Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching

International Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 271-283

  Lochtman, Katja ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Analytic foreign language teaching; Corrective feedback; Negotiation of meaning and form

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844449761     PISSN: 08830355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00005-3     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
3. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Edmondson, W. J., & House, J. (1993). Einführung in die Sprachlehrforschung. Tübingen/Basel: Francke Verlag.
6. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Farrar, M. J. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28, 90-98.
8. Gordon, P. (1990). Learnability and feedback. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 217-220.
9. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner 'ethnography and second language classroom research. London: Longman.
10. Lightbown, P. (2001). Input filters in second language acquisition. In S. Foster-Cohen, & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook 1 (pp. 79-97). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
11. Lochtman, K. (1997). Kommunikativer Grammatikunterricht an den flämischen Gesamtschulen: Realisierbare norm oder Utopie. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 27, 113-127.
12. Lochtman, K., (2000). Korrekturhandlungen im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
13. Lochtman, K. (2002). Korrekturhandlungen im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.
14. Long, M. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359-382.
15. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
16. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
17. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lyster, R. (1994). La négotiation de la forme: Stratégie analytique en classe d'immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 47, 159-176.
19. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
20. Lyster, R. (2002). Negotiation in immersion teacher-student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 237-253.
21. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
22. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
23. McHoul, A. W. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349-377.
24. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. In J. K. Hall, & L. Verplaetse (Eds.), The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
26. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Saxton, M. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139-161.
28. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-64). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
29. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
30. Stern, H. H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 93-109). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass, & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). London: Newbury House.
33. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wolff, D. (1997). Content based bilingual education or using foreign languages as working languages in the classroom. In D. Marsh, B. Marsland, & T. Nikula (Eds.), Aspects of implementing plurilingual education: Seminar and field notes (pp. 51-64). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.