Impact of bioaugmentation on biochemical methane potential for wheat straw with addition of Clostridium cellulolyticum

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 152, Issue , 2014, Pages 567-571

  Peng, Xiaowei ^a,c   Börner, Rosa Aragão ^a   Nges, Ivo Achu ^a   Liu, Jing ^a,b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Bioprocess Control AB   (Sweden)

^c INSTITUTE OF PROCESS ENGINEERING   (China)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Bioaugmentation; Biogas; Cellulase; Straw

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOGAS; CARBON; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; SUBSTRATES;

ANAEROBIC BACTERIUM; BIO-AUGMENTATION; BIOAUGMENTATION AGENTS; BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; CELLULASE; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; DIGESTION EFFICIENCY; LIGNOCELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES;

STRAW;

CARBON; CELLOBIOSE; METHANE;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CELLULOSE; INCUBATION; LIGNIN; METHANE; SUBSTRATE; WHEAT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOAUGMENTATION; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; CARBON SOURCE; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRAW; WHEAT STRAW;

CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOAUGMENTATION; BIOGAS; CELLULASE; STRAW;

BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; CELLULASE; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; METHANE; TIME FACTORS; TRITICUM; WASTE PRODUCTS;

EID: 84891161069     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.067     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. APHA Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids in Solid and Semisolid Samples. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Baltimore. 21st ed. A.D. Eaton, L.S. Clesceri, E.W. Rice, A.E. Greenberg, M.A. Franson (Eds.).
2. Badshah M., Lam D.M., Liu J., Mattiasson B. Use of an automatic methane potential test system for evaluating the biomethane potential of sugarcane bagasse after different treatments. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:262-269.
3. Bouchez T., Patureau D., Dabert P., Wagner M., Delgenès J.P., Moletta R. Successful and unsuccessful bioaugmentation experiments monitored by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41(12):61-68.
4. Cirne D.G., Björnsson L., Alves M., Mattiasson B. Effects of bioaugmentation by an anaerobic lipolytic bacterium on anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81:1745-1752.
5. Costa J.C., Barbosa S.G., Alves M.M., Sousa D.Z. Thermochemical pre- and biological co-treatments to improve hydrolysis and methane production from poultry litter. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111:141-147.
6. Deflaun M.F., Steffan R.J. Bioaugmentation. Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology 2002, vol. 1:434-442. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
7. Ghosh A., Bhattacharyya B.C. Biomethanation of white rotted and brown rotted rice straw. Biopro. Eng. 1999, 20:297-302.
8. Jiang H.L., Maszenan A.M., Tay J.H. Bioaugmentation and coexistence of two functionally similar bacterial strains in aerobic granules. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 75(5):1191-1200.
9. Kubicek C.P. β-Glucosidase excretion by Trichoderma pseudokoningii correlation with cell wall bound β-1, 3-glucanase activities. Arch. Microbiol. 1982, 132:349-354.
10. Lu X.B., Xi B., Zhang Y.M., Angelidaki I. Microwave pretreatment of rape straw for bioethanol production: focus on energy efficiency. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:7937-7940.
11. Ma F.Y., Yang N., Xu C.Y., Yu H.B., Wu J.G., Zhang X.Y. Combination of biological pretreatment with mild acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production from water hyacinth. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:9600-9604.
12. Mandels M., Andreotti R., Roche C. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1976, 6:21-23.
13. Nges I.A., Björn A., Björnsson L. Stable operation during pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of nutrient-supplemented maize/sugar beet silage. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118:445-454.
14. Nielsen H., Mladenovska Z., Ahring B. Bioaugmentation of a two-stage thermophilic (68°C/55°C) anaerobic digestion concept for improvement of the methane yield from cattle manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97(6):1638-1643.
15. Rivière D., Desvignes V., Pelletier E., Chaussonnerie S., Guermazi S., Weissenbach J., Li T.L., Camacho P., Sghir A. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. J. Int. Soc. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 3:700-714.
16. Wirth R., Kovács E., Maróti G., Bagi Z., Rákhely G., Kovács K. Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5:41.
17. Yang B., Wyman C.E. Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuel. Bioprod. Bior. 2007, 2:26-40.
18. Yu H.B., Guo G.N., Zhang X.Y., Yan K.L., Xu C.Y. The effect of biological pretreatment with the selective white-rot fungus Echinodontium taxodii on enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods and hardwoods. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5170-5175.
19. Zhao R., Zhang Z., Zhang R., Li M., Lei Z., Utsumi M., Sugiura N. Methane production from rice straw pretreated by a mixture of acetic-propionic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(3):990-994.
20. Zhong W.Z., Zhang Z.Z., Luo Y.J., Sun S.S., Qiao W., Xiao M. Effect of biological pretreatments in enhancing corn straw biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:11177-11182.