Population structure and comparative genome hybridization of European flor yeast reveal a unique group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with few gene duplications in their genome

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Legras, Jean Luc ^a,b,c   Erny, Claude ^d   Charpentier, Claudine ^e  

^a SPO   (France)

^b MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^c UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE HAUTE ALSACE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

UNTRANSLATED RNA; FLO11 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MICROSATELLITE DNA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLOIDY; EUROPE; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MCH2 GENE; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NONHUMAN; PLOIDY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WILD TYPE; YEAST; YKL221W GENE; YKL222C GENE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENE DELETION; GENE LOCUS; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BASE SEQUENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC LOCI; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOMICS; MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEINS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE DELETION;

EID: 84907494489     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108089     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Cortes MB, Moreno JJ, Zea L, Moyano L., Medina M. (1998) Changes in Aroma compounds of Sherry wines during their Biological Aging carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae races bayanus and capensis. J Agric Food Chem 46: 2389-2394.
2. Thuy PT, Elisabeth G, Pascal S., Claudine C. (1995) Optimal Conditions for the Formation of Sotolon from.alpha.-Ketobutyric Acid in the French "Vin Jaune." J Agric Food Chem 43: 2616-2619.
3. Collin S, Nizet S, Claeys Bouuaert T, Despatures P-M (2012) Main odorants in Jura flor-sherry wines. Relative contributions of sotolon, abhexon, and theaspirane-derived compounds. J Agric Food Chem 60: 380-387.
4. Pozo-Bayon MA, Moreno-Arribas MV (2011) Sherry wines. Adv Food Nutr Res 63: 17-40.
5. Esteve-Zarzoso B, Fernández-Espinar MT, Querol A (2004) Authentication and identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae "flor" yeast races involved in sherry ageing. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 85: 151-158.
6. Naumova ES, Ivannikova YV, Naumov G.I. (2005) Genetic differentiation of the sherry yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Microbiol 41: 578-582.
7. Sancho ED, Hernandez E, Rodriguez-Navarro A (1986) Presumed Sexual Isolation in Yeast Populations during Production of Sherrylike Wine. Appl Environ Microbiol 51: 395-397.
8. Charpentier C, Colin A, Alais A., Legras J-L (2009) French Jura flor yeasts: genotype and technological diversity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 95: 263-273.
9. Mesa JJ, Infante JJ, Rebordinos L, Cantoral J.M. (1999) Characterization of Yeasts Involved in the Biological Ageing of Sherry Wines. Leb Wiss und Technol 32: 114-120.
10. Budroni M, Giordano G, Pinna G., Farris G.A. (2000) A genetic study of natural flor strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated during biological ageing from Sardinian wines. J Appl Microbiol 89: 657-662.
11. Martínez P, Codón AC, Pérez L, Benítez T (1995) Physiological and molecular characterization of flor yeasts: polymorphism of flor yeast populations. Yeast 11: 1399-1411.
12. Infante JJ, Dombek KM, Rebordinos L, Cantoral J.M., Young E.T. (2003) Genome-wide amplifications caused by chromosomal rearrangements play a major role in the adaptive evolution of natural yeast. Genetics 165: 1745-1759.
13. Guijo S, Mauricio JC, Salmon J.M., Ortega J.M. (1997) Determination of the relative ploidy in different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for fermentation and "flor" film ageing of dry sherry-type wines. Yeast 13: 101-117.
14. Adams J, Puskas-Rozsa S, Simlar J., Wilke C.M. (1992) Adaptation and major chromosomal changes in populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 22: 13-19.
15. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea T.L., Adams J., Brown PO, et al. (2002) Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharo-myces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16144-16149.
16. Zara S, Antonio Farris G, Budroni M, Bakalinsky A.T. (2002) HSP12 is essential for biofilm formation by a Sardinian wine strain of S. cerevisiae. Yeast 19: 269-276.
17. Ishigami M, Nakagawa Y, Hayakawa M., Iimura Y. (2004) FLO11 is essential for flor formation caused by the C-terminal deletion of NRG1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 237: 425-430.
18. Fidalgo M, Barrales RR, Ibeas J.I., Jimenez J. (2006) Adaptive evolution by mutations in the FLO11 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 11228-11233.
19. Zara S, Bakalinsky AT, Zara G, Pirino G., Demontis MA, et al. (2005) FLO11-based model for air-liquid interfacial biofilm formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 2934-2939.
20. Bumgarner SL, Dowell RD, Grisafi P, Gifford D.K., Fink G.R. (2009) Toggle involving cis-interfering noncoding RNAs controls variegated gene expression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18321-18326.
21. Fornachon JC (1953) Studies on the sherry flor. Australian Wine Board A, editor Adelaide.
22. Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet J.M., Karst F. (2007) Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol 16: 2091-2102.
23. Legras JL, Karst F. (2003) Optimisation of interdelta analysis for Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain characterisation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 221: 249-255.
24. Takezaki N, Nei M. (1996) Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144: 389-399.
25. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N., Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739.
26. Gao H, Williamson S, Bustamante C.D. (2007) A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach for joint inference of population structure and inbreeding rates from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 176: 1635-1651.
27. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna, Austria ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
28. Winzeler EA, Richards DR, Conway A.R., Goldstein AL, Kalman S, et al. (1998) Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. Science 281: 1194-1197.
29. Liu W, Mei R, Di X., Ryder TB, Hubbell E, et al. (2002) Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithms. Bioinformatics 18: 1593-1599.
30. Venkatraman ES, Olshen A.B. (2007) A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23: 657-663.
31. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown P.O., Botstein D. (1998) Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 14863-14868.
32. Nogales-Cadenas R, Carmona-Saez P, Vazquez M., Vicente C, Yang X, et al. (2009) GeneCodis: interpreting gene lists through enrichment analysis and integration of diverse biological information. Nucleic Acids Res 37: W317-22.
33. Erny C, Raoult P, Alais A., Butterlin G, Delobel P, et al. (2012) Ecological Success of a Group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/Saccharomyces kudriavzevii Hybrids in the Northern European Wine-Making Environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 3256-3265.
34. Delobel P, Tesnière C (2014) A Simple FCM Method to Avoid Misinterpretation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Cycle Assessment between G0 and Sub-G1. PLoS One 9: e84645.
35. Haase SB, Reed S.I. (2002) Improved flow cytometric analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. Cell Cycle 1: 132-136.
36. Stefanini I, Dapporto L, Legras J-L, Calabretta A, Di Paola M, et al. (2012) Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 13398-13403.
37. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses A.M., Warringer J., Parts L, et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
38. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
39. Cubillos FA, Vásquez C, Faugeron S., Ganga A, Martínez C (2009) Self-fertilization is the main sexual reproduction mechanism in native wine yeast populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67: 162-170.
40. Goddard MR, Anfang N, Tang R., Gardner RC, Jun C. (2010) A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Environ Microbiol 12: 63-73.
41. Huson DH, Bryant D. (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 254-267.
42. Alexandre H (2013) Flor yeasts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-their ecology, genetics and metabolism. Int J Food Microbiol. 167: 269-75.
43. Brion C, Ambroset C, Sanchez I., Legras J-L, Blondin B. (2013) Differential adaptation to multi-stressed conditions of wine fermentation revealed by variations in yeast regulatory networks. BMC Genomics 14: 681.
44. Dunn B, Levine RP, Sherlock G. (2005) Microarray karyotyping of commercial wine yeast strains reveals shared, as well as unique, genomic signatures. BMC Genomics 6: 53.
45. Carreto L, Eiriz MF, Gomes A.C., Pereira PM, Schuller D, et al. (2008) Comparative genomics of wild type yeast strains unveils important genome diversity. BMC Genomics 9: 524.
46. Dunn B, Richter C, Kvitek D.J., Pugh T., Sherlock G. (2012) Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments. Genome Res 22: 908-924.
47. Ames RM, Rash BM, Hentges K.E., Robertson DL, Delneri D, et al. (2010) Gene duplication and environmental adaptation within yeast populations. Genome Biol Evol 2: 591-601.
48. Zara G, Zara S, Pinna C., Marceddu S, Budroni M. (2009) FLO11 gene length and transcriptional level affect biofilm-forming ability of wild flor strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 155: 3838-3846.
49. Capece A, Siesto G, Poeta C., Pietrafesa R, Romano P. (2013) Indigenous yeast population from Georgian aged wines produced by traditional "Kakhetian" method. Food Microbiol 36: 447-455.
50. Gresham D, Desai MM, Tucker C.M., Jenq HT, Pai DA, et al. (2008) The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet 4: e1000303.
51. Gresham D, Usaite R, Germann S.M., Lisby M., Botstein D, et al. (2010) Adaptation to diverse nitrogen-limited environments by deletion or extrachromosomal element formation of the GAP1 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 18551-18556.
52. Brauer MJ, Saldanha AJ, Dolinski K, Botstein D. (2005) Homeostatic adjustment and metabolic remodeling in glucose-limited yeast cultures. Mol Biol Cell 16: 2503-2517.
53. Ferea TL, Botstein D, Brown P.O., Rosenzweig R.F. (1999) Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 9721-9726.
54. Kao KC, Sherlock G. (2008) Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 40: 1499-1504.
55. Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman M.J., Sodergren E., Weinstock GM, et al. (2013) Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature 500: 571-574.
56. Ibáñez C, Pérez-Torrado R, Chiva R, Guillamón JM, Barrio E, et al. (2014) Comparative genomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts isolated from fermentations of traditional beverages unveils different adaptive strategies. Int J Food Microbiol 171: 129-135.
57. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E., Galeote V, Gavory F, et al. (2009) Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 16333-16338.
58. Chang S-L, Lai H-Y, Tung S-Y, Leu J-Y (2013) Dynamic Large-Scale Chromosomal Rearrangements Fuel Rapid Adaptation in Yeast Populations. PLoS Genet 9: e1003232.
59. Pérez-Ortín JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E (2002) Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res 12: 1533-1539.
60. Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit J.P., Forgan AH, et al. (2011) Whole-Genome Comparison Reveals Novel Genetic Elements That Characterize the Genome of Industrial Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 7: e1001287.
61. Galeote V, Bigey F, Beyne E., Novo M, Legras J-L, et al. (2011) Amplification of a Zygosaccharomyces bailii DNA Segment in Wine Yeast Genomes by Extrachromosomal Circular DNA Formation. PLoS One 6: e17872.
62. Makuc J, Paiva S, Schauen M., Krämer R, André B, et al. (2001) The putative monocarboxylate permeases of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae do not transport monocarboxylic acids across the plasma membrane. Yeast 18: 1131-1143.
63. Novo M, Mangado A, Quirós M, Morales P., Salvadó Z, et al. (2013) Genome-Wide Study of the Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the Early Stages of Wine Fermentation. PLoS One 8: e74086.
64. Zara S, Gross MK, Zara G, Budroni M., Bakalinsky A.T. (2010) Ethanol-independent biofilm formation by a flor wine yeast strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 4089-4091.
65. Arlt H, Perz A, Ungermann C. (2011) An overexpression screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies novel genes that affect endocytic protein trafficking. Traffic 12: 1592-1603.
66. Zimmer A, Durand C, Loira N., Durrens P, Sherman DJ, et al. (2014) QTL Dissection of Lag Phase in Wine Fermentation Reveals a New Translocation Responsible for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Adaptation to Sulfite. PLoS One 9: e86298.
67. Cubillos FA, Billi E, Zörgö E, Parts L, Fargier P, et al. (2011) Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol Ecol 20: 1401-1413.