Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 307-329

  Ferris, Dana R ^a   Liu, Hsiang ^b   Sinha, Aparna ^a   Senna, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Error correction; Generation 1.5; Self editing strategies; Teacher feedback; Written corrective feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881240546     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bitchener J. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:102-118.
2. Bitchener J., Ferris D. Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing 2012, Routledge, New York.
3. Bitchener J., Knoch U. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 2008, 12:409-431.
4. Bitchener J., Knoch U. The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal 2009, 63:204-211.
5. Bitchener J., Knoch U. Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2010, 19:207-217.
6. Bitchener J., Knoch U. The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics 2010, 31:193-214.
7. Bitchener J., Young S., Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2005, 9:227-258.
8. Bruton A. Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing 2009, 18:136-140.
9. Chiang Y.-S., Schmida M. Language identity and language ownership: Linguistic conflicts of first-year university writing students. Generation 1.5 meets college composition 1999, 81-96. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. L. Harklau, K. Losey, M. Siegal (Eds.).
10. Cohen A.D., Robbins M. Toward assessing interlanguage performance: The relationship between selected errors, learners' characteristics, and learners' expectations. Language Learning 1976, 26:45-66.
11. Connors R., Lunsford A.A. Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication 1988, 39:395-409.
12. Conrad S., Goldstein L. ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8:147-179.
13. Costino K.A., Hyon S. A class for students like me: Reconsidering relationships among identity labels, residency status, and students' preferences for mainstream or multilingual composition. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:63-81.
14. Cresswell J.W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches 2006, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
15. Ellis R., Sheen Y., Murakami M., Takashima H. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 2008, 36:353-371.
16. Evans N., Hartshorn J., McCollum R., Wolfersberger M. Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 2010, 14:445-464.
17. Ferris D.R. One size does not fit all: Response and revision issues for immigrant student writers. Generation 1.5 meets college composition 1999, 143-157. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. L. Harklau, K. Losey, M. Siegal (Eds.).
18. Ferris D.R. Response to student writing: Research implications for second language students 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
19. Ferris D.R. The grammar correction debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime. .?). Journal of Second Language Writing 2004, 13:49-62.
20. Ferris D.R. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues 2006, 81-104. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
21. Ferris D.R. Teaching college writing to diverse student populations 2009, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
22. Ferris D.R. Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2010, 32:181-201.
23. Ferris D.R. Treatment of error in second language student writing 2011, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. 2nd ed.
24. Ferris D.R., Brown J., Liu H., Stine M.E.A. Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: What teachers say and what they do. TESOL Quarterly 2011, 45:207-234.
25. Ferris D.R., Hedgcock J.S. Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
26. Ferris D.R., Liu H., Rabie B. The job of teaching writing: Teacher views of responding to writing. Writing and Pedagogy 2011, 3(1):39-77.
27. Ferris D.R., Roberts B.J. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10:161-184.
28. Flahive D. A reconsideration of pedagogical implications and further research needed moves in the reporting of second language writing research and their roles in theory building. Practicing theory in second language writing 2010, 126-158. Parlor Press, West Lafayette. T. Silva, P.K. Matsuda (Eds.).
29. Foin A., Lange E. Generation 1.5 writers' success in correcting errors marked on an out-of-class paper. CATESOL Journal 2007, 19:146-163.
30. Gerring J. Case study research: Principles and practices 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31. Goldstein L. Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms 2005, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
32. Goldstein L. Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. Feedback in second language writing 2006, 185-205. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
33. Goldstein L. Finding theory in the particular: An autobiography of what I learned and how about teacher feedback. Practicing theory in second language writing 2010, 72-89. Parlor Press, West Lafayette, IN. T. Silva, P.K. Matsuda (Eds.).
34. Goldstein L., Conrad S. Student input and the negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly 1990, 24:443-460.
35. Guénette D. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback in writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:40-53.
36. Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S.-educated learners of ESL 1999, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. L. Harklau, K. Losey, M. Siegal (Eds.).
37. Hendrickson J.M. The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal 1980, 64:216-221.
38. Hyland F. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 1998, 7:255-286.
39. Hyland F. Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System 2003, 31:217-230.
40. Hyland F., Hyland K. Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10:185-212.
41. Hyland K., Hyland F. Context and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. Feedback in second language writing 2006, 1-20. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
42. Hyland K., Hyland F. Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. Feedback in second language writing 2006, 206-224. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
43. Krashen S.D. Principles and practices in second language acquisition 1982, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
44. Krashen S.D. Writing: Research, theory, and application 1984, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
45. Lalande J.F. Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal 1982, 66:140-149.
46. Lee I. Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:69-85.
47. Lee I. Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal 2009, 63:13-22.
48. Lunsford A.A., Lunsford K.J. Mistakes are a fact of life: A national comparative study. College Composition and Communication 2008, 59:781-806.
49. Manchón R.M. The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts. Lessons from research. Foreign language writing. Research insights 2011, 44-64. Parlor Press, West Lafayette, IN. M. Reichelt, T. Chimasko (Eds.).
50. Montgomery J.L., Baker W. Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:82-99.
51. Newkirk T. The writing conference as performance. Research in the Teaching of English 1995, 29:193-215.
52. Ortmeier-Hooper C. English may be my second language-But I'm not ESL. College Composition and Communication 2008, 59:389-419.
53. Park K. I really do feel I'm 1.5: The construction of self and community by young Korean Americans. Amerasia Journal 1999, 25:139-163.
54. Patthey-Chavez G.G., Ferris D.R. Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English 1997, 31:51-90.
55. Qi D.S., Lapkin S. Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10:277-303.
56. Reid J. Eye learners and Ear learners: Identifying the language needs of international student and U.S. resident writers. Grammar in the composition classroom: Essays on teaching ESL for college-bound students 1998, 3-17. Heinle & Heinle, Boston. P. Byrd, J.M. Reid (Eds.).
57. Reynolds D. Beyond texts: A research agenda for quantitative research on second language writers and readers. Practicing theory in second language writing 2010, 159-175. Parlor Press, West Lafayette, IN. T. Silva, P.K. Matsuda (Eds.).
58. Roberge M.M. California's Generation 1.5 immigrants: What experiences, characteristics, and needs do they bring to our English classes?. CATESOL Journal 2002, 14:107-129.
59. Generation 1.5 in college composition 2009, Routledge, New York. M. Roberge, M. Siegal, L. Harklau (Eds.).
60. Santa T. Dead letters: Error in composition, 1873-2004 2006, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.
61. Sheen Y. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 2007, 41:255-283.
62. Sheen Y., Wright D., Moldawa A. Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 2009, 37:556-569.
63. Silva T. Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom 1990, 11-23. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Kroll (Ed.).
64. Storch N., Wigglesworth G. Learners' processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2010, 32:303-334.
65. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 1996, 46:327-369.
66. Truscott J. The case for the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8:111-122.
67. Truscott J. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:255-272.
68. Valdés G. Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized?. The Modern Language Journal 2005, 89:410-425.
69. van Beuningan C., de Jong N.H., Kuiken F. The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2008, 156:279-296.
70. van Beuningan C., de Jong N.H., Kuiken F. Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 2012, 62(1):1-41.
71. Williams J.M. The phenomenology of error. College Composition and Communication 1981, 32:152-168.