Expert concept mapping method for defining the characteristics of adaptive e-learning: ALFANET project case

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 41-54

  Stoyanov, Slavi ^a   Kirschner, Paul ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3943092527     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02504838     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Active learning for adaptive Internet (ALFANET) project. (2002). Users requirements (Project deliverable report). European Communities, Fifth Framework Information Society Technology program (IST-2001-33288).
2. Arlow, J., & Neustadt, I. (2001). UML and the unified process: Practical object-oriented analysis and design. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
3. Ayersman, D., & Von Midden, A. (1995). Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3-4), 371-390.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Bastiaens, Th. J, Nijhof, W. J., Streumer, J. N., & Abma, H. J. (1997a). Working and learning with electronic performance support systems: An effectiveness study. Training for Quality, 5(1), 10-18.
6. Bastiaens, Th. J, Nijhof, W. J., Streumer, J. N. & Abma, H. J. (1997b). Electronic performance support systems for telephone operators. In H. Preskill. & R. L. Dilworth, (Eds.), Human resource development in transition. Defining the cutting edge (pp.75-86). Washington: ISPI/ AHRD.
7. Brandon-Hall.com. (2002). Learning management system 2002. Retrieved June 17, 2002, from: http://www. brandonhall.com/public/publications/LMS2002/
8. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The mind map book. New York: Plume.
9. Carroll, J. (2000). Making use: Scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
10. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
11. Clegg, B., & Birch, P. (1999). Instant creativity. London, UK: Kogan Page.
12. Concept System (Demo version) [Computer software]. (2002). Ithaca, New York: Concept System Inc.
13. Constantine, L. (2001). The peopleware papers: Notes on the human side of software. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
14. Constantine, L., & Lockwood, L. (1999). Software for use: A practical guide to the models and methods of usage-centered design (ACM Press Series). Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
15. Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods. Strategy for product design (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16. Decision Explorer® [Computer software]. (2003). Kendal, Cumbria, UK: Banxia Software.
17. Eden, C., Ackermann, F., & Cropper, S. (1997). Getting started with cognitive mapping. Glasgow, UK: Banxia Software.
18. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2002). Making strategy. The journey of strategic management. London, UK: Sage Publications.
19. Eysenck, M., & Keane, M. (2000). Cognitive psychology. London, UK: LEA.
20. Gery, G. (1995). Attributes and behaviors of performance-centered systems. Performance Improvement Quarterly 8(1), 47-93.
21. Hodgson, A. M. (1999). Hexagons for system thinking. Retrieved March 16, 1999 from: http://www.idon-group.com/assoc/hexsys/hesys.htm
22. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, UK: Peter Honey.
23. Inspiration® [Computer software]. (2002). Beaverton Hillsdale, Portland: Inspiration Software, Inc.
24. Jackson, K. & Trochim, W. (2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, 5 (4), 307-336.
25. Jonassen, D., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
26. Jonassen, D. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environment. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 89-117). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
27. Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1998). Please understand me. Character and temperament types. DelMar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis.
28. Kessels, J. (1999). A relational approach to curriculum design. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plompt (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 59-70). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
29. Kirschner, P., Carr, C., van Merriënboer, J., & Sloep, P. (2002). How expert designers design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(4), 86-104.
30. Kirton, M. (1994). Adaptors and innovators. Styles of creativity and problem solving. London, UK: International Thomson Press.
31. Kolb, D. (1998). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32. Krathwohl, D. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research. New York: Longman.
33. Kruskal, J., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Larman, C. (2001). Applying UML and patterns: An introduction to object-oriented analysis and design and the unified process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Mager, R. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: The Center for Effective Performance.
37. Michalko, M. (1998). Cracking creativity. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.
38. Mind Manager® [Computer software]. (2002). Mindjet: Larkspur, CA.
39. Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge. Concept mapsä as facilitative tools in schools and corporation. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
40. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London, UK: Sage Publications.
41. Raybould, B. (2000). Building performance-centered web-based systems, information systems, and knowledge management systems in the 21st century. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 39(6), 32-39.
42. Richey, R., & Nelson, W. (1996). Development research. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 1213-1245). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
43. Riding, R., & Rayners, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. London, UK: David Fulton Publishers.
44. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. Mahwah, NJ: LEA
45. Schön, D. (1996). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. London, UK: Arena.
46. SenGupta, S. (1996, November). Concept mapping and pattern matching in integrated mental health service delivery. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the American Evaluation Association. Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved May 25, 2000 from http://www.conceptsystems.com/papers/paperu sr/sengupta/aea96.htm
47. Stoyanov, S. (2001). Mapping in the educational and training design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
48. SPSS® [Computer software]. (2002). SPSS, Inc. Chicago, Illinois.
49. Straker, D. (1997). Rapid problem solving with Post-itO notes. Tucson, Arizona: Fisher Books.
50. Trochim, W. (Ed.).(1989a). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning [Special issue]. 12, 1-16.
51. Trochim, W. (Ed.). (1989b). Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? Evaluation and Program Planning [Special issue]. 12, 87-110.
52. Trochim, W. (1993, November). Reliability of concept mapping. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the American Evaluation Association. Dallas, Texas.
53. Trochim, W. (1996, November). An Internet-based concept mapping of accreditation standards for evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the American Evaluation Association: Atlanta, Georgia.
54. Trochim, W. (1999a, November). Measuring organizational performance as a result of installing a new information system: Using concept mapping as the basis for performance measurement. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association. Orlando, Florida.
55. Trochim, W. (1999b, October). The evaluator as cartographer: Technology for mapping where we're going and where we've been. Paper presented at the conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network "Evaluation and Technology: Tools for the 21st Century" Portland, Oregon.
56. van der Heijden, K (1996). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chichetser, UK: Wiley.
57. van der Heijden, K., & Eden, C. (1998). The theory and praxis of reflective learning in strategic making. In C. Eden & J-C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organisational cognition. Theory, method and research (pp. 58-75). London, UK: Sage Publications.
58. VanGundy, A. (1997). Techniques of structured problem solving. New York: Van Nostrand.
59. van Merriënboer, J. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
60. van Merriënboer, J., Clark, R., & de Croock, M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID model. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 50(2), 39-64.
61. Vennix, J.A.M. (1997). Group model building. Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
62. Visscher-Voerman, I., Gustafson, K., & Plomp, T. (1999). Educational design and development. An overview of paradigms. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plompt (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 15-28). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
63. Voss, J., Lawrence, J., & Engle, R. (1992). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In R. Sternberg & P. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving (pp. 119-183). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
64. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.