메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 499-519

Interpersonal aspect of written feedback: a community college students’ perspective

Author keywords

community college; Feedback; interpersonal aspect; relationship; second language writing

Indexed keywords


EID: 85061005657     PISSN: 13596748     EISSN: 17475112     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2018.1526906     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)

References (71)
  • 1
    • 77649342903 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Challenge and Opportunity: Rethinking the Role and Function of Developmental Education in Community College
    • Bailey, T., 2009. “Challenge and Opportunity: Rethinking the Role and Function of Developmental Education in Community College.” New Directions for Community Colleges 2009 (145): 11–30. doi:10.1002/cc.352
    • (2009) New Directions for Community Colleges , vol.2009 , Issue.145 , pp. 11-30
    • Bailey, T.1
  • 2
    • 84858405682 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning?
    • Beaumont, C., M., O’Doherty, and L., Shannon. 2011. “Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning?” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 671–687. doi:10.1080/03075071003731135
    • (2011) Studies in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.6 , pp. 671-687
    • Beaumont, C.1    O’Doherty, M.2    Shannon, L.3
  • 4
    • 67649494592 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback
    • Bitchener, J., and U., Knoch. 2009. “The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback.” ELT Journal 63 (3): 204–211. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn043
    • (2009) ELT Journal , vol.63 , Issue.3 , pp. 204-211
    • Bitchener, J.1    Knoch, U.2
  • 5
    • 78049469707 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback
    • Bitchener, J., and U., Knoch. 2010. “Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing 19 (4): 207–217. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
    • (2010) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.19 , Issue.4 , pp. 207-217
    • Bitchener, J.1    Knoch, U.2
  • 6
    • 29244476254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing
    • Bitchener, J., S., Young, and D., Cameron. 2005. “The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (3): 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
    • (2005) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.14 , Issue.3 , pp. 191-205
    • Bitchener, J.1    Young, S.2    Cameron, D.3
  • 8
    • 56049112059 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Los Angeles, CA: Sage, and,. Introduction. Grounded Theory Research: Methods and Practices. edited by, and, –28
    • Bryant, A., and K., Charmaz. 2007. “Introduction. Grounded Theory Research: Methods and Practices.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by A., Bryant and K., Charmaz, 1–28. Los Angeles, CA: Sage
    • (2007) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory , pp. 1
    • Bryant, A.1    Charmaz, K.2    Bryant, A.3    Charmaz, K.4
  • 9
    • 84887572730 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How Do Students of German Perceive Feedback Practices at University? A Motivational Exploration
    • Busse, V., 2013. “How Do Students of German Perceive Feedback Practices at University? A Motivational Exploration.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (4): 406–424. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005
    • (2013) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.22 , Issue.4 , pp. 406-424
    • Busse, V.1
  • 10
    • 33645228936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process
    • Carless, D., 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
    • (2006) Studies in Higher Education , vol.31 , Issue.2 , pp. 219-233
    • Carless, D.1
  • 11
    • 77951711838 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trust, Distrust and Their Impact on Assessment Reform
    • Carless, D., 2009. “Trust, Distrust and Their Impact on Assessment Reform.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1080/02602930801895786
    • (2009) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.34 , Issue.1 , pp. 79-89
    • Carless, D.1
  • 13
    • 79959432842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices
    • Carless, D., D., Salter, M., Yang, and J., Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449
    • (2011) Studies in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.4 , pp. 395-407
    • Carless, D.1    Salter, D.2    Yang, M.3    Lam, J.4
  • 16
    • 85037598676 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reconsidering Teacher, Peer, and Computer-Generated Feedback
    • Chong, I., 2017. “Reconsidering Teacher, Peer, and Computer-Generated Feedback”. TESOL Journal 8 (4): 886–893. doi:10.1002/tesj.334
    • (2017) TESOL Journal , vol.8 , Issue.4 , pp. 886-893
    • Chong, I.1
  • 17
    • 85017651622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interplay among Technical, Socio-Emotional and Personal Factors in Written Feedback Research
    • Chong, I., 2018a. “Interplay among Technical, Socio-Emotional and Personal Factors in Written Feedback Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 185–196. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1317712
    • (2018) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.43 , Issue.2 , pp. 185-196
    • Chong, I.1
  • 18
    • 85060987040 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Three-Stage Model for Implementing Focused Written Corrective Feedback
    • Chong, S. W., 2018b. “A Three-Stage Model for Implementing Focused Written Corrective Feedback.” TESL Canada Journal 34 (2): 71–82. doi:10.18806/tesl.v34i2.1267
    • (2018) TESL Canada Journal , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 71-82
    • Chong, S.W.1
  • 21
    • 84876102993 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Teacher Education: Ideally Feedback Is a Continuing Two-Way Communication that Encourages Progress
    • Dowden, T., S., Pittaway, H., Yost, and R., McCarthy. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Teacher Education: Ideally Feedback Is a Continuing Two-Way Communication that Encourages Progress.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (3): 349–362. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.632676
    • (2013) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.38 , Issue.3 , pp. 349-362
    • Dowden, T.1    Pittaway, S.2    Yost, H.3    McCarthy, R.4
  • 23
    • 62549120785 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types
    • Ellis, R., 2009. “A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types.” ELT Journal 63 (2): 97–107. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn023
    • (2009) ELT Journal , vol.63 , Issue.2 , pp. 97-107
    • Ellis, R.1
  • 24
    • 47949122416 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context
    • Ellis, R., Y., Sheen, M., Murakami, and H., Takashima. 2008. “The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context.” System 36 (3): 353–371. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
    • (2008) System , vol.36 , Issue.3 , pp. 353-371
    • Ellis, R.1    Sheen, Y.2    Murakami, M.3    Takashima, H.4
  • 25
    • 84880594980 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High-Proficient L2 Learners
    • Farrokhi, F., and S., Sattarpour. 2012. “The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High-Proficient L2 Learners.” World Journal of Education 2 (2). doi:10.5430/wje.v2n2p49
    • (2012) World Journal of Education , vol.2 , Issue.2
    • Farrokhi, F.1    Sattarpour, S.2
  • 26
    • 79551514779 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student Perceptions of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education
    • Ferguson, P., 2011. “Student Perceptions of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 51–62. doi:10.1080/02602930903197883
    • (2011) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.1 , pp. 51-62
    • Ferguson, P.1
  • 27
    • 84881240546 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers
    • Ferris, D. R., H., Liu, A., Sinha, and M., Senna. 2013. “Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 307–329. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
    • (2013) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.22 , Issue.3 , pp. 307-329
    • Ferris, D.R.1    Liu, H.2    Sinha, A.3    Senna, M.4
  • 28
    • 51849110761 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Predictors of First-Year Student Retention in the Community College
    • Fike, D. S., and R., Fike. 2008. “Predictors of First-Year Student Retention in the Community College.” Community College Review 36 (2): 68–88. doi:10.1177/0091552108320222
    • (2008) Community College Review , vol.36 , Issue.2 , pp. 68-88
    • Fike, D.S.1    Fike, R.2
  • 30
    • 85060972203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Students’ Reactions to Teacher Written Feedback in Their Compositions at an Giang University, Vietnam
    • Hanh, N. D., and R., Ramnath. 2016. “Students’ Reactions to Teacher Written Feedback in Their Compositions at an Giang University, Vietnam.” The New English Teacher: An International Journal 10 (1): 42–54
    • (2016) The New English Teacher: An International Journal , vol.10 , Issue.1 , pp. 42-54
    • Hanh, N.D.1    Ramnath, R.2
  • 31
    • 0010709236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback
    • Higgins, R., P., Hartley, and A., Skelton. 2001. “Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 269–274. doi:10.1080/13562510120045230
    • (2001) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.6 , Issue.2 , pp. 269-274
    • Higgins, R.1    Hartley, P.2    Skelton, A.3
  • 32
    • 84879426746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Faculty Feedback: Perceptions and Practices in L2 Disciplinary Writing
    • Hyland, K., 2013. “Faculty Feedback: Perceptions and Practices in L2 Disciplinary Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 240–253. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003
    • (2013) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.22 , Issue.3 , pp. 240-253
    • Hyland, K.1
  • 33
    • 33751222044 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing
    • Hyland, K., and F., Hyland. 2006a. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399
    • (2006) Language Teaching , vol.39 , Issue.2 , pp. 83-101
    • Hyland, K.1    Hyland, F.2
  • 36
    • 48749133334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meeting in the Margins: Effects of the Teacher–Student Relationship on Revision Processes of EFL College Students Taking a Composition Course
    • Lee, G., and D. L., Schallert. 2008. “Meeting in the Margins: Effects of the Teacher–Student Relationship on Revision Processes of EFL College Students Taking a Composition Course.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002
    • (2008) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.17 , Issue.3 , pp. 165-182
    • Lee, G.1    Schallert, D.L.2
  • 37
    • 85014932009 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Investigating Teacher Perceptions of Feedback
    • Lee, H. H., A. P., Leong, and G., Song. 2017. “Investigating Teacher Perceptions of Feedback.” ELT Journal 71 (1): 60–68. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw047
    • (2017) ELT Journal , vol.71 , Issue.1 , pp. 60-68
    • Lee, H.H.1    Leong, A.P.2    Song, G.3
  • 38
    • 48749088210 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback in Two Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms
    • Lee, I., 2008. “Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback in Two Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 144–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
    • (2008) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.17 , Issue.3 , pp. 144-164
    • Lee, I.1
  • 39
    • 84894451605 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives
    • Lee, I., 2014. “Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (1): 201–213. doi:10.1002/tesq.153
    • (2014) TESOL Quarterly , vol.48 , Issue.1 , pp. 201-213
    • Lee, I.1
  • 40
    • 84980276914 scopus 로고
    • The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes
    • Leki, I., 1991. “The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes.” Foreign Language Annals 24 (3): 203–218. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x
    • (1991) Foreign Language Annals , vol.24 , Issue.3 , pp. 203-218
    • Leki, I.1
  • 41
    • 33847607240 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • “You Cannot Ignore”: L2 Graduate Students’ Response to Discipline-Based Written Feedback
    • New York: Cambridge University Press,. edited by, and
    • Leki, I., 2006. ““You Cannot Ignore”: L2 Graduate Students’ Response to Discipline-Based Written Feedback.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K., Hyland and F., Hyland, 266–286. New York: Cambridge University Press
    • (2006) Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues , pp. 266-286
    • Leki, I.1    Hyland, K.2    Hyland, F.3
  • 42
    • 84992727054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • “I Feel Disappointed”: EFL University Students’ Emotional Responses Towards Teacher Written Feedback
    • Mahfoodh, O. H. A., 2017. ““I Feel Disappointed”: EFL University Students’ Emotional Responses Towards Teacher Written Feedback.” Assessing Writing 31: 53–72. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
    • (2017) Assessing Writing , vol.31 , pp. 53-72
    • Mahfoodh, O.H.A.1
  • 45
    • 34548127909 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teacher-Written Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Self-Assessment, and Actual Teacher Performance
    • Montgomery, J. L., and W., Baker. 2007. “Teacher-Written Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Self-Assessment, and Actual Teacher Performance.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2): 82–99. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002
    • (2007) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.16 , Issue.2 , pp. 82-99
    • Montgomery, J.L.1    Baker, W.2
  • 46
    • 84945157793 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feedback on Feedback Practice: Perceptions of Students and Academics
    • Mulliner, E., and M., Tucker. 2015. “Feedback on Feedback Practice: Perceptions of Students and Academics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 266–288. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365
    • (2015) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.42 , Issue.2 , pp. 266-288
    • Mulliner, E.1    Tucker, M.2
  • 48
    • 85030097560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Student Survey (NSS) report. 2017. Higher Education Funding Council for England. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/national-student-survey-2016-overall-satisfaction-results
    • (2017) Higher Education Funding Council for England
  • 49
    • 79955551589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education
    • Nicol, D., 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559
    • (2010) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.35 , Issue.5 , pp. 501-517
    • Nicol, D.1
  • 50
    • 79751479825 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feedback Alignment: Effective and Ineffective Links between Tutors’ and Students’ Understanding of Coursework Feedback
    • Orsmond, P., and S., Merry. 2011. “Feedback Alignment: Effective and Ineffective Links between Tutors’ and Students’ Understanding of Coursework Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2): 125–136. doi:10.1080/02602930903201651
    • (2011) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.2 , pp. 125-136
    • Orsmond, P.1    Merry, S.2
  • 51
    • 84871772392 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Relevance of Second Language Acquisition Theory to the Written Error Correction Debate
    • Polio, C., 2012. “The Relevance of Second Language Acquisition Theory to the Written Error Correction Debate.” Journal of Second Language Writing 21 (4): 375–389. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004
    • (2012) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.21 , Issue.4 , pp. 375-389
    • Polio, C.1
  • 52
    • 0007122445 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Etiology of Poor Second Language Writing: The Influence of Perceived Teacher Preferences on Second Language Revision Strategies
    • Porte, G. K., 1997. “The Etiology of Poor Second Language Writing: The Influence of Perceived Teacher Preferences on Second Language Revision Strategies.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1): 61–78. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90006-0
    • (1997) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.6 , Issue.1 , pp. 61-78
    • Porte, G.K.1
  • 55
    • 34447579136 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles
    • Sheen, Y., 2007. “The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 255–283. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
    • (2007) TESOL Quarterly , vol.41 , Issue.2 , pp. 255-283
    • Sheen, Y.1
  • 56
    • 70449520185 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners
    • Sheen, Y., D., Wright, and A., Moldawa. 2009. “Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners.” System 37 (4): 556–569. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002
    • (2009) System , vol.37 , Issue.4 , pp. 556-569
    • Sheen, Y.1    Wright, D.2    Moldawa, A.3
  • 57
    • 84880591275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Comparative Effect of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Metalinguistic Explanation on Learners’ Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of the English Indefinite Article
    • Shintani, N., and R., Ellis. 2013. “The Comparative Effect of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Metalinguistic Explanation on Learners’ Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of the English Indefinite Article.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 286–306. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
    • (2013) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.22 , Issue.3 , pp. 286-306
    • Shintani, N.1    Ellis, R.2
  • 58
    • 84893851807 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures
    • Shintani, N., R., Ellis, and W., Suzuki. 2014. “Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures.” Language Learning 64:(1): 103–131. doi:10.1111/lang.12029
    • (2014) Language Learning , vol.64 , pp. 103-131
    • Shintani, N.1    Ellis, R.2    Suzuki, W.3
  • 59
    • 79959315183 scopus 로고
    • Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers
    • Sommers, N., 1980. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.” College Composition and Communication 31 (4): 378–388. doi:10.2307/356588
    • (1980) College Composition and Communication , vol.31 , Issue.4 , pp. 378-388
    • Sommers, N.1
  • 60
    • 84937936187 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference
    • Stefanou, C., and A., Révész. 2015. “Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference.” The Modern Language Journal 99 (2): 263–282. doi:10.1111/modl.12212
    • (2015) The Modern Language Journal , vol.99 , Issue.2 , pp. 263-282
    • Stefanou, C.1    Révész, A.2
  • 61
    • 79959360813 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research
    • Storch, N., 2010. “Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research.” International Journal of English Studies 10 (2): 29–46. doi:10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119181
    • (2010) International Journal of English Studies , vol.10 , Issue.2 , pp. 29-46
    • Storch, N.1
  • 62
    • 85044054306 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Written Corrective Feedback from Sociocultural Theoretical Perspectives: A Research Agenda
    • Storch, N., 2018. “Written Corrective Feedback from Sociocultural Theoretical Perspectives: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 51 (2): 262–277. doi:10.1017/s0261444818000034
    • (2018) Language Teaching , vol.51 , Issue.2 , pp. 262-277
    • Storch, N.1
  • 64
    • 84992663676 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘This Is Not What I Need’: Conflicting Assessment Feedback Beliefs in a Post-Secondary Institution in Hong Kong
    • To, J., 2016. “‘This Is Not What I Need’: Conflicting Assessment Feedback Beliefs in a Post-Secondary Institution in Hong Kong.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 21 (4): 447–467. doi:10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588
    • (2016) Research in Post-Compulsory Education , vol.21 , Issue.4 , pp. 447-467
    • To, J.1
  • 65
    • 0030507912 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
    • Truscott, J., 1996. “The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.” Language Learning 46 (2): 327–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
    • (1996) Language Learning , vol.46 , Issue.2 , pp. 327-369
    • Truscott, J.1
  • 66
    • 0345849867 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?
    • Tsui, A. B., and M., Ng. 2000. “Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2): 147–170. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9
    • (2000) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.9 , Issue.2 , pp. 147-170
    • Tsui, A.B.1    Ng, M.2
  • 67
    • 85013030284 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Motivation and Feedback: How Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict L2 Writers’ Motivation and Feedback Orientation
    • Waller, L., and M., Papi. 2017. “Motivation and Feedback: How Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict L2 Writers’ Motivation and Feedback Orientation.” Journal of Second Language Writing 35: 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
    • (2017) Journal of Second Language Writing , vol.35 , pp. 54-65
    • Waller, L.1    Papi, M.2
  • 69
    • 33846699999 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses
    • Weaver, M. R., 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061
    • (2006) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.31 , Issue.3 , pp. 379-394
    • Weaver, M.R.1
  • 70
    • 84878658584 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes
    • Yang, M., and D., Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
    • (2013) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.18 , Issue.3 , pp. 285-297
    • Yang, M.1    Carless, D.2
  • 71
    • 85060971214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Globalization and Sustainability of the Community College in the Asia-Pacific Region: The Case of Hong Kong and the Chinese Mainland
    • Yung, M., and G., Postiglione. 2005. “Globalization and Sustainability of the Community College in the Asia-Pacific Region: The Case of Hong Kong and the Chinese Mainland.” Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal 4: 19–34
    • (2005) Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal , vol.4 , pp. 19-34
    • Yung, M.1    Postiglione, G.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.