Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 271-281

  Velten, Lars ^a   Haas, Simon F ^b,c   Raffel, Simon ^b,c,d   Blaszkiewicz, Sandra ^b,c   Islam, Saiful ^e   Hennig, Bianca P ^a   Hirche, Christoph ^b,c   Lutz, Christoph ^d   Buss, Eike C ^d   Nowak, Daniel ^d   Boch, Tobias ^d   Hofmann, Wolf Karsten ^d   Ho, Anthony D ^d   Huber, Wolfgang ^a   Trumpp, Andreas ^b,c   Essers, Marieke A G ^b,c   Steinmetz, Lars M ^a,e  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b Exp Hematology Group Heidelberg Institute for Stem Cell Technology and Experimental Medicine GGmbH   (Germany)

^c GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA6 INTEGRIN; CD135 ANTIGEN; CD2 ANTIGEN; CD38 ANTIGEN; CD45RA ANTIGEN; CD7 ANTIGEN; CD71 ANTIGEN; COMMON ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA ANTIGEN; GLYCOPROTEIN GP 130; THY 1 ANTIGEN; LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIESIS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RNA SEQUENCE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; UPREGULATION; ADULT; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; MOUSE; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; FEMALE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HEMATOPOIESIS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELLS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85015695567     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3493     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Chao, M. P., Seita, J. & Weissman, I. L. Establishment of a normal hematopoietic and leukemia stem cell hierarchy. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 73, 439–449 (2008).
2. Morrison, S., Uchida, N. & Weissman, I. The biology of hematopoietic stem cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 35–71 (1995).
3. Kondo, M., Weissman, I. L. & Akashi, K. Identification of clonogenic common lymphoid progenitors in mouse bone marrow. Cell 91, 661–672 (1997).
4. Akashi, K., Traver, D., Miyamoto, T. & Weissman, I. L. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature 404, 193–197 (2000).
5. Doulatov, S. et al. Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development. Nat. Immunol. 11, 585–593 (2010).
6. Notta, F. et al. Isolation of single human hematopoietic stem cells capable of long-term multilineage engraftment. Science 333, 218–221 (2011).
7. Notta, F. et al. Distinct routes of lineage development reshape the human blood hierarchy across ontogeny. Science 351, aab2116 (2016).
8. Sun, J. et al. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature 514, 322–327 (2014).
9. Busch, K. et al. Fundamental properties of unperturbed haematopoiesis from stem cells in vivo. Nature 518, 542–546 (2015).
10. PeriØ, L., Duffy, K. R., Kok, L., de Boer, R. J. & Schumacher, T. N. The branching point in erythro-myeloid differentiation. Cell 163, 1655–1662 (2015).
11. Haas, S. et al. Inflammation-induced emergency megakaryopoiesis driven by hematopoietic stem cell-like megakaryocyte progenitors. Cell Stem Cell 17, 422–434 (2015).
12. Grgens, A. et al. Revision of the human hematopoietic tree: granulocyte subtypes derive from distinct hematopoietic lineages. Cell Rep. 3, 1539–1552 (2013).
13. + lympho-myeloid stem cells lacking erythro-megakaryocytic potential. Cell 121, 295–306 (2005).
14. Yamamoto, R. et al. Clonal analysis unveils self-renewing lineage-restricted progenitors generated directly from hematopoietic stem cells. Cell 154, 1112–1126 (2013).
15. Naik, S. H. et al. Diverse and heritable lineage imprinting of early haematopoietic progenitors. Nature 496, 229–232 (2013).
16. Paul, F. et al. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell 163, 1663–1677 (2015).
17. Wilson, N. K. et al. Combined single-cell functional and gene expression analysis resolves heterogeneity within stem cell populations. Cell Stem Cell 16, 712–724 (2015).
18. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014).
19. Shin, J. et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq with waterfall reveals molecular cascades underlying adult neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 17, 360–372 (2015).
20. Olsson, A. Single-cell analysis of mixed-lineage states leading to a binary cell fate choice. Nature 537, 698–702 (2016).
21. Theilgaard-Monch, K. The transcriptional program of terminal granulocytic differentiation. Blood 105, 1785–1796 (2005).
22. Borregaard, N. Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 33, 657–670 (2010).
23. Clark, M. R., Mandal, M., Ochiai, K. & Singh, H. Orchestrating B cell lymphopoiesis through interplay of IL-7 receptor and pre-B cell receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 69–80 (2013).
24. Haghverdi, L., Bttner, M., Wolf, F. A., Buettner, F. & Theis, F. J. Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching. Nat. Methods 13, 845–848 (2016).
25. Hoppe, P. et al. Early myeloid lineage choice is not initiated by random PU.1 to GATA1 protein ratios. Nature 535, 299–302 (2016).
26. Fischbach, N. A. et al. HOXB6 overexpression in murine bone marrow immortalizes a myelomonocytic precursor in vitro and causes hematopoietic stem cell expansion and acute myeloid leukemia in vivo. Blood 105, 1456–1466 (2005).
27. Iacovino, M. et al. HoxA3 is an apical regulator of haemogenic endothelium. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 72–78 (2011).
28. Chuikov, S., Levi, B. P., Smith, M. L. & Morrison, S. J. Prdm16 promotes stem cell maintenance in multiple tissues, partly by regulating oxidative stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 999–1006 (2010).
29. Ito, K. & Suda, T. Metabolic requirements for the maintenance of self-renewing stem cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 243–256 (2014).
30. Shojaei, F. et al. Hierarchical and ontogenic positions serve to define the molecular basis of human hematopoietic stem cell behavior. Dev. Cell 8, 651–663 (2005).
31. Kataoka, K. et al. Evi1 is essential for hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal, and its expression marks hematopoietic cells with long-term multilineage repopulating activity. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2403–2416 (2011).
32. Frelin, C. et al. GATA-3 regulates the self-renewal of long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Immunol. 14, 1037–1044 (2013).
33. Hattangadi, S. M., Wong, P., Zhang, L., Flygare, J. & Lodish, H. F. From stem cell to red cell: regulation of erythropoiesis at multiple levels by multiple proteins, RNAs, and chromatin modifications. Blood 118, 6258–6269 (2011).
34. Novershtern, N. et al. Densely interconnected transcriptional circuits control cell states in human hematopoiesis. Cell 144, 296–309 (2011).
35. Signer, R. A. J., Magee, J. A., Salic, A. & Morrison, S. J. Haematopoietic stem cells require a highly regulated protein synthesis rate. Nature 509, 49–54 (2014).
36. Friedman, A. D. Transcriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development. Oncogene 26, 6816–6828 (2007).
37. Hystad, M. E. et al. Characterization of early stages of human B cell development by gene expression profiling. J. Immunol. 179, 3662–3671 (2007).
38. Kurotaki, D. et al. IRF8 inhibits C/EBPα activity to restrain mononuclear phagocyte progenitors from differentiating into neutrophils. Nat. Commun. 5, 4978 (2014).
39. Waddington, C. H. The Strategy of the Genes (Routledge, 1957).
40. Brock, A., Chang, H. & Huang, S. Non-genetic heterogeneity—a mutation-independent driving force for the somatic evolution of tumours. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 336–342 (2009).
41. Huang, S. Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise. Development 136, 3853–3862 (2009).
42. Freud, A. G. & Caligiuri, M. A. Human natural killer cell development. Immunol. Rev. 214, 56–72 (2006).
43. Essers, M. A. G. et al. IFNα activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature 458, 904–908 (2009).
44. Picelli, S. et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10, 1096–1098 (2013).
45. Sasagawa, Y. et al. Quartz-Seq: a highly reproducible and sensitive single-cell RNA-Seq reveals non-genetic gene expression heterogeneity. Genome Biol. 14, R31 (2013).
46. Picelli, S. et al. Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Res. 24, 2033–2040 (2014).
47. Wu, T. D. & Nacu, S. Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads. Bioinformatics 26, 873–881 (2010).
48. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
49. Kharchenko, P. V., Silberstein, L. & Scadden, D. T. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 11, 740–742 (2014).
50. Velten, L. et al. Single-cell polyadenylation site mapping reveals 3’ isoform choice variability. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 812 (2015).
51. Jaitin, D. A. et al. Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 343, 776–779 (2014).
52. Van Dongen, S. Graph clustering via a discrete uncoupling process. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30, 121–141 (2008).
53. Csardi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems, 1695 (2006).