Mammalian RAD52 Functions in Break-Induced Replication Repair of Collapsed DNA Replication Forks

Molecular Cell

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1127-1134

  Sotiriou, Sotirios K ^a   Kamileri, Irene ^a   Lugli, Natalia ^a   Evangelou, Konstantinos ^b   Da Ré, Caterina ^a   Huber, Florian ^a   Padayachy, Laura ^a   Tardy, Sebastien ^a   Nicati, Noemie L ^a   Barriot, Samia ^a   Ochs, Fena ^c   Lukas, Claudia ^c   Lukas, Jiri ^c   Gorgoulis, Vassilis G ^b,d,e   Scapozza, Leonardo ^a   Halazonetis, Thanos D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

^c University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Greece)

Author keywords

break induced replication; cancer; DNA recombination; DNA replication stress; RAD52

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN E; DNA; RAD52 PROTEIN; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI PROTEIN, MOUSE; APC PROTEIN; NOCODAZOLE; RAD52 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CANCER GROWTH; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HETEROZYGOTE; LIFESPAN; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; ONCOGENE; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; CELL PROLIFERATION; DEFICIENCY; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; METABOLISM; MORTALITY; OSTEOSARCOMA; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI PROTEIN; ANIMALS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; CYCLIN E; DNA; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; G1 PHASE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NOCODAZOLE; OSTEOSARCOMA; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECOMBINATIONAL DNA REPAIR; RNA, SMALL INTERFERING; S PHASE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85008222788     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.038     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anand, R.P., Lovett, S.T., Haber, J.E., Break-induced DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 5, 2013, a010397.
2. Arlt, M.F., Wilson, T.E., Glover, T.W., Replication stress and mechanisms of CNV formation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22 (2012), 204–210.
3. Bartkova, J., Horejsí, Z., Koed, K., Krämer, A., Tort, F., Zieger, K., Guldberg, P., Sehested, M., Nesland, J.M., Lukas, C., et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434 (2005), 864–870.
4. Bartkova, J., Rezaei, N., Liontos, M., Karakaidos, P., Kletsas, D., Issaeva, N., Vassiliou, L.V., Kolettas, E., Niforou, K., Zoumpourlis, V.C., et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature 444 (2006), 633–637.
5. Bétous, R., Mason, A.C., Rambo, R.P., Bansbach, C.E., Badu-Nkansah, A., Sirbu, B.M., Eichman, B.F., Cortez, D., SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 26 (2012), 151–162.
6. Bhowmick, R., Minocherhomji, S., Hickson, I.D., RAD52 facilitates mitotic DNA synthesis following replication stress. Mol. Cell 64 (2016), 1117–1126 this issue.
7. Blow, J.J., Ge, X.Q., Jackson, D.A., How dormant origins promote complete genome replication. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36 (2011), 405–414.
8. Bonner, W.M., Redon, C.E., Dickey, J.S., Nakamura, A.J., Sedelnikova, O.A., Solier, S., Pommier, Y., GammaH2AX and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8 (2008), 957–967.
9. Branzei, D., Foiani, M., Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11 (2010), 208–219.
10. Cheung, A.F., Carter, A.M., Kostova, K.K., Woodruff, J.F., Crowley, D., Bronson, R.T., Haigis, K.M., Jacks, T., Complete deletion of Apc results in severe polyposis in mice. Oncogene 29 (2010), 1857–1864.
11. Chou, D.M., Elledge, S.J., Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006), 18143–18147.
12. Costantino, L., Sotiriou, S.K., Rantala, J.K., Magin, S., Mladenov, E., Helleday, T., Haber, J.E., Iliakis, G., Kallioniemi, O.P., Halazonetis, T.D., Break-induced replication repair of damaged forks induces genomic duplications in human cells. Science 343 (2014), 88–91.
13. Cramer-Morales, K., Nieborowska-Skorska, M., Scheibner, K., Padget, M., Irvine, D.A., Sliwinski, T., Haas, K., Lee, J., Geng, H., Roy, D., et al. Personalized synthetic lethality induced by targeting RAD52 in leukemias identified by gene mutation and expression profile. Blood 122 (2013), 1293–1304.
14. Dilley, R.L., Verma, P., Cho, N.W., Winters, H.D., Wondisford, A.R., Greenberg, R.A., Break-induced telomere synthesis underlies alternative telomere maintenance. Nature 539 (2016), 54–58.
15. Donnianni, R.A., Symington, L.S., Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 (2013), 13475–13480.
16. Errico, A., Costanzo, V., Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 47 (2012), 222–235.
17. Feng, Z., Scott, S.P., Bussen, W., Sharma, G.G., Guo, G., Pandita, T.K., Powell, S.N., Rad52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with BRCA2 deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 (2011), 686–691.
18. Galanos, P., Vougas, K., Walter, D., Polyzos, A., Maya-Mendoza, A., Haagensen, E.J., Kokkalis, A., Roumelioti, F.M., Gagos, S., Tzetis, M., et al. Chronic p53-independent p21 expression causes genomic instability by deregulating replication licensing. Nat. Cell Biol. 18 (2016), 777–789.
19. Gorgoulis, V.G., Vassiliou, L.V., Karakaidos, P., Zacharatos, P., Kotsinas, A., Liloglou, T., Venere, M., Ditullio, R.A. Jr., Kastrinakis, N.G., Levy, B., et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 434 (2005), 907–913.
20. Halazonetis, T.D., Gorgoulis, V.G., Bartek, J., An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319 (2008), 1352–1355.
21. Hills, S.A., Diffley, J.F., DNA replication and oncogene-induced replicative stress. Curr. Biol. 24 (2014), R435–R444.
22. Ira, G., Haber, J.E., Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002), 6384–6392.
23. Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J.A., Charpentier, E., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337 (2012), 816–821.
24. Kagawa, W., Kurumizaka, H., Ishitani, R., Fukai, S., Nureki, O., Shibata, T., Yokoyama, S., Crystal structure of the homologous-pairing domain from the human Rad52 recombinase in the undecameric form. Mol. Cell 10 (2002), 359–371.
25. Lieberman, R., Xiong, D., James, M., Han, Y., Amos, C.I., Wang, L., You, M., Functional characterization of RAD52 as a lung cancer susceptibility gene in the 12p13.33 locus. Mol. Carcinog. 55 (2016), 953–963.
26. Llorente, B., Smith, C.E., Symington, L.S., Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for?. Cell Cycle 7 (2008), 859–864.
27. Lok, B.H., Powell, S.N., Molecular pathways: understanding the role of Rad52 in homologous recombination for therapeutic advancement. Clin. Cancer Res. 18 (2012), 6400–6406.
28. Lydeard, J.R., Jain, S., Yamaguchi, M., Haber, J.E., Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448 (2007), 820–823.
29. Macheret, M., Halazonetis, T.D., DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 10 (2015), 425–448.
30. Malkova, A., Ira, G., Break-induced replication: functions and molecular mechanism. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23 (2013), 271–279.
31. Mayle, R., Campbell, I.M., Beck, C.R., Yu, Y., Wilson, M., Shaw, C.A., Bjergbaek, L., Lupski, J.R., Ira, G., DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage. Science 349 (2015), 742–747.
32. Menichincheri, M., Albanese, C., Alli, C., Ballinari, D., Bargiotti, A., Caldarelli, M., Ciavolella, A., Cirla, A., Colombo, M., Colotta, F., et al. Cdc7 kinase inhibitors: 5-heteroaryl-3-carboxamido-2-aryl pyrroles as potential antitumor agents. 1. Lead finding. J. Med. Chem. 53 (2010), 7296–7315.
33. Minocherhomji, S., Ying, S., Bjerregaard, V.A., Bursomanno, S., Aleliunaite, A., Wu, W., Mankouri, H.W., Shen, H., Liu, Y., Hickson, I.D., Replication stress activates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis. Nature 528 (2015), 286–290.
34. Montagnoli, A., Moll, J., Colotta, F., Targeting cell division cycle 7 kinase: a new approach for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 16 (2010), 4503–4508.
35. Montagnoli, A., Ballinari, D., Ciavolella, A., Rainoldi, S., Menichincheri, M., Pesenti, E., Galvani, A., Isacchi, A., Moll, J., Activity of the Cdc7 inhibitor NMS-1116354 as single agent and in combination in breast cancer models. EJC Suppl., 8, 2010, 49.
36. Moser, A.R., Pitot, H.C., Dove, W.F., A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science 247 (1990), 322–324.
37. Murfuni, I., Basile, G., Subramanyam, S., Malacaria, E., Bignami, M., Spies, M., Franchitto, A., Pichierri, P., Survival of the replication checkpoint deficient cells requires MUS81-RAD52 function. PLoS Genet., 9, 2013, e1003910.
38. Murga, M., Lecona, E., Kamileri, I., Díaz, M., Lugli, N., Sotiriou, S.K., Anton, M.E., Méndez, J., Halazonetis, T.D., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., POLD3 is haploinsufficient for DNA replication in mice. Mol. Cell 63 (2016), 877–883.
39. Negrini, S., Gorgoulis, V.G., Halazonetis, T.D., Genomic instability—an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11 (2010), 220–228.
40. Ochs, F., Somyajit, K., Altmeyer, M., Rask, M.B., Lukas, J., Lukas, C., 53BP1 fosters fidelity of homology-directed DNA repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23 (2016), 714–721.
41. Payen, C., Koszul, R., Dujon, B., Fischer, G., Segmental duplications arise from Pol32-dependent repair of broken forks through two alternative replication-based mechanisms. PLoS Genet., 4, 2008, e1000175.
42. Pepe, A., West, S.C., MUS81-EME2 promotes replication fork restart. Cell Rep. 7 (2014), 1048–1055.
43. Petermann, E., Orta, M.L., Issaeva, N., Schultz, N., Helleday, T., Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol. Cell 37 (2010), 492–502.
44. Pommier, Y., Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6 (2006), 789–802.
45. Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W., Jasin, M., Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 7, 2015, a016600.
46. Rijkers, T., Van Den Ouweland, J., Morolli, B., Rolink, A.G., Baarends, W.M., Van Sloun, P.P., Lohman, P.H., Pastink, A., Targeted inactivation of mouse RAD52 reduces homologous recombination but not resistance to ionizing radiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18 (1998), 6423–6429.
47. Roumelioti, F.M., Sotiriou, S.K., Katsini, V., Chiourea, M., Halazonetis, T.D., Gagos, S., Alternative lengthening of human telomeres is a conservative DNA replication process with features of break-induced replication. EMBO Rep., 2016, e201643169.
48. Saini, N., Ramakrishnan, S., Elango, R., Ayyar, S., Zhang, Y., Deem, A., Ira, G., Haber, J.E., Lobachev, K.S., Malkova, A., Migrating bubble during break-induced replication drives conservative DNA synthesis. Nature 502 (2013), 389–392.
49. Sarbajna, S., Davies, D., West, S.C., Roles of SLX1-SLX4, MUS81-EME1, and GEN1 in avoiding genome instability and mitotic catastrophe. Genes Dev. 28 (2014), 1124–1136.
50. Sharan, S.K., Morimatsu, M., Albrecht, U., Lim, D.S., Regel, E., Dinh, C., Sands, A., Eichele, G., Hasty, P., Bradley, A., Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature 386 (1997), 804–810.
51. Singleton, M.R., Wentzell, L.M., Liu, Y., West, S.C., Wigley, D.B., Structure of the single-strand annealing domain of human RAD52 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002), 13492–13497.
52. Sugawara, N., Wang, X., Haber, J.E., In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12 (2003), 209–219.
53. Symington, L.S., Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66 (2002), 630–670.
54. Treuner, K., Helton, R., Barlow, C., Loss of Rad52 partially rescues tumorigenesis and T-cell maturation in Atm-deficient mice. Oncogene 23 (2004), 4655–4661.
55. Wilson, M.A., Kwon, Y., Xu, Y., Chung, W.H., Chi, P., Niu, H., Mayle, R., Chen, X., Malkova, A., Sung, P., Ira, G., Pif1 helicase and Polδ promote recombination-coupled DNA synthesis via bubble migration. Nature 502 (2013), 393–396.
56. Wray, J., Liu, J., Nickoloff, J.A., Shen, Z., Distinct RAD51 associations with RAD52 and BCCIP in response to DNA damage and replication stress. Cancer Res. 68 (2008), 2699–2707.
57. Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y., Sonoda, E., Buerstedde, J.M., Bezzubova, O., Morrison, C., Takata, M., Shinohara, A., Takeda, S., Homologous recombination, but not DNA repair, is reduced in vertebrate cells deficient in RAD52. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18 (1998), 6430–6435.
58. Yeeles, J.T., Poli, J., Marians, K.J., Pasero, P., Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 5, 2013, a012815.