Functional proteomics within the genus Lactobacillus

Proteomics

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 946-962

  De Angelis, Maria ^a   Calasso, Maria ^a   Cavallo, Noemi ^a   Di Cagno, Raffaella ^a   Gobbetti, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Environmental metabolic adaptation; Lactobacillus; Microbiology; Secretome; Stress response

Indexed keywords

AMINOTRANSFERASE; ASPARTIC ACID; CARBOHYDRATE; CYSTATHIONINE; GLUTAMIC ACID; LIPID; METHIONINE; NUCLEOTIDE; PYRUVIC ACID; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ADAPTATION; AMINO ACID METABOLISM; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CARBOHYDRATE TRANSPORT; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; FUNCTIONAL PROTEOMICS; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; LACTOBACILLUS BREVIS; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; LACTOBACILLUS JOHNSONII; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; LIPID METABOLISM; LIPID TRANSPORT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE METABOLISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; LACTOBACILLUS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84961238222     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500117     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Gobbetti, M., De Angelis, M., Corsetti, A., Di Cagno, R., Biochemistry and physiology of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 57-69.
2. Giraffa, G., Chanishvili, N., Widyastuti, Y., Importance of lactobacilli in food and feed biotechnology. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 162, 480-487.
3. De Angelis, M., Gobbetti, M., in: Fuquay, J. W., Fox, P. F., McSweeney, P. L. H. (Eds.), Lactic Acid Bacteria Lactobacillus spp.: General Characteristics, Academic Press, San Diego 2012, pp. 78-90.
4. Gaspar, P., Carvalho, A. L., Vinga, S., Santos, H., Neves, A. R., From physiology to systems metabolic engineering for the production of biochemicals by lactic acid bacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 764-788.
5. Gobbetti, M., Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Functional microorganisms for functional food quality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 50, 716-727.
6. Cai, H., Thompson, R., Budinich, M. F., Broadbent, J. R., Steele, J. L., Genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus casei: insights into their niche-associated evolution. Gen. Biol. Evol. 2009, 9, 239-257.
7. Goh, Y., Klaenhammer, T. R., Genomic features of Lactobacillus species. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 1362-1386.
8. De Angelis, M., Gobbetti, M., Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: a review. Proteomics 2004, 4, 106-122.
9. De Angelis, M., Gobbetti, M., in: Papadimitriou, K., Tsakalidou, E., (Eds.), Stress Responses of Lactic Acid Bacteria, Springer Science & Business Media LCC, New York 2011. pp. 219-249.
10. Plumed-Ferrer, C., Koistinen, K. M., Tolonen, T. N., Lehesranta, S. J. et al., Comparative study of sugar fermentation and protein expression patterns of two Lactobacillus plantarum strains grown in three different media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5349-5358.
11. Bove, C. G., De Angelis, M., Gatti, M., Calasso, M. et al., Metabolic and proteomic adaptation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains during growth under cheese-like environmental conditions compared to MRS medium. Proteomics 2012, 12, 3206-3218.
12. Siragusa, S., De Angelis, M., Calasso, M., Campanella, D. et al., Fermentation and proteome profiles of Lactobacillus plantarum strains during growth under food-like conditions. J. Proteomics 2014, 96, 366-380.
13. Wang, J., Wu, R., Zhang, W., Sun, Z. et al., Proteomic comparison of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus casei Zhang cultivated in milk and soy milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 5603-5624.
14. Wu, R., Zhang, W., Sun, T., Wu, J. et al., Proteomic analysis of responses of a new probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus casei to low acid stress. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 181-187.
15. Aakko, J., Sánchez, B., Gueimonde, M., Salminenet, S., Assessment of stress tolerance acquisition in the heat-tolerant derivative strains of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 239-248.
16. Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Limitone, A., Minervini, F. et al., Cell-cell communication in sourdough lactic acid bacteria: a proteomic study in Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2430-2446.
17. Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Calasso, M., Vicentini, O. et al., Quorum sensing in sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum DC400: Induction of plantaricin A (PlnA) under co-cultivation with other lactic acid bacteria and effect of PlnA on bacterial and Caco-2 cells. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2175-2190.
18. Cohen, D. P., Renes, J., Bouwman, F. G., Zoetendal, E. G. et al., Proteomic analysis of log to stationary growth phase Lactobacillus plantarum cells and 2-DE database. Proteomics 2006, 6, 6485-6493.
19. Koskenniemi, K., Lyra, C., Rajaniemi-Wacklin, P., Jokela, J., Sivonen, K., A quantitative real-time PCR detection of toxic Nodularia cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 2173-2179.
20. Koskenniemi, K., Koponen, J., Kankainen, M., Savijoki, K. et al., Proteome analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG using 2D DIGE and mass spectrometry shows differential protein production in laboratory and industrial-type growth media. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4993-5007.
21. Laakso, K., Koskenniemi, K., Koponen, J., Kankainen, M. et al., Growth phase-associated changes in the proteome and transcriptome of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in industrial-type whey medium. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011, 4, 756-766.
22. Liu, S., Proteomic analyses of ethanol tolerance in Lactobacillus buchneri NRRL B-30929. Proteomics 2014, 14, 2540-2544.
23. Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Limitone, A., Fox, P. F., Gobbetti, M., Response of Lactobacillus helveticus PR4 to heat stress during propagation in cheese whey with a gradient of decreasing temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 4503-4514.
24. Zhai, Z., Douillard, F. P., An, H., Wang, G. et al., Proteomic characterization of the acid tolerance response in Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CAUH1 and functional identification of a novel acid stress-related transcriptional regulator Ldb0677. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1524-1537.
25. Marceau, A., Zagorec, M., Chaillou, S., Méra, T., Champomier-Vergès, M. C., Evidence for involvement of at least six proteins in adaptation of Lactobacillus sakei to cold temperatures and addition of NaCl. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 7260-7268.
26. Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Coda, R., Minervini, F., Gobbetti, M., Molecular adaptation of sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum DC400 under co-cultivation with other lactobacilli. Microbiol. Res. 2009, 160, 358-366.
27. Koponen, J., Laakso, K., Koskenniemi, K., Kankainen, M. et al., Effect of acid stress on protein expression and phosphorylation in Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 1357-1374.
28. Fernandez, A., Ogawa, J., Penaud, S., Boudebbouze, S. et al., Rerouting of pyruvate metabolism during acid adaptation in Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Proteomics 2008, 8, 3154-3163.
29. Broadbent, J., Walsh, T., Upton, Z., Proteomics in chronic wound research: potentials in healing and health. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2010, 4, 204-214.
30. Al-Naseri, A., Bowman, J. P., Wilson, R., Nilsson, R. E., Britz, M. L., Impact of lactose starvation on the physiology of Lactobacillus casei GCRL163 in the presence or absence of tween 80. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 5313-5322.
31. Zotta, T., Ricciardi, A., Guidone, A., Sacco, M. et al., Inactivation of ccpA and aeration affect growth, metabolite production and stress tolerance in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 155, 51-59.
32. Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Coda, R., Minervini, F., Gobbetti, M., Molecular adaptation of sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum DC400 under co-cultivation with other lactobacilli. Microbiol. Res. 2009, 160, 358-366.
33. Suokko, A., Poutanen, M., Savijoki, K., Kalkkinen, N., Varmanen, P., ClpL is essential for induction of thermotolerance and is potentially part of the HrcA regulon in Lactobacillus gasseri. Proteomics 2008, 8, 1029-1041.
34. Siragusa, S., Fontana, C., Cappa, F., Caputo, L. et al., Disruption of the gene encoding glutamate dehydrogenase affects growth, amino acids catabolism and survival of Lactobacillus plantarum UC1001. Int. Dairy J. 2011, 21, 59-68.
35. Siragusa, S., De Angelis, M., Di Cagno, R., Rizzello, C. G. et al., Synthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid by lactic acid bacteria isolated from a variety of Italian cheeses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7283-7290.
36. De Angelis, M., Mariotti, L., Rossi, J., Servili, M. et al., Arginine catabolism by sourdough lactic acid bacteria: Purification and characterization of the arginine deiminase pathway enzymes from Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 6193-6201.
37. Behr, J., Israel, L., Gänzle, M. G., Vogel, R. F., Proteomic approach for characterization of hop-inducible proteins in Lactobacillus brevis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 3300-3306.
38. Pessione, E., Mazzoli, R., Giuffrida, M. G., Lamberti, C. et al., A proteomic approach to studying biogenic amine producing lactic acid bacteria. Proteomics 2005, 5, 687-698.
39. Kilstrup, M., Hammer, K., Jensen, P. R., Martinussen, J., Nucleotide metabolism and its control in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 555-590.
40. Koskenniemi, K., Laakso, K., Koponen, J., Kankainen, M. et al., Proteomics and transcriptomics characterization of bile stress response in probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, 1-18.
41. Burns, P., Sánchez, B., Vinderola, G., Ruas-Madiedo, P., Inside the adaptation process of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis to bile. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 142, 132-141.
42. Alcántara, C., Zúñiga, M., Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of the response to bile stress of Lactobacillus casei BL23. Microbiology 2012, 158, 1206-1218.
43. Rivas-Sendra, A., Landete, J. M., Alcántara, C., Zúñiga, M., Response of Lactobacillus casei BL23 to phenolic compounds. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 111, 1473-1481.
44. Castaldo, C., Siciliano, R. A., Muscariello, L., Marasco R., Sacco M., CcpA affects expression of the groESL and dnaK operons in Lactobacillus plantarum. Microbial Cell Factories 2006, 5, 35.
45. Frees, D., Savijoki, K., Varmanen, P., Ingmer, H., Clp ATPases and ClpP proteolytic complexes regulate vital biological processes in low GC, Gram-positive bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1285-1295.
46. Altermann, E., Russell, W. M., Azcarate-Peril, M. A., Barrangou, R. et al., Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 102, 3906-3912.
47. Azcarate-Peril, M. A., McAuliffe, O., Altermann, E., Lick, S. et al., Microarray analysis of a two-component regulatory system involved in acid resistance and proteolytic activity in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5794-5804.
48. Pfeiler, E. A., Klaenhammer, T. R., The genomics of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 12, 546-553.
49. Calasso, M., Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Campanella, D. et al., Effects of the peptide pheromone plantaricin A and cocultivation with Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis DPPMA174 on the exoproteome and the adhesion capacity of Lactobacillus plantarum DC400. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 2657-2669.
50. Espino, E., Koskenniemi, K., Mato-Rodriguez, L., Nyman, T.A. et al., Uncovering surface-exposed antigens of Lactobacillus rhamnosus by cell shaving proteomics and two-dimensional immunoblotting. J Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 1010-1024.
51. Heunis, T., Deane, S., Smit, S., Dicks, L. M. T., Proteomic profiling of the acid stress response in Lactobacillus plantarum 423. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 4028-4039.
52. Zhou, M., Theunissen, D., Wels, M., Siezen, R. J., LAB-secretome: a genome-scale comparative analysis of the predicted extracellular and surface-associated proteins of lactic acid bacteria. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 651.
53. Solis, N., Cordwell, S. J., Current methodologies for proteomics of bacterial surface-exposed and cell envelope proteins. Proteomics 2011, 11, 3169-3189.
54. Ashida, N., Yanagihara, S., Shinoda, T., Yamamoto, N., Characterization of adhesive molecule with affinity to Caco-2 cells in Lactobacillus acidophilus by proteome analysis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 112, 333-337.
55. Johnson, B., Kurt, S., O'Flaherty, S., Goh, Y. J., Klaenhamme, T., Identification of extracellular surface-layer associated proteins in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Microbiology 2013, 159, 2269-2282.
56. Meng J, Zhu X, Gao, Q., Zhang, Q. et al., Characterization of surface layer proteins and its role in probiotic properties of three Lactobacillus strains. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 65, 110-114.
57. Zhu, L., Hu, W., Liu, D., Tian, W. et al., A reference proteomic database of Lactobacillus plantarum CMCC-P0002. PLoS One 2011, 6, e25596.
58. De Angelis, M., Siragusa, S., Campanella, D., Di Cagno, R., Gobbetti, M., Comparative proteomic analysis of biofilm and planktonic cells of Lactobacillus plantarum DB200. Proteomics 2015, in press.
59. Sánchez, B., Schmitter, J.-M., Urdaci, M. C., Identification of novel proteins secreted by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG grown in de Mann-Rogosa-Sharpe broth. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 48, 618-622.
60. Sánchez, B., Bressollier, P., Chaignepain, S., Identification of surface-associated proteins in the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 85-88.
61. Waśko, A., Polak-Berecka, M., Paduch, R., Jźwiak, K., The effect of moonlighting proteins on the adhesion and aggregation ability of Lactobacillus helveticus. Anaerobe 2014, 30, 161-168.
62. Kelly, P., Maguire, P. B., Bennett, M., Fitzgerald, D. J. et al., Correlation of probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius growth phase with its cell wall-associated proteome. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 252, 153-159.
63. Pessione, E., Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2002, 2, 86.
64. Deepika, G., Green, R. J., Frazier, R. A., Charalampopoulos, D., Effect of growth time on the surface and adhesion properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 107, 1230-1240.
65. Hamon, E., Horvatovich, P., Izquierdo, E., Bringel, F. et al., Comparative proteomic analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum for the identification of key proteins in bile tolerance. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 63.
66. Hamon, E., Horvatovich, P., Bisch, M., Bringel, F. et al., Investigation of biomarkers of bile tolerance in Lactobacillus casei using comparative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 109-118.
67. Mackenzie, D. A., Jeffers, F., Parker, M. L., Vibert-Vallet, A. et al., Strain-specific diversity of mucusbinding proteins in the adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillus reuteri. Microbiology 2010, 156, 3368-3378.
68. Malik, S., Petrova, M. I., Claes, I. J., Verhoeven, T.L. et al., The highly autoaggregative and adhesive phenotype of the vaginal Lactobacillus plantarum strain CMPG5300 is sortase dependent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4576-4585.
69. Gross, G., Snel, J., Boekhorst, J., Smits, M. A., Kleerebezem, M., Biodiversity of mannose-specific adhesion in Lactobacillus plantarum revisited: strain-specific domain composition of the mannose-adhesin. Benef. Microbes 2010, 1, 61-66.
70. Siciliano, R. A., Cacace, G., Mazzeo, M. F., Morelli, L. et al., Proteomic investigation of the aggregation phenomenon in Lactobacillus crispatus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008, 1784, 335-342.
71. Desvaux, M., Hebraud, M., Talon, R., Henderson, I. R., Secretion and subcellular localizations of bacterial proteins: a semantic awareness issue. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 13, 139-145.
72. Bergonzelli, G. E., Granato, D., Pridmore, R. D., Marvin-Guy, L. F. et al., GroEL of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 (NCC 533) is cell surface associated: potential role in interactions with the host and the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 425-434.
73. Fredriksen, L., Mathiesen, G., Moen, A., Bron, P. A, The major autolysin Acm2 from Lactobacillus plantarum undergoes cytoplasmic O-glycosylation. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 325-333.
74. Fredriksen, L., Moen, A., Adzhubei, A.A., Mathiesen G. et al., Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 O-linked protein glycosylation: an extended spectrum of target proteins and modification sites detected by mass spectrometry. Glycobiology 2013, 23, 1439-1451.
75. Lebeer, S., Claes, I. J. J., Balog, C. I. A., Schoofs, G. et al., The major secreted protein Msp1/p75 is O-glycosylated in Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Microbial Cell Factor. 2012, 11, 15.
76. Sakaidani, Y., Nomura, T., Matsuura, A., Ito, M. et al., O-Linked-N-acetylglucosamine on extracellular protein domains mediates epithelial cell-matrix interactions. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 583.
77. Wilmes, P., Bond, P. L., The application of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and downstream analyses to a mixed community of prokaryotic microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 9, 911-920.
78. Gagnaire, V., Piota, M., Camiera, B., Vissers, J. P. C. et al., Survey of bacterial proteins released in cheese: a proteomic approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 185-201.
79. Klaassens, E. S., de Vos, W. M., Vaughan, E. E., Metaproteomics approach to study the functionality of the microbiota in the human infant gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1388-1392.
80. Mao, L., Franke, J., Symbiosis, dysbiosis, and rebiosis-the value of metaproteomics in human microbiome monitoring. Proteomics 2014, 15, 1142-1151.
81. Gagnaire, V., Jardin, J., Jan, G., Lortal, S., Invited review: proteomics of milk and bacteria used in fermented dairy products: from qualitative to quantitative advances. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 811-825.
82. Jardin, J., Mollé, D., Piot, M., Lortal, S., Gagnaire, V., Quantitative proteomic analysis of bacterial enzymes released in cheese during ripening. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 155, 19-28.
83. Jones, M. L., Martoni, C. J., Ganopolsky, J. G., Labbé, A., Prakash, S., The human microbiome and bile acid metabolism: dysbiosis, dysmetabolism, disease and intervention. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 467-482.
84. Tanca, A., Palomba, A., Pisanu, S., Addis, M. F., Uzzau, S., Enrichment or depletion? The impact of stool pretreatment on metaproteomic characterization of the human gut microbiota. Proteomics 2015, 15, 3474-3485.
85. Kolmeder, C. A., de Been, M., Nikkilä, J., Ritamo, I. et al., Comparative metaproteomics and diversity analysis of human intestinal microbiota testifies for its temporal stability and expression of core functions. PLoS One 2012, 10.1371/journal.pone.0029913.
86. Verberkmoes, N. C., Russell, A. L., Shah, M., Godzik, A. et al., Shotgun metaproteomics of the human distal gut microbiota. ISME J. 2009, 3, 179-189.
87. Rooijers, K., Kolmeder, C., Juste, C., Doré, J. et al., An iterative workflow for mining the human intestinal metaproteome. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 6.
88. Tang, T., Underwood, A., Gielbert, A., Woodward, M. J., Petrovska, L., Metaproteomics analysis reveals the adaptation process for the chicken gut microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2014, 80, 478-485.
89. Aires, J., Butel, M. J., Proteomics, human gut microbiota and probiotics. Expert. Rev. Proteomics 2011, 8, 279-288.
90. Koistinen, K. M., Plumed-Ferrer, C., Lehesranta, S. J., Kärenlampi, S. O., von Wright, A., Comparison of growth-phase-dependent cytosolic proteomes of two Lactobacillus plantarum strains used in food and feed fermentations. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 273, 12-21.
91. Savijoki, K., Lietzn, N., Kankainen, M., Alatossava, T. et al., Comparative proteome cataloging of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains GG and Lc705. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3460-3473.
92. Wu, R., Wang, W., Yu, D., Zhang, W. et al., Proteomics analysis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a new probiotic bacterium isolated from traditional home-made koumiss in Inner Mongolia of China. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 2321-2338.
93. Majumder, A., Sultan, A., Jersie-Christensen, R. R., Ejby, M. et al., Proteome reference map of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and quantitative proteomics towards understanding the prebiotic action of lactitol. Proteomics 2011, 11, 3470-3481.
94. 35S] methionine labelling and proteomic analyses of probiotic lactobacilli. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 42, 202-209.
95. Wu, R., Sun, Z., Wu, J., Meng, H., Zhang, H., Effect of bile salts stress on protein synthesis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang revealed by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 3858-3868.
96. Lee, K., Lee, H. G., Choi, Y. J., Proteomic analysis of the effect of bile salts on the intestinal and probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 137, 14-19.
97. Lee, J. Y., Pajarillo, E.A., Kim, M. J., Chae, J. P., Kang, D. K. Proteomic and transcriptional analysis of Lactobacillus johnsonii PF01 during bile salt exposure by iTRAQ shotgun proteomics and quantitative RT-PCR. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 432-443.
98. Yan, F., Wang, J., Li, X., Ying, T. et al., 2-DE and MS analysis of interactions between Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 and intestinal epithelial cells. Electrophoresis 2007, 28, 4330-4339.
99. Nazzaro, F., Fratianni, F., Coppola, R., Sada, A., Orlando, P., Fermentative ability of alginate-prebiotic encapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus and survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. J. Funct. Foods 2009, 1, 319-323.
100. Lee, S. G., Park, T. H., Han, N. S., Proteomic analysis of proteins increased or reduced by ethanol of Lactobacillus plantarum ST4 isolated from Makgeolli, traditional Korean rice wine. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 516-525.
101. Huang, G., Zhong, X., Li, C., Cao, Y., Analysis of differential expression proteins and functions in Lactobacillus brevis NCL912 under acid stress. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 2011, 51, 241-248.
102. Hosseini Nezhad, M., Knight, M., Britz, M. L., Evidence of changes in cell surface proteins during growth of Lactobacillus casei under acidic conditions. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 21, 253-260.
103. Hamon, E., Horvatovich, P., Marchioni, E., Aoudé-Werner, D., Ennahar, S., Investigation of potential markers of acid resistance in Lactobacillus plantarum by comparative proteomics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 134-144.
104. Lee, K., Lee, H. G., Pi, K., Cho, Y. J., The effect of low pH on protein expression by the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri. Proteomics 2008, 8, 1624-1630.
105. Schurr, B.C., Behr, J., Vogel, R.F., Detection of acid and hop shock induced responses in beer spoiling Lactobacillus brevis by MALDI-TOF MS. Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 501-506.
106. Song, S., Bae, D. W., Lim, K., Griffiths, M. W., Oh, S., Cold stress improves the ability of Lactobacillus plantarum L67 to survive freezing. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 191, 135-143.
107. Silva, J., Carvalho, A. S., Ferreira, R., Vitorino, R., Effect of the pH of growth on the survival of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus to stress conditions during spray-drying. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 775-782.
108. Desmond, C., Fitzgerald, G. F., Stanton, C., Ross, R. P., Improved stress tolerance of GroESL-overproducing Lactococcus lactis and probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5929-5936.
109. Prasad, J., McJarrow, P., Gopal, P., Heat and osmotic stress responses of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20) in relation to viability after drying. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 917-925.
110. Russo, P., de la Luz Mohedano, M., Capozzi, V., de Palencia, P. F. et al., Comparative proteomic analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 and ΔctsR mutant strains under physiological and heat stress conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 10680-10696.
111. Parente, E., Ciocia, F., Ricciardi, A., Zotta, T. et al., Diversity of stress tolerance in Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactobacillus paraplantarum: A multivariate screening study. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 144, 270-279.
112. Hörmann, S., Scheyhing, C., Behr, J., Pavlovic, M. et al., Comparative proteome approach to characterize the high-pressure stress response of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis DSM 20451(T). Proteomics 2006, 6, 1878-1885.
113. Cecconi, D., Cristofoletti, M., Milli, A., Antonioli, P. et al., Effect of tannic acid on Lactobacillus plantarum wine strain during starvation: a proteomic study. Electrophoresis 2009, 30, 957-965.
114. Bossi, A., Rinalducci, S., Zolla, L., Antonioli, P. et al., Effect of tannic acid on Lactobacillus hilgardii analysed by a proteomic approach. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 102, 787-795.
115. Altaf Hussain, M., Wu, X., Natt, N., Amoafo, O., Cytosolic proteomes of Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC27773 cells grown in pH 5.5 and 6.5. J. Proteomics Computational Biol. 2015, 2, 7.
116. Altaf Hussain, M., Kaur Natt, N., Comparison of changes in the cytosolic proteomes of lactose starved and acid stressed Lactobacillus rhamnosus cells. American J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 1, 56-63.
117. Lee, J., Kim, Y., Yun, H. S., Kim, Y. G. et al., Genetic and proteomic analysis of factors affecting serum cholesterol reduction by Lactobacillus acidophilus A4. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 4829-4835.
118. Noh, D. O., Kim, S. H., Gilliland, S. E., Incorporation of cholesterol into the cellular membrane of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 12, 3107-3113.
119. Lamberti, C., Mangiapane, E., Pessione, A., Mazzoli, R. et al., Proteomic characterization of a selenium-metabolizing probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri Lb2 BM for nutraceutical applications. Proteomics 2011, 11, 2212-2221.
120. Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., Calasso, M., Gobbetti, M., Proteomics of the bacterial cross-talk by quorum sensing. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 19-34.
121. Herve-Jimenez, L., Guillouard, I., Guedon, E., Boudebbouze, S. et al., Postgenomic analysis of Streptococcus thermophilus co-cultivated in milk with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus: involvement of nitrogen, purine, and iron metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 2062-2073.
122. Ramiah, K., van Reenen, C. A., Dicks, L. M. T., Surface-bound proteins of Lactobacillus plantarum 423 that contribute to adhesion of Caco-2 cells and their role in competitive exclusion and displacement of Clostridium sporogenes and Enterococcus faecalis. Res. Microbiol. 2008, 159, 470-475.
123. Beck, H. C., Madsen, S. M., Glenting, J., Petersen, J., Proteomic analysis of cell surface-associated proteins from probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 8, 2321-2338.
124. Sánchez, B., Chaignepain, S., Schmitter, J. M., Urdaci, M. U., A method for the identification of proteins secreted by lactic acid bacteria grown in complex media. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 19, 208-211.
125. Izquierdo, E., Horvatovich, P., Marchioni, E., Aoude-Werner, D. et al., 2-DE and MS analysis of key proteins in the adhesion of Lactobacillus plantarum, a first step toward early selection of probiotics based on bacterial biomarkers. Electrophoresis 2009, 30, 949-956.
126. Kankainen, M., Paulin, L., Tynkkynen, S., von Ossowski, I. et al., Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human-mucus binding protein. PNAS 2009, 106, 17193-17198.