Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students

System

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 217-230

  Esther Lee, Eun Jeong ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced level adult ESL classrooms; Learner repair; Second language acquisition; Students' corrective feedback preferences; Teachers' oral corrective feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879010116     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Doughty, C., 1999. The cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. University of Hawai'I Working Papers in ESL 18, pp. 1-69.
2. Doughty C., Varela E. Communicative focus on form. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 1998, 114-138. Cambridge University Press, New York. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
3. Ellis R. The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures in a Mackay. Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: a Collection of Empirical Studies 2007, 407-452. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Ellis R. Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal 2009, 1:3-18.
5. Han Z. A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly 2002, 36:543-572.
6. Han J., Jung J. Patterns and preferences of corrective feedback and learner repair. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 2007, 23:243-260.
7. Havranek G. The effectiveness of corrective feedback: preliminary results of an empirical study. Acquisition et interaction en language étagère: Proceedings of the Eighth EUROSLA Conference 1999, 2:189-206.
8. Heift T. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL 2004, 16:416-431.
9. Hu G. English language teaching in China: regional differences and contributing factors. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 2003, 24:290-318.
10. Ishida M. Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form of -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning 2004, 54:311-394.
11. Iwashita N. Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: differential effects of L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2003, 25:1-36.
12. Kang E. An investigation on characteristics of recasts and learner repair in beginning and advanced ESL classrooms. Foreign Languages Education 2008, 15:51-75.
13. Kim J.H. Issues of corrective feedback in second language acquisition. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 2004, 4:1-24.
14. Lin Y.H., Hedgcock J. Negative feedback incorporation among high-proficiency and low-proficiency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning 1996, 46:567-611.
15. Long M.H. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition 1996, 413-468. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. W.C. Ritche, T.K. Bhatia (Eds.).
16. Long M.H., Robinson P. Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 1998, 15-41. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
17. Long M., Inagaki S., Ortega L. The role of implicit negative evidence in SLA: models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal 1998, 82:357-371.
18. Lyster R. Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning 1998, 48:183-218.
19. Lyster R., Mori H. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2006, 28:269-300.
20. Lyster R., Ranta L. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1997, 19:37-66.
21. Mackey A., Philip J. Conversational interaction and second language development: recast, responses, and red herrings?. The Modern Language Journal 1998, 82:338-356.
22. McKay S.L., Bokhorst-Heng W.D. International English in its Sociolinguistic Contexts: Towards a Socially Sensitive EIL Pedagogy 2008, Routledge Taylor Francis, New York & London.
23. Netten J. Towards a more language oriented second language classroom. Language, Culture and Cognition 1991, 284-304. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England. L. Malave, G. Duquette (Eds.).
24. Ohta A. Rethinking recasts: a learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. The Construction of Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction 2000, 47-71. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J.K. Hall, L. Verplaetse (Eds.).
25. Oliver R. Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning 2000, 50:119-151.
26. Panove I., Lyster R. Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 2002, 36:573-593.
27. Sheen Y. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 2004, 8:263-300.
28. Sheen Y. The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies 2007, 301-322. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Mackey (Ed.).
29. Suzuki M. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in adult ESL classrooms. Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 2004, 4:1-21.
30. Tsang W.K. Feedback and uptake in teacher-student interaction: an analysis of 18 English lessons in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. RELC Journal 2004, 35:187-209.
31. White L. Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 1991, 7:133-161.
32. Yamamoto S. Can corrective feedback bring about substantial changes in the learner inter-language system?. Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 2003, 3:1-9.
33. Yang Y., Lyster R. Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners' acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2010, 32:235-263.
34. Yoshida R. Teachers' choice and learners' preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness 2008, 17:78-93.