Adaptation of s. Cerevisiae to fermented food environments reveals remarkable genome plasticity and the footprints of domestication

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 1712-1727

  Legras, Jean Luc ^a   Galeote, Virginie ^a   Bigey, Frederic ^a   Camarasa, Carole ^a   Marsit, Souhir ^a   Nidelet, Thibault ^a   Sanchez, Isabelle ^b   Couloux, Arnaud ^c   Guy, Julie ^c   Franco Duarte, Ricardo ^d   Marcet Houben, Marina ^e,f   Gabaldon, Toni ^e,f,g   Schuller, Dorit ^d   Sampaio, Jose Paulo ^h   Dequin, Sylvie ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b UMR 729 MISTEA   (France)

^c CENTRE NATIONAL DE SÉQUENÇAGE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^e BARCELONA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^g INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^h UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Domestication; Horizontal gene transfer; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sweep

Indexed keywords

GALACTOSE;

AMINO ACID TRANSPORT; ARTICLE; BAKERY PRODUCT; CHEESE; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DAIRY PRODUCT; DOMESTICATION; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FERMENTED PRODUCT; FLOR; FOOD; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOME PLASTICITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; INTROGRESSION; LIFE CYCLE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; METABOLITE; NONHUMAN; OAK; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE; POPULATION GENETICS; RUM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTIVE SWEEP; WINE; ADAPTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FERMENTATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DOMESTICATION; FERMENTATION; FERMENTED FOODS; GENE TRANSFER, HORIZONTAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85049474062     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy066     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Akao T, Yashiro I, Hosoyama A, Kitagaki H, Horikawa H, Watanabe D, Akada R, Ando Y, Harashima S, Inoue T, et al. 2011. Whole-genome sequencing of sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7. DNA Res. 18(6):423–434.
2. Alachiotis N, Stamatakis A, Pavlidis P. 2012. OmegaPlus: a scalable tool for rapid detection of selective sweeps in whole-genome datasets. Bioinformatics 28(17):2274–2275.
3. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. 2009. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19(9):1655–1664.
4. Almeida P, Barbosa R, Bensasson D, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP. 2017. Adaptive divergence in wine yeasts and their wild relatives suggests a prominent role for introgressions and rapid evolution at noncod-ing sites. Mol Ecol. 26(7):2167–2182.
5. Almeida P, Barbosa R, Zalar P, Imanishi Y, Shimizu K, Turchetti B, Legras J-L, Serra M, Dequin S, Couloux A, et al. 2015. A population genomics insight into the Mediterranean origins of wine yeast domestication. Mol Ecol. 24(21):5412–5427.
6. Argueso JL, Carazzolle MF, Mieczkowski PA, Duarte FM, Netto OVC, Missawa SK, Galzerani F, Costa GGL, Vidal RO, Noronha MF, et al. 2009. Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res. 19(12):2258–2270.
7. Badouin H, Gladieux P, Gouzy J, Siguenza S, Aguileta G, Snirc A, Le Prieur S, Jeziorski C, Branca A, Giraud T. 2017. Widespread selective sweeps throughout the genome of model plant pathogenic fungi and identification of effector candidates. Mol Ecol. 26(7):2041–2062.
8. Baker E, Wang B, Bellora N, Peris D, Hulfachor AB, Koshalek JA, Adams M, Libkind D, Hittinger CT. 2015. The genome sequence of Saccharomyces eubayanus and the domestication of Lager-Brewing yeasts. Mol Biol Evol. 32(11):2818–2831.
9. Bely M, Sablayrolles J-M, Barre P. 1990. Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in oenological conditions. J Ferment Bioeng. 70(4):246–252.
10. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 57:289–300.
11. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Genome analysis Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15):2114–2120.
12. Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ. 2011. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 7(2):e1001287.
13. Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ. 2008. Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 8(7):1185–1195.
14. Brice C, Cubillos FA, Dequin S, Camarasa C, Martınez C. 2018. Adaptability of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts to wine fermentation conditions relies on their strong ability to consume nitrogen. PLoS One 13(2):e0192383.
15. Browning SR, Browning BL. 2007. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 81(5):1084–1097.
16. Camarasa C, Sanchez I, Brial P, Bigey F, Dequin S. 2011. Phenotypic landscape of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation: evidence for origin-dependent metabolic traits. PLoS One 6(9):e25147.
17. Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martınez JM, Gabaldon T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25(15):1972–1973.
18. Coi AL, Bigey F, Mallet S, Marsit S, Zara G, Gladieux P, Galeote V, Budroni M, Dequin S, Legras JL. 2017. Genomic signatures of adaptation to wine biological ageing conditions in biofilm-forming flor yeasts. Mol Ecol. 38:42–49.
19. Crepin L, Nidelet T, Sanchez I, Dequin S, Camarasa C. 2012. Sequential use of nitrogen compounds by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation: a model based on kinetic and regulation characteristics of nitrogen permeases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 78(22):8102–8111.
20. Cromie GA, Hyma KE, Ludlow CL, Garmendia-Torres C, Gilbert TL, May P, Huang A. A, Dudley AM, Fay JC. 2013. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 (Bethesda) 3(12):2163–2171.
21. Dugat-Bony E, Straub C, Teissandier A, Onesime D, Loux V, Monnet C, Irlinger F, Landaud S, Leclercq-Perlat M-N, Bento P, et al. 2015. Overview of a surface-ripened cheese community functioning by meta-omics analyses. PLoS One 10(4):e0124360.
22. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea TL, Adams J, Brown PO, Rosenzweig F, Botstein D. 2002. Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99(25):16144–16149.
23. Dunn B, Richter C, Kvitek DJ, Pugh T, Sherlock G. 2012. Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments. Genome Res. 22(5):908–924.
24. Engel SR, Cherry JM. 2013. The new modern era of yeast genomics: community sequencing and the resulting annotation of multiple Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains at the Saccharomyces Genome Database. Database (Oxford) 2013:bat012.
25. Enjalbert J, David JL. 2000. Inferring recent outcrossing rates using multilocus individual heterozygosity: application to evolving wheat populations. Genetics 156(4):1973–1982.
26. Fariello MI, Boitard S, Naya H, SanCristobal M, Servin B. 2013. Detecting signatures of selection through haplotype differentiation among hierarchically structured populations. Genetics 193(3):929–941.
27. Fay JC, Benavides JA. 2005. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1(1):66–71.
28. Fay JC, Wu CI. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155(3):1405–1413.
29. Freedman AH, Lohmueller KE, Wayne RK. 2016. Evolutionary history, selective sweeps, and deleterious variation in the dog. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 47(1):73–96.
30. Galeote V, Bigey F, Beyne E, Novo M, Legras J-L, Casaregola S, Dequin S. 2011. Amplification of a Zygosaccharomyces bailii DNA segment in wine yeast genomes by extrachromosomal circular DNA formation. PLoS One 6(3):e17872.
31. Galeote V, Novo M, Salema-Oom M, Brion C, Valerio E, Gonçalves P, Dequin S. 2010. FSY1, a horizontally transferred gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 wine yeast strain, encodes a high-affinity fructose/Hþ symporter. Microbiology 156(Pt 12):3754–3761.
32. Gallone B, Steensels J, Prahl T, Soriaga L, Saels V, Herrera-Malaver B, Merlevede A, Roncoroni M, Voordeckers K, Miraglia L, et al. 2016. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 166(6):1397–1410.e16.
33. Gao F, Ming C, Hu W, Li H. 2016. New software for the fast estimation of population recombination rates (FastEPRR) in the genomic era. G3 (Bethesda) 6(6):1563–1571.
34. Gautier M, Vitalis R. 2012. rehh: an R package to detect footprints of selection in genome-wide SNP data from haplotype structure. Bioinformatics 28(8):1176–1177.
35. Gibbons JG, Rinker DC. 2015. The genomics of microbial domestication in the fermented food environment. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 35:1–8.
36. Gibbons JG, Salichos L, Slot JC, Rinker DC, McGary KL, King JG, Klich MA, Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Rokas A. 2012. The evolutionary imprint of domestication on genome variation and function of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Curr Biol. 22(15): 1403–1409.
37. Gladieux P, Ropars J, Badouin H, Branca A, Aguileta G, de Vienne DM, Rodrıguez de la Vega RC, Branco S, Giraud T. 2014. Fungal evolutionary genomics provides insight into the mechanisms of adaptive divergence in eukaryotes. Mol Ecol. 23(4):753–773.
38. Gladman S, Seeman T. 2012. velvet optimiser. Available from: http://www.vicbioinformatics.com/software.velvetoptimiser.shtml, last accessed March 1, 2018.
39. Goddard MR, Godfray HCJ, Burt A. 2005. Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434(7033):636–640.
40. Goddard MR, Greig D. 2015. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche? FEMS Yeast Res. 15(3):1–6.
41. Goel M, Khanna P, Kishore J. 2010. Understanding survival analysis: Kaplan–Meier estimate. Int J Ayurveda Res. 1(4):274–278.
42. Guillaume C, Delobel P, Sablayrolles J-M, Blondin B. 2007. Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 73(8):2432–2439.
43. Hellenthal G, Busby GBJ, Band G, Wilson JF, Capelli C, Falush D, Myers S. 2014. A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Science 343(6172):747–751.
44. Hudson RR. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18(2):337–338.
45. Huerta-Cepas J, Capella-Gutierrez S, Pryszcz LP, Denisov I, Kormes D, Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldon T. 2011. PhylomeDB v3.0: an expanding repository of genome-wide collections of trees, alignments and phylogeny-based orthology and paralogy predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(Database):D556–D560.
46. Huerta-Cepas J, Serra F, Bork P. 2016. ETE 3: Reconstruction, Analysis, and Visualization of Phylogenomic Data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33:1635–1638.
47. Hussin J, Nadeau P, Lefebvre J-F, Labuda D. 2010. Haplotype allelic classes for detecting ongoing positive selection. BMC Bioinformatics 11:65.
48. Katoh K, Kuma KI, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(2):511–518.
49. Kondrashov FA. 2012. Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 279(1749):5048–5057.
50. Kowallik V, Miller E, Greig D. 2015. The interaction of Saccharomyces paradoxus with its natural competitors on oak bark. Mol Ecol. 24(7):1596–1610.
51. Kuang MC, Hutchins PD, Russell JD, Coon JJ, Hittinger CT. 2016. Ongoing resolution of duplicate gene functions shapes the diversification of a metabolic network. Elife 5:1–28.
52. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5(2):R12.
53. Landan G, Graur D. 2007. Heads or tails: a simple reliability check for multiple sequence alignments. Mol Biol Evol. 24(6):1380–1383.
54. Lassmann T, Sonnhammer ELL. 2005. Kalign – an accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 6(1):298–299.
55. Lawson DJ, Hellenthal G, Myers S, Falush D. 2012. Inference of population structure using dense haplotype data. PLoS Genet. 8(1):e1002453.
56. Lê Cao K, Boitard S, Besse P. 2011. Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for mul-ticlass problems. BMC Bioinformatics 12:253.
57. Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. 25(1):1–18.
58. Lee T-H, Guo H, Wang X, Kim C, Paterson AH. 2014. SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data. BMC Genomics 15:162.
59. Legras J-L, Erny C, Charpentier C. 2014. Population structure and comparative genome hybridization of European Flor yeast reveal a unique group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with few gene duplications in their genome. PLoS One 9(10):e108089.
60. Legras J-L, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet J-M, Karst F. 2007. Bread, beer and wine: saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol. 16(10):2091–2102.
61. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760.
62. Liti G, Barton DBH, Louis EJ. 2006. Sequence diversity, reproductive isolation and species concepts in Saccharomyces. Genetics 174(2):839–850.
63. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, James SA, Davey RP, Roberts IN, Burt A, Koufopanou V, et al. 2009. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458(7236):337–341.
64. Liti G, Nguyen Ba AN, Blythe M, Müller CA, Bergström A, Cubillos FA, Dafhnis-Calas F, Khoshraftar S, Malla S, Mehta N, et al. 2013. High quality de novo sequencing and assembly of the Saccharomyces arboricolus genome. BMC Genomics 14:69.
65. Magwene PM, Kayıkçı O, Granek J. A, Reininga JM, Scholl Z, Murray D. 2011. Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(5):1987–1992.
66. Marsit S, Dequin S. 2015. Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review. FEMS Yeast Res. 32:1695–1707.
67. Marsit S, Mena A, Bigey F, Sauvage F-X, Couloux A, Guy J, Legras J-L, Barrio E, Dequin S, Galeote V. 2015. Evolutionary advantage conferred by an eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer event in wine yeasts. Mol Biol Evol. 32(7):1695–1707.
68. Marsit S, Sanchez I, Galeote V, Dequin S. 2016. Horizontally acquired oligopeptide transporters favour adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast to oenological environment. Environ Microbiol. 18(4):1148–1161.
69. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, et al. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20(9):1297–1303.
70. Mendes I, Franco-duarte R, Umek L, Fonseca E, Drumonde-Neves J, Dequin S, Zupan B, Schuler D. 2013. Computational models for prediction of yeast strain potential for winemaking from phenotypic profiles. PLoS One 8(7):e66523.
71. Morales L, Dujon B. 2012. Evolutionary role of interspecies hybridization and genetic exchanges in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 76(4):721–739.
72. Moran NA. 2002. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell 108:583–586.
73. Morran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC, Lively CM. 2011. Running with the Red Queen: host-parasite coevolution selects for biparental sex. Science 333(6039):216–218.
74. Muller LAH, McCusker JH. 2009. A multispecies-based taxonomic mi-croarray reveals interspecies hybridization and introgression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 9(1):143–152.
75. Murphy H. A, Zeyl CW. 2010. Yeast sex: surprisingly high rates of outcrossing between Asci. PLoS One 5(5):e10461.
76. Ness F, Aigle M. 1995. RTM1: a member of a new family of telomeric repeated genes in yeast. Genetics 140(3):945–956.
77. Ng PC, Henikoff S. 2001. Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res. 11:863–874. t
78. Nidelet T, Brial P, Camarasa C, Dequin S. 2016. Diversity of flux distribution in central carbon metabolism of S. cerevisiae strains from diverse environments. Microb Cell Fact. 15:58.
79. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E, Galeote V, Gavory F, Mallet S, Cambon B, Legras J-L, Wincker P, Casaregola S, et al. 2009. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(38):16333–16338.
80. Pfeifer B, Wittelsbürger U, Ramos-Onsins SE, Lercher MJ. 2014. PopGenome: an efficient Swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Mol Biol Evol. 31(7):1929–1936.
81. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, et al. 2007. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 81(3):559–575.
82. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26(6):841–842.
83. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Found. Stat. Comput. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
84. Renaut S, Rieseberg LH. 2015. The accumulation of deleterious mutations as a consequence of domestication and improvement in sunflowers and other compositae crops. Mol Biol Evol. 32(9):2273–2283.
85. Rollero S, Bloem A, Camarasa C, Sanchez I, Ortiz-Julien A, Sablayrolles J, Dequin S, Mouret J. 2015. Combined effects of nutrients and temperature on the production of fermentative aromas by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 99(5):2291–2304.
86. Roop JI, Chang KC, Brem RB. 2016. Polygenic evolution of a sugar specialization trade-off in yeast. Nature 530(7590):336–339.
87. Ross-Ibarra J, Morrell PL, Gaut BS. 2007. Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104(suppl 1):8641–8648.
88. Ruderfer DM, Pratt SC, Seidel HS, Kruglyak L. 2006. Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat Genet. 38(9):1077–1081.
89. Scannell DR, Zill O. A, Rokas A, Payen C, Dunham MJ, Eisen MB, Rine J, Johnston M, Hittinger CT. 2011. The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus. G3 (Bethesda) 1(1):11–25.
90. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17(12):1246–1247.
91. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9):1312–1313.
92. Strope PK, Skelly D. A, Kozmin SG, Mahadevan G, Stone E. A, Magwene PM, Dietrich FS, McCusker JH. 2015. The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res. 25(5):762–774.
93. Therneau T. 2014. A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.37-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival, last accessed March 1, 2018.
94. Tsai IJ, Bensasson D, Burt A, Koufopanou V. 2008. Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: quantifying the life cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105(12):4957–4962.
95. Vatsiou AI, Bazin E, Gaggiotti OE. 2016. Detection of selective sweeps in structured populations: a comparison of recent methods. Mol Ecol. 25(1):89–103.
96. Vitti JJ, Grossman SR, Sabeti PC. 2013. Detecting natural selection in genomic data. Annu Rev Genet. 47:97–120.
97. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen X, Pritchard JK. 2006. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 4(3):e72–0458.
98. Wallace IM, O’Sullivan O, Higgins DG, Notredame C. 2006. M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(6):1692–1699.
99. Warringer J, Zörgö E, Cubillos FA, Zia A, Gjuvsland A, Simpson JT, Forsmark A, Durbin R, Omholt SW, Louis EJ, et al. 2011. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 7(6):e1002111.
100. Wei W, McCusker JH, Hyman RW, Jones T, Ning Y, Cao Z, Gu Z, Bruno D, Miranda M, Nguyen M, et al. 2007. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104(31):12825–12830.
101. Yvon M, Rijnen L. 2001. Flavour formation by amino acid catabolism. Int Dairy J. 11(4–7):185–201.
102. Zeng K, Fu YX, Shi S, Wu CI. 2006. Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants. Genetics 174(3):1431–1439.
103. Zhu YO, Siegal ML, Hall DW, Petrov D. a. 2014. Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(22):E2310–E2318.
104. Zörgö E, Gjuvsland A, Cubillos F. A, Louis EJ, Liti G, Blomberg A, Omholt SW, Warringer J. 2012. Life history shapes trait heredity by accumulation of loss-of-function alleles in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 29(7):1781–1789.