Tasks, Teacher Feedback, and Learner Modified Output in Naturally Occurring Classroom Interaction

Language Learning

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 851-879

  Gurzynski Weiss, Laura ^a   Révész, Andrea ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classroom research; Error correction; Implicit and explicit; Modified output; Negative feedback; Spanish as a foreign language; Task based language teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865327497     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00716.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bygate, M. (2000). Introduction. Language Teaching Research, 4, 185-192.
2. Chaudron, C. (1988).Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Doughty, C. J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Doughty, C. J., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 129-154). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 339-360). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1-23.
8. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3-17.
10. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611.
11. Han, Z. H. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
12. Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Ed.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Kim, J. H., & Han, Z. H. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 269-300). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
15. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
16. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
17. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
18. Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Ed.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179-192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
21. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
22. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300.
23. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
24. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
25. Mackey, A. (2007). The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 1-28). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407-452). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
28. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Mackey, A., & Sachs, R. (2012). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback and L2 development. Language Learning, 62(3), doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00649.x.
30. Nuevo, A. M. (2006). Task complexity and interaction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
31. Nuevo, A. M., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). In P. Robinson (Ed.), Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning and performance (pp.175-202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
33. Oliver, R. & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519-533.
34. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
35. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437-470.
36. Révész, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal, 95 (Supplement s1), 162-181.
37. Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93-132.
38. Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Mackey, A. (2011). Task complexity, uptake of recasts, and second language development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning and performance (pp. 203-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Communicative language teaching. In J. C. Richards & T. S. Rodgers (Eds.), Approaches and methods in language teaching (pp. 153-177). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Sagarra, N. (2007). From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 229-248). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
43. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300.
44. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301-322). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
46. Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268-286.
47. Slimani, A. (1992). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In J. C. Alderson & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 197-219). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
49. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, H. G. Widdowson, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle & practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 171-198). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.
52. Willis, J. R. (2004). Perspectives on task-based instruction: Understanding our practices, Acknowledging different practitioners. In B. L. Leaver & J. R. Willis (Eds.), Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practice and programs (pp. 3-44). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.