Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 244-258

  Schulz, Renate A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011063086     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00107     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brandi, K. K. (1995). Strong and weak students' preferences for error feedback options and responses. Modern Language Journal, 79, 194-211.
2. Cathcart, R. L., & Olsen, J. E. W. B. (1976). Teachers' and students' preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors. In J. F. Fanselow & R. H. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '76 (pp. 41-53). Washington, DC: TESOL.
3. Chenoweth, N. A., Day, R. R., Chun, A. E., & Luppescu, S. (1983). Attitudes and preferences of ESL students to error correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 79-87.
4. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Fox, C. A. (1993). Communicative competence and beliefs about language among graduate teaching assistants in French. Modern Language Journal, 77, 313-324.
6. Green, J. M. (1993). Student attitudes toward communicative and non-communicative activities: Do enjoyment and effectiveness go together? Modern Language Journal, 77, 1-10.
7. Hammerly, H. (1985). An integrated theory of language teaching. N. Burnaby, BC, Canada: Second Language Publications.
8. Hammond, R. M. (1988). Accuracy versus communicative competency: The acquisition of grammar in the second language classroom. Hispania, 71, 408-417.
9. Higgs, T. V., & Clifford, R. (1982). The push toward communication. In T. V. Higgs (Ed.), Curriculum, competence, and the foreign language teacher (pp. 57-79). Skokie, IL: National Textbook.
10. Honvitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72, 283-294.
11. Horwitz, E. K. (1990). Attending to the affective domain in the foreign language classroom. In S. Magnan (Ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learner (pp. 15-33). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
12. Kern, R. G. (1995). Students' and teachers' beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 71-92.
13. Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
14. Krashen, S. (1999). Seeking a role for grammar: A review of some recent studies. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 245-257.
15. Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.
16. Lee J., & Valdman, A. (2000). Form and meaning: Multiple perspectives. Boston: Heinle.
17. Lightbown, P. M. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lyster, R., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). A response to Truscott's "What's wrong with oral grammar correction." Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 457-467.
20. Mantle-Bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: Links to proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 70, 372-386.
21. McCargar, D. F. (1993). Teacher and student role expectations: Cross-cultural differences and implications. Modern Language Journal, 77, 192-207.
22. Musumeci, D. (1997). Breaking tradition: An exploration of the historical relationship between theory and practice in second language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.
23. Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247.
24. Salomone, A. M. (1998). Communicative grammar teaching: A problem for and a message from international teaching assistants. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 552-566.
25. Schachter, J. (1991). Corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language Research, 7, 89-102.
26. Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 343-364.
27. Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
28. Terrell, T. D. (1977). A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning. Modern Language Journal, 61, 325-336.
29. Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction? Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437-456.
30. Valette, R. M. (1991). Proficiency and the prevention of fossilization - An editorial. Modern Language Journal, 75, 325-328.
31. Wenden, A. L. (1986). What do second-language learners know about their language learning? A second look at retrospective accounts. Applied Linguistics, 7, 187-201.
32. Wipf, J. (1993, May). Error correction in the foreign language classroom: A student perspective. Paper presented at the Pacific Northwest Council on Foreign Languages Conference, Eugene, OR.