Guru: Designing a conversational expert intelligent tutoring system

Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing: Issues and Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 156-171

  Olney, Andrew M ^a   Person, Natalie K ^b   Graesser, Arthur C ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b RHODES COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898552786     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-447-5.ch011     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). The cognitive tutor authoring tools (CTAT): Preliminary evaluation of efficiency gains. In Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 61-70).
2. Aronson, J. (2002). Improving academic achievement: Impact of physchological factors on education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Beck, J., Stern, M., & Haugsjaa, E. (1996). Applications of AI in education. Crossroads, 3(1), 11-15. doi:10.1145/332148.332153
4. Berry, M. W. (1992). Large scale singular value computations. The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 6(1), 13-49.
5. Biswas, G., Schwartz, D., Leelawong, K., & Vye, N. (2005, March). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19, 363-392. doi:10.1080/08839510590910200
6. Bloom, B. S. (1984, June). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
7. Bratko, I. (1986). Prolog programming for artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
8. Cade, W. L., Copeland, J. L., Person, N. K., &D'Mello, S. K. (2008). Dialogue modes in expert tutoring. In ITS '08: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 470-479). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
9. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1
10. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
11. Corbett, A. (2002, November). Cognitive tutor algebra I: Adaptive student modeling in widespread classroom use. In Technology and Assessment: Thinking Ahead. Proceedings from a Workshop (pp. 50-62). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2005). What do reading tutors do? A naturalistic study of more and less experienced tutors in reading. Discourse Processes, 40(2), 83-113. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4002_1
13. Cullum, J. K., & Willoughby, R. A. (2002). Lanczos algorithms for large symmetric eigenvalue computations: Vol. 1. Theory. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
14. D'Mello, S., Olney, A. M., & Person, N. (in press). Mining collaborative patterns in tutorial dialogues. Journal of Educational Data Mining.
15. Deerwester, S. C., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. A. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391-407. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
16. Derry, S. J., & Lajoie, S. P. (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Derry, S. J., & Potts, M. K. (1998). How tutors model students: A study of personal constructs in adaptive tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 65-99. doi:10.2307/1163452
18. Dumais, S. (1991). Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23(2), 229-236. doi:10.3758/BF03203370
19. Eckart, C., & Young, G. (1936). The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1(3), 211-218. doi:10.1007/BF02288367
20. Evens, M., Spitkovsky, J., Boyle, P., Michael, J., & Rovick, A. (1993). Synthesizing tutorial dialogues. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Fisher, K., Wandersee, J., &Moody, D. (2000). Mapping biology knowledge. Kluwer Academic Pub.
22. Foltz, P., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in on-line writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 111-127. doi:10.1076/1049-4820(200008)8:2;1-B;FT111
23. Fox, B. (1993). The human tutoring dialogue project. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Freedman, R. (1996). Interaction of discourse planning, instructional planning, and dialogue management in an interactive tutoring system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
25. Gatt, A., & Reiter, E. (2009). Simplenlg: a realisation engine for practical applications. In Enlg '09: Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 90-93). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. Glass, M., Kim, J., Evens, M., Michael, J., & Rovick, A. (1999). Novice vs. expert tutors: A comparison of style. In Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference.
27. Gordon, S., Schmierer, K., & Gill, R. (1993). Conceptual graph analysis: Knowledge acquisition for instructional system design. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35(3), 459-481.
28. Graesser, A. C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B., & Olney, A. (2005, November). AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 612-618. doi:10.1109/TE.2005.856149
29. Graesser, A. C., & Franklin, S. P. (1990). Quest: A cognitive model of question answering. Discourse Processes, 13, 279-303. doi:10.1080/01638539009544760
30. Graesser, A. C., Louwerse, M. M., McNamara, D., Olney, A., Cai, Z., & Mitchell, H. (2007). Inference generation and cohesion in the construction of situation models: Some connections with computational linguistics. In Schmalhofer, F., & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inferences and comprehension processes (pp. 289-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., & Olney, A. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 180-193. doi:10.3758/BF03195563
32. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
33. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Harter, D. (2001). Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(3), 257-279.
34. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-28. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090604
35. Graesser, A. C.,Wiemer-Hastings, P.,Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Harter, D. Tutoring Research Group, T., & Person, N. (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 129-147. doi:10.1076/1049-4820(200008)8:2;1-B;FT129
36. Hu, X., Cai, Z., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Strengths, limitations, and extensions of LSA. In Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Johansson, R., & Nugues, P. (2008). Dependencybased syntactic-semantic analysis with PropBank and NomBank. In CONLL '08: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (pp. 183-187). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
38. Jordan, P., & Siler, S. (2002). Student initiative and questioning strategies in computer-mediated human tutoring dialogues. In Proceedings of ITS 2002 Workshop on Empirical Methods for Tutorial Dialogue Systems.
39. Khuwaja, R., Evens, M., Rovick, A., & Michael, J. (1994). Architecture of CIRCSIM-Tutor (v. 3): A smart cardiovascularphysiology tutor. In Proceedings 1994 IEEE Seventh Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (pp. 158-163).
40. Lajoie, S., Faremo, S., & Wiseman, J. (2001). Tutoring strategies for effective instruction in internal medicine. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 293-309.
41. Landauer, T. K. (2007). LSA as a theory of meaning. In Landauer, T., McNamara, D., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 379-400). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
42. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
43. Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Larsson, S., & Traum, D. (2000). Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI Dialogue Move Engine Toolkit. Natural Language Engineering, Special Issue on Best Practice in Spoken Language Dialogue Systems Engineering, 323-340.
45. Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181-208.
46. Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mumme, D. L., & Chabay, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social-perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of expert tutors. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-Inference Processes: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 217-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In Aronson, J. (Ed.), Improving academic achievement (pp. 135-158). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012064455-1/50010-5
48. Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D., & Gurtner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer based tutors. In Lajoie, S., & Derry, S. (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Martin, D. I., & Berry, M. W. (2007). Mathematical foundations behind latent semantic analysis. In Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 35-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
50. Meyers, A., Reeves, R., Macleod, C., Szekely, R., Zielinska, V., & Young, B. (2004, May 2 - May 7). The NomBank project: An interim report. In A. Meyers (Ed.), HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: Frontiers in Corpus Annotation (pp. 24-31). Boston, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
51. Murray, T. (1998). Authoring knowledge-based tutors: Tools for content, instructional strategy, student model, and interface design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(1), 5. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0701_2
52. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2006, January). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them (Tech. Rep.). Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
53. Ohlsson, S. (1992). Constraint-based student modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3(4), 429-447.
54. Olde, B. A., Franceschetti, D., Karnavat, A., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). The right stuff: Do you need to sanitize your corpus when using Latent Semantic Analysis? In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 708-713). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Olney, A. M. (2006). Unsupervised induction of latent semantic grammars with application to parsing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis.
56. Olney, A. M. (2007a). Dialogue generation for robotic portraits. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 5th Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems (pp. 15-21). Hyderabad, India.
57. Olney, A. M. (2007b). Latent semantic grammar induction: Context, projectivity, and prior distributions. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Textgraphs: Graph-Based Algorithms for Natural Language Processing (pp. 45-52). Rochester, NY: Association for Computational Linguistics.
58. Olney, A. M. (2009a). Generalizing latent semantic analysis. In IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (pp. 40-46). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
59. Olney, A. M. (2009b, November 5-7). Gnututor: An open source intelligent tutoring. system based on AutoTutor. In Proceedings of the 2009 AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems (p. 70-75). Washington, DC: AAAI Press. (FS-09-02)
60. Olney, A. M. (in press). Extraction of concept maps from textbooks for domain modeling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
61. Olney, A. M., & Cai, Z. (2005a). An orthonormal basis for entailment. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 554-559). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
62. Olney, A. M., & Cai, Z. (2005b). An orthonormal basis for topic segmentation in tutorial dialogue. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 971-978). Philadelphia, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
63. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., & Kingsbury, P. (2005). The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1), 71-106. doi:10.1162/0891201053630264
64. Person, N. K., Graesser, A. C., Magliano, J. P., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Inferring what the student knows in one-to-one tutoring: The role of student questions and answers. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(2), 205-229. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(94)90010-8
65. Shah, F., Evens, M., Michael, J., & Rovick, A. (2002). Classifying student initiatives and tutor responses in human keyboard-to-keyboard tutoring sessions. Discourse Processes, 33(1), 23-52. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3301_02
66. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 3-62. doi:10.1080/03640210709336984
67. Zinn, C., Moore, J., & Core, M. (2002). A 3-tier planning architecture for managing tutorial dialogue. In ITS '02: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 574-584). London, UK: Springer.