Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 165-182

  Lee, Given ^a   Schallert, Diane L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiple draft approach; Revision; Teacher written feedback; Teacher student relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 48749133334     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Beach R. Self-evaluation strategies of extensive revisers and non-revisers. College Composition and Communication 27 (1976) 160-164
2. Belcher D. The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes 13 (1994) 23-34
3. Berkenkotter C. Decisions and revisions: The planning strategies of a publishing writer. College Composition and Communication 34 (1983) 156-172
4. Blakeslee A. Interacting with audiences: Social influences on the production of scientific writing (2001), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
5. Braine G. From the periphery to the center: One teacher's journey. In: Braine G. (Ed). Non-native educators in English language teaching (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 15-28
6. Braine G. Academic literacy and the nonnative speaker graduate student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1 (2002) 59-68
7. Brannon L., and Knoblauch C. On students' rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication 33 (1982) 157-166
8. Bruner J. Actual minds, possible worlds (1986), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Casanave C.P. Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In: Belcher D., and Braine G. (Eds). Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (1995), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 83-110
10. Casanave C.P. Looking ahead to more sociopolically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship (but should it be called "post-process"?). Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (2003) 85-102
11. Conrad S.M., and Goldstein L.M. ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1999) 147-179
12. Dong Y.R. Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral students' dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English 30 (1996) 428-457
13. Faigley L. Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College English 48 (1986) 527-542
14. Faigley L., and Witte S. Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication 32 (1981) 400-414
15. Ferris D. Students' reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29 (1995) 33-53
16. Ferris D., Pezone S., Tade C., and Tinti S. Teacher written commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1997) 155-182
17. Flower L., Hayes J., Carey L., Schriver K., and Stratman J. Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication 37 (1986) 16-55
18. Gebhardt R.C. Writing processes, revision, and rhetorical problems: A note on three recent articles. College Composition and Communication 34 (1983) 294-296
19. Goldstein L.M. Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 63-80
20. Grabe W., and Kaplan R.B. Theory and practice of writing (1996), Longman, New York
21. Herrington A. Composing one's self in a discipline: Students' and teachers' negotiations. In: Secor M., and Charney D. (Eds). Constructing rhetorical education (1992), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL 91-115
22. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Paper presented at the Urbana IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English.
23. Hyland F. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7 (1998) 255-286
24. Kim M. Dialogical caring encounters between teacher and students: The role of computer-mediated communication in preparing preservice reading teachers. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference 53 (2005) 67-89
25. Ko J., Schallert D.L., and Walters K.S. Rethinking scaffolding: Examining negotiation of meaning in an ESL storytelling task. TESOL Quarterly 37 (2003) 303-324
26. Lantolf J.P. Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching: The International Abstracting Journal for Language Teachers and Applied Linguists 33 (2000) 79-96
27. Lee, G. (2007). The Teacher-student relationship in an EFL College Composition Classroom: How Caring is Enacted in the Feedback and Revision Process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
28. Leki I. Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. In: Kroll B. (Ed). Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 57-68
29. Li Y. Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: An interview of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly 41 (2007) 55-80
30. Medgyes P. Non-native teacher (1994), Macmillan, London
31. Murphy S. A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room?. Assessing Writing 7 (2000) 79-90
32. Murray D.M. Internal revision: A process of discovery (1978), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL
33. Odell L., Goswami D., and Herrington A. The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. In: Mosenthal P., Tamor L., and Walmsley S.A. (Eds). Research on writing: Principles and methods (1983), Longman, New York & London 220-235
34. Park, J. K. (1997). An elementary EFL teaching model for limited-English-proficient teacher of English. Paper presented at The 1st Pan-Asia Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.
35. Park J.K. Teaching English in Korean culture and context. English Teaching 54 (1999) 3-21
36. Perl S. The composing process of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English 13 (1979) 317-336
37. Phillipson R. Linguistic imperialism (1992), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
38. Prior P. Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses: A case study of response, revision, and disciplinary enculturation. Research in the Teaching of English 29 (1995) 283-325
39. Raimes A. What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly 19 (1985) 229-258
40. Reves T., and Medgyes P. The NNS EFL/ESL teacher's self-image: An international survey. System 22 (1994) 353-367
41. Samimy K., and Brutt-Griffler J. To be a native or non-native speaker: Perceptions of "non-native" students in a graduate TESOL program. In: Braine G. (Ed). Non-native educators in English language teaching (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 127-144
42. Smith S. The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher response to student writing. College Composition and Communication 48 (1997) 249-268
43. Sommers N. Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication 33 (1982) 148-156
44. Sperling M., and Freedman S.W. A good girl writes like a good girl: Written response to student writing. Written Communication 4 (1987) 343-369
45. Tang C. On the power and status of nonnative ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly 31 (1997) 572-580
46. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46 (1996) 327-369
47. Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (1978), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
48. Wells G. Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education (1999), Cambridge University Press, New York
49. Wertsch J.V. A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In: Resnick L.B., Levine J.M., and Teasley S.D. (Eds). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (1991), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 85-100
50. Witte S. Topical structure and revision: An exploratory study. College Composition and Communication 34 (1983) 313-341
51. Zamel V. Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly 19 (1985) 79-101
52. Ziv N. The effect of teacher comments on the writing of four college freshmen. In: Beach R., and Bridwell L.S. (Eds). New directions in composition research (1984), Guilford, New York 348-380