An adaptive feedback framework to support reflection, guiding and tutoring

Advances in Web-Based Education: Personalized Learning Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 178-202

  Gouli, Evangelia ^a   Gogoulou, Agoritsa ^a   Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A ^a   Grigoriadou, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958104300     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-690-7.ch008     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Arroyo, I., Beck, J., Beal, C., Wing, R., & Woolf, B. (2001). Analyzing students' response to help provision in an elementary mathematics Intelligent Tutoring System. In R. Luckin (Ed.), Papers of the AIED-2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments (pp. 34-46).
2. Arroyo, I., Beck, J., Woolf, B., Beal, C., & Schultz, K. (2000). Macroadapting Animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 574-583).
3. Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, C., Kulik, J., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
4. Chang, K., Sung, T., & Chen, S-F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 21-33.
5. Chi, M., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M-H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
6. Cimolino, L., Kay, J., & Miller, A. (2003). Incremental student modelling and reflection by verified concept-mapping. Supplementary Proceedings of the AIED2003: Learner Modelling for Reflection Workshop (pp. 219-227).
7. Davis, E. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91-142.
8. Fiedler, A., & Tsovaltzi, D. (2003). Automating hinting in an intelligent tutorial dialog system for mathematics. Proceedings of the IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Knowledge Representation and Automated Reasoning for E-Learning Systems, Acapulco, Mexico. Retrieved 2004 from http://www.unikoblenz.de/~peter/ijcai-03-elearning/
9. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., Papanikolaou, K., & Grigoriadou, M. (2004a, August). Designing an adaptive feedback scheme to support reflection in concept mapping. Proceedings of the Adaptive Hypermedia Conference 2004: Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (pp. 126-135).
10. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., Papanikolaou, K., & Grigoriadou, M. (2004b, September). COMPASS: An adaptive Web-based concept map assessment tool. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain.
11. Hedberg, J., & McNamara, S. (1985). Matching feedback and cognitive style in a visual CAI task. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 26015).
12. Jackson, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. Proceedings of ACM, CHI'98 Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 187-194).
13. Jonassen, D., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Jonassen, D., Reeves, T., Hong, N., Harvey, D., & Peters, K. (1997). Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3/4), 289-308.
15. Lin, S., Liu, E., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420-432.
16. Mason, B., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Retrieved 2004 from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html
17. Mathan, S., & Koedinger, K. (2003). Recasting the feedback debate: Benefits of tutoring error detection and correction skills. In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo, & J. Kay (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education, shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies, Proceedings of AIED 2003 (pp. 13-20). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
18. Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak, J. (2000). Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view. Educational Psychology Series, Academic Press.
19. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2000). Evaluating the effectiveness of feedback in SQL-Tutor. In Kinshuk, C. Jesshope, & T. Okamoto (Eds.), Proceedings of International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies, IWALT2000, Palmerston North, New Zealand (pp. 143-144).
20. Mory, E. (1996). Feedback research. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 919-956). New York: Simon & Schuster Maxmillan.
21. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, R. Brünken, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
22. Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn. UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Papanikolaou, K., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., & Magoulas, G. (2003). Personalizing the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: the case of INSPIRE. User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(3), 213-267.
24. Ross, S., & Morrison, G. (1993). Using feedback to adapt instruction for individuals. In J. Dempsey & G. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 177-195). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
25. Sales, G. (1993). Adapted and adaptive feedback in technology-based instruction. In J. Dempsey & G. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 159-176). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
26. Stern, M., Beck, J., & Woolf, B. (1996). Adaptation of problem presentation and feedback in an intelligent mathematics tutor. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 605-615). New York: Springer-Verlag.
27. Vosniadou, S. (2001). How children learn. International Academy of Education. Educational Practices Series, 7. Retrieved 2002 from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/Publications/EducationalPractices/prachome.htm
28. Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L., Wang, K. H., & Huang, H. C. (2004). A case study of Web-based instruction (WBI): The effectiveness of using frontpage feedback system (FFS) as metacognition strategy for freshmen biology teaching. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(2), 18-27.