Dialogue within peer feedback processes: clarification and negotiation of meaning

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 883-897

  Zhu, Qiyun ^a,b   Carless, David ^a,b  

^a GUANGDONG UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN STUDIES   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

feedback dialogue; Peer feedback; peer review; second language writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85043334276     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D., (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
2. Alaszewski, A., (2006). Using diaries for social research. London: Sage.
3. Boud, D., & Molloy, E., (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V., (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5. Cho, K., & MacArthur, C., (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
6. Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K., (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629–643. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
7. Creswell, J. W., (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
8. Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P., (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 137–155. doi: 10.1080/02602930903221444
9. Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J., (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 55–67. doi: 10.1080/07294360701658765
10. Kim, M., (2009). The impact of an elaborated receiver’s role in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 105–114. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955960
11. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W., (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
12. McConlogue, T., (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1495–1506. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.868878
13. Merriam, S. B., (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from ‘case study research in education’. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. Min, H. T., (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
15. Min, H. T., (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
16. Nicol, D., (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. doi: 10.1080/02602931003786559
17. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C., (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
18. Panadero, E., (2016). Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: A review and future directions. In G. T. L., Brown & L. R., Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 247–266). New York, NY: Routledge.
19. Patton, M., (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Thomas, D. R., (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748
21. Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A., (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19–36. doi: 10.1080/02602930500262346
22. Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J., (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
23. Yang, M., & Carless, D., (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154