Towards molecular biomarkers for biogas production from lignocellulose-rich substrates

Anaerobe

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 10-21

  Lebuhn, Michael ^a   Hanreich, Angelika ^b   Klocke, Michael ^b   Schlüter, Andreas ^c   Bauer, Christoph ^a   Pérez, Carmen Marín ^d  

^a Central Department for Quality Assurance and Analytics   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING AND BIOECONOMY ATB   (Germany)

^c BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Animal Husbandry   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biogas; Bioindicator; Biomarker; Hydrolysis acidogenesis; Metagenome; Microbial community analysis

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; LIGNOCELLULOSE; BIOFUEL; LIGNIN; METHANE; RNA 16S; WASTE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CLOSTRIDIUM; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY YIELD; HAY; HYDROLYSIS ACIDOGENESIS; LACHNOSPIRACEAE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PH MEASUREMENT; PHYLOGENY; PREVOTELLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRAW; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM; THERMOPHILIC BACTERIUM; THERMOTOGAE; ARCHAEON; BACTERIA; BIOREACTOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; CLASSIFICATION; CROP; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; METAGENOME; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; PH; PRESSURE; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TEMPERATURE; WASTE;

CLOSTRIDIUM; LACHNOSPIRACEAE; PREVOTELLA; PREVOTELLACEAE; THERMOTOGAE; THERMOTOGAE (CLASS);

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; BIOFUELS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOREACTORS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENETIC VARIATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; METAGENOME; METHANE; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; PHYLOGENY; PRESSURE; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; TEMPERATURE; WASTE PRODUCTS;

EID: 84902378982     PISSN: 10759964     EISSN: 10958274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Fachverband Biogas e.V. Branchenzahlen - Prognose 2013/2014; 2013. Available from: http://www.biogas.org/edcom/webfvb.nsf/id/DE%5fBranchenzahlen/%24file/13-11-11%5fBiogas%2520Branchenzahlen%5f2013-2014.pdf.
2. National renewable energy action plan 2010, German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU). http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/en/topics/eu-international/eu-directive-on-the-promotion-of-the-use-of-energy-from-renewable-sources-200928eg/national-action-plan/.
3. Schiermeier Q. Germany's energy gamble. Nature 2013, 496(11):156-158.
4. Lebuhn M, Munk B, Effenberger M. Agricultural biogas production in Germany - from practice to microbiology basics. Energy Sustain Soc; in press.
5. Thauer R.K., Kaster A.K., Seedorf H., Buckel W., Hedderich R. Methanogenic archaea, ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008, 6(8):579-591.
6. Ghosh S. Improved sludge gasification by two-phase anaerobic digestion. JEnviron Eng 1987, 113(6):1265-1284.
7. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:849-860.
8. Cirne D.G., Lehtomäki A., Björnsson L., Blackall L.L. Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops. JAppl Microbiol 2007, 103:516-527.
9. Klocke M., Nettmann E., Bergmann I., Mundt K., Souidi K., Mumme J., et al. Characterization of the methanogenic Archaea within two-phase biogas reactor systems operated with plant biomass. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008, 31(3):190-205.
10. Wang H., Vuorela M., Keränen A.L., Lehtinen T.M., Lensu A., Lehtomäki A., et al. Development of microbial populations in the anaerobic hydrolysis of grass silage for methane production. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2010, 72(3):496-506.
11. Pinto A.J., Raskin L. PCR biases distort bacterial and archaeal community structure in pyrosequencing datasets. PLoS One 2012, 7(8):e43093.
12. Palatinszky M., Nikolausz M., Sváb D., Márialigeti K. Preferential ligation during TA-cloning of multitemplate PCR products-a factor causing bias in microbial community structure analysis. JMicrobiol Meth. 2011, 85(2):131-136.
13. Lee C.K., Herbold C.W., Polson S.W., Wommack K.E., Williamson S.J., McDonald I.R., et al. Groundtruthing next-gen sequencing for microbial ecology-biases and errors in community structure estimates from PCR amplicon pyrosequencing. PLoS One 2012, 7(9):e44224.
14. Köllmeier T., Zverlov V.V., Schwarz W.H. Mikrobiologie der Hydrolyse von Pflanzenfasern in Biogasanlagen. Bornim Agrar Ber 2012, 79:99-113. 0947-7314.
15. Marín Pérez C., Dandikas V., Weber A., Lebuhn M. Abschlussbericht des BMBF Vorhabens 'Bioraffinerie-Modul zum gerichtet-fermentativen Aufschluss von Biomasse für eine kombinierte energetische und stoffliche Verwertung, Teilvorhaben 2: Mikrobiologische Optimierung der Hydrolyse, Arbeitsbereich Verfahrenstechnik 2013, Bayerische Landesanst für Landwirtsch (LfL), Inst für Landtech Tierhalt Freising-Weihenstephan, pp. 56.
16. Hahn F., Lindner J., Zielonka S., Lemmer A. Optimierung der hydrolyse durch gezielte pH-Wert Steuerung. Bornim, Agrar Ber 2012, 79:45-57. 0947-7314.
17. Lebuhn M., Effenberger M., Gronauer A., Wilderer P.A., Würtz S. Using quantitative real-time PCR to determine the hygienic status of cattle manure. Water Sci Technol 2003, 48(4):97-103.
18. Munk B., Bauer C., Gronauer A., Lebuhn M. Population dynamics of methanogens during acidification of biogas fermenters fed with maize silage. Eng Life Sci 2010, 10:496-508.
19. Munk B., Bauer C., Gronauer A., Lebuhn M. Ametabolic quotient for methanogenic archaea. Water Sci Technol 2012, 66(11):2311-2317.
20. Tringe S.G., Hugenholtz P. Arenaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene. Curr Opin Microbiol 2008, 11:442-446.
21. Armougom F., Raoult D. Exploring microbial diversity using 16S rRNA high-throughput methods. JComput. Sci Syst Biol 2009, 2:74-92.
22. Clarridge J.E. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004, 17:840-862.
23. Rudi K., Skulberg O.M., Larsen F., Jakobsen K.S. Strain characterization and classification of oxyphotobacteria in clone cultures on the basis of 16S rRNA sequences from the variable regions V6, V7, and V8. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63(7):2593-2599.
24. Costa R., Götz M., Mrotzek N., Lottmann J., Berg G., Smalla K. Effects of site and plant species on rhizosphere community structure as revealed by molecular analysis of microbial guilds. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2006, 56:236-249.
25. Hanreich A. Phylogenetic and functional analysis of microbial, biogas-producing communities during the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass 2013, Technische Universität Berlin, PhD thesis, p. 151.
26. Schlüter A., Bekel T., Diaz N.N., Dondrup M., Eichenlaub R., Gartemann K.H., et al. The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. JBiotechnol 2008, 136:77-90.
27. Cole J.R., Wang Q., Cardenas E., Fish J., Chai B., Farris R.J., et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucl Acids Res 2009, 37:D141-D145.
28. Quast C., Pruesse E., Yilmaz P., Gerken J., Schweer T., Yarza P., et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucl Acids Res 2013, 41(D1):D590-D596.
29. Kumar S., Nei M., Dudley J., Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 2008, 9:299-306.
30. Huber T., Faulkner G., Hugenholtz P. Bellerophon; a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2317-2319.
31. Ashelford K.E., Weightman A.J., Fry J.C. PRIMROSE: a computer program for generating and estimating the phylogenetic range of 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes and primers in conjunction with the RDP-II database. Nucl Acids Res 2002, 30:3481-3489.
32. Tang Y.Q., Matsui T., Morimura S., Wu X.L., Kida K. Effect of temperature on microbial community of a glucose-degrading methanogenic consortium under hyperthermophilic chemostat cultivation. JBiosci Bioeng 2008, 106(2):180-187.
33. Zakrzewski M., Goesmann A., Jaenicke S., Jünemann S., Eikmeyer F., Szczepanowski R., et al. Profiling of the metabolically active community from a production-scale biogas plant by means of high-throughput metatranscriptome sequencing. JBiotech 2012, 158:248-258.
34. Li T., Mazéas L., Sghir A., Leblon G., Bouchez T. Insights into networks of functional microbes catalysing methanization of cellulose under mesophilic conditions. Environ Microbiol 2009, 11(4):889-904.
35. Ito T., Yoshiguchi K., Ariesyady H.D., Okabe S. Identification and quantification of key microbial trophic groups of methanogenic glucose degradation in an anaerobic digester sludge. Biores Technol 2012, 123:599-607.
36. O-Thong S., Prasertsan P., Karakashev D., Angelidaki I. Thermophilic fermentative hydrogen production by the newly isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33(4):1204-1214.
37. Shiratori H., Sasaya K., Ohiwa H., Ikeno H., Ayame S., Kataoka N., et al. Clostridium clariflavum sp. nov. and Clostridium caenicola sp. nov., moderately thermophilic, cellulose-/cellobiose-digesting bacteria isolated from methanogenic sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009, 59:1764-1770.
38. Hania W.B., Godbane R., Postec A., Hamdi M., Ollivier B., Fardeau M.L. Isolation and characterization of Defluviitoga tunisiensis gen. nov, sp. nov., a novel thermophilic bacterium pertaining to the order Thermotogales, isolated from a mesothermic anaerobic reactor treating cheese whey in Tunisia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011, 62:1377-1382.
39. Westerholm M., Roos S., Schnürer A. Syntrophaceticus schinkii gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic, syntrophic acetate oxidizing bacterium isolated from a mesophilic anaerobic filter. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2010, 309:100-104.
40. Kampmann K., Ratering S., Kramer I., Schmidt M., Zerr W., Schnell S. Unexpected stability of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes communities in laboratory biogas reactors fed with different defined substrates. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78(7):2106-2119.
41. Bengelsdorf F.R., Gerischer U., Langer S., Zak M., Kazda M. Stability of a biogas-producing bacterial, archaeal and fungal community degrading food residues. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2013, 84(1):201-212.
42. Fröschle B, Munk B, Bauer C, Gronauer A, Lebuhn M. Targeting syntrophic bacterial populations in biogas production using the formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase gene. In: Proceedings of the international IWA-symposium on anaerobic digestion of solid waste and energy crops, Vienna, Austria; August 28-September 1, 2011. pp. 5.
43. Keer J.T., Birch L. Molecular methods for the assessment of bacterial viability. JMicrobiol Meth 2003, 53(2):175-183.