The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 436-458

  Brown, Dan ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corrective feedback; Meta analysis; Observational classroom research; Oral feedback types; Second language instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977073839     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362168814563200     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. S.AhangariS.Amirzadeh (2011). Exploring the teachers’ use of spoken corrective feedback in teaching Iranian EFL learners at different levels of proficiency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1859–1868.
2. E.Alcón. (2007). Incidental focus on form, noticing and vocabulary learning in EFL classroom. International Journal of English Studies, 7, 41–60.
3. R.L.Bangert-Drowns (1995). Misunderstanding meta-analysis. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 18, 304–314.
4. A.V.Brown (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 46–60.
5. C.Chaudron. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of errors. Language Learning, 27, 29–46.
6. H.Cooper. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Z.Dong. (2012). Beliefs and practices: A case study on oral corrective feedback in the Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language (TCFL) classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis. Arizona State University, AZ, USA.
8. R.EllisH.BasturkmenS.Loewen (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.
9. R.Ellis. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3–18.
10. J.Fanselow. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10, 583–593.
11. S.GassA.MackeyT.Pica (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 299–307.
12. L.Gurzynski-WeissA.Revesz (2012). Tasks, teacher feedback, and learner modified output in naturally occurring classroom interaction. Language Learning, 62, 851–879.
13. G.Havranek. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed?International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 255–270.
14. A.A.JabbariA.M.Fazilatfar. (2012). The role of error types and feedback in Iranian EFL classrooms. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2, 135–148.
15. J.Jimenez. (2006). Corrective feedback in EFL university classrooms: A case study at an Italian university. Linguistica e Filologia, 23, 45–89.
16. N.Kamiya. (2012). The relationship between stated beliefs, classroom practices, and reading research studies of oral corrective feedback in four ESL teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, MI, USA.
17. K.KelleyK.J.Preacher (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17, 137–152.
18. E.J.Lee. (2006). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in English immersion classrooms in Korea. Unpublished masters’ thesis, International Graduate School of English, Seoul, South Korea.
19. E.J.Lee (2013). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41, 217–230.
20. S.Li. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
21. H.H.Lin. (2009). Patterns of corrective feedback and learner uptake in ESL low, intermediate, and advanced level speaking classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, San Diego, CA, USA.
22. K.Lochtman. (2002). Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 271–283.
23. S.Loewen. (2003). Variations in the frequency and characteristics of incidental focus on form. Language Teaching Research, 7, 315–345.
24. S.LoewenT.Nabei (2006). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In: (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 361–377). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. S.LoewenJ.Philp (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.
26. S.LoewenS.LiF.FeiA.ThompsonK.NakatsukasaS.AhnX.Chen (2009). L2 learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 91–104.
27. R.Lyster. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183–218.
28. R.LysterH.Mori (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.
29. R.LysterL.Ranta (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.
30. R.LysterK.Saito (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.
31. R.LysterK.SaitoM.Sato (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40.
32. A.MackeyJ.Goo (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In: (Ed.), Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 408–452). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. A.MackeyS.GassK.MacDonough (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497.
34. D.P.Margolis (2007). Impacts of oral error feedback in Korean university EFL classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
35. A.S.McNulty (2007). A study of corrective feedback and uptake patterns as observed in four foreign language classrooms at selected mid-western public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA.
36. P.C.MillerW.Pan (2012). Recasts in the L2 classroom: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 48–59.
37. H.Mori. (2002). Error treatment sequences in Japanese immersion classroom interactions at different grade levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
38. R.Mori. (2011). Teacher cognition in corrective feedback in Japan. System, 39, 451–467.
39. G.Musayeva. (1998). Corrective discourse in Turkish EFL classrooms. IRAL, 36, 137–160.
40. J.M.NorrisL.Ortega (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
41. J.M.NorrisL.Ortega (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In: (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3–50). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
42. R.Oliver. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119–151.
43. A.OskozJ.E.Liskin-Gasparro. (2001). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and teacher beliefs: A pilot study. The past, present, and future of second language research (selected proceedings from the 2000 Second Language Research Forum), 209–228.
44. F.L.OswaldL.Plonsky (2010). Meta-analysis in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85–110.
45. I.PanovaR.Lyster (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573–595.
46. L.Plonsky (2012). Replication, meta-analysis, and generalizability. In: (Eds.), Replication Research in Applied Linguistics (pp. 117–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. L.PlonskyD.Brown (2014). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of feedback (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research. Advance online Publication. doi: 10.1177/0267658314536436
48. L.PlonskyS.Gass (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61, 325–366.
49. L.PlonskyF.L.Oswald (2012). How to do a meta-analysis. In: (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 275–295). London: Basil Blackwell.
50. M.A.Roberts (1995). Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In: (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 163–182). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
51. J.RussellN.Spada (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 131–164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
52. R.G.SamarP.Shayestefar (2009). Corrective feedback in EFL classrooms: Learner negotiation strategies and uptake. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 52, 107–134.
53. R.A.Schulz (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258.
54. Y.Sheen. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263–300.
55. Y.Sheen. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 8, 361–392.
56. D.SimardG.Jean (2011). An exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions devised to draw L2 learners’ attention to form. Language Learning, 61, 759–785.
57. M.Suzuki. (2005). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in adult ESL classrooms. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 4 [page range needed].
58. W.Tsang. (2004). Feedback and uptake in teacher-student interaction: An analysis of 18 English lessons in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Regional Language Centre Journal, 35, 187–209.
59. S.VaeziE.Zand-VakiliA.F.Kashani (2011). Patterns of corrective feedback in relation to error types in Iranian adult EFL learners’ classes. European Journal of Scientific Research, 66, 517–531.
60. L.Vicente-Rasoamalala. (2009). Teachers’ reactions to foreign language learner output. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Unversitat de Barcelona, Spain.
61. W.Wang. (2009). The noticing and effect of teacher feedback in ESL classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, MI, USA.
62. E.Won. (2004). Target language corrective feedback and language use by Korean elementary school EFL teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, Michigan State University, MI, USA.
63. R.Yoshida. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17, 78–93.
64. E.ZyzikC.Polio (2008). Incidental focus on form in university Spanish literature courses. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 53–70.