Replication stress activates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis

Nature

Volumn 528, Issue 7581, 2015, Pages 286-290

  Minocherhomji, Sheroy ^a   Ying, Songmin ^b   Bjerregaard, Victoria A ^a   Bursomanno, Sara ^a   Aleliunaite, Aiste ^a   Wu, Wei ^a   Mankouri, Hocine W ^a   Shen, Huahao ^b,c   Liu, Ying ^a   Hickson, Ian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^c State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA POLYMERASE; DNA POLYMERASE POLD3; ENDONUCLEASE; ENDONUCLEASE EME1; ENDONUCLEASE MUS81; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; EME1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MUS81 PROTEIN, HUMAN; POLD3 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

CANCER; CHROMOSOME; DNA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENOME;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL NUCLEUS INCLUSION BODY; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA SYNTHESIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MITOSIS; NONDISJUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHASE; PROTEIN DEPLETION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HCT116 CELL LINE; HELA CELL LINE; HT 29 CELL LINE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CARCINOGENESIS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITES; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; ENDONUCLEASES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; HCT116 CELLS; HELA CELLS; HT29 CELLS; HUMANS; MITOSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONDISJUNCTION, GENETIC; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84949790002     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature16139     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Halazonetis, T. D., Gorgoulis, V. G. & Bartek, J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319, 1352-1355 (2008).
2. Burrow, A. A., Williams, L. E., Pierce, L. C. & Wang, Y. H. Over half of breakpoints in gene pairs involved in cancer-specific recurrent translocations are mapped to human chromosomal fragile sites. BMC Genomics 10, 59 (2009).
3. Arlt, M. F., Durkin, S. G., Ragland, R. L. & Glover, T. W. Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5, 1126-1135 (2006).
4. Le Tallec, B. et al. Common fragile site profiling in epithelial and erythroid cells reveals that most recurrent cancer deletions lie in fragile sites hosting large genes. Cell Reports 4, 420-428 (2013).
5. Burrell, R. A. et al. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 494, 492-496 (2013).
6. Glover, T. W., Berger, C., Coyle, J. & Echo, B. DNA polymerase ? inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes. Hum. Genet. 67, 136-142 (1984).
7. Ying, S. et al. MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression. Nature Cell Biol. 15, 1001-1007 (2013).
8. Naim, V., Wilhelm, T., Debatisse, M. & Rosselli, F. ERCC1 and MUS81-EME1 promote sister chromatid separation by processing late replication intermediates at common fragile sites during mitosis. Nature Cell Biol. 15, 1008-1015 (2013).
9. Minocherhomji, S. & Hickson, I. D. Structure-specific endonucleases: Guardians of fragile site stability. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 321-327 (2014).
10. Le Beau, M. M. et al. Replication of a common fragile site, FRA3B, occurs late in S phase and is delayed further upon induction: Implications for the mechanism of fragile site induction. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 755-761 (1998).
11. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M. & Sorger, P. K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45-60 (2004).
12. Vassilev, L. T. et al. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10660-10665 (2006).
13. Beaudouin, J., Gerlich, D., Daigle, N., Eils, R. & Ellenberg, J. Nuclear envelope breakdown proceeds by microtubule-induced tearing of the lamina. Cell 108, 83-96 (2002).
14. Chan, K. L., Palmai-Pallag, T., Ying, S. & Hickson, I. D. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 753-760 (2009).
15. Hanada, K. et al. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1096-1104 (2007).
16. Ehmsen, K. T. & Heyer, W.-D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mus81-Mms4 is a catalytic, DNA structure-selective endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2182-2195 (2008).
17. Wyatt, H. D., Sarbajna, S., Matos, J. & West, S. C. Coordinated actions of SLX1-SLX4 and MUS81-EME1 for Holliday junction resolution in human cells. Mol. Cell 52, 234-247 (2013).
18. Castor, D. et al. Cooperative control of Holliday junction resolution and DNA repair by the SLX1 and MUS81-EME1 nucleases. Mol. Cell 52, 221-233 (2013).
19. Lukas, C. et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 243-253 (2011).
20. Harrigan, J. A. et al. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 193, 97-108 (2011).
21. Hirano, T. Condensins: Universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions. Genes Dev. 26, 1659-1678 (2012).
22. Tedeschi, A. et al. Wapl is an essential regulator of chromatin structure and chromosome segregation. Nature 501, 564-568 (2013).
23. Lénárt, P. et al. The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Curr. Biol. 17, 304-315 (2007).
24. Costantino, L. et al. Break-induced replication repair of damaged forks induces genomic duplications in human cells. Science 343, 88-91 (2014).
25. Donnianni, R. A. & Symington, L. S. Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13475-13480 (2013).
26. Lydeard, J. R., Jain, S., Yamaguchi, M. & Haber, J. E. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448, 820-823 (2007).
27. Dunlop, M. G. et al. Common variation near CDKN1A, POLD3 and SHROOM2 influences colorectal cancer risk. Nature Genet. 44, 770-776 (2012).
28. Pedersen, R. T., Kruse, T., Nilsson, J., Oestergaard, V. H. & Lisby, M. TopBP1 is required at mitosis to reduce transmission of DNA damage to G1 daughter cells. J. Cell Biol. 210, 565-582 (2015).
29. Wilson, M. A. et al. Pif1 helicase and Pol? promote recombination-coupled DNA synthesis via bubble migration. Nature 502, 393-396 (2013).
30. Saini, N. et al. Migrating bubble during break-induced replication drives conservative DNA synthesis. Nature 502, 389-392 (2013).