Fully Automated Driving: Impact of Trust and Practice on Manual Control Recovery

Human Factors

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 229-241

  Payre, William ^a,b   Cestac, Julien ^b   Delhomme, Patricia ^b  

^a Institut VEDECOM   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

fully automated driving; manual control recovery; practice; trust

Indexed keywords

CRASHWORTHINESS; MANUAL CONTROL; RECOVERY;

AUTOMATED DEVICE; AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS; DRIVING SIMULATOR; FULL CONTROL; FULLY AUTOMATED; PRACTICE; TRUST;

AUTOMATION;

ADULT; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRUST;

ADULT; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TRUST;

EID: 84958984172     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720815612319     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bainbridge L., (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19 (6), 775-779.
2. Brookhuis K. A., de Waard D., (2006). Consequences of automation for driver behavior and acceptance. Proceedings of the 16th IEA Congress. [CD-ROM]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Cohen M. S., Parasuraman R., Freeman J. T., (1998). Trust in decision aids: A model and its training implications. Proceedings of the 1998 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (pp. 255-265). Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Command and Control Research Program.
4. Desmond P. A., Hancock P. A., Monette J. L., (1998). Fatigue and automation-induced impairments in simulated driving performance. Transportation Research Record, 1628, 8-14.
5. de Waard D., van der Hulst M., Hoedemaeker M., Brookhuis K. A., (1999). Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the Automated Highway System. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 67-82.
6. Dzindolet M. T., Peterson S. A., Pomranky R. A., Pierce L. G., Beck H. P., (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 697-718.
7. Federal Aviation Administration. (2013). Operational use of flight path management systems. Retrieved from http://www.faa.gov/about/office-org/headquarters-offices/avs/offices/afs/afs400/parc/parc-reco/media/2013/130908-PARC-FltDAWG-Final-Report-Recommendations.pdf.
8. Hatakka M., Keskinen E., Gregersen N. P., Glad A., Hernetkoski K., (2002). From control of the vehicle to personal self-control; broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 201-215.
9. Hoc J. M., Mars F., Milleville-Pennel I., (2006). Human-machine cooperation in car driving for lateral safety: Delegation and mutual control. Le Travail Humain, 69 (2), 153-182.
10. Hoc J. M., Young M. S., Blosseville J. M., (2009). Cooperation between drivers and automation: Implications for safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 135-160.
11. Hoff K. A., Bashir M., (2014). Trust in automation integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570
12. Inagaki T., (1999). Situation-adaptive autonomy: Trading control of authority in human-machine systems. In Scerbo M. W., Mouloua M., (Eds.), Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends (pp. 154-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Inagaki T., (2006). Design of human-machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8 (3), 161-167.
14. Inagaki T., Furukawa H., (2004,). Computer simulation for the design of authority in the adaptive cruise control systems under possibility of driver's over-trust in automation. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 3932-3937). New York: IEEE.
15. Kaber D. B., Endsley M. R., (1997). Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Safety Progress, 16 (3), 126-131.
16. Kopf M., Nirschl G., (1997). Driver-vehicle interaction while driving with ACC in borderline situations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Berlin, Germany.
17. Kopf M., Simon J., (2001). A concept for a learn-adaptive advanced driver assistance system. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches, Neubiberg, Germany.
18. Lee J. D., Moray N., (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
19. Lee J. D., Moray N., (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operator's adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153-184.
20. Lee J. D., See K. A., (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80.
21. Manstetten D., Krautter W., Engeln A., Zahn P., Simon J., Kuhn F., Frank P., Junge M., Lehrach K., Buld S., (2003). Learnability of driver assistance systems-invent FVM-driver behavior and human machine interaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Madrid, Spain.
22. May J. F., Baldwin C. L., (2009). Driver fatigue: The importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12, 218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.11.005
23. McClellan J. M., (1994). Can you trust your autopilot? Flying, 76-83.
24. Muir B. M., (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aides. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 527-539.
25. Muir B. M., Moray N., (1996). Trust in automation: Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics, 39 (3), 429-460.
26. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013). Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated-Vehicles-Policy.pdf
27. Neubauer C., Matthews G., Saxby D., (2012). The effects of cell phone use and automation on driver performance and subjective state in simulated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 1987-1991). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
28. Orr J. M., Sackett P. R., DuBois C. L. Z., (1991). Outlier detection and treatment in I/O psychology: A survey of researcher beliefs and an empirical illustration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 473-486.
29. Parasuraman R., Manzey D., (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors, 52, 381-410.
30. Parasuraman R., Riley V. A., (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse., Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
31. Parasuraman R., Sheridan T. B., Wickens C. D., (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30 (3), 286-297.
32. Payre W., Cestac J., Delhomme P., (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27 (Part B), 252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009
33. Saad F., Hjälmdahl M., Cañas J., Alonso M., Garayo P., Macchi L., Nathan F., Ojeda L., Papakostopoulos V., Panou M., Bekiaris E., (2004). Literature review of behavioural effects. AIDE, Deliverable 1.2.1.
34. Saxby D. J., Matthews G., Hitchcock E. M., Warm J. S., (2008). Development of active and passive fatigue manipulations using a driving simulator. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD.
35. Saxby D. J., Matthews G., Warm J. S., Hitchcock E. M., Neubauer C., (2013). Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: Discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19 (4), 287.
36. Stanton N. A., Young M. S., (1998). Vehicle automation and driving performance. Ergonomics, 41 (7), 1014-1028. doi.org/10.1080/001401398186568
37. Stanton N. A., Young M. S., Walker G. H., Turner H., Randle S., (2001). Automating the driver's control tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5 (3), 221-236. doi: 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503-5
38. Weinberger M., Winner H., Bubb H., (2001). Adaptive cruise control field operational test-The learning phase. JSAE, 22, 487-494.
39. Wickens C. D., Gempler K., Morphew M. E., (2000). Workload and reliability of predictor displays in aircraft traffic avoidance. Transportation Human Factors, 2, 99-126.
40. Wickens C. D., Hollands J. G., (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Wiener E. L., (1981). Complacency: Is the term useful for air safety? In Proceedings of the 26th Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar (pp. 116-125). Denver, CO: Flight Safety Foundation, Inc.
42. Young M. S., Stanton N. A., (2007). What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload. Ergonomics, 50 (8), 1324-1339.