Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 55-67

  Wen, Meichun Lydia ^a   Tsai, Chin Chung ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049184717     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510701794050     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boud, D. (1990) Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15, pp. 110-113.
2. Brindley, C. and Scoffield, S. (1998) Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, pp. 79-89.
3. Butcher, A. C. and Stefani, L. A. J. (1995) Analysis of peer-, self- and staff-assessment in group project work, Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 2, pp. 165-185.
4. Cheng, W. and Warren, M. (1997) Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22, pp. 233-239.
5. Chou, C. and Tsai, C. -C. (2002) Developing web-based curricula: Issues and challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, pp. 623-636.
6. Clifford, V. A. (1999) The development of autonomous learners in a university setting. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, pp. 115-128.
7. Davies, P. (2000) Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37, pp. 346-355.
8. Fallows, S. and Chandramohan, B. (2001) Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, pp. 229-246.
9. Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 32, pp. 175-187.
10. Falchikov, N. and Goldfinch, J. (2000) Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, pp. 287-322.
11. Freeman, M. and McKenzie, J. (2002) SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, pp. 551-569.
12. Guilford, J. P. (1968) Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications, Robert R. Knapp, San Diego, CA
13. Hanrahan, S. J. and Issacs, G. (2001) Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20, pp. 53-70.
14. Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D. and Welch, W. (2001) The science achievement of various subgroups on alternative assessment formats. Science Education, 85, pp. 279-290.
15. Lejk, M. and Wyvill, M. (2001) The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, pp. 551-561.
16. Liu, C. -C. and Tsai, C. -C. An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education
17. Paquet, M. R. and Marchais, J. E. Des (1998) Students' acceptance of peer assessment. Education for Health, 11, pp. 25-35.
18. Reeves, T. C. (2000) Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, pp. 101-111.
19. Ross, S. J. (2005) The impact of assessment method on foreign language proficiency growth. Applied Linguistics, 26, pp. 317-342.
20. Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F. and Moerkerke, G. (1999) Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment. Learning Environment Research, 1, pp. 293-319.
21. Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S. and van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2002) Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, pp. 443-454.
22. Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merrienboer, J. J. G. and Martens, R. L. (2004) Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, pp. 59-78.
23. Topping, K. (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, pp. 249-276.
24. Tsai, C. -C. (2000) Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42, pp. 193-205.
25. Tsai, C. -C. (2001) The interpretation construction design model for teaching science and its applications to internet-based instruction in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 21, pp. 401-415.
26. Tsai, C. -C., Liu, E. Z. -F., Lin, S. S. J. and Yuan, S. -M. (2001) A networked peer assessment system based on a Vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38, pp. 220-230.
27. Tsai, C. -C., Lin, S. S. J. and Yuan, S. -M. (2002) Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, pp. 241-252.
28. Wen, M. L. and Tsai, C. -C. (2006) University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51, pp. 27-44.
29. Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. -C. and Chang, C. -Y. (2006) Attitudes toward peer assessment: A comparison of perspectives from preservice and inservice teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43, pp. 83-92.
30. Williams, E. (1992) Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 17, pp. 45-58.
31. Woolhouse, M. (1999) Peer assessment: The participants' perception of two activities on a further education teacher education course. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, pp. 211-219.