Adaptive feedback in computer-based learning environments: a review

Adaptive Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 217-234

  Bimba, Andrew Thomas ^a   Idris, Norisma ^a   Al Hunaiyyan, Ahmed ^b   Mahmud, Rohana Binti ^a   Shuib, Nor Liyana Bt Mohd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Adaptation; learner model; learning environment; problem solving; student modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029635453     PISSN: 10597123     EISSN: 17412633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059712317727590     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Advisors E. G., (2013). Learning to adapt: A case for accelerating adaptive learning in higher education. Education Growth Advisors. Retrieved from http://tytonpartners.com/library/accelerating-adaptive-learning-in-higher-education
2. Arroyo I., Beal C., Bergman A., Lindenmuth M., Marshall D., Woolf B. P., (2003). Intelligent tutoring for high-stakes achievement tests. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning Through Intelligent Technologies, 97, 365.
3. Arroyo I., Beck J. E., Woolf B. P., Beal C. R., Schultz K., (2000). Macroadapting animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. s1839, pp. 574–583).
4. Arroyo I., Woolf B. P., Burelson W., Muldner K., Rai D., Tai M., (2014). A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 387–426. New York: Springer.
5. Billings D., (2012). Efficacy of adaptive feedback strategies in simulation-based training. Military Psychology, 24, 114–133.
6. Bokhove C., Koolstra G., Boon P., Heck A., (2007). Towards an integrated learning environment for mathematics. In 8th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching. Czech Republic, 1–4 July 2007, 5 pp.
7. Brusilovsky P., (1998). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. In Adaptive hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 1–43). Netherlands: Springer.
8. Brusilovsky P., (1999). Adaptive and intelligent technologies for web-based education. Ki, 13(4), 19–25.
9. Carter J., (1984). Instructional learner feedback: A literature review with implications for software development. Computing Teacher, 12, 53–55. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/169781
10. Chieu V. M., (2005). Constructivist learning: An operational approach for designing adaptive learning environments supporting cognitive flexibility (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
11. D’Mello S., Graesser A., (2012). Autotutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (Tiis), 2(4), Article 23.
12. Economides A. A., (2006). Adaptive feedback characteristics in cat. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(8), 15–54.
13. Farid S., Ahmad R., Alam M., (2015). A hierarchical model for e-learning implementation challenges using AHP. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 28(3), 166–188.
14. Gerdes A., Jeuring J., Heeren B., (2012). An interactive functional programming tutor. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 250–255). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
15. Gertner A. S., VanLehn K., (2000). Andes: A coached problem solving environment for physics. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 133–142). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
16. Ghauth K. I., Abdullah N. A., (2010). An empirical evaluation of learner performance in e-learning recommender systems and an adaptive hypermedia system. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 23, 141–152.
17. Gouli E., Gogoulou A., Papanikolaou K. A., Grigoriadou M., (2006). An adaptive feedback framework to support reflection, guiding and tutoring. In Advances in web-based education: Personalized learning environments (pp. 178–202). Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science Publishing.
18. Gross S., Mokbel B., Paassen B., Hammer B., Pinkwart N., (2014). Example-based feedback provision using structured solution spaces. International Journal of Learning Technology, 10, 9248–9280.
19. Gross S., Pinkwart N., (2015). Towards an integrative learning environment for java programming. In 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 24–28). Hualien, China: IEEE.
20. Hattie J., Gan M., (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–271). New York: Routledge.
21. Heift T., (2010). Developing an intelligent language tutor. CALICO Journal, 27, 443–459.
22. Heift T., (2016). Web delivery of adaptive and interactive language tutoring: Revisited. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 489–503.
23. Heift T., McFetridge P., (1999). Exploiting the student model to emphasize language teaching pedagogy in natural language processing. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Computer Mediated Language Assessment and Evaluation in Natural Language Processing (pp. 55–61). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Heift T., Nicholson D., (2001). Web delivery of adaptive and interactive language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 310–325.
25. Heift T., Schulze M., (2007). Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. New York, USA: Routledge.
26. Hepplestone S., Holden G., Irwin B., Parkin H., Thorpe L. P., (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 117–127. doi:10.1080/21567069.2011.586677
27. Le N.-T., (2016). A classification of adaptive feedback in educational systems for programming. Systems, 4(2), 22. doi:10.3390/systems4020022
28. Lo J. J., Chan Y. C., Yeh S. W., (2012). Designing an adaptive web-based learning system based on students’ cognitive styles identified online. Computers & Education, 58, 209–222. Retrieved from doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.018
29. Luckin R., Holmes W., (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. London: Pearson.
30. Mason B. J., Bruning R., (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us (Tech. Rep.). University of Nebraska. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247291218_Providing_Feedback_in_Computer-based_Instruction_What_the_Research_Tells_Us
31. Mathan S. A., Koedinger K. R., (2005). Fostering the intelligent novice: Learning from errors with metacognitive tutoring. Educational Psychologist, 40, 257–265.
32. Melis E., Goguadze G., Libbrecht P., Ullrich C., (2009). Activemath—A learning platform with semantic web features. The Future of Learning, 159–177.
33. Melis E., Moormann M., Ullrich C., Goguadze G., Libbrecht P., (2007). How activemath supports moderate constructivist mathematics teaching. In 8th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching, Hradec Kralove.
34. Mitrovic A., (2003). An intelligent SQL tutor on the web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 173–197.
35. Mitrovic A., Ohlsson S., (1999). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238–256.
36. Mitrovic A., Ohlsson S., Barrow D. K., (2013). The effect of positive feedback in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system. Computers & Education, 60, 264–272.
37. Moundridou M., Virvou M., (2002). WEAR: A web-based authoring tool for building intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd Helenic Conference on AI, Companion Volume (pp. 203–214). Thessaloniki, Greece.
38. Muñoz-Merino P. J., Pardo A., Scheffel M., Niemann K., Wolpers M., Leony D., Delgado Kloos C., (2011). An ontological framework for adaptive feedback to support students while programming. In Proceedings of the 10th International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 1–4). Bonn, Germany.
39. Narciss S., (2013). Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning. Digital Education Review, 23, 7–26.
40. Narciss S., Huth K., (2002). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/catalog/design-informative-tutoring-feedback-multimedia-learning/
41. Narciss S., Sosnovsky S., Schnaubert L., Andres E., Eichelmann A., Goguadze G., Melis E., (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education, 71, 56–76. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011
42. Nye B. D., Graesser A. C., Hu X., (2014). Autotutor and family: A review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 427–469.
43. Olney A. M., D’Mello S., Person N., Cade W., Hays P., Williams C... Graesser A., (2012). Guru: A computer tutor that models expert human tutors. In Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 256–261). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
44. Olney A. M., Person N. K., Graesser A. C., (2011). Guru: Designing. In Cross-disciplinary advances in applied natural language processing: Issues and approaches (p. 156) Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
45. Papanikolaou K. A., Grigoriadou M., Kornilakis H., Magoulas G. D., (2003). Personalizing the interaction in a web-based educational hypermedia system: The case of INSPIRE. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13, 213–267.
46. Prince M. J., Felder R. M., (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123–138. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
47. Pryor J., Crossouard B., (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20.
48. Rivers K., Koedinger K. R., (2015). Data-driven hint generation in vast solution spaces: A self-improving python programming tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27, 37–64.
49. Rus V., Conley M., Graesser A., (2014). The dendrogram model of instruction: On instructional strategies and their implementation in DeepTutor. Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 311–325.
50. Rus V., Niraula N. B., Banjade R., (2015). Deeptutor: An effective, online intelligent tutoring system that promotes deep learning. In AAAI (pp. 4294–4295). Palo Alto, California: AAAI Press.
51. Scheuer O., Loll F., Pinkwart N., McLaren B. M., (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 43–102. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x
52. Specht M., Kravcik M., Klemke R., Pesin L., Httenhain R., (2002). Adaptive learning environment for teaching and learning in winds. In International conference on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 572–575). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
53. Specht M. E., (1998). Adaptive methods in computer-based teaching/learning systems. New York, NY: ACM.
54. Stoyanov S., Kirchner P., (2004). Expert concept mapping method for defining the characteristics of adaptive E-learning: ALFANET project case. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52, 41–54.
55. Tsovaltzi D., Fiedler A., (2003). Enhancement and use of a mathematical ontology in a tutorial dialog system. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge Representation and Automated Reasoning for E-learning Systems (pp. 23–35). Acapulco, Mexico.
56. VanLehn K., Lynch C., Schulze K., Shapiro J. A., Shelby R., Taylor L... Wintersgill M., (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 147–204.
57. Virvou M., Moundridou M., (2000). Modelling the instructor in a web-based authoring tool for algebrarelated ITSs. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 635–644). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
58. Virvou M., Moundridou M., (2001). Student and instructor models: Two kinds of user model and their interaction in an its authoring tool. In International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 158–167). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.