A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes

Nature

Volumn 560, Issue 7718, 2018, Pages 319-324

  Montoro, Daniel T ^a,b,c,d   Haber, Adam L ^d   Biton, Moshe ^b,d   Vinarsky, Vladimir ^a,b,c   Lin, Brian ^a,b,c   Birket, Susan E ^e,f   Yuan, Feng ^g   Chen, Sijia ^h   Leung, Hui Min ^b   Villoria, Jorge ^a,b,c   Rogel, Noga ^d   Burgin, Grace ^d   Tsankov, Alexander M ^d   Waghray, Avinash ^a,b,c,d   Slyper, Michal ^d   Waldman, Julia ^d   Nguyen, Lan ^d   Dionne, Danielle ^d   Rozenblatt Rosen, Orit ^d   Tata, Purushothama Rao ^i,j,k   Mou, Hongmei ^b   Shivaraju, Manjunatha ^a,b,c   Bihler, Hermann ^l   Mense, Martin ^l   Tearney, Guillermo J ^b   Rowe, Steven M ^e,f   Engelhardt, John F ^g   Regev, Aviv ^d,m   Rajagopal, Jayaraj ^a,b,c,d   more..

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^e University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

ⁱ DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^k DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics   (United States)

^m MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYSTIC FIBROSIS TRANSMEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE REGULATOR; CFTR PROTEIN, HUMAN; CFTR PROTEIN, MOUSE; FORKHEAD TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; FOXI1 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ASTHMA; CELL COMPONENT; DISEASE; GENE EXPRESSION; MUCUS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN; QUATERNARY; TURNOVER;

AIRWAY EPITHELIUM CELL; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CFTR GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOXI1 GENE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE KNOCKOUT; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GOBLET CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; MUCUS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PULMONARY IONOCYTE; RNA SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ASTHMA; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; CYTOLOGY; DEFICIENCY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; LUNG; MALE; METABOLISM; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; TRACHEA;

ANIMALS; ASTHMA; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; CYSTIC FIBROSIS TRANSMEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE REGULATOR; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; FORKHEAD TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GOBLET CELLS; HUMANS; LUNG; MALE; MICE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRACHEA;

EID: 85051624261     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0393-7     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Rock, J. R. et al. Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12771–12775 (2009)
2. Lump, A. Nunn’s Applied Respiratory Physiology, 8th edn (Elsevier, Edinburgh, 2016)
3. Ardini-Poleske, M. E. et al. LungMAP: The Molecular Atlas of Lung Development Program. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 313, L733–L740 (2017)
4. Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371–375 (2014)
5. Nabhan, A. N., Brownfield, D. G., Harbury, P. B., Krasnow, M. A. & Desai, T. J. Single-cell Wnt signaling niches maintain stemness of alveolar type 2 cells. Science 359, 1118–1123 (2018)
6. Zepp, J. A. et al. Distinct mesenchymal lineages and niches promote epithelial self-renewal and myofibrogenesis in the lung. Cell 170, 1134–1148 (2017)
7. Plasschaert, L. W. et al. A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte. Nature 10.1038/s41586-018-0394-6 (2018)
8. Quigley, I. K., Stubbs, J. L. & Kintner, C. Specification of ion transport cells in the Xenopus larval skin. Development 138, 705–714 (2011)
9. +-ATPase in the skin of zebrafish larvae. Dev. Biol. 329, 116–129 (2009)
10. Pardo-Saganta, A. et al. Parent stem cells can serve as niches for their daughter cells. Nature 523, 597–601 (2015)
11. Tsao, P.-N. et al. Epithelial Notch signaling regulates lung alveolar morphogenesis and airway epithelial integrity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8242–8247 (2016)
12. Sriuranpong, V. et al. Notch signaling induces rapid degradation of achaete-scute homolog 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 3129–3139 (2002)
13. Moriyama, M. et al. Multiple roles of Notch signaling in the regulation of epidermal development. Dev. Cell 14, 594–604 (2008)
14. Verzi, M. P., Khan, A. H., Ito, S. & Shivdasani, R. A. Transcription factor Foxq1 controls mucin gene expression and granule content in mouse stomach surface mucous cells. Gastroenterology 135, 591–600 (2008)
15. Li, M. J. et al. GWASdb v2: an update database for human genetic variants identified by genome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D869–D876 (2016)
16. Bochkov, Y. A. et al. Cadherin-related family member 3, a childhood asthma susceptibility gene product, mediates rhinovirus C binding and replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5485–5490 (2015)
17. Bansal, G., Xie, Z., Rao, S., Nocka, K. H. & Druey, K. M. Suppression of immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic responses by regulator of G protein signaling 13. Nat. Immunol. 9, 73–80 (2008)
18. Pardo-Saganta, A., Law, B. M., Gonzalez-Celeiro, M., Vinarsky, V. & Rajagopal, J. Ciliated cells of pseudostratified airway epithelium do not become mucous cells after ovalbumin challenge. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 48, 364–373 (2013)
19. Roy, M. G. et al. Muc5b is required for airway defence. Nature 505, 412–416 (2014)
20. Danahay, H. et al. Notch2 is required for inflammatory cytokine-driven goblet cell metaplasia in the lung. Cell Reports 10, 239–252 (2015)
21. Munitz, A., Brandt, E. B., Mingler, M., Finkelman, F. D. & Rothenberg, M. E. Distinct roles for IL-13 and IL-4 via IL-13 receptor α1 and the type II IL-4 receptor in asthma pathogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7240–7245 (2008)
22. Watson, J. K. et al. Clonal dynamics reveal two distinct populations of basal cells in slow-turnover airway epithelium. Cell Reports 12, 90–101 (2015)
23. Ng, F. S. P. et al. Annexin-1-deficient mice exhibit spontaneous airway hyperresponsiveness and exacerbated allergen-specific antibody responses in a mouse model of asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 41, 1793–1803 (2011)
24. Haber, A. L. et al. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature 551, 333–339 (2017)
25. Dixon, R. A. et al. Requirement of a 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein for leukotriene synthesis. Nature 343, 282–284 (1990)
26. + bacteria by M cells initiates mucosal immune response. Nature 462, 226–230 (2009)
27. 4 receptors as modulators of lung surfactant secretion. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 171 (2013)
28. Bergström, J. H. et al. Gram-positive bacteria are held at a distance in the colon mucus by the lectin-like protein ZG16. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13833–13838 (2016)
29. Vidarsson, H. et al. The forkhead transcription factor Foxi1 is a master regulator of vacuolar H-ATPase proton pump subunits in the inner ear, kidney and epididymis. PLoS ONE 4, e4471 (2009)
30. Jonz, M. G. & Nurse, C. A. Epithelial mitochondria-rich cells and associated innervation in adult and developing zebrafish. J. Comp. Neurol. 497, 817–832 (2006)
31. Hoegger, M. J. et al. Impaired mucus detachment disrupts mucociliary transport in a piglet model of cystic fibrosis. Science 345, 818–822 (2014)
32. Engelhardt, J. F. et al. Submucosal glands are the predominant site of CFTR expression in the human bronchus. Nat. Genet. 2, 240–248 (1992)
33. Py, B. F. et al. Cochlin produced by follicular dendritic cells promotes antibacterial innate immunity. Immunity 38, 1063–1072 (2013)
34. Birket, S. E. et al. A functional anatomic defect of the cystic fibrosis airway. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 190, 421–432 (2014)
35. Birket, S. E. et al. Development of an airway mucus defect in the cystic fibrosis rat. JCI Insight 3, e97199 (2018)
36. Tang, X. X. et al. Acidic pH increases airway surface liquid viscosity in cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 879–891 (2016)
37. Liu, L. et al. An autoregulatory mechanism governing mucociliary transport is sensitive to mucus load. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 51, 485–493 (2014)
38. Shah, V. S. et al. Airway acidification initiates host defense abnormalities in cystic fibrosis mice. Science 351, 503–507 (2016)
39. − conductances. J. Gen. Physiol. 120, 407–418 (2002)
40. Liu, X., Yan, Z., Luo, M. & Engelhardt, J. F. Species-specific differences in mouse and human airway epithelial biology of recombinant adeno-associated virus transduction. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 34, 56–64 (2006)
41. Sun, X. et al. Disease phenotype of a ferret CFTR-knockout model of cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 3149–3160 (2010)
42. McCarron, A., Donnelley, M. & Parsons, D. Airway disease phenotypes in animal models of cystic fibrosis. Respir. Res. 19, 54 (2018)
43. Ostrowski, L. E. et al. Expression of CFTR from a ciliated cell-specific promoter is ineffective at correcting nasal potential difference in CF mice. Gene Ther. 14, 1492–1501 (2007)
44. Regev, A. et al. Science Forum: The Human Cell Atlas. eLife 6, e27041 (2017)
45. + Clara cells in the long-term maintenance and repair of lung airway, but not alveolar, epithelium. Cell Stem Cell 4, 525–534 (2009)
46. Salic, A. & Mitchison, T. J. A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo. P roc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2415–2420 (2008)
47. Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171–181 (2014)
48. Liu, L. et al. Method for quantitative study of airway functional microanatomy using micro-optical coherence tomography. PLoS ONE 8, e54473 (2013)
49. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012)
50. Birket, S. E. et al. Combination therapy with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators augment the airway functional microanatomy. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 310, L928–L939 (2016)
51. Mou, H. et al. Dual SMAD signaling inhibition enables long-term expansion of diverse epithelial basal cells. Cell Stem Cell 19, 217–231 (2016)
52. Konermann, S. et al. Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR–Cas9 complex. Nature 517, 583–588 (2015)
53. Yan, Z. et al. Optimization of recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated expression for large transgenes, using a synthetic promoter and tandem array enhancers. Hum. Gene Ther. 26, 334–346 (2015)
54. Brennecke, P. et al. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods 10, 1093–1095 (2013)
55. Johnson, W. E., Li, C. & Rabinovic, A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics 8, 118–127 (2007)
56. Leek, J. T., Johnson, W. E., Parker, H. S., Jaffe, A. E. & Storey, J. D. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 882–883 (2012)
57. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009)
58. Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011)
59. Buja, A. & Eyuboglu, N. Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behav. Res. 27, 509–540 (1992)
60. Van Der Maaten, L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3221–3245 (2014)
61. van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008)
62. Rosvall, M. & Bergstrom, C. T. Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1118–1123 (2008)
63. Levine, J. H. et al. Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell 162, 184–197 (2015)
64. Shekhar, K. et al. Comprehensive classification of retinal bipolar neurons by single-cell transcriptomics. Cell 166, 1308–1323 (2016)
65. fgsea: Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. (Computer Technologies Laboratory, 2018)
66. Coifman, R. R. et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: multiscale methods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7432–7437 (2005)
67. Zhang, H.-M. et al. AnimalTFDB: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D144–D149 (2012)
68. Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14 (2010)
69. Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740 (2011)
70. Haghverdi, L., Buettner, F. & Theis, F. J. Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data. Bioinformatics 31, 2989–2998 (2015)
71. Buettner, F. et al. Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 155–160 (2015)
72. Gelman, A & Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/hierarchical Models (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2007)
73. Schwarzer, G et al. (eds) Meta-Analysis with R (Springer, New York, 2015)
74. Koenker, R. & Hallock, K. F. Quantile regression. J. Econ. Perspect. 15, 143–156 (2001)
75. Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J. & Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Simoudis E. et al. eds) 226–231 (AAAI, 1996)
76. Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015)
77. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 57, 289–300