-
1
-
-
77649342903
-
Challenge and Opportunity: Rethinking the Role and Function of Developmental Education in Community College
-
Bailey, T., 2009. “Challenge and Opportunity: Rethinking the Role and Function of Developmental Education in Community College.” New Directions for Community Colleges 2009 (145): 11–30. doi:10.1002/cc.352
-
(2009)
New Directions for Community Colleges
, vol.2009
, Issue.145
, pp. 11-30
-
-
Bailey, T.1
-
2
-
-
84858405682
-
Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning?
-
Beaumont, C., M., O’Doherty, and L., Shannon. 2011. “Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning?” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 671–687. doi:10.1080/03075071003731135
-
(2011)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.6
, pp. 671-687
-
-
Beaumont, C.1
O’Doherty, M.2
Shannon, L.3
-
4
-
-
67649494592
-
The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback
-
Bitchener, J., and U., Knoch. 2009. “The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback.” ELT Journal 63 (3): 204–211. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn043
-
(2009)
ELT Journal
, vol.63
, Issue.3
, pp. 204-211
-
-
Bitchener, J.1
Knoch, U.2
-
5
-
-
78049469707
-
Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback
-
Bitchener, J., and U., Knoch. 2010. “Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing 19 (4): 207–217. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
-
(2010)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.19
, Issue.4
, pp. 207-217
-
-
Bitchener, J.1
Knoch, U.2
-
6
-
-
29244476254
-
The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing
-
Bitchener, J., S., Young, and D., Cameron. 2005. “The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (3): 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
-
(2005)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.14
, Issue.3
, pp. 191-205
-
-
Bitchener, J.1
Young, S.2
Cameron, D.3
-
8
-
-
56049112059
-
-
Los Angeles, CA: Sage, and,. Introduction. Grounded Theory Research: Methods and Practices. edited by, and, –28
-
Bryant, A., and K., Charmaz. 2007. “Introduction. Grounded Theory Research: Methods and Practices.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by A., Bryant and K., Charmaz, 1–28. Los Angeles, CA: Sage
-
(2007)
The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory
, pp. 1
-
-
Bryant, A.1
Charmaz, K.2
Bryant, A.3
Charmaz, K.4
-
9
-
-
84887572730
-
How Do Students of German Perceive Feedback Practices at University? A Motivational Exploration
-
Busse, V., 2013. “How Do Students of German Perceive Feedback Practices at University? A Motivational Exploration.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (4): 406–424. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005
-
(2013)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.22
, Issue.4
, pp. 406-424
-
-
Busse, V.1
-
10
-
-
33645228936
-
Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process
-
Carless, D., 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
-
(2006)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.31
, Issue.2
, pp. 219-233
-
-
Carless, D.1
-
11
-
-
77951711838
-
Trust, Distrust and Their Impact on Assessment Reform
-
Carless, D., 2009. “Trust, Distrust and Their Impact on Assessment Reform.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1080/02602930801895786
-
(2009)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.34
, Issue.1
, pp. 79-89
-
-
Carless, D.1
-
13
-
-
79959432842
-
Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices
-
Carless, D., D., Salter, M., Yang, and J., Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449
-
(2011)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.4
, pp. 395-407
-
-
Carless, D.1
Salter, D.2
Yang, M.3
Lam, J.4
-
16
-
-
85037598676
-
Reconsidering Teacher, Peer, and Computer-Generated Feedback
-
Chong, I., 2017. “Reconsidering Teacher, Peer, and Computer-Generated Feedback”. TESOL Journal 8 (4): 886–893. doi:10.1002/tesj.334
-
(2017)
TESOL Journal
, vol.8
, Issue.4
, pp. 886-893
-
-
Chong, I.1
-
17
-
-
85017651622
-
Interplay among Technical, Socio-Emotional and Personal Factors in Written Feedback Research
-
Chong, I., 2018a. “Interplay among Technical, Socio-Emotional and Personal Factors in Written Feedback Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 185–196. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1317712
-
(2018)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.43
, Issue.2
, pp. 185-196
-
-
Chong, I.1
-
18
-
-
85060987040
-
A Three-Stage Model for Implementing Focused Written Corrective Feedback
-
Chong, S. W., 2018b. “A Three-Stage Model for Implementing Focused Written Corrective Feedback.” TESL Canada Journal 34 (2): 71–82. doi:10.18806/tesl.v34i2.1267
-
(2018)
TESL Canada Journal
, vol.34
, Issue.2
, pp. 71-82
-
-
Chong, S.W.1
-
21
-
-
84876102993
-
Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Teacher Education: Ideally Feedback Is a Continuing Two-Way Communication that Encourages Progress
-
Dowden, T., S., Pittaway, H., Yost, and R., McCarthy. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Teacher Education: Ideally Feedback Is a Continuing Two-Way Communication that Encourages Progress.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (3): 349–362. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.632676
-
(2013)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.38
, Issue.3
, pp. 349-362
-
-
Dowden, T.1
Pittaway, S.2
Yost, H.3
McCarthy, R.4
-
23
-
-
62549120785
-
A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types
-
Ellis, R., 2009. “A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types.” ELT Journal 63 (2): 97–107. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn023
-
(2009)
ELT Journal
, vol.63
, Issue.2
, pp. 97-107
-
-
Ellis, R.1
-
24
-
-
47949122416
-
The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context
-
Ellis, R., Y., Sheen, M., Murakami, and H., Takashima. 2008. “The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context.” System 36 (3): 353–371. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
-
(2008)
System
, vol.36
, Issue.3
, pp. 353-371
-
-
Ellis, R.1
Sheen, Y.2
Murakami, M.3
Takashima, H.4
-
25
-
-
84880594980
-
The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High-Proficient L2 Learners
-
Farrokhi, F., and S., Sattarpour. 2012. “The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High-Proficient L2 Learners.” World Journal of Education 2 (2). doi:10.5430/wje.v2n2p49
-
(2012)
World Journal of Education
, vol.2
, Issue.2
-
-
Farrokhi, F.1
Sattarpour, S.2
-
26
-
-
79551514779
-
Student Perceptions of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education
-
Ferguson, P., 2011. “Student Perceptions of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 51–62. doi:10.1080/02602930903197883
-
(2011)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.1
, pp. 51-62
-
-
Ferguson, P.1
-
27
-
-
84881240546
-
Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers
-
Ferris, D. R., H., Liu, A., Sinha, and M., Senna. 2013. “Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 307–329. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
-
(2013)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.22
, Issue.3
, pp. 307-329
-
-
Ferris, D.R.1
Liu, H.2
Sinha, A.3
Senna, M.4
-
28
-
-
51849110761
-
Predictors of First-Year Student Retention in the Community College
-
Fike, D. S., and R., Fike. 2008. “Predictors of First-Year Student Retention in the Community College.” Community College Review 36 (2): 68–88. doi:10.1177/0091552108320222
-
(2008)
Community College Review
, vol.36
, Issue.2
, pp. 68-88
-
-
Fike, D.S.1
Fike, R.2
-
30
-
-
85060972203
-
Students’ Reactions to Teacher Written Feedback in Their Compositions at an Giang University, Vietnam
-
Hanh, N. D., and R., Ramnath. 2016. “Students’ Reactions to Teacher Written Feedback in Their Compositions at an Giang University, Vietnam.” The New English Teacher: An International Journal 10 (1): 42–54
-
(2016)
The New English Teacher: An International Journal
, vol.10
, Issue.1
, pp. 42-54
-
-
Hanh, N.D.1
Ramnath, R.2
-
31
-
-
0010709236
-
Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback
-
Higgins, R., P., Hartley, and A., Skelton. 2001. “Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 269–274. doi:10.1080/13562510120045230
-
(2001)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.6
, Issue.2
, pp. 269-274
-
-
Higgins, R.1
Hartley, P.2
Skelton, A.3
-
32
-
-
84879426746
-
Faculty Feedback: Perceptions and Practices in L2 Disciplinary Writing
-
Hyland, K., 2013. “Faculty Feedback: Perceptions and Practices in L2 Disciplinary Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 240–253. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003
-
(2013)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.22
, Issue.3
, pp. 240-253
-
-
Hyland, K.1
-
33
-
-
33751222044
-
Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing
-
Hyland, K., and F., Hyland. 2006a. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399
-
(2006)
Language Teaching
, vol.39
, Issue.2
, pp. 83-101
-
-
Hyland, K.1
Hyland, F.2
-
35
-
-
34547668918
-
-
2nd, New York, NY: Routledge, and, ed
-
Jones, S. R., V., Torres, and J., Arminio. 2014. Negotiating the Complexities of Qualitative Research in Higher Education: Fundamental Elements and Issues. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge
-
(2014)
Negotiating the Complexities of Qualitative Research in Higher Education: Fundamental Elements and Issues
-
-
Jones, S.R.1
Torres, V.2
Arminio, J.3
-
36
-
-
48749133334
-
Meeting in the Margins: Effects of the Teacher–Student Relationship on Revision Processes of EFL College Students Taking a Composition Course
-
Lee, G., and D. L., Schallert. 2008. “Meeting in the Margins: Effects of the Teacher–Student Relationship on Revision Processes of EFL College Students Taking a Composition Course.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002
-
(2008)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.17
, Issue.3
, pp. 165-182
-
-
Lee, G.1
Schallert, D.L.2
-
37
-
-
85014932009
-
Investigating Teacher Perceptions of Feedback
-
Lee, H. H., A. P., Leong, and G., Song. 2017. “Investigating Teacher Perceptions of Feedback.” ELT Journal 71 (1): 60–68. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw047
-
(2017)
ELT Journal
, vol.71
, Issue.1
, pp. 60-68
-
-
Lee, H.H.1
Leong, A.P.2
Song, G.3
-
38
-
-
48749088210
-
Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback in Two Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms
-
Lee, I., 2008. “Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback in Two Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 144–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
-
(2008)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.17
, Issue.3
, pp. 144-164
-
-
Lee, I.1
-
39
-
-
84894451605
-
Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives
-
Lee, I., 2014. “Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (1): 201–213. doi:10.1002/tesq.153
-
(2014)
TESOL Quarterly
, vol.48
, Issue.1
, pp. 201-213
-
-
Lee, I.1
-
40
-
-
84980276914
-
The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes
-
Leki, I., 1991. “The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes.” Foreign Language Annals 24 (3): 203–218. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x
-
(1991)
Foreign Language Annals
, vol.24
, Issue.3
, pp. 203-218
-
-
Leki, I.1
-
41
-
-
33847607240
-
“You Cannot Ignore”: L2 Graduate Students’ Response to Discipline-Based Written Feedback
-
New York: Cambridge University Press,. edited by, and
-
Leki, I., 2006. ““You Cannot Ignore”: L2 Graduate Students’ Response to Discipline-Based Written Feedback.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K., Hyland and F., Hyland, 266–286. New York: Cambridge University Press
-
(2006)
Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues
, pp. 266-286
-
-
Leki, I.1
Hyland, K.2
Hyland, F.3
-
42
-
-
84992727054
-
“I Feel Disappointed”: EFL University Students’ Emotional Responses Towards Teacher Written Feedback
-
Mahfoodh, O. H. A., 2017. ““I Feel Disappointed”: EFL University Students’ Emotional Responses Towards Teacher Written Feedback.” Assessing Writing 31: 53–72. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
-
(2017)
Assessing Writing
, vol.31
, pp. 53-72
-
-
Mahfoodh, O.H.A.1
-
45
-
-
34548127909
-
Teacher-Written Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Self-Assessment, and Actual Teacher Performance
-
Montgomery, J. L., and W., Baker. 2007. “Teacher-Written Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Self-Assessment, and Actual Teacher Performance.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2): 82–99. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002
-
(2007)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.16
, Issue.2
, pp. 82-99
-
-
Montgomery, J.L.1
Baker, W.2
-
46
-
-
84945157793
-
Feedback on Feedback Practice: Perceptions of Students and Academics
-
Mulliner, E., and M., Tucker. 2015. “Feedback on Feedback Practice: Perceptions of Students and Academics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 266–288. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365
-
(2015)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.42
, Issue.2
, pp. 266-288
-
-
Mulliner, E.1
Tucker, M.2
-
48
-
-
85030097560
-
-
National Student Survey (NSS) report. 2017. Higher Education Funding Council for England. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/national-student-survey-2016-overall-satisfaction-results
-
(2017)
Higher Education Funding Council for England
-
-
-
49
-
-
79955551589
-
From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education
-
Nicol, D., 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559
-
(2010)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, Issue.5
, pp. 501-517
-
-
Nicol, D.1
-
50
-
-
79751479825
-
Feedback Alignment: Effective and Ineffective Links between Tutors’ and Students’ Understanding of Coursework Feedback
-
Orsmond, P., and S., Merry. 2011. “Feedback Alignment: Effective and Ineffective Links between Tutors’ and Students’ Understanding of Coursework Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2): 125–136. doi:10.1080/02602930903201651
-
(2011)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.2
, pp. 125-136
-
-
Orsmond, P.1
Merry, S.2
-
51
-
-
84871772392
-
The Relevance of Second Language Acquisition Theory to the Written Error Correction Debate
-
Polio, C., 2012. “The Relevance of Second Language Acquisition Theory to the Written Error Correction Debate.” Journal of Second Language Writing 21 (4): 375–389. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004
-
(2012)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.21
, Issue.4
, pp. 375-389
-
-
Polio, C.1
-
52
-
-
0007122445
-
The Etiology of Poor Second Language Writing: The Influence of Perceived Teacher Preferences on Second Language Revision Strategies
-
Porte, G. K., 1997. “The Etiology of Poor Second Language Writing: The Influence of Perceived Teacher Preferences on Second Language Revision Strategies.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1): 61–78. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90006-0
-
(1997)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.6
, Issue.1
, pp. 61-78
-
-
Porte, G.K.1
-
53
-
-
79951861213
-
Feedback: All that Effort, but What Is the Effect?
-
Price, M., K., Handley, J., Millar, and B., O’Donovan. 2010. “Feedback: All that Effort, but What Is the Effect?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 277–289. doi:10.1080/02602930903541007
-
(2010)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, Issue.3
, pp. 277-289
-
-
Price, M.1
Handley, K.2
Millar, J.3
O’Donovan, B.4
-
55
-
-
34447579136
-
The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles
-
Sheen, Y., 2007. “The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 255–283. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
-
(2007)
TESOL Quarterly
, vol.41
, Issue.2
, pp. 255-283
-
-
Sheen, Y.1
-
56
-
-
70449520185
-
Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners
-
Sheen, Y., D., Wright, and A., Moldawa. 2009. “Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners.” System 37 (4): 556–569. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002
-
(2009)
System
, vol.37
, Issue.4
, pp. 556-569
-
-
Sheen, Y.1
Wright, D.2
Moldawa, A.3
-
57
-
-
84880591275
-
The Comparative Effect of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Metalinguistic Explanation on Learners’ Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of the English Indefinite Article
-
Shintani, N., and R., Ellis. 2013. “The Comparative Effect of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Metalinguistic Explanation on Learners’ Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of the English Indefinite Article.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 286–306. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
-
(2013)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.22
, Issue.3
, pp. 286-306
-
-
Shintani, N.1
Ellis, R.2
-
58
-
-
84893851807
-
Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures
-
Shintani, N., R., Ellis, and W., Suzuki. 2014. “Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures.” Language Learning 64:(1): 103–131. doi:10.1111/lang.12029
-
(2014)
Language Learning
, vol.64
, pp. 103-131
-
-
Shintani, N.1
Ellis, R.2
Suzuki, W.3
-
59
-
-
79959315183
-
Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers
-
Sommers, N., 1980. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.” College Composition and Communication 31 (4): 378–388. doi:10.2307/356588
-
(1980)
College Composition and Communication
, vol.31
, Issue.4
, pp. 378-388
-
-
Sommers, N.1
-
60
-
-
84937936187
-
Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference
-
Stefanou, C., and A., Révész. 2015. “Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference.” The Modern Language Journal 99 (2): 263–282. doi:10.1111/modl.12212
-
(2015)
The Modern Language Journal
, vol.99
, Issue.2
, pp. 263-282
-
-
Stefanou, C.1
Révész, A.2
-
61
-
-
79959360813
-
Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research
-
Storch, N., 2010. “Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research.” International Journal of English Studies 10 (2): 29–46. doi:10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119181
-
(2010)
International Journal of English Studies
, vol.10
, Issue.2
, pp. 29-46
-
-
Storch, N.1
-
62
-
-
85044054306
-
Written Corrective Feedback from Sociocultural Theoretical Perspectives: A Research Agenda
-
Storch, N., 2018. “Written Corrective Feedback from Sociocultural Theoretical Perspectives: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 51 (2): 262–277. doi:10.1017/s0261444818000034
-
(2018)
Language Teaching
, vol.51
, Issue.2
, pp. 262-277
-
-
Storch, N.1
-
63
-
-
84875093228
-
-
eds.,. New York: Routledge
-
Tight, M., K. H., Mok, J., Huisman, and C. C., Morphew, eds. 2009. The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. New York: Routledge
-
(2009)
The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education
-
-
Tight, M.1
Mok, K.H.2
Huisman, J.3
Morphew, C.C.4
-
64
-
-
84992663676
-
‘This Is Not What I Need’: Conflicting Assessment Feedback Beliefs in a Post-Secondary Institution in Hong Kong
-
To, J., 2016. “‘This Is Not What I Need’: Conflicting Assessment Feedback Beliefs in a Post-Secondary Institution in Hong Kong.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 21 (4): 447–467. doi:10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588
-
(2016)
Research in Post-Compulsory Education
, vol.21
, Issue.4
, pp. 447-467
-
-
To, J.1
-
65
-
-
0030507912
-
The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
-
Truscott, J., 1996. “The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.” Language Learning 46 (2): 327–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
-
(1996)
Language Learning
, vol.46
, Issue.2
, pp. 327-369
-
-
Truscott, J.1
-
66
-
-
0345849867
-
Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?
-
Tsui, A. B., and M., Ng. 2000. “Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2): 147–170. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9
-
(2000)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.9
, Issue.2
, pp. 147-170
-
-
Tsui, A.B.1
Ng, M.2
-
67
-
-
85013030284
-
Motivation and Feedback: How Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict L2 Writers’ Motivation and Feedback Orientation
-
Waller, L., and M., Papi. 2017. “Motivation and Feedback: How Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict L2 Writers’ Motivation and Feedback Orientation.” Journal of Second Language Writing 35: 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
-
(2017)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.35
, pp. 54-65
-
-
Waller, L.1
Papi, M.2
-
68
-
-
84882927122
-
Student Perceptions of Feedback in Australian University Accounting Education
-
Australia:, and
-
Watty, K., R., Carr, P., De Lange, B., O’Connell, and B., Howieson. 2011. “Student Perceptions of Feedback in Australian University Accounting Education”. Paper presented at 2011 Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) Conference, Australia, 1–33
-
(2011)
Paper presented at 2011 Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) Conference
, pp. 1-33
-
-
Watty, K.1
Carr, R.2
De Lange, P.3
O’Connell, B.4
Howieson, B.5
-
69
-
-
33846699999
-
Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses
-
Weaver, M. R., 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061
-
(2006)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.31
, Issue.3
, pp. 379-394
-
-
Weaver, M.R.1
-
70
-
-
84878658584
-
The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes
-
Yang, M., and D., Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
-
(2013)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.18
, Issue.3
, pp. 285-297
-
-
Yang, M.1
Carless, D.2
-
71
-
-
85060971214
-
Globalization and Sustainability of the Community College in the Asia-Pacific Region: The Case of Hong Kong and the Chinese Mainland
-
Yung, M., and G., Postiglione. 2005. “Globalization and Sustainability of the Community College in the Asia-Pacific Region: The Case of Hong Kong and the Chinese Mainland.” Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal 4: 19–34
-
(2005)
Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal
, vol.4
, pp. 19-34
-
-
Yung, M.1
Postiglione, G.2
|