53BP1 Protects against CtIP-Dependent Capture of Ectopic Chromosomal Sequences at the Junction of Distant Double-Strand Breaks

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Guirouilh Barbat, Josée ^a   Gelot, Camille ^a   Xie, Anyong ^b   Dardillac, Elodie ^a   Scully, Ralph ^b   Lopez, Bernard S ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLASTICIDIN S; DEOXYCHOLATE SODIUM; GENOMIC DNA; NEOMYCIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; TRANSFER RNA; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR P53 BINDING PROTEIN 1; CARRIER PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; RBBP8 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TP53BP1 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CHEMOLUMINESCENCE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; EWING SARCOMA; EXPRESSION VECTOR; FIBROBLAST; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENE DELETION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOBLOTTING; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; OPEN READING FRAME; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RETROPOSON; RNA SPLICING; SCAR; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; WESTERN BLOTTING; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; HUMAN GENOME;

CARRIER PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; FIBROBLASTS; GENE SILENCING; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR P53-BINDING PROTEIN 1;

EID: 85020374932     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1006230     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Haber JE. Genome stability. DNA repair and recombination. Garland Science, Talor and Francis Group, New York and London; 2014.
2. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Huck S, Bertrand P, Pirzio L, Desmaze C, Sabatier L, et al. Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol Cell. 2004; 14: 611–623. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.008 PMID: 15175156
3. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Rass E, Plo I, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 20902–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708541104 PMID: 18093953
4. Betermier M, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process? PLoS Genet. 2014. p. e1004086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086 PMID: 24453986
5. Grabarz A, Barascu A, Guirouilh-Barbat J, Lopez BS. Initiation of DNA double strand break repair: signaling and single-stranded resection dictate the choice between homologous recombination, nonhomologous end-joining and alternative end-joining. Am J Cancer Res. United States; 2012. pp. 249–268.
6. McVey M, Lee SE. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director’s cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 2008. pp. 529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.007 PMID: 18809224
7. Bennardo N, Cheng A, Huang N, Stark JM. Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet. 2008. p. e1000110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen. 1000110 PMID: 18584027
8. Xie A, Kwok A, Scully R. Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative nonhomologous end joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009; 16: 814–8. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1640 PMID: 19633669
9. Deriano L, Stracker TH, Baker A, Petrini JHJ, Roth DB. Roles for NBS1 in alternative nonhomologous end-joining of V(D)J recombination intermediates. Mol Cell. Elsevier Ltd; 2009; 34: 13–25. doi: 10. 1016/j.molcel.2009.03.009 PMID: 19362533
10. Rass E, Grabarz A, Plo I, Gautier J, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Role of Mre11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009. pp. 819–824. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1641 PMID: 19633668
11. Saintigny Y, Delacote F, Vares G, Petitot F, Lambert S, Averbeck D, et al. Characterization of homologous recombination induced by replication inhibition in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2001. pp. 3861–3870. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.14.3861 PMID: 11447127
12. Magdalou I, Lopez BS, Pasero P, Lambert SA. The causes of replication stress and their consequences on genome stability and cell fate. [Internet]. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014. pp. 154–164. doi: 10. 1016/j.semcdb.2014.04.035 PMID: 24818779
13. Gelot C, Magdalou I, Lopez BS. Replication stress in Mammalian cells and its consequences for mitosis. Genes (Basel). 2015; 6: 267–98.
14. Gelot C, Guirouilh-Barbat J, Le Guen T, Dardillac E, Chailleux C, Canitrot Y, et al. The Cohesin Complex Prevents the End Joining of Distant DNA Double-Strand Ends. Mol Cell. 2016; 61: 15–26. doi: 10. 1016/j.molcel.2015.11.002 PMID: 26687679
15. Hastings PJ, Ira G, Lupski JR. A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet. 2009. p. e1000327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen. 1000327 PMID: 19180184
16. Zhang F, Khajavi M, Connolly AM, Towne CF, Batish SD, Lupski JR. The DNA replication FoSTeS/ MMBIR mechanism can generate genomic, genic and exonic complex rearrangements in humans. Nat Genet. 2009. pp. 849–853. doi: 10.1038/ng.399 PMID: 19543269
17. Zhang F, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR. Complex human chromosomal and genomic rearrangements. Trends Genet. England; 2009. pp. 298–307.
18. Anand RP, Tsaponina O, Greenwell PW, Lee C-S, Du W, Petes TD, et al. Chromosome rearrangements via template switching between diverged repeated sequences. Genes Dev. 2014; 28: 2394–406. doi: 10.1101/gad.250258.114 PMID: 25367035
19. Cary RB, Peterson SR, Wang J, Bear DG, Bradbury EM, Chen DJ. DNA looping by Ku and the DNA-dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997. pp. 4267–4272. PMID: 9113978
20. Weterings E, Van Gent DC. The mechanism of non-homologous end-joining: A synopsis of synapsis. DNA Repair. 2004. pp. 1425–1435. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.06.003 PMID: 15380098
21. Shao Z, Davis AJ, Fattah KR, So S, Sun J, Lee K-JJ, et al. Persistently bound Ku at DNA ends attenuates DNA end resection and homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst). 2012; 11: 310–6.
22. DeFazio LG, Stansel RM, Griffith JD, Chu G. Synapsis of DNA ends by DNA-dependent protein kinase. Embo J. 2002. pp. 3192–3200. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf299 PMID: 12065431
23. Soutoglou E, Dorn JF, Sengupta K, Jasin M, Nussenzweig A, Ried T, et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007. pp. 675–682. doi: 10.1038/ncb1591 PMID: 17486118
24. Yan CT, Boboila C, Souza EK, Franco S, Hickernell TR, Murphy M, et al. IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway. Nature. 2007; 449: 478–82. doi: 10.1038/ nature06020 PMID: 17713479
25. Boboila C, Jankovic M, Yan CT, Wang JH, Wesemann DR, Zhang T, et al. Alternative end-joining catalyzes robust IgH locus deletions and translocations in the combined absence of ligase 4 and Ku70. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 107: 3034–3039.
26. McVey M, Radut D, Sekelsky JJ. End-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Drosophila melanogaster is largely DNA ligase IV independent. Genetics. 2004; 168: 2067–2076. doi: 10.1534/genetics. 104.033902 PMID: 15611176
27. Weinstock DM, Brunet E, Jasin M. Formation of NHEJ-derived reciprocal chromosomal translocations does not require Ku70. Nat Cell Biol. 2007.
28. Simsek D, Jasin M. Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Nature Publishing Group; 2010; 17: 410–6. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1773 PMID: 20208544
29. Ghezraoui H, Piganeau M, Renouf B, Renaud J- B, Sallmyr A, Ruis B, et al. Chromosomal translocations in human cells are generated by canonical nonhomologous end-joining. Mol Cell. 2014; 55: 829–42. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.002 PMID: 25201414
30. Grabarz A, Guirouilh-Barbat JJ, Barascu AA, Pennarun GG, Genet D, Rass E, et al. A role for BLM in double-strand break repair pathway choice: prevention of CtIP/Mre11-mediated alternative nonhomologous end-joining. Cell Rep. 2013; 5: 21–8. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.034 PMID: 24095737
31. Beck C, Boehler C, Guirouilh Barbat J, Bonnet ME, Illuzzi G, Ronde P, et al. PARP3 affects the relative contribution of homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014. pp. 5616–5632. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku174 PMID: 24598253
32. Barton O, Naumann SC, Diemer-Biehs R, Künzel J, Steinlage M, Conrad S, et al. Polo-like kinase 3 regulates CtIP during DNA double-strand break repair in G1. J Cell Biol. 2014; 206: 877–94. doi: 10. 1083/jcb.201401146 PMID: 25267294
33. Bothmer A, Robbiani DF, Di Virgilio M, Bunting SF, Klein IA, Feldhahn N, et al. Regulation of DNA end joining, resection, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination by 53BP1. Mol Cell. 2011. pp. 319–329.
34. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Huck S, Bertrand P, Pirzio L, Desmaze C, Sabatier L, et al. Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol Cell. 2004. pp. 611–623.
35. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Rass E, Plo I, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. pp. 20902–20907. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708541104 PMID: 18093953
36. Grabarz A, Guirouilh-Barbat J, Barascu A, Pennarun G, Genet D, Rass E, et al. A role for BLM in double-strand break repair pathway choice: prevention of CtIP/Mre11-mediated alternative nonhomologous end-joining. Cell Rep. 2013. pp. 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.034 PMID: 24095737
37. Bunting SF, Calln E, Wong N, Chen HT, Polato F, Gunn A, et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell. 2010; 141: 243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012 PMID: 20362325
38. Zucman-Rossi J, Legoix P, Victor JM, Lopez B, Thomas G. Chromosome translocation based on illegitimate recombination in human tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998. pp. 11786–11791. PMID: 9751743
39. Piganeau M, Ghezraoui H, De Cian A, Guittat L, Tomishima M, Perrouault L, et al. Cancer translocations in human cells induced by zinc finger and TALE nucleases. Genome Res. 2013. pp. 1182–1193. doi: 10.1101/gr.147314.112 PMID: 23568838
40. Dion V, Kalck V, Horigome C, Towbin BD, Gasser SM. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat Cell Biol. 2012; 14: 502–509. doi: 10.1038/ncb2465 PMID: 22484486
41. Miné-Hattab J, Rothstein R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat Cell Biol. 2012; 14: 510–517. doi: 10.1038/ncb2472 PMID: 22484485
42. Roukos V, Voss TC, Schmidt CK, Lee S, Wangsa D, Misteli T. Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells. Science. 2013; 341: 660–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1237150 PMID: 23929981
43. Soutoglou E, Dorn JF, Sengupta K, Jasin M, Nussenzweig A, Ried T, et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol. Nature Publishing Group; 2007; 9: 675–82. doi: 10.1038/ncb1591 PMID: 17486118
44. Jung D, Alt FW. Unraveling V(D)J recombination; insights into gene regulation. Cell. 2004. pp. 299–311.
45. Gorgoulis VG, Vassiliou L V, Karakaidos P, Zacharatos P, Kotsinas A, Liloglou T, et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature. 2005. pp. 907–913. doi: 10.1038/nature03485 PMID: 15829965
46. Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Kramer A, Tort F, Zieger K, et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005. pp. 864–870. doi: 10.1038/ nature03482 PMID: 15829956
47. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, et al. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Boston; 1999.
48. Xie A, Kwok A, Scully R. Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative nonhomologous end joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009. pp. 814–818. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1640 PMID: 19633669