Incidental focus on form in University Spanish literature courses

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-70

  Zyzik, Eve ^a   Polio, Charlene ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41949116285     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00686.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Brinton, D., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York: Newbury House.
2. Byrnes, H. (1990). Addressing curriculum articulation in the nineties: A proposal. Foreign Language Annals, 23, 281-292.
3. Byrnes, H. (1998). Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages (pp. 262-295). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
4. Byrnes, H., & Kord, S. (2002). Developing literacy and literary competence: Challenges for foreign language departments. In V. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues (pp. 35-73). Boston: Heinle.
5. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
6. Davis, J. N. (2000). Perspective on an age: Forty-five years of NECTFL reports. In R. M. Terry (Ed.), Agents of change in a changing age (pp. 23-46). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
7. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Donato, R., & Brooks, F. (2004). Literary discussions and advanced speaking functions: Researching the (dis)connection. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 183-199.
9. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, SUPP/1, 1-46.
12. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407-432.
13. Fowle, C. (2002). Vocabulary notebooks: Implementation and outcomes. English Language Teaching Journal, 56, 380-388.
14. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Gass, S., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53, 497-545.
16. Harley, B. (1994). Appealing to consciousness in the L2 classroom. AILA Review, 11, 57-68.
17. Katz, S. (2002). Teaching literary texts at the intermediate level: A structured input approach. In V. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues (pp. 151-168). Boston: Heinle.
18. Knutson, E. M. (1997). Reading with a purpose: Communicative reading tasks for the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 49-57.
19. Kramsch, C. (1985). Literary texts in the classroom: A discourse. Modern Language Journal, 69, 356-366.
20. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: The Alemany Press.
22. Loewen, S. (2003). Variation in the frequency and characteristics of incidental focus on form. Language Teaching Research, 7, 315-345.
23. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
24. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
25. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic.
27. Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. D. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.). Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179-192). Philadephia: John Benjamins.
28. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, process. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom Second Language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lyster, R. (1998a). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in second language acquisition, 20, 51-81.
31. Lyster, R. (1998b). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
32. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
33. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
34. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and second language development: An empirical study of L2 classroom interaction. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405-430.
35. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
36. Mackey, A., Polio, C., & McDonough, K. (2004). The relationship between experience, education, and teachers' use of incidental focus on form techniques. Language Teaching Research, 8, 301-327.
37. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.
38. Met, M. (1998). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. Washington, DC: The National Foreign Language Resource Center.
39. Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics, 17, 286-325.
40. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL participant's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
41. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
42. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
43. Paesani, K. (2005). Literary texts and grammar instruction: Revisiting the inductive presentation. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 15-24.
44. Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.
45. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
46. Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1-19.
47. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
48. Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217-243.
49. Polio, C. (1996). Issues and problems in reporting classroom research. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Second language classroom research: Issues and opportunities (p. 61-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Polio, C., & Zyzik, E. (2006). Don Quixote meets ser and estar: Language-focused instruction in university Spanish literature classes. Presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Montreal, June 2006.
51. Redmann, J. (2005). An interactive reading journal for all levels of the foreign language curriculum. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 484-493.
52. Rodgers, D. M. (2006). Developing content and form: Encouraging evidence from Italian content-based instruction. Modern Language Journal, 90, 373-386.
53. Rounds, P. (1996). The classroom-based researcher as field worker: Strangers in a strange land. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Second language classroom research: Issues and opportunities (p. 45-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35-78.
55. Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M., & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 67-93.
56. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
57. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Schultz, J. M. (1995). Making the transition from language to literature. In M. A. Haggstrom, L. Z. Morgan, & J. A. Wieczorek (Eds.), The foreign language classroom: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 3-20). New York: Garland Publishing.
59. Schultz, J. M. (2002). The Gordian Knot: Language, literature, and critical thinking. In V. M. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues. (pp. 3-34). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
60. Schulz, R. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 343-364.
61. Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions about the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258.
62. Scott, V. M., & Tucker, H. (2002). Introduction. In V. M. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues (pp. ix-xvii). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
63. Shook, D. J. (1996). Foreign language literature and the beginning learner-reader. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 201-216.
64. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language teaching: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
65. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 235-256). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
66. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68-83.
67. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.
71. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.