Diversity of flux distribution in central carbon metabolism of S. cerevisiae strains from diverse environments

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Nidelet, Thibault ^a   Brial, Pascale ^a   Camarasa, Carole ^a   Dequin, Sylvie ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Diversity; Flux balance analysis; Metabolic flux; Modeling; S. cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ACETALDEHYDE; GLUTAMATE DEHYDROGENASE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; CARBON;

ALCOHOL METABOLISM; ARTICLE; CARBON METABOLISM; CELL SIZE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE; FUNGAL BIOMASS; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GLYCOLYSIS; HEREDITY; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NONHUMAN; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE CYCLE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STEADY STATE; WINE; ADAPTATION; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; CARBON; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; GLYCOLYSIS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MICROBIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE PATHWAY; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 85007500885     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0456-0     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Nielsen J. It is all about metabolic fluxes. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:7031-5.
2. Wiechert W. 13C metabolic flux analysis. Metab Eng. 2001;3:195-206.
3. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ. What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:245-8.
4. Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:119.
5. Burgard AP, Maranas CD. Optimization-based framework for inferring and testing hypothesized metabolic objective functions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003;82:670-7.
6. García Sánchez CE, Torres Sáez RG, CE. Comparison and analysis of objective functions in flux balance analysis. Biotechnol Prog. 2014;30:985-91.
7. Ramakrishna R, Edwards JS, McCulloch A, Palsson BO. Flux-balance analysis of mitochondrial energy metabolism: consequences of systemic stoichiometric constraints. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001;280:R695-704.
8. Segrè D, Vitkup D, Church GM. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:15112-7.
9. Celton M, Goelzer A, Camarasa C, Fromion V, Dequin S. A constraint-based model analysis of the metabolic consequences of increased NADPH oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2012;14:366-79.
10. Kauffman KJ, Prakash P, Edwards JS. Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003;14:491-6.
11. Feist AM, Palsson BO. The biomass objective function. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13:344-9 (Ecology and industrial microbiology special section: systems biology).
12. Celton M, Sanchez I, Goelzer A, Fromion V, Camarasa C, Dequin S. A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation. BMC Genom. 2012;13:317.
13. Quirós M, Martínez-Moreno R, Albiol J, Morales P, Vázquez-Lima F, Barreiro-Vázquez A, Ferrer P, Gonzalez R. Metabolic flux analysis during the exponential growth phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in wine fermentations. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71909.
14. Kerkhoven EJ, Lahtvee P-J, Nielsen J. Applications of computational modeling in metabolic engineering of yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;15:1-13.
15. Oberhardt MA, Palsson BØ, Papin JA. Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions. Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:320.
16. österlund T, Nookaew I, Nielsen J. Fifteen years of large scale metabolic modeling of yeast: developments and impacts. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:979-88.
17. Blank LM, Lehmbeck F, Sauer U. Metabolic-flux and network analysis in fourteen hemiascomycetous yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005;5:545-58.
18. Velagapudi VR, Wittmann C, Schneider K, Heinzle E. Metabolic flux screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae single knockout strains on glucose and galactose supports elucidation of gene function. J Biotechnol. 2007;132:395-404 (In Memoriam W.-D. Deckwer: merging process engineering and systems biology).
19. Patil KR, Nielsen J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:2685-9.
20. Agren R, Otero JM, Nielsen J. Genome-scale modeling enables metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for succinic acid production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40:735-47.
21. Bro C, Regenberg B, Förster J, Nielsen J. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metab Eng. 2006;8:102-11.
22. Otero JM, Cimini D, Patil KR, Poulsen SG, Olsson L, Nielsen J. Industrial systems biology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae enables novel succinic acid cell factory. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54144.
23. Bundy JG, Papp B, Harmston R, Browne RA, Clayson EM, Burton N, Reece RJ, Oliver SG, Brindle KM. Evaluation of predicted network modules in yeast metabolism using NMR-based metabolite profiling. Genome Res. 2007;17:510-9.
24. Cannizzaro C, Christensen B, Nielsen J, von Stockar U. Metabolic network analysis on Phaffia rhodozyma yeast using 13C-labeled glucose and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Metab Eng. 2004;6:340-51.
25. Fiaux J, çakar ZP, Sonderegger M, Wüthrich K, Szyperski T, Sauer U. Metabolic-flux profiling of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. Eukaryot Cell. 2003;2:170-80.
26. Christen S, Sauer U. Intracellular characterization of aerobic glucose metabolism in seven yeast species by 13C flux analysis and metabolomics. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011;11:263-72.
27. Fay JC, Benavides JA. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:e5.
28. Legras J-L, Ruh O, Merdinoglu D, Karst F. Selection of hypervariable microsatellite loci for the characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;102:73-83.
29. Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet J, Karst F. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:2091-102.
30. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, James SA, Davey RP, Roberts IN, Burt A, Koufopanou V. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature. 2009;458:337-41.
31. Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2009;458:342-5.
32. Cromie GA, Hyma KE, Ludlow CL, Garmendiatorres C, Gilbert TL, May P, Huang AA, Dudley AM, Fay JC. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 Gene Genom Genet. 2013;3:2163-71.
33. Warringer J, Zörgö E, Cubillos FA, Zia A, Gjuvsland A, Simpson JT, Forsmark A, Durbin R, Omholt SW, Louis EJ, Liti G, Moses A, Blomberg A. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002111.
34. Strope PK, Skelly DA, Kozmin SG, Mahadevan G, Stone EA, Magwene PM, Dietrich FS, McCusker JH. The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res. 2015;25:762-74.
35. Spor A, Nidelet T, Simon J, Bourgais A, de Vienne D, Sicard D. Nichedriven evolution of metabolic and life-history strategies in natural and domesticated populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:296.
36. Camarasa C, Sanchez I, Brial P, Bigey F, Dequin S. Phenotypic landscape of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation: evidence for origindependent metabolic traits. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25147.
37. Barbosa C, Lage P, Vilela A, Mendes-Faia A, Mendes-Ferreira A. Phenotypic and metabolic traits of commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts. AMB Express. 2014;4:39.
38. Mukherjee V, Steensels J, Lievens B, de Voorde IV, Verplaetse A, Aerts G, Willems KA, Thevelein JM, Verstrepen KJ, Ruyters S. Phenotypic evaluation of natural and industrial Saccharomyces yeasts for different traits desirable in industrial bioethanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:9483-98.
39. Marsit S, Dequin S. Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15:67.
40. Reed JL, Palsson BØ. Genome-scale in silico models of E. coli have multiple equivalent phenotypic states: assessment of correlated reaction subsets that comprise network states. Genome Res. 2004;14:1797-805.
41. Heavner BD, Smallbone K, Price ND, Walker LP. Version 6 of the consensus yeast metabolic network refines biochemical coverage and improves model performance. Database. 2013;2013:bat059.
42. Heux S, Cadiere A, Dequin S. Glucose utilization of strains lacking PGI1 and expressing a transhydrogenase suggests differences in the pentose phosphate capacity among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:217-24.
43. Heyland J, Fu J, Blank LM. Correlation between TCA cycle flux and glucose uptake rate during respiro-fermentative growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 2009;155:3827-37.
44. Cadière A, Ortiz-Julien A, Camarasa C, Dequin S. Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway. Metab Eng. 2011;13:263-71.
45. Dequin S. The potential of genetic engineering for improving brewing, wine-making and baking yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;56:577-88.
46. Donalies UEB, Nguyen HTT, Stahl U, Nevoigt E. Improvement of Saccharomyces Yeast Strains Used in Brewing, Wine Making and Baking. In: Stahl U, Donalies UEB, Nevoigt E, editors. Food Biotechnology. Springer: Berlin; 2008 p. 67-98 (Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, vol. 111).
47. Husnik JI, Volschenk H, Bauer J, Colavizza D, Luo Z, van Vuuren HJJ. Metabolic engineering of malolactic wine yeast. Metab Eng. 2006;8:315-23.
48. Schuller D, Casal M. The use of genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in the wine industry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;68:292-304.
49. Ehsani M, Fernández MR, Biosca JA, Julien A, Dequin S. Engineering of 2,3-Butanediol dehydrogenase to reduce acetoin formation by glyceroloverproducing, low-alcohol Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:3196-205.
50. Kutyna DR, Varela C, Stanley GA, Borneman AR, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ. Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;93:1175-84.
51. Steensels J, Snoek T, Meersman E, Nicolino MP, Voordeckers K, Verstrepen KJ. Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38:947-95.
52. Varela C, Kutyna DR, Solomon MR, Black CA, Borneman A, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ. Evaluation of gene modification strategies for the development of low-alcohol-wine yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:6068-77.
53. Michnick S, Roustan J-L, Remize F, Barre P, Dequin S. Modulation of glycerol and ethanol yields during alcoholic fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains overexpressed or disrupted for GPD1 encoding glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Yeast. 1997;13:783-93.
54. Tilloy V, Ortiz-Julien A, Dequin S. Reducing ethanol and improving glycerol yield by adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast under hyperosmotic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014. doi:10.1128/AEM.03710-13.
55. Eglinton JM, Heinrich AJ, Pollnitz AP, Langridge P, Henschke PA, de Barros Lopes M. Decreasing acetic acid accumulation by a glycerol overproducing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by deleting the ALD6 aldehyde dehydrogenase gene. Yeast. 2002;19:295-301.
56. Remize F, Andrieu E, Dequin S. Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the cytosolic Mg2 + and mitochondrial K + acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:3151-9.
57. Nevoigt E, Stahl U. Reduced pyruvate decarboxylase and increased glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD +] levels enhance glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1996;12:1331-7.
58. Noble J, Sanchez I, Blondin B. Identification of new Saccharomyces cerevisiae variants of the MET2 and SKP2 genes controlling the sulfur assimilation pathway and the production of undesirable sulfur compounds during alcoholic fermentation. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:1-16.
59. Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming RMT, Thiele I, Orth JD, Feist AM, Zielinski DC, Bordbar A, Lewis NE, Rahmanian S, Kang J, Hyduke DR, Palsson BØ. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:1290-307.
60. Racine JS, RStudio. A Platform-Independent IDE for R and Sweave. J Appl Econom. 2012;27:167-72.