The microbial community Structure in industrial biogas plants influences the degradation rate of Straw and cellulose in batch tests

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Sun, Li ^a   Liu, Tong ^a   Müller, Bettina ^a   Schnürer, Anna ^a,b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biogas; cel48; cel5; Cellulose; Community composition; Glycoside hydrolases; Next generation amplicon Sequencing; Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T RFLP)

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; BACTERIA; BIOGAS; CELLULOSE; CLONING; DEGRADATION; ENZYMES; GENES; HYDROLASES; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; LIBRARIES; LIGNIN; MICROORGANISMS; PLANTS (BOTANY); RNA; SUGARS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

AMPLICONS; CEL48; CEL5; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASES; TERMINAL RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISMS;

BIODEGRADATION;

BIOGAS; CELLULOSE; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DEGRADATION; ENZYME; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; POLYMORPHISM; STRAW; WASTE FACILITY;

BACTERIA; BIOGAS; CELLULOSE; DEGRADATION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BACTEROIDETES; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; FIRMICUTES; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84975794217     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0543-9     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Börjesson P, Mattiasson B. Biogas as a resource-efficient vehicle fuel. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:7-13.
2. Möller K, Müller T. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci. 2012;12:242-57.
3. Lozanovski A, Lindner J, Bos U. Environmental evaluation and comparison of Selected industrial Scale biomethane production facilities across Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19:1823-32.
4. Börjesson P, Tufvesson LM. Agricultural crop-based biofuels - resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. J Clean Prod. 2011;19:108-20.
5. Appels L, Lauwers J, Degrève J, Helsen L, Lievens B, Willems K, Van Impe J, Dewil R. Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: potential and research challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2011;15:4295-301.
6. Weiland P. Biogas production: current State and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:849-60.
7. Sawatdeenarunat C, Surendra KC, Takara D, Oechsner H, Khanal SK. Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 2015;178:178-86.
8. Ioelovich M. Recent findings and the energetic potential of plant biomass as a renewable Source of biofuels - a review. Bioresources. 2015;10:1879-914.
9. Noike T, Endo G, Chang JE, Yaguchi JI, Matsumoto JI. Characteristics of carbohydrate degradation and the rate-limiting Step in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985;27:1482-9.
10. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66:506-77.
11. Mata-Alvarez J, Macé S, Llabrés P. Anaerobic digestion of organic Solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:3-16.
12. Yang L, Xu F, Ge X, Li Y. Challenges and Strategies for Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;44:824-34.
13. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2014;42:35-53.
14. Čater M, Fanedl L, Malovrh Š, Marinšek Logar R. Biogas production from brewery Spent grain enhanced by bioaugmentation with hydrolytic anaerobic bacteria. Bioresour Technol. 2015;186:261-9.
15. MerlinChristy P, Gopinath LR, Divya D. A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;34:167-73.
16. Zinder SH, Koch M. Non-aceticlastic methanogenesis from acetate: acetate oxidation by a thermophilic Syntrophic coculture. Arch Microbiol. 1984;138:263-72.
17. Angelidaki I, Karakashev D, Batstone DJ, Plugge CM, Stams AJM. Chapter Sixteen - biomethanation and its potential. In: Amy CR, Stephen WR, editors. Methods enzymol. New York: Academic Press; 2011. p. 327-51.
18. Himmel ME, Xu Q, Luo Y, Ding S-Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA. Microbial enzyme Systems for biomass conversion: emerging paradigms. Biofuels. 2010;1:323-41.
19. Medie FM, Davies GJ, Drancourt M, Henrissat B. Genome analyses highlight the different biological roles of cellulases. Nat Rev Micro. 2012;10:227-34.
20. Koeck DE, Pechtl A, Zverlov VV, Schwarz WH. Genomics of cellulolytic bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;29:171-83.
21. Azman S, Khadem AF, Van Lier JB, Zeeman G, Plugge CM. Presence and role of anaerobic hydrolytic microbes in conversion of lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2015;45:2523-64.
22. Yang JC, Chynoweth DP, Williams DS, Li A. Clostridium aldrichii Sp. Nov., A cellulolytic mesophile inhabiting a wood-fermenting anaerobic digester. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1990;40:268-72.
23. Palop ML, Valles S, Pinaga F, Flors A. Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium, Clostridium celerecrescens Sp. Nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989;39:68-71.
24. Shiratori H, Ikeno H, Ayame S, Kataoka N, Miya A, Hosono K, Beppu T, Ueda K. Isolation and characterization of a New Clostridium Sp. That performs effective cellulosic waste digestion in a thermophilic methanogenic bioreactor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3702-9.
25. Shiratori H, Sasaya K, Ohiwa H, Ikeno H, Ayame S, Kataoka N, Miya A, Beppu T, Ueda K. Clostridium clariflavum Sp. Nov. and Clostridium caenicola Sp. Nov., moderately thermophilic, cellulose-/cellobiose-digesting bacteria isolated from methanogenic Sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:1764-70.
26. Sleat R, Mah RA, Robinson R. Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium, Clostridium cellulovorans Sp. Nov. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984;48:88-93.
27. Sleat R, Mah RA. Clostridium populeti Sp. Nov., A cellulolytic Species from a woody-biomass digestor. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1985;35:160-3.
28. Lebuhn M, Hanreich A, Klocke M, Schluter A, Bauer C, Perez CM. Towards molecular biomarkers for biogas production from lignocellulose-rich Substrates. Anaerobe. 2014;29:10-21.
29. Sun L, Müller B, Schnürer A. Biogas production from wheat Straw: community Structure of cellulose-degrading bacteria. Energy Sustain Soc. 2013;3:15.
30. Krause L, Diaz NN, Edwards RA, Gartemann KH, Krömeke H, Neuweger H, Pühler A, Runte KJ, Schlüter A, Stoye J, et al. Taxonomic composition and gene content of a methane-producing microbial community isolated from a biogas reactor. J Biotechnol. 2008;136:91-101.
31. Sun L, Pope PB, Eijsink VGH, Schnürer A. Characterization of microbial community Structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of Straw and cow manure. Microb Biotechnol. 2015;8:815-27.
32. Lucas R, Kuchenbuch A, Fetzer I, Harms H, Kleinsteuber S. Long-term monitoring reveals Stable and remarkably Similar microbial communities in parallel full-scale biogas reactors digesting energy crops. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015;91(3). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv004.
33. Theuerl S, Kohrs F, Benndorf D, Maus I, Wibberg D, Schlüter A, Kausmann R, Heiermann M, Rapp E, Reichl U, et al. Community Shifts in a well-operating agricultural biogas plant: how process variations are handled by the microbiome. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:7791-803.
34. Guo Z, Zhou A, Yang C, Liang B, Sangeetha T, He Z, Wang L, Cai W, Wang A, Liu W. Enhanced Short chain fatty acids production from waste activated Sludge conditioning with typical agricultural residues: carbon Source composition regulates community functions. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:192.
35. Schlüter A, Bekel T, Diaz NN, Dondrup M, Eichenlaub R, Gartemann KH, Krahn I, Krause L, Krömeke H, Kruse O, et al. The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. J Biotechnol. 2008;136:77-90.
36. Hanreich A, Schimpf U, Zakrzewski M, Schlüter A, Benndorf D, Heyer R, Rapp E, Pühler A, Reichl U, Klocke M. Metagenome and metaproteome analyses of microbial communities in mesophilic biogas-producing anaerobic batch fermentations indicate concerted plant carbohydrate degradation. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013;36:330-8.
37. Theuretzbacher F, Lizasoain J, Lefever C, Saylor MK, Enguidanos R, Weran N, Gronauer A, Bauer A. Steam explosion pretreatment of wheat Straw to improve methane yields: investigation of the degradation kinetics of Structural compounds during anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2015;179:299-305.
38. Risberg K, Sun L, Levén L, Horn SJ, Schnürer A. Biogas production from wheat Straw and manure - impact of pretreatment and process operating parameters. Bioresour Technol. 2013;149:232-7.
39. Ferreira LC, Nilsen PJ, Fdz-Polanco F, Pérez-Elvira SI. Biomethane potential of wheat Straw: influence of particle Size, water impregnation and thermal hydrolysis. Chem Eng J. 2014;242:254-9.
40. Werner JJ, Garcia ML, Perkins SD, Yarasheski KE, Smith SR, Muegge BD, Stadermann FJ, DeRito CM, Floss C, Madsen EL, et al. Microbial community dynamics and Stability during an ammonia-induced Shift to Syntrophic acetate oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:3375-83.
41. De Vrieze J, Saunders AM, He Y, Fang J, Nielsen PH, Verstraete W, Boon N. Ammonia and temperature determine potential clustering in the anaerobic digestion microbiome. Water Res. 2015;75:312-23.
42. Müller B, Sun L, Westerholm M, Schnürer A. Bacterial community composition and fhs profiles of low- and high-ammonia biogas digesters reveal novel Syntrophic acetate-oxidising bacteria. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:48.
43. Carballa M, Smits M, Etchebehere C, Boon N, Verstraete W. Correlations between molecular and operational parameters in continuous lab-scale anaerobic reactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:303-14.
44. Wittebolle L, Marzorati M, Clement L, Balloi A, Daffonchio D, Heylen K, De Vos P, Verstraete W, Boon N. Initial community evenness favours functionality under Selective Stress. Nature. 2009;458:623-6.
45. Sundberg C, Al-Soud WA, Larsson M, Alm E, Yekta SS, Svensson BH, Sørensen SJ, Karlsson A. 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013;85:612-26.
46. Klocke M, Mähnert P, Mundt K, Souidi K, Linke B. Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely Stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet Silage as mono-substrate. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2007;30:139-51.
47. Lu X, Rao S, Shen Z, Lee PKH. Substrate induced emergence of different active bacterial and archaeal assemblages during biomethane production. Bioresour Technol. 2013;148:517-24.
48. Cirne DG, Lehtomäki A, Björnsson L, Blackall LL. Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103:516-27.
49. Wang H, Vuorela M, Keränen AL, Lehtinen TM, Lensu A, Lehtomäki A, Rintala J. Development of microbial populations in the anaerobic hydrolysis of grass Silage for methane production. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;72:496-506.
50. Ziganshin AM, Liebetrau J, Proter J, Kleinsteuber S. Microbial community Structure and dynamics during anaerobic digestion of various agricultural waste materials. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:5161-74.
51. Kovács E, Wirth R, Maróti G, Bagi Z, Nagy K, Minárovits J, Rákhely G, Kovács KL. Augmented biogas production from protein-rich Substrates and associated metagenomic changes. Bioresour Technol. 2015;178:254-61.
52. Kovács E, Wirth R, Maróti G, Bagi Z, Rákhely G, Kovács KL. Biogas production from protein-rich biomass: fed-batch anaerobic fermentation of casein and of pig blood and associated changes in microbial community composition. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77265.
53. Bouanane-Darenfed A, Fardeau ML, Gregoire P, Joseph M, Kebbouche-Gana S, Benayad T, Hacene H, Cayol JL, Ollivier B. Caldicoprobacter algeriensis Sp. Nov. A new thermophilic anaerobic, xylanolytic bacterium isolated from an Algerian hot Spring. Curr Microbiol. 2011;62:826-32.
54. Yokoyama H, Wagner ID, Wiegel J. Caldicoprobacter oshimai gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an anaerobic, xylanolytic, extremely thermophilic bacterium isolated from Sheep faeces, and proposal of Caldicoprobacteraceae fam. Nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:67-71.
55. Bouanane-Darenfed A, Ben Hania W, Hacene H, Cayol JL, Ollivier B, Fardeau ML. Caldicoprobacter guelmensis Sp. Nov., A thermophilic, anaerobic, xylanolytic bacterium isolated from a hot Spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:2049-53.
56. Tang Y, Shigematsu T, Morimura S, Kida K. The effects of micro-aeration on the phylogenetic diversity of microorganisms in a thermophilic anaerobic municipal Solid-waste digester. Water Res. 2004;38:2537-50.
57. Cheon J, Hong F, Hidaka T, Koshikawa H, Tsuno H. Microbial population dynamics in a thermophilic methane digester fed with garbage. Water Sci Technol. 2007;55:175-82.
58. Alauzet C, Marchandin H, Courtin P, Mory F, Lemée L, Pons JL, Chapot-Chartier MP, Lozniewski A, Jumas-Bilak E. Multilocus analysis reveals diversity in the genus Tissierella: description of Tissierella carlieri Sp. Nov. in the new class Tissierellia classis nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014;37:23-34.
59. Schiefer-Ullrich H, Andreesen J. Peptostreptococcus barnesae Sp. Nov., A Gram-positive, anaerobic, obligately purine utilizing coccus from chicken feces. Arch Microbiol. 1985;143:26-31.
60. Hatamoto M, Kaneshige M, Nakamura A, Yamaguchi T. Bacteroides luti Sp. Nov., an anaerobic, cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacterium isolated from methanogenic Sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:1770-4.
61. Robert C, Chassard C, Lawson PA, Bernalier-Donadille A. Bacteroides cellulosilyticus Sp. Nov., A cellulolytic bacterium from the human gut microbial community. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1516-20.
62. Rui J, Li J, Zhang S, Yan X, Wang Y, Li X. The core populations and co-occurrence patterns of prokaryotic communities in household biogas digesters. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:1-15.
63. Chouari R, Le Paslier D, Dauga C, Daegelen P, Weissenbach J, Sghir A. Novel major bacterial candidate division within a municipal anaerobic Sludge digester. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2145-53.
64. Limam RD, Chouari R, Mazéas L, Wu TD, Li T, Grossin-Debattista J, Guerquin-Kern JL, Saidi M, Landoulsi A, Sghir A, Bouchez T. Members of the uncultured bacterial candidate division WWE1 are implicated in anaerobic digestion of cellulose. MicrobiologyOpen. 2014;3:157-67.
65. Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, Ivanova NN, Anderson IJ, Cheng J-F, Darling A, Malfatti S, Swan BK, Gies EA, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature. 2013;499:431-7.
66. Nobu MK, Narihiro T, Rinke C, Kamagata Y, Tringe SG, Woyke T, Liu W-T. Microbial dark matter ecogenomics reveals complex Synergistic networks in a methanogenic bioreactor. ISME J. 2015;9:1710-22.
67. Narihiro T, Sekiguchi Y. Microbial communities in anaerobic digestion processes for waste and wastewater treatment: a microbiological update. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18:273-8.
68. Chouari R, Le Paslier D, Daegelen P, Ginestet P, Weissenbach J, Sghir A. Novel predominant archaeal and bacterial groups revealed by molecular analysis of an anaerobic Sludge digester. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1104-15.
69. Riviere D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, Chaussonnerie S, Guermazi S, Weissenbach J, Li T, Camacho P, Sghir A. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of Sludge. ISME J. 2009;3:700-14.
70. Wan S, Sun L, Sun J, Luo W. Biogas production and microbial community change during the Co-digestion of food waste with chinese Silver grass in a Single-stage anaerobic reactor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2013;18:1022-30.
71. Zhang Y, Hu M, Li P, Wang X, Meng Q. Trichloroethylene removal and bacterial variations in the up-flow anaerobic Sludge blanket reactor in response to temperature Shifts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:6091-102.
72. Shu D, He Y, Yue H, Wang Q. Microbial Structures and community functions of anaerobic Sludge in Six full-scale wastewater treatment plants as revealed by 454 high-throughput pyrosequencing. Bioresour Technol. 2015;186:163-72.
73. Narihiro T, Nobu MK, Kim N-K, Kamagata Y, Liu W-T. The nexus of Syntrophy-associated microbiota in anaerobic digestion revealed by long-term enrichment and community Survey. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:1707-20.
74. Ariesyady HD, Ito T, Okabe S. Functional bacterial and archaeal community Structures of major trophic groups in a full-scale anaerobic Sludge digester. Water Res. 2007;41:1554-68.
75. Hagen LH, Vivekanand V, Linjordet R, Pope PB, Eijsink VGH, Horn SJ. Microbial community Structure and dynamics during co-digestion of whey permeate and cow manure in continuous Stirred tank reactor Systems. Bioresour Technol. 2014;171:350-9.
76. Yamada T, Sekiguchi Y. Cultivation of uncultured Chloroflexi Subphyla: Significance and ecophysiology of formerly uncultured Chloroflexi 'Subphylum I' with natural and biotechnological relevance. Microbes Environ. 2009;24:205-16.
77. Miura Y, Okabe S. Quantification of cell Specific uptake activity of microbial products by uncultured chloroflexi by microautoradiography combined with fluorescence in Situ hybridization. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:7380-6.
78. BonillaSalinas M, Fardeau ML, Thomas P, Cayol JL, Patel BKC, Ollivier B. Mahella australiensis gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., A moderately thermophilic anaerobic bacterium isolated from an Australian oil well. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:2169-73.
79. Niu Q, Qiao W, Qiang H, Li YY. Microbial community Shifts and biogas conversion computation during Steady, inhibited and recovered Stages of thermophilic methane fermentation on chicken manure with a wide variation of ammonia. Bioresour Technol. 2013;146:223-33.
80. Niu Q, Takemura Y, Kubota K, Li Y-Y. Comparing mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: microbial community dynamics and process resilience. Waste Manage. 2015;43:114-22.
81. Nedashkovskaya OI, Kim SB, Hoste B, Shin DS, Beleneva IA, Vancanneyt M, Mikhailov VV. Echinicola vietnamensis Sp. Nov., A member of the phylum Bacteroidetes isolated from Seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:761-3.
82. Petitdemange E, Caillet F, Giallo J, Gaudin C. Clostridium cellulolyticum Sp. Nov., A cellulolytic, mesophilic: Species from decayed grass. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1984;34:155-9.
83. Giallo J, Gaudin C, Belaich JP, Petitdemange E, Caillet-Mangin F. Metabolism of glucose and cellobiose by cellulolytic mesophilic Clostridium Sp. Strain H10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;45:843-9.
84. Peng X, Börner RA, Nges IA, Liu J. Impact of bioaugmentation on biochemical methane potential for wheat Straw with addition of Clostridium cellulolyticum. Bioresour Technol. 2014;152:567-71.
85. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005;308:1635-8.
86. Pereyra LP, Hiibel SR, Prieto Riquelme MV, Reardon KF, Pruden A. Detection and quantification of functional genes of cellulose-degrading, fermentative, and Sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic Archaea. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2192-202.
87. Suzuki M, Nakagawa Y, Harayama S, Yamamoto S. Phylogenetic analysis of genus Marinilabilia and related bacteria based on the amino acid Sequences of GyrB and emended description of Marinilabilia Salmonicolor with Marinilabilia agarovorans as its Subjective Synonym. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1999;49:1551-7.
88. Hethener P, Brauman A, Garcia JL. Clostridium termitidis Sp. Nov., A cellulolytic Bacterium from the gut of the wood-feeding termite, Nasutitermes lujae. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1992;15:52-8.
89. Kato S, Haruta S, Cui ZJ, Ishii M, Yokota A, Igarashi Y. Clostridium Straminisolvens Sp. Nov., A moderately thermophilic, aerotolerant and cellulolytic bacterium isolated from a cellulose-degrading bacterial community. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:2043-7.
90. Wei Y, Zhou H, Zhang J, Zhang L, Geng A, Liu F, Zhao G, Wang S, Zhou Z, Yan X. Insight into dominant cellulolytic bacteria from two biogas digesters and their glycoside hydrolase genes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0129921.
91. Park SK, Jang HM, Ha JH, Park JM. Sequential Sludge digestion after diverse pre-treatment conditions: Sludge removal, methane production and microbial community changes. Bioresour Technol. 2014;162:331-40.
92. Prasad P, Singh T, Bedi S. Characterization of the cellulolytic enzyme produced by Streptomyces griseorubens (Accession No. AB184139) isolated from Indian Soil. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2013;25:245-50.
93. Feng HW, Zhi YE, Shi WW, Mao L, Zhou P. Isolation, identification and characterization of a Straw degrading Streptomyces griseorubens JSD-1. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2013;7:2730-5.
94. Feng H, Zhi Y, Sun Y, Wei X, Luo Y, Zhou P. Draft genome Sequence of a novel Streptomyces griseorubens Strain, JSD-1, active in carbon and nitrogen recycling. Genome Announc. 2014;2:e00650.
95. Patel GB, Khan AW, Agnew BJ, Colvin JR. Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic, cellulolytic microorganism, Acetivibrio cellulolyticus gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30:179-85.
96. Akinosho H, Yee K, Close D, Ragauskas A. The emergence of Clostridium thermocellum as a high utility candidate for consolidated bioprocessing applications. Front Chem. 2014;2:66. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00066.
97. MahalingeswaraBhat K, Wood TM. The cellulase of the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum isolation, dissociation, and reassociation of the cellulosome. Carbohydr Res. 1992;227:293-300.
98. Lu F, Bize A, Guillot A, Monnet V, Madigou C, Chapleur O, Mazeas L, He P, Bouchez T. Metaproteomics of cellulose methanisation under thermophilic conditions reveals a Surprisingly high proteolytic activity. ISME J. 2014;8:88-102.
99. Lamed R, Setter E, Bayer EA. Characterization of a cellulose-binding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol. 1983;156:828-36.
100. Dumitrache A, Wolfaardt G, Allen G, Liss SN, Lynd LR. Form and function of Clostridium thermocellum biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:231-9.
101. Chassard C, Delmas E, Robert C, Lawson PA, Bernalier-Donadille A. Ruminococcus champanellensis Sp. Nov., A cellulose-degrading bacterium from human gut microbiota. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:138-43.
102. De Vrieze J, Raport L, Willems B, Verbrugge S, Volcke E, Meers E, Angenent LT, Boon N. Inoculum Selection influences the biochemical methane potential of agro-industrial Substrates. Microb Biotechnol. 2015;8:776-86.
103. Westerholm M, Hansson M, Schnürer A. Improved biogas production from whole Stillage by co-digestion with cattle manure. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:314-9.
104. Stromberg S, Nistor M, Liu J. Towards eliminating Systematic errors caused by the experimental conditions in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Waste Manag. 2014;34:1939-48.
105. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation; 1998.
106. Hansen KH, Angelidaki I, Ahring BK. Anaerobic digestion of Swine manure: inhibition by ammonia. Water Res. 1998;32:5-12.
107. Stanley D, Geier MS, Hughes RJ, Denman SE, Moore RJ. Highly variable microbiota development in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e84290.
108. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple Sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792-7.
109. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731-9.