Author Correction: Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir (Nature Biotechnology, (2019), 37, 4, (451-460), 10.1038/s41587-019-0068-4);Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 451-460

  Setty, Manu ^a   Kiseliovas, Vaidotas ^a   Levine, Jacob ^a   Gayoso, Adam ^a   Mazutis, Linas ^a   Pe’er, Dana ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; BONE; DIGITAL STORAGE; PLASTICITY; RNA; TRANSCRIPTION;

CELL LINEAGE; HIGH RESOLUTION; HUMAN BONE MARROW; PROBABILISTIC PROCESS; RNA SEQUENCING; TERMINAL STATE; TIME ORDERING; TISSUE TYPES;

CYTOLOGY;

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL PLASTICITY; COLON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENTROPY; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIESIS; HUMAN; MARKOV CHAIN; NONHUMAN; PALANTIR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RNA SEQUENCE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; ERYTHROPOIESIS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; ERYTHROPOIESIS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HEMATOPOIESIS; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85063336708     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0282-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (58)

1. Bendall, S. C. et al. Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression and regulatory coordination in human B cell development. Cell 157, 714–725 (2014).
2. Setty, M. et al. Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 637–645 (2016).
3. Haghverdi, L., Buttner, M., Wolf, F. A., Buettner, F. & Theis, F. J. Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching. Nat. Methods 13, 845–848 (2016).
4. Velten, L. et al. Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 271–281 (2017).
5. Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Integrated single-cell analysis maps the continuous regulatory landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation. Cell 173, 1535–1548 e1516 (2018).
6. Paul, F. et al. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell 163, 1663–1677 (2015).
7. Plass, M. et al. Cell type atlas and lineage tree of a whole complex animal by single-cell transcriptomics. Science 360, eaaq1723 (2018).
8. Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018).
9. Stergachis, A. B. et al. Developmental fate and cellular maturity encoded in human regulatory DNA landscapes. Cell 154, 888–903 (2013).
10. Corces, M. R. et al. Lineage-specific and single-cell chromatin accessibility charts human hematopoiesis and leukemia evolution. Nat. Genet. 48, 1193–1203 (2016).
11. Orkin, S. H. & Zon, L. I. Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 132, 631–644 (2008).
12. Amir el, A. D. et al. viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 545–552 (2013).
13. Levine, J. H. et al. Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell 162, 184–197 (2015).
14. Coifman, R. R. et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: diffusion maps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7426–7431 (2005).
15. Haber, A. L. et al. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature 551, 333–339 (2017).
16. Hastie, T. J. & Tibshirani, R. J. Generalized Additive Models (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1990).
17. Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017).
18. Dahlin, J. S. et al. A single-cell hematopoietic landscape resolves 8 lineage trajectories and defects in Kit mutant mice. Blood 131, e1–e11 (2018).
19. Azizi, E. et al. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment. Cell 174, 1293–1308.e36 (2018).
20. Novershtern, N. et al. Densely interconnected transcriptional circuits control cell states in human hematopoiesis. Cell 144, 296–309 (2011).
21. Psaila, B. et al. Single-cell profiling of human megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors identifies distinct megakaryocyte and erythroid differentiation pathways. Genome Biol. 17, 83 (2016).
22. Pei, W. et al. Polylox barcoding reveals haematopoietic stem cell fates realized in vivo. Nature 548, 456–460 (2017).
23. Takubo, K. et al. Regulation of glycolysis by Pdk functions as a metabolic checkpoint for cell cycle quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 12, 49–61 (2013).
24. Majeti, R., Park, C. Y. & Weissman, I. L. Identification of a hierarchy of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors in human cord blood. Cell Stem Cell 1, 635–645 (2007).
25. Mori, Y. et al. Identification of the human eosinophil lineage-committed progenitor: revision of phenotypic definition of the human common myeloid progenitor. J. Exp. Med. 206, 183–193 (2009).
26. Ravet, E. et al. Characterization of DNA-binding-dependent and -independent functions of SCL/TAL1 during human erythropoiesis. Blood 103, 3326–3335 (2004).
27. Siatecka, M. & Bieker, J. J. The multifunctional role of EKLF/KLF1 during erythropoiesis. Blood 118, 2044–2054 (2011).
28. Ferreira, R., Ohneda, K., Yamamoto, M. & Philipsen, S. GATA1 function, a paradigm for transcription factors in hematopoiesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 1215–1227 (2005).
29. Funnell, A. P. et al. Erythroid Kruppel-like factor directly activates the basic Kruppel-like factor gene in erythroid cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 2777–2790 (2007).
30. Nerlov, C., Querfurth, E., Kulessa, H. & Graf, T. GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription. Blood 95, 2543–2551 (2000).
31. Zhang, P. et al. PU.1 inhibits GATA-1 function and erythroid differentiation by blocking GATA-1 DNA binding. Blood 96, 2641–2648 (2000).
32. May, G. et al. Dynamic analysis of gene expression and genome-wide transcription factor binding during lineage specification of multipotent progenitors. Cell Stem Cell 13, 754–768 (2013).
33. Tusi, B. K. et al. Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies. Nature 555, 54–60 (2018).
34. Antebi, Y. E. et al. Mapping differentiation under mixed culture conditions reveals a tunable continuum of T cell fates. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001616 (2013).
35. Herring, C. A. et al. Unsupervised trajectory analysis of single-cell RNA-seq and imaging data reveals alternative tuft cell origins in the gut. Cell Syst. 6, 37–51 e39 (2018).
36. Li, H. & Jasper, H. Gastrointestinal stem cells in health and disease: from flies to humans. Dis. Model Mech. 9, 487–499 (2016).
37. Herman, J. S., Sagar & Grun, D. FateID infers cell fate bias in multipotent progenitors from single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Methods 15, 379–386 (2018).
38. Yang, J., Zhang, L., Yu, C., Yang, X. F. & Wang, H. Monocyte and macrophage differentiation: circulation inflammatory monocyte as biomarker for inflammatory diseases. Biomark. Res. 2, 1 (2014).
39. Benschop, R. J. & Cambier, J. C. B cell development: signal transduction by antigen receptors and their surrogates. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11, 143–151 (1999).
40. Merad, M., Sathe, P., Helft, J., Miller, J. & Mortha, A. The dendritic cell lineage: ontogeny and function of dendritic cells and their subsets in the steady state and the inflamed setting. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 31, 563–604 (2013).
41. Hoppe, P. S. et al. Early myeloid lineage choice is not initiated by random PU.1 to GATA1 protein ratios. Nature 535, 299–302 (2016).
42. Ibarra-Soria, X. et al. Defining murine organogenesis at single-cell resolution reveals a role for the leukotriene pathway in regulating blood progenitor formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 127–134 (2018).
43. Regev, A. et al. The human cell atlas. Elife 6, e27041 (2017).
44. Farrell, J. A. et al. Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis. Science 360, 981–987 (2018).
45. Kotton, D. N. & Morrisey, E. E. Lung regeneration: mechanisms, applications and emerging stem cell populations. Nat. Med. 20, 822–832 (2014).
46. Beck, B. & Blanpain, C. Unravelling cancer stem cell potential. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 727–738 (2013).
47. Raj, B. et al. Simultaneous single-cell profiling of lineages and cell types in the vertebrate brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 442–450 (2018).
48. Spanjaard, B. et al. Simultaneous lineage tracing and cell-type identification using CRISPR–Cas9-induced genetic scars. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 469–473 (2018).
49. Biezuner, T. et al. A generic, cost-effective, and scalable cell lineage analysis platform. Genome Res. 26, 1588–1599 (2016).
50. Macaulay, I. C. et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12, 519–522 (2015).
51. van Dijk, D. et al. Recovering gene interactions from single-cell data using data diffusion. Cell 174, 716–729.e27 (2018).
52. Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).
53. Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).
54. Buettner, F. et al. Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 155–160 (2015).
55. Buettner, F., Pratanwanich, N., McCarthy, D. J., Marioni, J. C. & Stegle, O. f-scLVM: scalable and versatile factor analysis for single-cell RNA-seq. Genome Biol. 18, 212 (2017).
56. van der Maaten, L. P. J. & Hinton, G. E. Visualizing high-dimensional data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
57. Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).
58. Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Code Ocean Capsule 10.24433/CO.6f3a9d2b-82d6-45bd-a583-5346a30e0c5d (2018).