Members of the uncultured bacterial candidate division WWE1 are implicated in anaerobic digestion of cellulose

MicrobiologyOpen

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 157-167

  Limam, Rim Driss ^a,b,c,d,e   Chouari, Rakia ^e   Mazéas, Laurent ^a   Wu, Ting Di ^f,g   Li, Tianlun ^a   Grossin Debattista, Julien ^a   Guerquin Kern, Jean Luc ^f,g   Saidi, Mouldi ^d   Landoulsi, Ahmed ^e   Sghir, Abdelghani ^b,c   Bouchez, Théodore ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b DIF   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE   (France)

^d Centre National des Sciences et Technologies Nucleaires Tunis   (Tunisia)

^e University of Carthage   (Tunisia)

^f INSERM   (France)

^g INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Cellulose anaerobic digestion; FISH; SIMSISH; SIP; WWE1 candidate division

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; CARBON; WASTE WATER;

ANAEROBIC BACTERIUM; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE SEQUENCE; HYDROLYSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WWE1 BACTERIUM; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BACTERIA; BIOTA; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; ISOTOPE LABELING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; WASTE WATER;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIA; BIOTA; CARBON ISOTOPES; CELLULOSE; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; ISOTOPE LABELING; WASTE WATER;

EID: 84898007181     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20458827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.144     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ademe 1999. Composition des ordures ménagères en France(données et références).
2. Amann, R. I., W. Ludwig, and K. H. Schleifer, 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59:143-169.
3. Antoni, D., V. V. Zverlov, and W. H. Schwarz, 2007. Biofuels from microbes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77:23-35.
4. Artiguenave, F., P. Wincker, P. Brottier, S. Duprat, F. Jovelin, C. Scarpelli, et al. 2000. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 2. Data generation and processing. FEBS Lett. 487:13-16.
5. Barlaz, M. A., D. M. Schaefer, and R. K. Ham, 1989. Bacterial population development and chemical characteristics of refuse decomposition in a simulated sanitary landfill. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:55-65.
6. Behrens, S., B. M. Fuchs, F. Mueller, and R. Amann, 2003. Is the in situ accessibility of the 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli for Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide probes predicted by a three-dimensional structure model of the 30S ribosomal subunit? Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:4935-4941.
7. Behrens, S., T. Losekann, J. Pett-Ridge, P. K. Weber, W. O.Ng, B. S. Stevenson, et al. 2008. Linking microbial phylogeny to metabolic activity at the single-cell level by using enhanced element labeling-catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (EL-FISH) and NanoSIMS. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3143-3150.
8. Braun, M., F. Mayer, and G. Gottschalk, 1981. Clostridium aceticum (Wieringa), a microorganism producing acetic acid from molecular hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Arch. Microbiol. 128:288-293.
9. Buckley, D. H., V. Huangyutitham, S. F. Hsu, and T. A.Nelson, 2007. Stable isotope probing with 15N achieved by disentangling the effects of genome G+C content and isotope enrichment on DNA density. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:3189-3195.
10. Burrell, P. C., C. O'Sullivan, H. Song, W. P. Clarke, and L. L.Blackall, 2004. Identification, detection, and spatial resolution of clostridium populations responsible for cellulose degradation in a methanogenic landfill leachate bioreactor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:2414-2419.
11. Chouari, R., D. Le Paslier, C. Dauga, P. Daegelen, J.Weissenbach, and A. Sghir, 2005. Novel major bacterial candidate division within a municipal anaerobic sludge digester. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:2145-2153.
12. Daims, H., A. Bruhl, R. Amann, K. H. Schleifer, and M.Wagner, 1999. The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 22:434-444.
13. Elshahed, M. S., N. H. Youssef, Q. Luo, F. Z. Najar, B. A. Roe, T. M. Sisk, et al. 2007. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of Planctomycetes from anaerobic, sulfide- and sulfur-rich Zodletone Spring, Oklahoma. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4707-4716.
14. Ferry, J. G. 1997. Methane: small molecule, big impact. Science 278:1413-1414.
15. Gagnaire, D. Y., and F. R. Taravel, 1980. Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose from D-glucose uniformly enriched in 13C. Eur. J. Biochem. 103:133-143.
16. Goebel, B. M., and E. Stackebrandt, 1994. Cultural and phylogenetic analysis of mixed microbial populations found in natural and commercial bioleaching environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:1614-1621.
17. Guedon, E., M. Desvaux, and H. Petitdemange, 2002. Improvement of cellulolytic properties of Clostridium cellulolyticum by metabolic engineering. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:53-58.
18. Hattori, S., A. S. Galushko, Y. Kamagata, and B. Schink, 2005. Operation of the CO dehydrogenase/acetyl coenzyme A pathway in both acetate oxidation and acetate formation by the syntrophically acetate-oxidizing bacterium Thermacetogenium phaeum. J. Bacteriol. 187:3471-3476.
19. Li, T., T.-D. Wu, L. Mafzéas, L. Toffin, J.-L. Guerquin-Kern, G. Leblon, et al. 2008. Simultaneous analysis of microbial identity and function using NanoSIMS. Environ. Microbiol. 10:580-588.
20. Li, T., L. Mazéas, A. Sghir, G. Leblon, and T. Bouchez, 2009. Insights into networks of functional microbes catalysing methanization of cellulose under mesophilic conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 11:889-904.
21. Liu, G., R. Zhang, H. M. El-Mashad, and R. Dong, 2009. Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 100:5103-5108.
22. Ludwig, W., O. Strunk, R. Westram, L. Richter, H. Meier, Yadhukumar, et al. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1363-1371.
23. Lynd, L. R., P. J. Weimer, W. H. van Zyl, and I. S.Pretorius, 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:506-577.
24. McKendry, P. 2002. Energy production from biomass (Part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 83:37-46.
25. Nakatsu, C. H., and L. J. Forney. 1996. Parameters of nucleic acid hybridization experiments. Pp. 1-12 in A. D. Akkermans, J. D van Elsas and F. J de Bruijn, eds. Molecular microbial ecology manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
26. Neef, A., R. Amann, H. Schlesner, and K. H. Schleifer. 1998. Monitoring a widespread bacterial group: in situ detection of planctomycetes with 16S rRNA-targeted probes. Microbiology 144(Pt. 12):3257-3266.
27. Ni, B. J., H. Liu, Y. Q. Nie, R. J. Zeng, G. C. Du, J. Chen, et al. 2011. Coupling glucose fermentation and homoacetogenesis for elevated acetate production: experimental and mathematical approaches. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108:345-353.
28. Olsen, G. J., H. Matsuda, R. Hagstrom, and R. Overbeek. 1994. fastDNAmL: a tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:41-48.
29. O'Sullivan, C. A., P. C. Burrell, W. P. Clarke, and L. L.Blackall. 2005. Structure of a cellulose degrading bacterial community during anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 92:871-878.
30. Pavlostathis, S. G., T. L. Miller, and M. J. Wolin. 1988. Fermentation of insoluble cellulose by continuous cultures of ruminococcus albus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:2655-2659.
31. Pelletier, E., A. Kreimeyer, S. Bocs, Z. Rouy, G. Gyapay, R.Chouari, et al. 2008. "Candidatus Cloacamonas acidaminovorans": genome sequence reconstruction provides a first glimpse of a new bacterial division. J. Bacteriol. 190:2572-2579.
32. Pett-Ridge, J., and P. K. Weber. 2012. NanoSIP: NanoSIMS applications for microbial biology. Methods Mol. Biol. 881:375-408.
33. Qu, X., L. Mazeas, V. A. Vavilin, J. Epissard, M. Lemunier, J. M. Mouchel, et al. 2009. Combined monitoring of changes in delta13CH4 and archaeal community structure during mesophilic methanization of municipal solid waste. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68:236-245.
34. Radajewski, S., I. R. McDonald, and J. C. Murrell. 2003. Stable-isotope probing of nucleic acids: a window to the function of uncultured microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14:296-302.
35. Riviere, D., V. Desvignes, E. Pelletier, S. Chaussonnerie, S.Guermazi, J. Weissenbach, et al. 2009. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J. 3:700-714.
36. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. 4:406-425.
37. Schloss, P. D., and J. Handelsman. 2005. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:1501-1506.
38. Schmid, M. W., A. Lehner, R. Stephan, K. H. Schleifer, and H.Meier. 2005. Development and application of oligonucleotide probes for in situ detection of thermotolerant Campylobacter in chicken faecal and liver samples. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 105:245-255.
39. Schwarz, W. H. 2001. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56:634-649.
40. Swan, B. K., C. J. Ehrhardt, K. M. Reifel, L. I. Moreno, and D. L. Valentine. 2010. Archaeal and bacterial communities respond differently to environmental gradients in anoxic sediments of a California hypersaline lake, the Salton Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:757-768.
41. Swofford, D. L. 2003. Paup: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4.0b 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
42. Terron-Gonzalez, L., C. Medina, M. C. Limon-Mortes, and E.Santero. 2013. Heterologous viral expression systems in fosmid vectors increase the functional analysis potential of metagenomic libraries. Sci. Rep. 3:1107.
43. Tobino, T., F. Kurisu, I. Kasuga, and H. Furumai. 2011. Shotgun isotope array for rapid, substrate-specific detection of microorganisms in a microbial community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:7430-7432.