hypertext: The electronic labyrinth. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
142. SPIRES, R.J., & ESTES, T.H. (2002). Reading in Web-based learning environments. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 115-125). New York: Guilford.
143. SPIRO, R.J. (2004). Principled pluralism for adaptive flexibility in teaching and learning. In R.B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 654-659). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
144. SPIRO, R.J., COULSON, R.L., FELTOVICH, P.J., &ANDERSON, D.K. (2004). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R.B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 640-653). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
145. SPIRO, R.J., FELTOVICH, P.J., JACOBSON, M.I., & COULSON, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in illstructured domains. Educational Technology, 35, 24-33.
146. SPIVEY, N.N. (1984). Discourse synthesis: Constructing texts in reading and writing (Outstanding Dissertation Monograph Series). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
147. SPIVEY, N.N. (1987). Construing constructivism: Reading research in the United States. Poetics, 16, 169-192.
148. SPIVEY, N.N., & KING, J.R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7-26
149. STAKE, R (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
150. STEIN, N.L., & TRABASSO, T. (1982). What's in a story? An approach to comprehension and instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 212-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
151. STREET, B. (1999). New literacies in theory and practice. Linguistics and Education, 10, 1-24.
152. TESCH, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
153. TIERNEY, R., & PEARSON, P.D. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts, 60, 568-580.
154. TRABASSO, T., & BOUCHARD, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176-200). New York: Guilford.
155. TRIPP, S.D., & ROBY, W. (1990). Orientation and disorientation in a hypertext lexicon. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 120-124.
156. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law, and today's students are revolutionizing expectations. National Education Technology Plan 2004. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from www.ed.gov/about/office/list/os/technology/plan/2004/plan.pdf
157. VAN DIJK, T.A., & KINTSCH, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.
158. VAN OOSTENDORP, H., & DE MUL, S. (Eds.). (1996). Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
159. VAN OOSTENDORP, H., & GOLDMAN, S.R. (Eds.). (1999). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
160. VOSS, J.F., VESONDER, G.T., & SPILICH, G.T. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 651-667.
161. WALLACE, R.M., KUPPERMAN, J., KRAJCIK, J., & SOLOWAY, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 75-104.
162. WEAVER, C.A., III, & KINTSCH, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 230-244). White Plains, NY: Longman.
163. WEB-BASED EDUCATION COMMISSION. (2000). The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from http://interact.hpcnet.org/ webcommission/index.htm
164. WINDSCHITL, M. (2000). Using the WWW for teaching and learning in K - 12 classrooms: What are the interesting research questions? CyberPsycholagy & Behavior, 3, 89-96.
165. YANG, S.C. (1997). Information seeking as problem-solving: Using a qualitative approach to uncover the novice learner's information-seeking processes in a Perseus hyptertext system. Library and Information Science Research, 19, 71-94.
166. YIN, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
167. ZABRUCKY, K., & RATNER, H.H. (1992). Effects of passage type on comprehension monitoring and recall in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 373-391.
168. ZAKON, R.H. (2005). Hobbes' Internet timeline v8.2. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline