Assessment of oral presentations: Effectiveness of self-, peer-, and teacher assessments

International Journal of Instruction

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 615-632

  Nejad, Ali Mansoori ^a   Mahfoodh, Omer Hassan Ali ^b  

^a ILAM UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Methods of assessment; Oral presentations; Peer assessment; Self assessment; Teacher assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068263111     PISSN: 1694609X     EISSN: 13081470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.29333/iji.2019.12337a     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441
2. Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners' writing performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 513-533
3. Bonk, W. J., & Ockey, G. J. (2003). A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89-110
4. Bryant, D. A., & Carless, D. R. (2010). Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(1), 3-15
5. Burnett, W., & Cavaye, G. (1980). Peer assessment by fifth year students of surgery. Assessment in Higher Education, 5(3), 273-278
6. Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5-31
7. Cameron, R. (2009). A sequential mixed model research design: Design, analytical and display issues. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 140-152
8. Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(1), 39-54
9. Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., & Lou, S.-J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 58(1), 303-320
10. Chen, C.-h. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229-236
11. Cheng, L., Rogers, W. T., & Wang, X. (2008). Assessment purposes and procedures in ESL/EFL classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 9-32
12. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93-121
13. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891
14. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In J. W. Creswell (Ed.), Designing and conducting mixed methods research (pp. 53-106). London: Sage
15. Cumming, A. (2001). ESL/EFL instructors' practices for writing assessment: specific purposes or general purposes? Language Testing, 18(2), 207-224
16. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346-355
17. De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self-and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers' assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129-142
18. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher education, 24(3), 331-350
19. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146-166
20. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Scoring procedures for ESL contexts. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 241-276). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
21. Jafarpur, A. (1991). Can naive EFL learners estimate their own proficiency? Evaluation & Research in Education, 5(3), 145-157
22. Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: the use of 'Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning'to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875-891
23. Khonbi, Z. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2013). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment: An investigation into Iranian EFL students' attitudes. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 87-107
24. Magin, D., & Helmore, P. (2001). Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: how reliable are they? Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 287-298
25. Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 075-100
26. McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333-349
27. Miller, P. J. (2003). The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 383-394
28. Oldfield, K. A., & Macalpine, J. M. K. (1995). Peer and self-assessment at tertiary level: An experiential report. Assessment in Higher Education, 20(1), 125-132
29. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474-498
30. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23-38
31. Pantiwati, Y., & Husamah. (2017). Self and peer assessments in active learning model to increase metacognitive awareness and cognitive abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 185-202
32. Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2), 109-131
33. Perkins, K. (1983). On the use of composition scoring techniques, objective measures, and objective tests to evaluate ESL writing ability. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 651-671
34. Pope, N. K. L. (2005). The impact of stress in self-and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 51-63
35. Ratminingsih, N., Marhaeni, A., & Vigayanti, L. (2018). Self-assessment: The effect on students' independence and writing competence. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 277-290
36. Sadeghi, K., & Khonbi, Z. A. (2015). Iranian university students' experiences of and attitudes towards alternatives in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 641-665
37. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational assessment, 11(1), 1-31
38. Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2009). Peer-assessing peers' contribution to EFL group presentations. RELC Journal, 40(2), 149-171
39. Sasmaz Oren, F. (2012). The effects of gender and previous experience on the approach of self and peer assessment: a case from Turkey. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(2), 123-133
40. Sundrarajun, C., & Kiely, R. (2010). The oral presentation as a context for learning and assessment. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 101-117
41. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chiou, S.-K., & Hou, H.-T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45(2), 187-202
42. Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18(3), 275-302
43. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169
44. Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293-310
45. Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S.-M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252
46. Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174
47. ünaldi, I. (2016). Self and teacher assessment as predictors of proficiency levels of Turkish EFL learners. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 67-80
48. Wei, W. (2015). Using summative and formative assessments to evaluate EFL teachers' teaching performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 611-623
49. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 55-67
50. Wisker, G. (1994). Innovative assessment: Peer group and oral assessment. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 31(2), 104-114
51. Woolhouse, M. (1999). Peer assessment: the participants' perception of two activities on a further education teacher education course. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(2), 211-219
52. Xiao, Y., & Carless, D. R. (2013). Illustrating students' perceptions of English language assessment: Voices from China. RELC Journal, 44(3), 319-340
53. Yang, Y.-F., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72-83