'Beyond Jack and Jill': Designing for individuals using HADRIAN

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 249-264

  Porter, J Mark ^a   Case, Keith ^a   Marshall, Russell ^a   Gyi, Diane ^a   Sims Neé Oliver, Ruth ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Coping strategies; Design for all; Human modelling CAD systems; Inclusive design; Multivariate accommodation; Task posture

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATABASE SYSTEMS; HUMAN FORM MODELS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

FUNCTIONAL ABILITIES;

ERGONOMICS;

ACCURACY; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BODY BUILD; BODY SIZE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DATA BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 1042289326     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ashworth J.B., Reuben D.B., Benton L.A. Functional profile of healthy older persons. Age and Aging. 23:1994;34-39.
2. Avlund K., Schulz-Larsen K. What do 70-year-old men and women actually do? And what are they able to do? Aging. 3:1991;39-49.
3. Burns, C.M., Vicente, K.J., 1994. Designer evaluations of Human Factors reference information. Published in Proceedings of 12th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Vol. 4, Ergonomics and Design, Toronto.
4. Dreyfuss H. The Measure of Man. Human Factors in Design:1967;Whitney Library of Design, New York.
5. Gyi, D.E., Porter, J.M., Case, K., 2000. Design practice and 'designing for all'. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association's 14th Triennial Congress, San Diego, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, USA.
6. Hasdogen G. The nature and limitations of user models in the household product design process. Design Studies. 17(1):1995;19-33.
7. Haslegrave C.M. Characterising the anthropometric extremes of the population. Ergonomics. 29(2):1986;281-302.
8. Marshall R., Case K., Oliver R., Gyi D., Porter J.M. A task based 'design for all' support tool. Journal of Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 18(3-4):2002;297-303.
9. Martin, J., Meltzer, H., Elliot, D., 1994. OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain. Report 1: The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults. HMSO, London.
10. Molenbroek J.F.M., Steenbekkers L.P.A. Reaching envelopes. Steenbekkers L.P.A., van Beijsterveldt C.E.M. Design-Relevant Characteristics of Ageing Users. 1998;Delft University Press, Delft.
11. Muller W. Design discipline and the significance of visuo-spatial thinking. Design Studies. 10:1989;12-23.
12. Oliver, R., Gyi, D., Porter, J.M., Marshall, R., Case, K., 2001. A survey of the design needs of older and disabled people. Contemporary Ergonomics 2001, Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society Annual Conference. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 365-370.
13. Pheasant S.T. Bodyspace. Anthropometry Ergonomics and the Design of Work 2nd Edition:1996;Taylor & Francis, London (Philadelphia, PA).
14. Porter C.S., Porter J.M. Designing for usability. input of ergonomics information at an appropriate point, and appropriate form, in the design process Green W., Jordan P. Human Factors in Product Design. 1999;15-25 Taylor & Francis, London.
15. Porter, J.M., 2001. Invited paper. Beyond 'Jack and Jill': designing for individuals within populations. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Anthropometrics of Disability, Buffalo, NY, USA.
16. Porter J.M., Porter C.S. Occupant accommodation. an ergonomics approach Happian-Smith J. An Introduction to Modern Vehicle Design. 2001;233-276 Butterworth-Heineman, London. (ISBN 07506 5044 3).
17. Porter J.M., Freer M., Case K., Bonney M.C. Computer aided ergonomics and workspace design. Wilson J.A., Corlett E.N. Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology. 2nd Edition:1995;574-620 Taylor & Francis, London (Philadelphia, PA).
18. Porter J.M., Case K., Freer M.T. Computer aided design and human models. Karwowski W., Marras W. Handbook of Occupational Ergonomics. 1999;479-500 CRC Press LLC, Florida.
19. Robinette, K.M., McConville, J.T., 1982. An Alternative to Percentile Models, 810217. Society of Automotive Engineers, pp. 938-946.
20. Roebuck J.A. Jr., Kroemer K.H.E., Thomson W.G. Engineering Anthropometry Methods. 1975;Wiley, New York.
21. Simpson, R.E., Hartley, E.V., 1981. Scatter diagrams based on the anthropometric survey of 2000 Royal Air Force aircrew (1970/1971). Technical Report 81017, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Ministry of Defence, UK.
22. Tovey M.J. Intuitive and objective processes in automotive design. Design Studies. 13(1):1992;23-41.
23. Vanderheiden, G., Tobias, J., 2000. Universal design of consumer products: current industry practice and perceptions. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Society/Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Congress 2000, pp. 19-22.
24. World Health Organisation, 1998. Population ageing - a public health challenge. World Health Organisation Fact Sheet No. 135, http://www.who.int/inf- fs/en/fact135.html.