Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis

Science

Volumn 360, Issue 6392, 2018, Pages

  Farrell, Jeffrey A ^a   Wang, Yiqun ^g   Riesenfeld, Samantha J ^b   Shekhar, Karthik ^b   Regev, Aviv ^b,c   Schier, Alexander F ^a,b,d,e,f  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^g NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN NODAL; TRANSCRIPTOME; ZEBRAFISH PROTEIN;

CYPRINID; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; RECONSTRUCTION; RNA; VERTEBRATE;

ARTICLE; BLASTULA; CELL FATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMITE; WILD TYPE; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; EMBRYOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METABOLISM; NONMAMMALIAN EMBRYO; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

DANIO RERIO; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; BLASTULA; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTOME; ZEBRAFISH; ZEBRAFISH PROTEINS;

EID: 85046545613     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aar3131     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. T. Dickmeis et al., A crucial component of the endoderm formation pathway, CASANOVA, is encoded by a novel sox-related gene. Genes Dev. 15, 1487–1492 (2001). doi: 10.1101/ gad.196901; pmid: 11410529
2. Y. Kikuchi et al., casanova encodes a novel Sox-related protein necessary and sufficient for early endoderm formation in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 15, 1493–1505 (2001). doi: 10.1101/ gad.892301; pmid: 11410530
3. M. E. Halpern et al., Cell-autonomous shift from axial to paraxial mesodermal development in zebrafish floating head mutants. Development 121, 4257–4264 (1995). pmid: 8575325
4. C. B. Moens, V. E. Prince, Constructing the hindbrain: Insights from the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 224, 1–17 (2002). doi: 10.1002/ dvdy.10086; pmid: 11984869
5. L. Zhang et al., Noise drives sharpening of gene expression boundaries in the zebrafish hindbrain. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 613 (2012). doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.45; pmid: 23010996
6. E. Z. Macosko et al., Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002; pmid: 26000488
7. L. van der Maaten, G. Hinton, Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
8. T. M. J. Fruchterman, E. M. Reingold, Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exper. 21, 1129–1164 (1991). doi: 10.1002/spe.4380211102
9. A. F. Schier, W. S. Talbot, Molecular genetics of axis formation in zebrafish. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 561–613 (2005). doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143752; pmid: 16285872
10. C. B. Kimmel, R. M. Warga, T. F. Schilling, Origin and organization of the zebrafish fate map. Development 108, 581–594 (1990). pmid: 2387237
11. K. Woo, J. Shih, S. E. Fraser, Fate maps of the zebrafish embryo. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 439–443 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0959-437X(95)90046-J; pmid: 7580134
12. W. S. Talbot et al., A homeobox gene essential for zebrafish notochord development. Nature 378, 150–157 (1995). doi: 10.1038/378150a0; pmid: 7477317
13. J.-P. Brunet, P. Tamayo, T. R. Golub, J. P. Mesirov, Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 4164–4169 (2004). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308531101; pmid: 15016911
14. R. Satija, J. A. Farrell, D. Gennert, A. F. Schier, A. Regev, Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495–502 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nbt.3192; pmid: 25867923
15. G. Chechik et al., Activity motifs reveal principles of timing in transcriptional control of the yeast metabolic network. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1251–1259 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nbt.1499; pmid: 18953355
16. C. Thisse, B. Thisse, M. E. Halpern, J. H. Postlethwait, Goosecoid expression in neurectoderm and mesendoderm is disrupted in zebrafish cyclops gastrulas. Dev. Biol. 164, 420–429 (1994). doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1212; pmid: 8045345
17. I. Seiliez, B. Thisse, C. Thisse, FoxA3 and goosecoid promote anterior neural fate through inhibition of Wnt8a activity before the onset of gastrulation. Dev. Biol. 290, 152–163 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.11.021; pmid: 16364286
18. M. R. Gardiner, M. M. Gongora, S. M. Grimmond, A. C. Perkins, A global role for zebrafish klf4 in embryonic erythropoiesis. Mech. Dev. 124, 762–774 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2007. 06.005; pmid: 17709232
19. E. C. Swindell et al., Regulation and function of foxe3 during early zebrafish development. Genesis 46, 177–183 (2008). doi: 10.1002/dvg.20380; pmid: 18327772
20. K. Gritsman et al., The EGF-CFC protein one-eyed pinhead is essential for nodal signaling. Cell 97, 121–132 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80720-5; pmid: 10199408
21. A. Carmany-Rampey, A. F. Schier, Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation. Curr. Biol. 11, 1261–1265 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00353-0; pmid: 11525740
22. S. Picelli et al., Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10, 1096–1098 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2639; pmid: 24056875
23. K. Gritsman, W. S. Talbot, A. F. Schier, Nodal signaling patterns the organizer. Development 127, 921–932 (2000). pmid: 10662632
24. A. McKenna et al., Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing. Science 353, aaf7907 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7907; pmid: 27229144
25. B. Raj et al., Simultaneous single-cell profiling of lineages and cell types in the vertebrate brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 181 (2018). pmid: 29608178
26. D. A. Cusanovich et al., The cis-regulatory dynamics of embryonic development at single-cell resolution. Nature 555, 538–542 (2018). doi: 10.1038/nature25981; pmid: 29539636
27. R. L. Davis, H. Weintraub, A. B. Lassar, Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell 51, 987–1000 (1987). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90585-X; pmid: 3690668
28. S. J. Tapscott et al., MyoD1: A nuclear phosphoprotein requiring a Myc homology region to convert fibroblasts to myoblasts. Science 242, 405–411 (1988). doi: 10.1126/ science.3175662; pmid: 3175662
29. K. Takahashi, S. Yamanaka, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2006.07.024; pmid: 16904174
30. A. Wagner, A. Regev, N. Yosef, Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1145–1160 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nbt.3711; pmid: 27824854
31. R. Cannoodt, W. Saelens, Y. Saeys, Computational methods for trajectory inference from single-cell transcriptomics. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 2496–2506 (2016). doi: 10.1002/ eji.201646347; pmid: 27682842
32. S. C. Bendall et al., Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression and regulatory coordination in human B cell development. Cell 157, 714–725 (2014). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2014.04.005; pmid: 24766814
33. C. Trapnell et al., The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014). doi: 10.1038/ nbt.2859; pmid: 24658644
34. S. Jang et al., Dynamics of embryonic stem cell differentiation inferred from single-cell transcriptomics show a series of transitions through discrete cell states. eLife 6, e20487 (2017). doi: 10.7554/eLife.20487; pmid: 28296635
35. L. Haghverdi, F. Buettner, F. J. Theis, Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data. Bioinformatics 31, 2989–2998 (2015). doi: 10.1093/ bioinformatics/btv325; pmid: 26002886
36. L. Haghverdi, M. Büttner, F. A. Wolf, F. Buettner, F. J. Theis, Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching. Nat. Methods 13, 845–848 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3971; pmid: 27571553
37. M. Setty et al., Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 637–645 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nbt.3569; pmid: 27136076