Can user-paced, menu-free spoken language interfaces improve dual task handling while driving?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8511 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2014, Pages 394-405

  Eriksson, Alexander ^a,c   Lindström, Anders ^b   Seward, Albert ^b   Seward, Alexander ^b   Kircher, Katja ^c  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Veridict AB   (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

compensatory behaviour; hazard reporting; human factors; IVIS; natural language; simulated driving; speech based interface; strategic driving behaviour; VUI

Indexed keywords

HAZARDS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

COMPENSATORY BEHAVIOUR; DRIVING BEHAVIOUR; IVIS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; SIMULATED DRIVING; SPEECH-BASED INTERFACES; VUI;

SPEECH;

EID: 84903149955     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2_38     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Maciej, J., Vollrath, M.: Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with invehicle information systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention 41, 924-930 (2009)
2. Wickens, C.D.: Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, 128-133 (2002)
3. Salvucci, D.D., Taatgen, N.A.: Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review 115, 101-130 (2008)
4. Wu, X., Li, Z.: Secondary task method for workload measurement in alarm monitoring and identification tasks. In: Rau, P.L.P. (ed.) HCII 2013 and CCD 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8023, pp. 346-354. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
5. Grant, R.C., Carswell, C.M., Lio, C.H., Seales, W.B.: Measuring surgeons' mental workload with a time-based secondary task. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 21, 7-11 (2013)
6. Alm, H., Nilsson, L.: The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behavior in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention 27, 707-715 (1995)
7. Beede, K.E., Kass, S.J.: Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38, 415-421 (2006)
8. Horrey, W.J., Wickens, C.D.: Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors 48, 196-205 (2006)
9. Caird, J.K., Willness, C.R., Steel, P., Scialfa, C.: A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40, 1282-1293 (2008)
10. Sivak, M.: The information that drivers use: Is it indeed 90% visual? Perception 25, 1081-1089 (1996)
11. Fitch, G.M., Hanowski, R.J.: The risk of a safety-critical event associated with mobile device use as a function of driving task demands. In: Second Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Gothenburg, Sweden (2011)
12. Klauer, S.G., Guo, F., Simons-Morton, B.G., Ouimet, M.C., Lee, S.E., Dingus, T.A.: Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced Drivers. New England Journal of Medicine 370, 54-59 (2014)
13. Cooper, J.M., Vladisavljevic, I., Medeiros-Ward, N., Martin, P.T., Strayer, D.L.: An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability. Human Factors 51, 261-268 (2009)
14. O'Brien, N.P., Goodwin, A.H., Foss, R.D.: Talking and texting among teenage drivers: A glass half empty or half full? Traffic Injury Prevention 11, 549-554 (2010)
15. Esbjörnsson, M., Juhlin, O., Weilenmann, A.: Drivers using mobile phones in traffic: An ethnographic study of interactional adaptation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 22, 37-58 (2007)
16. Lindström, A., Villing, J., Larsson, S., Seward, A., Åberg, N., Holtelius, C.: The effect of cognitive load on disfluencies during in-vehicle spoken dialogue. Interspeech, Brisbane, Australia (2008)
17. Wickens, C.D.: Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman, R., Davies, D.R. (eds.) Varieties of Attention, pp. 63-102. Academic Press, New York (1984)
18. Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors 50, 449-455 (2008)
19. Derrick, W.L.: Dimensions of operator workload. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 30, 95-110 (1988)
20. Levy, J., Pashler, H., Boer, E.: Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science 17, 228-235 (2006)
21. NHTSA: Visual-manual NHTSA driver distraction guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices. Docket NHTSA-2010-0053 (2012)
22. Yager, C.: An evaluation of the effectiveness of voice-to-text programs at reducing incidences of distracted driving. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-3135, Technical Report SWUTC/ 13/600451-00011-1 (2013)
23. Green, P.A.: Driver interface/HMI standards to minimize driver distraction/ overload. UMTRI, SAE Paper 2008-21-2002 (2008)
24. McCracken, J.H., Aldrich, T.B.: Analyses of selected LHX mission functions: Implications for operator workload and system automation goals. Anacapa Sciences Inc., Research note ASI-479-024-84B (1984)
25. Kun, A.L., Paek, T., Zeljko, M.: The effect of speech interface accuracy on driving performance. Interspeech, Antwerp, Belgium (2007)
26. Green, P.A.: Crashes induced by driver information systems and what can be done to reduce them. In: Conference of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, PA, USA (1999)
27. Shioya, M., Nishimoto, T., Takahashi, J., Daigo, H.: A study of dialogue management principles corresponding to the driver's workload. In: Abut, H., Hansen, J.L., Takeda, K. (eds.) Advances for In-Vehicle and Mobile Systems, pp. 251-265. Springer, US (2007)
28. Villing, J., Larsson, S.: Speech, buttons or both? A comparative study of an in-car dialogue system. In: Third International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Salzburg, Austria (2011)
29. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of Oz studies - why and how. Know-ledge- Based Systems 6, 258-266 (1993)
30. Byers, J.C., Bittner, A.C., Hill, S.G.: Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary? In: International Industrial Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio (1989)