Microbial enzyme production using lignocellulosic food industry wastes as feedstock: A review

Bioengineering

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Ravindran, Rajeev ^a   Jaiswal, Amit K ^a  

^a DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Enzyme production; Enzyme purification; Fermentation strategies; Food industry waste; Lignocellulose

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023748230     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23065354     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering3040030     Document Type: Review

References (137)

1. Adrio, J.L.; Demain, A.L. Microbial enzymes: Tools for biotechnological processes. Biomolecules 2014, 4, 117–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Klein-Marcuschamer, D.; Oleskowicz-Popiel, P.; Simmons, B.A.; Blanch, H.W. The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 1083–1087. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. Exploitation of food industry waste for high value products. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 58–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Singh, R.; Shukla, A.; Tiwari, S.; Srivastava, M. A review on delignification of lignocellulosic biomass for enhancement of ethanol production potential. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 713–728. [CrossRef]
5. Maitan-Alfenas, G.P.; Visser, E.M.; Guimarães, V.M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: Converting food waste in valuable products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 1, 44–49. [CrossRef]
6. Meng, X.; Ragauskas, A.J. Recent advances in understanding the role of cellulose accessibility in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27, 150–158. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. BCC Research. Global Market for Industrial Enzymes to Reach Nearly $7.1 Billion by 2018; Detergent Enzyme Market to Record Maximum Growth; BCC Research: Wellesley, MA, USA, 2014.
8. Jegannathan, K.R.; Nielsen, P.H. Environmental assessment of enzyme use in industrial production—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 42, 228–240. [CrossRef]
9. Phitsuwan, P.; Laohakunjit, N.; Kerdchoechuen, O.; Kyu, K.L.; Ratanakhanokchai, K. Present and potential applications of cellulases in agriculture, biotechnology, and bioenergy. Folia Microbiol. 2013, 58, 163–176. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Laboratory NRE. Reducing Enzyme Cost Increases Market Potential of Biofuels; Laboratory NRE: Golden, CO, USA, 2010.
11. Mussatto, S.I.; Dragone, G.; Roberto, I.C. Brewers’ spent grain: Generation, characteristics and potential applications. J. Cereal Sci. 2006, 43, 1–14. [CrossRef]
12. Sun, X.; Liu, Z.; Qu, Y.; Li, X. The effects of wheat bran composition on the production of biomass-hydrolyzing enzymes by Penicillium decumbens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 146, 119–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Saunders, R.M. Rice bran: Composition and potential food uses. Food Rev. Int. 1985, 1, 465–495. [CrossRef]
14. Pirmohammadi, R.; Rouzbehan, Y.; Rezayazdi, K.; Zahedifar, M. Chemical composition, digestibility and in situ degradability of dried and ensiled apple pomace and maize silage. Small Rumin. Res. 2006, 66, 150–155. [CrossRef]
15. Bhushan, S.; Kalia, K.; Sharma, M.; Singh, B.; Ahuja, P.S. Processing of Apple Pomace for Bioactive Molecules. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2008, 28, 285–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Freestone, P.P.E.; Haigh, R.D.; Lyte, M. Bacterial Growth Enhancer. U.S. Patent Application 12/092,956, 2 April 2009.
17. European Commission. Towards a Circular Economy: A Zero Waste Programme for Europe; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
18. Lin, C.S.K.; Pfaltzgraff, L.A.; Herrero-Davila, L.; Mubofu, E.B.; Abderrahim, S.; Clark, J.H. Food waste as a valuable resource for the production of chemicals, materials and fuels: Current situation and global perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 426–464. [CrossRef]
19. Pfaltzgraff, L.A.; Cooper, E.C.; Budarin, V.; Clark, J.H. Food waste biomass: A resource for high-value chemicals. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 307–314. [CrossRef]
20. Yasin, N.H.M.; Mumtaz, T.; Hassan, M.A. Food waste and food processing waste for biohydrogen production: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 130, 375–385. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Couto, S.R.; Herrera, J.L.T. Industrial and biotechnological applications of laccases: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24, 500–513. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Liao, H.; Fan, X.; Mei, X.; Wei, Z.; Raza, W.; Shen, Q.; Xu, Y. Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzyme from Penicillium oxalicum GZ-2 and its application in lignocellulose saccharification. Biomass Bioenery 2015, 74, 122–134. [CrossRef]
23. Ragauskas, A.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Biddy, M.J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M.F. Lignin valorization: Improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 2014, 344, 1246843. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Zeng, Y.; Zhao, S.; Yang, S.; Ding, S.Y. Lignin plays a negative role in the biochemical process for producing lignocellulosic biofuels. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27, 38–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Chang, V.; Holtzapple, M. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. In Twenty-First Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals; Finkelstein, M., Davison, B., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 5–37.
26. Ghaffar, S.H.; Fan, M. Structural analysis for lignin characteristics in biomass straw. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 57, 264–279. [CrossRef]
27. Bansal, P.; Hall, M.; Realff, M.J.; Lee, J.H.; Bommarius, A.S. Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: A new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4461–4471. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Gurgel, L.V.A.; Marabezi, K.; Ramos, L.A.; Curvelo, A.A.D. Characterization of depolymerized residues from extremely low acid hydrolysis (ELA) of sugarcane bagasse cellulose: Effects of degree of polymerization, crystallinity and crystallite size on thermal decomposition. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 36, 560–571. [CrossRef]
29. Wang, K.; Kim, K.H.; Brown, R.C. Catalytic pyrolysis of individual components of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 727–735. [CrossRef]
30. DeMartini, J.D.; Pattathil, S.; Miller, J.S.; Li, H.; Hahn, M.G.; Wyman, C.E. Investigating plant cell wall components that affect biomass recalcitrance in poplar and switchgrass. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 898–909. [CrossRef]
31. Motta, F.; Andrade, C.; Santana, M. A review of xylanase production by the fermentation of xylan: Classification, characterization and applications. In Sustainable Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass-Techniques, Applications and Commercialization; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013.
32. Chesini, M.; Neila, L.P.; de la Parra, D.F.; Rojas, L.; Esquivel, J.C.C.; Cavalitto, S.F. Aspergillus kawachii produces an inulinase in cultures with yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) as substrate. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 16, 8.
33. Xiao, C.; Anderson, C.T. Roles of pectin in biomass yield and processing for biofuels. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 67. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Olsen, H.S. Biogas Production Process with Enzymatic Pre-Treatment. U.S. Patent Application 13/521,463, 14 February 2013.
35. Singh, J.; Suhag, M.; Dhaka, A. Augmented digestion of lignocellulose by steam explosion, acid and alkaline pretreatment methods: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 624–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Mai, N.L.; Ha, S.H.; Koo, Y.M. Efficient pretreatment of lignocellulose in ionic liquids/co-solvent for enzymatic hydrolysis enhancement into fermentable sugars. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 1144–1151. [CrossRef]
37. Bellido, C.; Bolado, S.; Coca, M.; Lucas, S.; González-Benito, G.; García-Cubero, M.T. Effect of inhibitors formed during wheat straw pretreatment on ethanol fermentation by Pichia stipitis. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 10868–10874. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. A comprehensive review on pre-treatment strategy for lignocellulosic food industry waste: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 92–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Vandenberghe, L.P.; Carvalho, J.C.; Libardi, N.; Rodrigues, C.; Soccol, C.R. Chapter 1—Microbial Enzyme Factories: Current Trends in Production Processes and Commercial Aspects. In Agro-Industrial Wastes as Feedstock for Enzyme Production; Dhillon, G.S., Kaur, S., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 1–22.
40. Arslan, S.; Eyi, A.; Küçüksarı, R. Toxigenic genes, spoilage potential, and antimicrobial resistance of Bacillus cereus group strains from ice cream. Anaerobe 2014, 25, 42–46. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Pariza, M.W.; Johnson, E.A. Evaluating the Safety of Microbial Enzyme Preparations Used in Food Processing: Update for a New Century. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2001, 33, 173–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Olempska-Beer, Z.S.; Merker, R.I.; Ditto, M.D.; DiNovi, M.J. Food-processing enzymes from recombinant microorganisms—A review. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2006, 45, 144–158. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Youssef, N.H.; Couger, M.B.; Struchtemeyer, C.G.; Liggenstoffer, A.S.; Prade, R.A.; Najar, F.Z. The Genome of the Anaerobic Fungus Orpinomyces sp. Strain C1A Reveals the Unique Evolutionary History of a Remarkable Plant Biomass Degrader. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4620–4634. [PubMed]
44. Nevoigt, E. Progress in Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 73, 379–412. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Keasling, J.D. Synthetic biology and the development of tools for metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14, 189–195. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Agrimi, G.; Pisano, I.; Palmieri, L. Process development and metabolic engineering for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. In Biorefinery: From Biomass to Chemicals and Fuels; Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., Dumeignil, F., Eds.; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2012.
47. Buschke, N.; Schäfer, R.; Becker, J.; Wittmann, C. Metabolic engineering of industrial platform microorganisms for biorefinery applications–optimization of substrate spectrum and process robustness by rational and evolutive strategies. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 133, 544–554. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Batche, H.; Valenzuela-Solano, C.; Hernandez-Martinez, R. Production of Conidiospores in Solid-State Fermentation of Trichoderma Harzianum and T. asperellum Isolated from Grapevine in Baja California; Phytopathology: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2014; p. 179.
49. Barrios-González, J. Solid-state fermentation: Physiology of solid medium, its molecular basis and applications. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 175–185. [CrossRef]
50. Hölker, U.; Lenz, J. Solid-state fermentation—Are there any biotechnological advantages? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005, 8, 301–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Ito, K.; Kawase, T.; Sammoto, H.; Gomi, K.; Kariyama, M.; Miyake, T. Uniform culture in solid-state fermentation with fungi and its efficient enzyme production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 300–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Ito, K.; Gomi, K.; Kariyama, M.; Miyake, T. Rapid enzyme production and mycelial growth in solid-state fermentation using the non-airflow box. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 116, 585–590. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53. Singhania, R.R.; Sukumaran, R.K.; Patel, A.K.; Larroche, C.; Pandey, A. Advancement and comparative profiles in the production technologies using solid-state and submerged fermentation for microbial cellulases. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2010, 46, 541–549. [CrossRef]
54. Maulini-Duran, C.; Abraham, J.; Rodríguez-Pérez, S.; Cerda, A.; Jiménez-Peñalver, P.; Gea, T. Gaseous emissions during the solid state fermentation of different wastes for enzyme production at pilot scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 179, 211–218. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Roukas, T. The role of oxidative stress on carotene production by Blakeslea trispora in submerged fermentation. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 424–433. [PubMed]
56. Gibbs, P.A.; Seviour, R.J.; Schmid, F. Growth of Filamentous Fungi in Submerged Culture: Problems and Possible Solutions. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2000, 20, 17–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. Zhang, B.; Weng, Y.; Xu, H.; Mao, Z. Enzyme immobilization for biodiesel production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 61–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Rajagopalan, G.; Krishnan, C. α-Amylase production from catabolite derepressed Bacillus subtilis KCC103 utilizing sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3044–3050. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59. Cunha, F.M.; Esperanca, M.N.; Zangirolami, T.C.; Badino, A.C.; Farinas, C.S. Sequential solid-state and submerged cultivation of Aspergillus niger on sugarcane bagasse for the production of cellulase. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 112, 270–274. [CrossRef]
60. Fakruddin, M.; Mohammad Mazumdar, R.; Bin Mannan, K.S.; Chowdhury, A.; Hossain, M.N. Critical Factors Affecting the Success of Cloning, Expression, and Mass Production of Enzymes by Recombinant E. coli. ISRN Biotechnol. 2013, 2013, 590587. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Young, C.L.; Britton, Z.T.; Robinson, A.S. Recombinant protein expression and purification: A comprehensive review of affinity tags and microbial applications. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 7, 620–634. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Liu, F.; Ye, M.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Bian, Y.; Sun, Z. Integration of Cell Lysis, Protein Extraction, and Digestion into One Step for Ultrafast Sample Preparation for Phosphoproteome Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 6786–6791. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Pečová, M.; Šebela, M.; Markova, Z.; Polakova, K.; Čuda, J.; Šafářová, K. Thermostable trypsin conjugates immobilized to biogenic magnetite show a high operational stability and remarkable reusability for protein digestion. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 125102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Malinsky, J.; Opekarová, M.; Grossmann, G.; Tanner, W. Membrane microdomains, rafts, and detergent-resistant membranes in plants and fungi. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 501–529. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Mathieson, W.; Thomas, G.A. Simultaneously extracting DNA, RNA, and protein using kits: Is sample quantity or quality prejudiced? Anal. Biochem. 2013, 433, 10–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66. Campden, R.; Pétrin, D.; Robitaille, M.; Audet, N.; Gora, S.; Angers, S.; Hébert, T.E. Tandem Affinity Purification to Identify Cytosolic and Nuclear Gβγ-Interacting Proteins. In Nuclear G-Protein Coupled Receptors; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 161–184.
67. Kanada, K.N.; Nakatsuji, T.; Gallo, R.L. Doxycycline indirectly inhibits proteolytic activation of tryptic kallikrein-related peptidases and activation of cathelicidin. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 1435–1442. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68. Yang, S.; Hai, F.I.; Nghiem, L.D.; Roddick, F.; Price, W.E. Removal of trace organic contaminants by nitrifying activated sludge and whole-cell and crude enzyme extract of Trametes versicolor. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 67, 1216–1223. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
69. He, R.; Girgih, A.T.; Malomo, S.A.; Ju, X.; Aluko, R.E. Antioxidant activities of enzymatic rapeseed protein hydrolysates and the membrane ultrafiltration fractions. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 219–227. [CrossRef]
70. Mirica, K.A.; Lockett, M.R.; Snyder, P.W.; Shapiro, N.D.; Mack, E.T.; Nam, S. Selective precipitation and purification of monovalent proteins using oligovalent ligands and ammonium sulfate. Bioconj. Chem. 2012, 23, 293–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
71. Sim, S.L.; He, T.; Tscheliessnig, A.; Mueller, M.; Tan, R.B.H.; Jungbauer, A. Protein precipitation by polyethylene glycol: A generalized model based on hydrodynamic radius. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 157, 315–319. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
72. Hanson, C. Recent Advances in Liquid-Liquid Extraction; Pergamon Press, Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013.
73. Babu, B.R.; Rastogi, N.K.; Raghavarao, K.S.M.S. Liquid–liquid extraction of bromelain and polyphenol oxidase using aqueous two-phase system. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2008, 47, 83–89. [CrossRef]
74. Scopes, R.K. Protein Purification: Principles and Practice; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013.
75. Kunji, E.R.S.; Harding, M.; Butler, P.J.G.; Akamine, P. Determination of the molecular mass and dimensions of membrane proteins by size exclusion chromatography. Methods 2008, 46, 62–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76. Lang, K.M.H.; Kittelmann, J.; Pilgram, F.; Osberghaus, A.; Hubbuch, J. Custom-tailored Adsorbers: A Molecular Dynamics Study on Optimal Design of Ion Exchange Chromatography Material. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1413, 60–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
77. Shchukina, O.I.; Zatirakha, A.V.; Smolenkov, A.D.; Nesterenko, P.N.; Shpigun, O.A. Anion exchangers with branched functional ion exchange layers of different hydrophilicity for ion chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1408, 78–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
78. Yin, W.; Zhang, H.; Huang, L.; Nishinari, K. Effects of the lyotropic series salts on the gelation of konjac glucomannan in aqueous solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 74, 68–78. [CrossRef]
79. Zhao, K.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Bai, Q.; Yang, F.; Wang, F. Preparation of a novel dual-function strong cation exchange/hydrophobic interaction chromatography stationary phase for protein separation. Talanta 2012, 98, 86–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
80. Ayyar, B.V.; Arora, S.; Murphy, C.; O’Kennedy, R. Affinity chromatography as a tool for antibody purification. Methods 2012, 56, 116–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
81. Tropea, J.E.; Cherry, S.; Waugh, D.S. Expression and purification of soluble his 6-tagged TEV protease. In High Throughput Protein Expression and Purification: Methods and ProtocolsI; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 297–307.
82. Royle, L.; Radcliffe, C.M.; Dwek, R.A.; Rudd, P.M. Detailed structural analysis of n-glycans released from glycoproteins in sds-page gel bands using HPLC combined with exoglycosidase array digestions. In Glycobiology Protocols; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 125–143.
83. Rothe, G.M. Electrophoresis of Enzymes: Laboratory Methods; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012.
84. Boeris, V.; Balce, I.; Vennapusa, R.R.; Rodríguez, M.A.; Picó, G.; Lahore, M.F. Production, recovery and purification of a recombinant β-galactosidase by expanded bed anion exchange adsorption. J. Chromatogr. B 2012, 900, 32–37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
85. Bhattacharjee, S.; Dong, J.; Ma, Y.; Hovde, S.; Geiger, J.H.; Baker, G.L.; Bruening, M.L. Formation of high-capacity protein-adsorbing membranes through simple adsorption of poly (acrylic acid)-containing films at low pH. Langmuir 2012, 28, 6885–6892. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
86. Garcia-Galan, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Rodrigues, R.C. Potential of different enzyme immobilization strategies to improve enzyme performance. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 2885–2904. [CrossRef]
87. Hernandez, K.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Control of protein immobilization: Coupling immobilization and site-directed mutagenesis to improve biocatalyst or biosensor performance. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2011, 48, 107–122. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
88. Fatima, A.; Husain, Q. Polyclonal antibodies mediated immobilization of a peroxidase from ammonium sulphate fractionated bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) proteins. Biomol. Eng. 2007, 24, 223–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
89. Wang, J.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Bachas, L.G. Orientation specific immobilization of organophosphorus hydrolase on magnetic particles through gene fusion. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 700–705. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
90. Van Tilbeurgh, H.; Egloff, M.-P.; Martinez, C.; Rugani, N.; Verger, R.; Cambillau, C. Interfacial activation of the lipase-procolipase complex by mixed micelles revealed by x-ray crystallography. Nature 1993, 362, 814–820. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
91. Brzozowski, A.; Derewenda, U.; Derewenda, Z.; Dodson, G.; Lawson, D.; Turkenburg, J.; Bjorkling, F.; Huge-Jensen, B.; Patkar, S.; Thim, L. A model for interfacial activation in lipases from the structure of a fungal lipase-inhibitor complex. Nature 1991, 351, 491–494. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
92. Derewenda, Z.S.; Derewenda, U.; Dodson, G.G. The crystal and molecular structure of the rhizomucor miehei triacylglyceride lipase at 1.9 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 227, 818–839. [CrossRef]
93. Fernández-Lorente, G.; Palomo, J.M.; Cabrera, Z.; Guisán, J.M.; Fernández-Lafuente, R. Specificity enhancement towards hydrophobic substrates by immobilization of lipases by interfacial activation on hydrophobic supports. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 41, 565–569. [CrossRef]
94. Fernandez-Lorente, G.; Cabrera, Z.; Godoy, C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Palomo, J.M.; Guisan, J.M. Interfacially activated lipases against hydrophobic supports: Effect of the support nature on the biocatalytic properties. Process Biochem. 2008, 43, 1061–1067. [CrossRef]
95. Manoel, E.A.; dos Santos, J.C.; Freire, D.M.; Rueda, N.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Immobilization of lipases on hydrophobic supports involves the open form of the enzyme. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2015, 71, 53–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
96. Palomo, J.M.; Muñoz, G.; Fernández-Lorente, G.; Mateo, C.; Fernández-Lafuente, R.; Guisán, J.M. Interfacial adsorption of lipases on very hydrophobic support (octadecyl–sepabeads): Immobilization, hyperactivation and stabilization of the open form of lipases. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2002, 19, 279–286. [CrossRef]
97. Bolivar, J.M.; Rocha-Martin, J.; Godoy, C.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Guisan, J.M. Complete reactivation of immobilized derivatives of a trimeric glutamate dehydrogenase from thermus thermophillus. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 107–113. [CrossRef]
98. Barbosa, O.; Torres, R.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.N.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Heterofunctional supports in enzyme immobilization: From traditional immobilization protocols to opportunities in tuning enzyme properties. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2433–2462. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
99. Mateo, C.; Palomo, J.M.; Fuentes, M.; Betancor, L.; Grazu, V.; López-Gallego, F.; Pessela, B.C.; Hidalgo, A.; Fernández-Lorente, G.; Fernández-Lafuente, R. Glyoxyl agarose: A fully inert and hydrophilic support for immobilization and high stabilization of proteins. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2006, 39, 274–280. [CrossRef]
100. Mateo, C.; Abian, O.; Bernedo, M.; Cuenca, E.; Fuentes, M.; Fernandez-Lorente, G.; Palomo, J.M.; Grazu, V.; Pessela, B.C.; Giacomini, C. Some special features of glyoxyl supports to immobilize proteins. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2005, 37, 456–462. [CrossRef]
101. Pedroche, J.; del Mar Yust, M.; Mateo, C.; Fernández-Lafuente, R.; Girón-Calle, J.; Alaiz, M.; Vioque, J.; Guisán, J.M.; Millán, F. Effect of the support and experimental conditions in the intensity of the multipoint covalent attachment of proteins on glyoxyl-agarose supports: Correlation between enzyme–support linkages and thermal stability. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1160–1166. [CrossRef]
102. Jönsson, L.J.; Alriksson, B.; Nilvebrant, N.-O. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: Inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
103. Ranatunga, T.D.; Jervis, J.; Helm, R.F.; McMillan, J.D.; Wooley, R.J. The effect of overliming on the toxicity of dilute acid pretreated lignocellulosics: The role of inorganics, uronic acids and ether-soluble organics. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 240–247. [CrossRef]
104. Alriksson, B.; Horvath, I.; Sjöde, A.; Nilvebrant, N.-O.; Jönsson, L. Ammonium Hydroxide Detoxification of Spruce Acid Hydrolysates. In Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals; Davison, B., Evans, B., Finkelstein, M., McMillan, J., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 911–922.
105. Behera, S.; Arora, R.; Nandhagopal, N.; Kumar, S. Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 36, 91–106. [CrossRef]
106. Jönsson, L.; Palmqvist, E.; Nilvebrant, N.-O.; Hahn-Hägerdal, B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus trametes versicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 49, 691–697. [CrossRef]
107. Cao, G.; Ximenes, E.; Nichols, N.N.; Zhang, L.; Ladisch, M. Biological abatement of cellulase inhibitors. Bioresource Technol. 2013, 146, 604–610. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
108. Kim, Y.; Ximenes, E.; Mosier, N.S.; Ladisch, M.R. Soluble inhibitors/deactivators of cellulase enzymes from lignocellulosic biomass. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2011, 48, 408–415. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
109. Zampieri, D.; Guerra, L.; Camassola, M.; Dillon, A.J. Secretion of endoglucanases and β-glucosidases by penicillium echinulatum 9A02S1 in presence of different carbon sources. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 50, 882–886. [CrossRef]
110. Yang, S.; Xiong, H.; Yang, H.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Z. High-level production of β-1, 3-1, 4-glucanase by rhizomucor miehei under solid-state fermentation and its potential application in the brewing industry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 118, 84–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
111. Irshad, M.; Anwar, Z.; Afroz, A. Characterization of exo 1, 4-[beta] glucanase produced from tricoderma viridi through solid-state bio-processing of orange peel waste. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2012, 3, 580–584. [CrossRef]
112. Dhillon, G.S.; Kaur, S.; Brar, S.K.; Verma, M. Potential of apple pomace as a solid substrate for fungal cellulase and hemicellulase bioproduction through solid-state fermentation. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2012, 38, 6–13. [CrossRef]
113. Sun, H.-Y.; Li, J.; Zhao, P.; Peng, M. Banana peel: A novel substrate for cellulase production under solid-state fermentation. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 17887–17890.
114. Dilipkumar, M.; Rajasimman, M.; Rajamohan, N. Utilization of copra waste for the solid state fermentatative production of inulinase in batch and packed bed reactors. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 662–668. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
115. Onilude, A.A.; Fadaunsi, I.F.; Garuba, E.O. Inulinase production by saccharomyces sp. in solid state fermentation using wheat bran as substrate. Ann. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 843–848. [CrossRef]
116. Paixão, S.M.; Teixeira, P.D.; Silva, T.P.; Teixeira, A.V.; Alves, L. Screening of novel yeast inulinases and further application to bioprocesses. New Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 598–606. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
117. Rashad, M.M.; Nooman, M.U. Production, purification and characterization of extracellular invertase from saccharomyses cerevisiae NRRL Y-12632 by solid state fermentation of red carrot residue. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2009, 3, 1910–1919.
118. Veana, F.; Martínez-Hernández, J.; Aguilar, C.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Michelena, G. Utilization of molasses and sugar cane bagasse for production of fungal invertase in solid state fermentation using aspergillus niger GH1. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 45, 373–377. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
119. Uma, C.; Gomathi, D.; Ravikumar, G.; Kalaiselvi, M.; Palaniswamy, M. Production and properties of invertase from a cladosporium cladosporioides in SmF using pomegranate peel waste as substrate. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S605–S611. [CrossRef]
120. Akolkar, S.; Sajgure, A.; Lele, S. Lactase production from lactobacillus acidophilus. World J. Microb. Biot. 2005, 21, 1119–1122. [CrossRef]
121. Yin, J.-S.; Liang, Q.-L.; Li, D.-M.; Sun, Z.-T. Optimization of production conditions for β-mannanase using apple pomace as raw material in solid-state fermentation. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 101–108. [CrossRef]
122. Rashid, J.I.A.; Samat, N.; Yusoff, W.M.W. Studies on extraction of mannanase enzyme by aspergillus terreus SUK-1 from fermented palm kernel cake. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 16, 933. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
123. Almeida, J.; Lima, V.; Giloni-Lima, P.; Knob, A. Passion fruit peel as novel substrate for enhanced β-glucosidases production by penicillium verruculosum: Potential of the crude extract for biomass hydrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 72, 216–226. [CrossRef]
124. Li, P.-J.; Xia, J.-L.; Shan, Y.; Nie, Z.-Y.; Su, D.-L.; Gao, Q.-R.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y.-L. Optimizing production of pectinase from orange peel by penicillium oxalicum PJ02 using response surface methodology. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2015, 6, 13–22. [CrossRef]
125. Patil, S.R.; Dayanand, A. Production of pectinase from deseeded sunflower head by aspergillus niger in submerged and solid-state conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 2054–2058. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
126. Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Production and application of xylanase from penicillium sp. Utilizing coffee by-products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 657–664. [CrossRef]
127. Nascimento, R.P.D.; Alves Junior, N.; Coelho, R.R.R. Brewer’s spent grain and corn steep liquor as alternative culture medium substrates for proteinase production by Streptomyces malaysiensis amt-3. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 1384–1389. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
128. Kieliszek, M.; Misiewicz, A. Microbial transglutaminase and its application in the food industry. A review. Folia Microbiol. 2014, 59, 241–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
129. Songulashvili, G.; Spindler, D.; Jimenez-Tobon, G.A.; Jaspers, C.; Kerns, G.; Penninckx, M.J. Production of a high level of laccase by submerged fermentation at 120-L scale of Cerrena unicolor C-139 grown on wheat bran. C. R. Biol. 2015, 338, 121–125. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
130. Gerber, C.B.; Kaufmann, F.; Nicoletti, G.; Dalla Costa, M.; Kempka, A.P. Production of lipase using cassava peel and sunflower oil in solid-state fermentation: Preliminary study. J. Agr. Sci. Technol. A 2013, 3, 948.
131. Jadhav, M.S.; Chougule, D.; Rampure, S. Lipase production from banana peel extract and potato peel extract. Int. J. Res. Pure Appl. Micrbiol. 2013, 3, 11–13.
132. Mittal, A.; Singh, G.; Goyal, V.; Yadav, A.; Aggarwal, N.K. Production of phytase by acido-thermophilic strain of Klebsiella sp. DB-3FJ711774. 1 using orange peel flour under submerged fermentation. Innov. Rom. Food Biotechnol. 2012, 10, 18.
133. Demir, H.; Göğüş, N.; Tari, C.; Heerd, D.; Lahore, M.F. Optimization of the process parameters for the utilization of orange peel to produce polygalacturonase by solid-state fermentation from an Aspergillus sojae mutant strain. Turk. J. Biol. 2012, 36, 394–404.
134. Demir, H.; Tarı, C. Valorization of wheat bran for the production of polygalacturonase in SSF of Aspergillus sojae. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 54, 302–309. [CrossRef]
135. Sharma, R.; Rawat, R.; Bhogal, R.S.; Oberoi, H.S. Multi-component thermostable cellulolytic enzyme production by Aspergillus niger HN-1 using pea pod waste: Appraisal of hydrolytic potential with lignocellulosic biomass. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 696–704. [CrossRef]
136. Inoue, H.; Kitao, C.; Yano, S.; Sawayama, S. Production of β-xylosidase from Trichoderma asperellum KIF125 and its application in efficient hydrolysis of pretreated rice straw with fungal cellulase. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
137. Dapper, T.B.; Arfelli, V.C.; Henn, C.; Simões, M.R.; dos Santos, M.R.; Torre, C.L.D.; Silva, J.L.C.; Simão, R.C.G.; Kadowaki, M.K. Fructofuranosidase production by Aspergillus versicolor isolated from Atlantic forest and grown on apple pomace. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 25, 938–948.