DNA End Resection: Facts and Mechanisms

Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 126-130

  Liu, Ting ^a   Huang, Jun ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chromatin remodeling factors; DNA double strand breaks; DNA end resection; Genome stability; Homologous recombination

Indexed keywords

BLOOM SYNDROME HELICASE; CTIP PROTEIN; DNA2 PROTEIN; EXO1 PROTEIN; HELICASE; PROTEIN; SGS1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; RECQ HELICASE;

CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA END RESECTION; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EUKARYOTIC CELL; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; METABOLISM;

CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMANS; RECQ HELICASES;

EID: 84973571934     PISSN: 16720229     EISSN: 22103244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2016.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. [1] van Gent, D.C., Hoeijmakers, J.H., Kanaar, R., Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection. Nat Rev Genet 2 (2001), 196–206.
2. [2] Shiloh, Y., Lehmann, A.R., Maintaining integrity. Nat Cell Biol 6 (2004), 923–928.
3. [3] O'Driscoll, M., Diseases associated with defective responses to DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2012, 4, 10.1101/cshperspect.a012773.
4. [4] Liu, T., Huang, J., Quality control of homologous recombination. Cell Mol Life Sci 71 (2014), 3779–3797.
5. [5] San Filippo, J., Sung, P., Klein, H., Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77 (2008), 229–257.
6. [6] Lieber, M.R., The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 79 (2010), 181–211.
7. [7] Betermier, M., Bertrand, P., Lopez, B.S., Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process?. PLoS Genet, 10, 2014, e1004086.
8. [8] Sonoda, E., Hochegger, H., Saberi, A., Taniguchi, Y., Takeda, S., Differential usage of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in double strand break repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 5 (2006), 1021–1029.
9. [9] Longhese, M.P., Bonetti, D., Manfrini, N., Clerici, M., Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection. EMBO J 29 (2010), 2864–2874.
10. [10] Mimitou, E.P., Symington, L.S., DNA end resection–unraveling the tail. DNA Repair (Amst) 10 (2011), 344–348.
11. [11] Huertas, P., DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17 (2010), 11–16.
12. [12] Mimitou, E.P., Symington, L.S., DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst) 8 (2009), 983–995.
13. [13] Daley, J.M., Sung, P., To Cut or Not to Cut: Discovery of a novel regulator of DNA break resection. Mol Cell 61 (2016), 325–326.
14. [14] Kakarougkas, A., Jeggo, P.A., DNA DSB repair pathway choice: an orchestrated handover mechanism. Br J Radiol, 87, 2014, 20130685.
15. [15] Ohta, K., Nicolas, A., Furuse, M., Nabetani, A., Ogawa, H., Shibata, T., Mutations in the MRE11, RAD50, XRS2, and MRE2 genes alter chromatin configuration at meiotic DNA double-stranded break sites in premeiotic and meiotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95 (1998), 646–651.
16. [16] D'Amours, D., Jackson, S.P., The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3 (2002), 317–327.
17. [17] Trujillo, K.M., Roh, D.H., Chen, L., Van Komen, S., Tomkinson, A., Sung, P., Yeast Xrs2 binds DNA and helps target Rad50 and Mre11 to DNA ends. J Biol Chem 278 (2003), 48957–48964.
18. [18] Lukas, C., Melander, F., Stucki, M., Falck, J., Bekker-Jensen, S., Goldberg, M., et al. Mdc1 couples DNA double-strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX-dependent chromatin retention. EMBO J 23 (2004), 2674–2683.
19. [19] Hopfner, K.P., Karcher, A., Craig, L., Woo, T.T., Carney, J.P., Tainer, J.A., Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell 105 (2001), 473–485.
20. [20] Tsubouchi, H., Ogawa, H., A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 18 (1998), 260–268.
21. [21] Furuse, M., Nagase, Y., Tsubouchi, H., Murakami-Murofushi, K., Shibata, T., Ohta, K., Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J 17 (1998), 6412–6425.
22. [22] van Noort, J., van Der Heijden, T., de Jager, M., Wyman, C., Kanaar, R., Dekker, C., The coiled-coil of the human Rad50 DNA repair protein contains specific segments of increased flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100 (2003), 7581–7586.
23. [23] Lichten, M., Rad50 connects by hook or by crook. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12 (2005), 392–393.
24. [24] Paull, T.T., New glimpses of an old machine. Cell 107 (2001), 563–565.
25. [25] de Jager, M., van Noort, J., van Gent, D.C., Dekker, C., Kanaar, R., Wyman, C., Human Rad50/Mre11 is a flexible complex that can tether DNA ends. Mol Cell 8 (2001), 1129–1135.
26. [26] Hopfner, K.P., Craig, L., Moncalian, G., Zinkel, R.A., Usui, T., Owen, B.A., et al. The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature 418 (2002), 562–566.
27. [27] Lee, J.H., Paull, T.T., Direct activation of the ATM protein kinase by the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex. Science 304 (2004), 93–96.
28. [28] Haber, J.E., The many interfaces of Mre11. Cell 95 (1998), 583–586.
29. [29] Neale, M.J., Pan, J., Keeney, S., Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436 (2005), 1053–1057.
30. [30] Stracker, T.H., Petrini, J.H., The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12 (2011), 90–103.
31. [31] Mimitou, E.P., Symington, L.S., Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455 (2008), 770–774.
32. [32] Shibata, A., Moiani, D., Arvai, A.S., Perry, J., Harding, S.M., Genois, M.M., et al. DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice is directed by distinct MRE11 nuclease activities. Mol Cell 53 (2014), 7–18.
33. [33] Zhu, Z., Chung, W.H., Shim, E.Y., Lee, S.E., Ira, G., Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134 (2008), 981–994.
34. [34] Gravel, S., Chapman, J.R., Magill, C., Jackson, S.P., DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22 (2008), 2767–2772.
35. [35] Stracker, T.H., Morales, M., Couto, S.S., Hussein, H., Petrini, J.H., The carboxy terminus of NBS1 is required for induction of apoptosis by the MRE11 complex. Nature 447 (2007), 218–221.
36. [36] Williams, B.R., Mirzoeva, O.K., Morgan, W.F., Lin, J., Dunnick, W., Petrini, J.H., A murine model of Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Curr Biol 12 (2002), 648–653.
37. [37] Zhu, J., Petersen, S., Tessarollo, L., Nussenzweig, A., Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr Biol 11 (2001), 105–109.
38. [38] Tauchi, H., Kobayashi, J., Morishima, K., van Gent, D.C., Shiraishi, T., Verkaik, N.S., et al. Nbs1 is essential for DNA repair by homologous recombination in higher vertebrate cells. Nature 420 (2002), 93–98.
39. [39] Dong, Z., Zhong, Q., Chen, P.L., The Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is essential for Mre11 phosphorylation upon DNA damage. J Biol Chem 274 (1999), 19513–19516.
40. [40] Paull, T.T., Gellert, M., Nbs1 potentiates ATP-driven DNA unwinding and endonuclease cleavage by the Mre11/Rad50 complex. Genes Dev 13 (1999), 1276–1288.
41. [41] Williams, R.S., Dodson, G.E., Limbo, O., Yamada, Y., Williams, J.S., Guenther, G., et al. Nbs1 flexibly tethers Ctp1 and Mre11-Rad50 to coordinate DNA double-strand break processing and repair. Cell 139 (2009), 87–99.
42. [42] Schaeper, U., Subramanian, T., Lim, L., Boyd, J.M., Chinnadurai, G., Interaction between a cellular protein that binds to the C-terminal region of adenovirus E1A (CtBP) and a novel cellular protein is disrupted by E1A through a conserved PLDLS motif. J Biol Chem 273 (1998), 8549–8552.
43. [43] Wong, A.K., Ormonde, P.A., Pero, R., Chen, Y., Lian, L., Salada, G., et al. Characterization of a carboxy-terminal BRCA1 interacting protein. Oncogene 17 (1998), 2279–2285.
44. [44] You, Z., Shi, L.Z., Zhu, Q., Wu, P., Zhang, Y.W., Basilio, A., et al. CtIP links DNA double-strand break sensing to resection. Mol Cell 36 (2009), 954–969.
45. [45] Sartori, A.A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450 (2007), 509–514.
46. [46] Takeda, S., Nakamura, K., Taniguchi, Y., Paull, T.T., Ctp1/CtIP and the MRN complex collaborate in the initial steps of homologous recombination. Mol Cell 28 (2007), 351–352.
47. [47] Chen, L., Nievera, C.J., Lee, A.Y., Wu, X., Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J Biol Chem 283 (2008), 7713–7720.
48. [48] Akamatsu, Y., Murayama, Y., Yamada, T., Nakazaki, T., Tsutsui, Y., Ohta, K., et al. Molecular characterization of the role of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nip1+/ctp1+ gene in DNA double-strand break repair in association with the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Mol Cell Biol 28 (2008), 3639–3651.
49. [49] Makharashvili, N., Tubbs, A.T., Yang, S.H., Wang, H., Barton, O., Zhou, Y., et al. Catalytic and noncatalytic roles of the CtIP endonuclease in double-strand break end resection. Mol Cell 54 (2014), 1022–1033.
50. [50] Wang, H., Li, Y., Truong, L.N., Shi, L.Z., Hwang, P.Y., He, J., et al. CtIP maintains stability at common fragile sites and inverted repeats by end resection-independent endonuclease activity. Mol Cell 54 (2014), 1012–1021.
51. [51] Makharashvili, N., Paull, T.T., CtIP: A DNA damage response protein at the intersection of DNA metabolism. DNA Repair (Amst) 32 (2015), 75–81.
52. [52] Szankasi, P., Smith, G.R., A DNA exonuclease induced during meiosis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem 267 (1992), 3014–3023.
53. [53] Szankasi, P., Smith, G.R., A role for exonuclease I from S. pombe in mutation avoidance and mismatch correction. Science 267 (1995), 1166–1169.
54. [54] Shim, E.Y., Chung, W.H., Nicolette, M.L., Zhang, Y., Davis, M., Zhu, Z., et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J 29 (2010), 3370–3380.
55. [55] Krasner, D.S., Daley, J.M., Sung, P., Niu, H., Interplay between Ku and replication protein A in the restriction of Exo1-mediated DNA break end resection. J Biol Chem 290 (2015), 18806–18816.
56. [56] Cannavo, E., Cejka, P., Kowalczykowski, S.C., Relationship of DNA degradation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae exonuclease 1 and its stimulation by RPA and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to DNA end resection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 (2013), E1661–E1668.
57. [57] Eid, W., Steger, M., El-Shemerly, M., Ferretti, L.P., Pena-Diaz, J., Konig, C., et al. DNA end resection by CtIP and exonuclease 1 prevents genomic instability. EMBO Rep 11 (2010), 962–968.
58. [58] Nimonkar, A.V., Ozsoy, A.Z., Genschel, J., Modrich, P., Kowalczykowski, S.C., Human exonuclease 1 and BLM helicase interact to resect DNA and initiate DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 (2008), 16906–16911.
59. [59] Cejka, P., Cannavo, E., Polaczek, P., Masuda-Sasa, T., Pokharel, S., Campbell, J.L., et al. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 467 (2010), 112–116.
60. [60] Niu, H., Chung, W.H., Zhu, Z., Kwon, Y., Zhao, W., Chi, P., et al. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467 (2010), 108–111.
61. [61] Nimonkar, A.V., Genschel, J., Kinoshita, E., Polaczek, P., Campbell, J.L., Wyman, C., et al. BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes Dev 25 (2011), 350–362.
62. [62] Unal, E., Arbel-Eden, A., Sattler, U., Shroff, R., Lichten, M., Haber, J.E., et al. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 16 (2004), 991–1002.
63. [63] van Attikum, H., Gasser, S.M., The histone code at DNA breaks: a guide to repair?. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6 (2005), 757–765.
64. [64] Cao, L.L., Shen, C., Zhu, W.G., Histone modifications in DNA damage response. Sci China Life Sci 59 (2016), 257–270.
65. [65] Rogakou, E.P., Pilch, D.R., Orr, A.H., Ivanova, V.S., Bonner, W.M., DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273 (1998), 5858–5868.
66. [66] van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O., Hohn, B., Gasser, S.M., Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119 (2004), 777–788.
67. [67] Morrison, A.J., Highland, J., Krogan, N.J., Arbel-Eden, A., Greenblatt, J.F., Haber, J.E., et al. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119 (2004), 767–775.
68. [68] Shim, E.Y., Ma, J.L., Oum, J.H., Yanez, Y., Lee, S.E., The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 25 (2005), 3934–3944.
69. [69] Shim, E.Y., Hong, S.J., Oum, J.H., Yanez, Y., Zhang, Y., Lee, S.E., RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 27 (2007), 1602–1613.
70. [70] Chambers, A.L., Downs, J.A., The RSC and INO80 chromatin-remodeling complexes in DNA double-strand break repair. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 110 (2012), 229–261.
71. [71] Costelloe, T., Louge, R., Tomimatsu, N., Mukherjee, B., Martini, E., Khadaroo, B., et al. The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 489 (2012), 581–584.
72. [72] Lazzaro, F., Sapountzi, V., Granata, M., Pellicioli, A., Vaze, M., Haber, J.E., et al. Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J 27 (2008), 1502–1512.
73. [73] Chen, X., Cui, D., Papusha, A., Zhang, X., Chu, C.D., Tang, J., et al. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489 (2012), 576–580.
74. [74] Durand-Dubief, M., Will, W.R., Petrini, E., Theodorou, D., Harris, R.R., Crawford, M.R., et al. SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling factor Fun30 supports point centromere function in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet, 8, 2012, e1002974.
75. [75] Eapen, V.V., Sugawara, N., Tsabar, M., Wu, W.H., Haber, J.E., The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol Cell Biol 32 (2012), 4727–4740.
76. [76] Johnston, H., Kneer, J., Chackalaparampil, I., Yaciuk, P., Chrivia, J., Identification of a novel SNF2/SWI2 protein family member, SRCAP, which interacts with CREB-binding protein. J Biol Chem 274 (1999), 16370–16376.
77. [77] Hood, R.L., Lines, M.A., Nikkel, S.M., Schwartzentruber, J., Beaulieu, C., Nowaczyk, M.J., et al. Mutations in SRCAP, encoding SNF2-related CREBBP activator protein, cause Floating-Harbor syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 90 (2012), 308–313.
78. [78] Dong, S., Han, J., Chen, H., Liu, T., Huen, M.S., Yang, Y., et al. The human SRCAP chromatin remodeling complex promotes DNA-end resection. Curr Biol 24 (2014), 2097–2110.
79. [79] Bernstein, K.A., Rothstein, R., At loose ends: resecting a double-strand break. Cell 137 (2009), 807–810.