Gene duplicability of core genes is highly consistent across all angiosperms

Plant Cell

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 326-344

  Li, Zhen ^a,b   Defoort, Jonas ^a,b   Tasdighian, Setareh ^a,b   Maere, Steven ^a,b   Van De Peer, Yves ^a,b,c   De Smet, Riet ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PLANT GENOME;

ANGIOSPERMS; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, ESSENTIAL; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS;

EID: 84960421688     PISSN: 10404651     EISSN: 1532298X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.15.00877     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. Alvarez-Ponce, D., and Fares, M.A. (2012). Evolutionary rate and duplicability in the Arabidopsis thaliana protein-protein interaction network. Genome Biol. Evol. 4: 1263–1274.
2. Amborella Genome Project (2013). The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342: 1241089.
3. Anisimova, M., and Gascuel, O. (2006). Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Syst. Biol. 55: 539–552.
4. Antoni, R., Gonzalez-Guzman, M., Rodriguez, L., Peirats-Llobet, M., Pizzio, G.A., Fernandez, M.A., De Winne, N., De Jaeger, G., Dietrich, D., Bennett, M.J., and Rodriguez, P.L. (2013). PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1-LIKE8 plays an important role for the regulation of abscisic acid signaling in root. Plant Physiol. 161: 931–941.
5. Armisén, D., Lecharny, A., and Aubourg, S. (2008). Unique genes in plants: specificities and conserved features throughout evolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 280.
6. Aury, J.M., et al. (2006). Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444: 171–178.
7. Bailey, N. (1964). The Elements of Stochastic Processes. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
8. Barker, M.S., Kane, N.C., Matvienko, M., Kozik, A., Michelmore, R.W., Knapp, S.J., and Rieseberg, L.H. (2008). Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the Compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 2445–2455.
9. Bassard, J.E., et al. (2012). Protein-protein and protein-membrane associations in the lignin pathway. Plant Cell 24: 4465–4482.
10. Bekaert, M., Edger, P.P., Pires, J.C., and Conant, G.C. (2011). Twophase resolution of polyploidy in the Arabidopsis metabolic network gives rise to relative and absolute dosage constraints. Plant Cell 23: 1719–1728.
11. Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met. 57: 289–300.
12. Birchler, J.A., Riddle, N.C., Auger, D.L., and Veitia, R.A. (2005). Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends Genet. 21: 219–226.
13. Birchler, J.A., and Veitia, R.A. (2007). The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell 19: 395–402.
14. Birchler, J.A., and Veitia, R.A. (2012). Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 14746–14753.
15. Blanc, G., and Wolfe, K.H. (2004a). Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 16: 1679–1691.
16. Blanc, G., and Wolfe, K.H. (2004b). Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16: 1667–1678.
17. Bremer, B., et al. (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161: 105–121.
18. Bridgham, J.T., Brown, J.E., Rodríguez-Marí, A., Catchen, J.M., and Thornton, J.W. (2008). Evolution of a new function by degenerative mutation in cephalochordate steroid receptors. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000191.
19. Brunet, F.G., Roest Crollius, H., Paris, M., Aury, J.M., Gibert, P., Jaillon, O., Laudet, V., and Robinson-Rechavi, M. (2006). Gene loss and evolutionary rates following whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 1808–1816.
20. Buggs, R.J., Chamala, S., Wu, W., Tate, J.A., Schnable, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., and Barbazuk, W.B. (2012). Rapid, repeated, and clustered loss of duplicate genes in allopolyploid plant populations of independent origin. Curr. Biol. 22: 248–252.
21. Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J.M., and Gabaldón, T. (2009). trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in largescale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25: 1972–1973.
22. Carretero-Paulet, L., and Fares, M.A. (2012). Evolutionary dynamics and functional specialization of plant paralogs formed by whole and small-scale genome duplications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 3541–3551.
23. Chae, L., Lee, I., Shin, J., and Rhee, S.Y. (2012). Towards understanding how molecular networks evolve in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15: 177–184.
24. Chao, D.Y., Dilkes, B., Luo, H., Douglas, A., Yakubova, E., Lahner, B., and Salt, D.E. (2013). Polyploids exhibit higher potassium uptake and salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis. Science 341: 658–659.
25. Chatr-Aryamontri, A., et al. (2013). The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: D816–D823.
26. Conant, G.C. (2014). Comparative genomics as a time machine: how relative gene dosage and metabolic requirements shaped the timedependent resolution of yeast polyploidy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31: 3184–3193.
27. Conant, G.C., Birchler, J.A., and Pires, J.C. (2014). Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 19: 91–98.
28. Cromer, L., Jolivet, S., Horlow, C., Chelysheva, L., Heyman, J., De Jaeger, G., Koncz, C., De Veylder, L., and Mercier, R. (2013). Centromeric cohesion is protected twice at meiosis, by SHUGOSHINs at anaphase I and by PATRONUS at interkinesis. Curr. Biol. 23: 2090–2099.
29. D’Antonio, M., and Ciccarelli, F.D. (2011). Modification of gene duplicability during the evolution of protein interaction network. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7: e1002029.
30. Davis, J.C., and Petrov, D.A. (2004). Preferential duplication of conserved proteins in eukaryotic genomes. PLoS Biol. 2: E55.
31. Dean, E.J., Davis, J.C., Davis, R.W., and Petrov, D.A. (2008). Pervasive and persistent redundancy among duplicated genes in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000113.
32. De Bodt, S., Hollunder, J., Nelissen, H., Meulemeester, N., and Inzé, D. (2012). CORNET 2.0: integrating plant coexpression, protein- protein interactions, regulatory interactions, gene associations and functional annotations. New Phytol. 195: 707–720.
33. De Smet, R., Adams, K.L., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M.C., Maere, S., and Van de Peer, Y. (2013). Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 2898–2903.
34. Di Rubbo, S., et al. (2013). The clathrin adaptor complex AP-2 mediates endocytosis of brassinosteroid insensitive1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25: 2986–2997.
35. Domenichini, S., Benhamed, M., De Jaeger, G., Van De Slijke, E., Blanchet, S., Bourge, M., De Veylder, L., Bergounioux, C., and Raynaud, C. (2012). Evidence for a role of Arabidopsis CDT1 proteins in gametophyte development and maintenance of genome integrity. Plant Cell 24: 2779–2791.
36. Douglas, G.M., et al. (2015). Hybrid origins and the earliest stages of diploidization in the highly successful recent polyploid Capsella bursa-pastoris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 2806–2811.
37. Drummond, D.A., and Wilke, C.O. (2008). Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134: 341–352.
38. Duarte, J.M., Wall, P.K., Edger, P.P., Landherr, L.L., Ma, H., Pires, J.C., Leebens-Mack, J., and dePamphilis, C.W. (2010). Identification of shared single copy nuclear genes in Arabidopsis, Populus, Vitis and Oryza and their phylogenetic utility across various taxonomic levels. BMC Evol. Biol. 10: 61.
39. Dunham, M.J., Badrane, H., Ferea, T., Adams, J., Brown, P.O., Rosenzweig, F., and Botstein, D. (2002). Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16144–16149.
40. Edgar, R.C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 1792–1797.
41. Edger, P.P., and Pires, J.C. (2009). Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes. Chromosome Res. 17: 699–717.
42. Eloy, N.B., et al. (2012). SAMBA, a plant-specific anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome regulator is involved in early development and A-type cyclin stabilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 13853–13858.
43. Fonseca, S., Fernández-Calvo, P., Fernández, G.M., Díez-Díaz, M., Gimenez-Ibanez, S., López-Vidriero, I., Godoy, M., Fernández- Barbero, G., Van Leene, J., De Jaeger, G., Franco-Zorrilla, J.M., and Solano, R. (2014). bHLH003, bHLH013 and bHLH017 are new targets of JAZ repressors negatively regulating JA responses. PLoS One 9: e86182.
44. Franceschini, A., Szklarczyk, D., Frankild, S., Kuhn, M., Simonovic, M., Roth, A., Lin, J., Minguez, P., Bork, P., von Mering, C., and Jensen, L.J. (2013). STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: D808–D815.
45. Freeling, M. (2009). Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60: 433–453.
46. Freeling, M., Lyons, E., Pedersen, B., Alam, M., Ming, R., and Lisch, D. (2008). Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales. Genome Res. 18: 1924–1937.
47. Freeling, M., and Thomas, B.C. (2006). Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16: 805–814.
48. Gadeyne, A., et al. (2014). The TPLATE adaptor complex drives clathrin-mediated endocytosis in plants. Cell 156: 691–704.
49. Gil, M., Zanetti, M.S., Zoller, S., and Anisimova, M. (2013). CodonPhyML: fast maximum likelihood phylogeny estimation under codon substitution models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 1270–1280.
50. Goldman, N., and Yang, Z. (1994). A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 725–736.
51. Gresham, D., Desai, M.M., Tucker, C.M., Jenq, H.T., Pai, D.A., Ward, A., DeSevo, C.G., Botstein, D., and Dunham, M.J. (2008). The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000303.
52. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., and Gascuel, O. (2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0.Syst. Biol. 59: 307–321.
53. Hahn, M.A., van Kleunen, M., and Müller-Schärer, H. (2012). Increased phenotypic plasticity to climate may have boosted the invasion success of polyploid Centaurea stoebe. PLoS One 7: e50284.
54. Hahn, M.W. (2007). Bias in phylogenetic tree reconciliation methods: implications for vertebrate genome evolution. Genome Biol. 8: R141.
55. Hahn, M.W., De Bie, T., Stajich, J.E., Nguyen, C., and Cristianini, N. (2005). Estimating the tempo and mode of gene family evolution from comparative genomic data. Genome Res. 15: 1153–1160.
56. Hall, B.G. (2004). Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy. (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates).
57. Han, F., Peng, Y., Xu, L., and Xiao, P. (2014). Identification, characterization, and utilization of single copy genes in 29 angiosperm genomes. BMC Genomics 15: 504.
58. He, X., and Zhang, J. (2006). Higher duplicability of less important genes in yeast genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 144–151.
59. Heijde, M., Binkert, M., Yin, R., Ares-Orpel, F., Rizzini, L., Van De Slijke, E., Persiau, G., Nolf, J., Gevaert, K., De Jaeger, G., and Ulm, R. (2013). Constitutively active UVR8 photoreceptor variant in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 20326–20331.
60. Huminiecki, L., and Heldin, C.H. (2010). 2R and remodeling of vertebrate signal transduction engine. BMC Biol. 8: 146.
61. Jiao, Y., Li, J., Tang, H., and Paterson, A.H. (2014). Integrated syntenic and phylogenomic analyses reveal an ancient genome duplication in monocots. Plant Cell 26: 2792–2802.
62. Kaltenegger, E., and Ober, D. (2015). Paralogue interference affects the dynamics after gene duplication. Trends Plant Sci. 20: 814–821.
63. Kitano, H. (2004). Biological robustness. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5: 826–837.
64. Koonin, E.V., et al. (2004). A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 5: R7.
65. Li, L., Stoeckert, C.J., Jr., and Roos, D.S. (2003). OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13: 2178–2189.
66. Liang, H., Plazonic, K.R., Chen, J., Li, W.H., and Fernández, A. (2008). Protein under-wrapping causes dosage sensitivity and decreases gene duplicability. PLoS Genet. 4: e11.
67. Lloyd, A.H., et al. (2014). Meiotic gene evolution: can you teach a new dog new tricks? Mol. Biol. Evol. 31: 1724–1727.
68. Lloyd, J., and Meinke, D. (2012). A comprehensive dataset of genes with a loss-of-function mutant phenotype in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 158: 1115–1129.
69. Lloyd, J.P., Seddon, A.E., Moghe, G.D., Simenc, M.C., and Shiu, S.H. (2015). Characteristics of plant essential genes allow for within- and between-species prediction of lethal mutant phenotypes. Plant Cell 27: 2133–2147.
70. Lynch, M., and Conery, J.S. (2000). The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151–1155.
71. Lynch, M., and Conery, J.S. (2003). The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 3: 35–44.
72. Lynch, M., and Katju, V. (2004). The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicates. Trends Genet. 20: 544–549.
73. Maere, S., De Bodt, S., Raes, J., Casneuf, T., Van Montagu, M., Kuiper, M., and Van de Peer, Y. (2005a). Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 5454–5459.
74. Maere, S., Heymans, K., and Kuiper, M. (2005b). BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21: 3448–3449.
75. Makino, T., Hokamp, K., and McLysaght, A. (2009). The complex relationship of gene duplication and essentiality. Trends Genet. 25: 152–155.
76. Makino, T., and McLysaght, A. (2010). Ohnologs in the human genome are dosage balanced and frequently associated with disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 9270–9274.
77. McGrath, C.L., and Lynch, M. (2012). Evolutionary significance of whole-genome duplication. In Polyploidy and Genome Evolution, P.S. Soltis and D.E. Soltis, eds (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), pp. 1–20.
78. Molina, N., and van Nimwegen, E. (2009). Scaling laws in functional genome content across prokaryotic clades and lifestyles. Trends Genet. 25: 243–247.
79. Monti, S., Tamayo, P., Mesirov, J., and Golub, T. (2003). Consensus clustering: A resampling-based method for class discovery and visualization of gene expression microarray data. Mach. Learn. 52: 91–118.
80. Muse, S.V., and Gaut, B.S. (1994). A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 715–724.
81. Myouga, F., Akiyama, K., Tomonaga, Y., Kato, A., Sato, Y., Kobayashi, M., Nagata, N., Sakurai, T., and Shinozaki, K. (2013). The Chloroplast Function Database II: a comprehensive collection of homozygous mutants and their phenotypic/genotypic traits for nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins. Plant Cell Physiol. 54: e2.
82. Nei, M., and Gojobori, T. (1986). Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3: 418–426.
83. Nguyen, T.H., Ranwez, V., Berry, V., and Scornavacca, C. (2013). Support measures to estimate the reliability of evolutionary events predicted by reconciliation methods. PLoS One 8: e73667.
84. Ohno, S. (1970). Evolution by Gene Duplication. (New York: Springer).
85. Oliver, T., Schmidt, B., Nathan, D., Clemens, R., and Maskell, D. (2005). Using reconfigurable hardware to accelerate multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW. Bioinformatics 21: 3431–3432.
86. Papp, B., Pál, C., and Hurst, L.D. (2003). Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424: 194–197.
87. Paterson, A.H., Chapman, B.A., Kissinger, J.C., Bowers, J.E., Feltus, F.A., and Estill, J.C. (2006). Many gene and domain families have convergent fates following independent whole-genome duplication events in Arabidopsis, Oryza, Saccharomyces and Tetraodon. Trends Genet. 22: 597–602.
88. Pauwels, L., et al. (2010). NINJA connects the co-repressor TOPLESS to jasmonate signalling. Nature 464: 788–791.
89. Perez, A.C., Durand, A.N., Vanden Bossche, R., De Clercq, R., Persiau, G., Van Wees, S.C.M., Pieterse, C.M.J., Gevaert, K., De Jaeger, G., Goossens, A., and Pauwels, L. (2014). The Non-JAZ TIFY protein TIFY8 from Arabidopsis thaliana is a transcriptional repressor. PLoS One 9: e84891.
90. Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Riaño-Pachón, D.M., Corrêa, L.G., Rensing, S.A., Kersten, B., and Mueller-Roeber, B. (2010). PlnTFDB: updated content and new features of the plant transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res. 38: D822–D827.
91. Rabier, C.E., Ta, T., and Ané, C. (2014). Detecting and locating whole genome duplications on a phylogeny: a probabilistic approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31: 750–762.
92. Rambaldi, D., Giorgi, F.M., Capuani, F., Ciliberto, A., and Ciccarelli, F.D. (2008). Low duplicability and network fragility of cancer genes. Trends Genet. 24: 427–430.
93. Rodgers-Melnick, E., Mane, S.P., Dharmawardhana, P., Slavov, G.T., Crasta, O.R., Strauss, S.H., Brunner, A.M., and Difazio, S.P. (2012). Contrasting patterns of evolution following whole genome versus tandem duplication events in Populus. Genome Res. 22: 95–105.
94. Salichos, L., and Rokas, A. (2013). Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497: 327–331.
95. Salichos, L., Stamatakis, A., and Rokas, A. (2014). Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31: 1261–1271.
96. Schmutz, J., et al. (2010). Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463: 178–183.
97. Selmecki, A., Forche, A., and Berman, J. (2006). Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313: 367–370.
98. Selmecki, A.M., Maruvka, Y.E., Richmond, P.A., Guillet, M., Shoresh, N., Sorenson, A.L., De, S., Kishony, R., Michor, F., Dowell, R., and Pellman, D. (2015). Polyploidy can drive rapid adaptation in yeast. Nature 519: 349–352.
99. Seoighe, C., and Gehring, C. (2004). Genome duplication led to highly selective expansion of the Arabidopsis thaliana proteome. Trends Genet. 20: 461–464.
100. Shimodaira, H. (2002). An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51: 492–508.
101. Siegel, J.J., and Amon, A. (2012). New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28: 189–214.
102. Slotte, T., et al. (2013). The Capsella rubella genome and the genomic consequences of rapid mating system evolution. Nat. Genet. 45: 831–835.
103. Smith, S.A., and Donoghue, M.J. (2008). Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322: 86–89.
104. Soltis, D.E., Buggs, R.J.A., Doyle, J.J., and Soltis, P.S. (2010). What we still don’t know about polyploidy. Taxon 59: 1387–1403.
105. Spinner, L., et al. (2013). A protein phosphatase 2A complex spatially controls plant cell division. Nat. Commun. 4: 1863.
106. Stamatakis, A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313.
107. Stolzer, M., Lai, H., Xu, M., Sathaye, D., Vernot, B., and Durand, D. (2012). Inferring duplications, losses, transfers and incomplete lineage sorting with nonbinary species trees. Bioinformatics 28: i409–i415.
108. Sunshine, A.B., Payen, C., Ong, G.T., Liachko, I., Tan, K.M., and Dunham, M.J. (2015). The fitness consequences of aneuploidy are driven by condition-dependent gene effects. PLoS Biol. 13: e1002155.
109. Suyama, M., Torrents, D., and Bork, P. (2006). PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: W609–W612.
110. Takahashi, N., Lammens, T., Boudolf, V., Maes, S., Yoshizumi, T., De Jaeger, G., Witters, E., Inzé, D., and De Veylder, L. (2008). The DNA replication checkpoint aids survival of plants deficient in the novel replisome factor ETG1. EMBO J. 27: 1840–1851.
111. te Beest, M., Le Roux, J.J., Richardson, D.M., Brysting, A.K., Suda, J., Kubesová, M., and Pysek, P. (2012). The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 109: 19–45.
112. Van de Peer, Y., Fawcett, J.A., Proost, S., Sterck, L., and Vandepoele, K. (2009a). The flowering world: a tale of duplications. Trends Plant Sci. 14: 680–688.
113. Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., and Meyer, A. (2009b). The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 725–732.
114. Van Landeghem, S., Björne, J., Wei, C.H., Hakala, K., Pyysalo, S., Ananiadou, S., Kao, H.Y., Lu, Z., Salakoski, T., Van de Peer, Y., and Ginter, F. (2013). Large-scale event extraction from literature with multi-level gene normalization. PLoS One 8: e55814.
115. Van Leene, J., et al. (2010). Targeted interactomics reveals a complex core cell cycle machinery in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6: 397.
116. Vanneste, K., Baele, G., Maere, S., and Van de Peer, Y. (2014a). Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplications in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Genome Res. 24: 1334–1347.
117. Vanneste, K., Maere, S., and Van de Peer, Y. (2014b). Tangled up in two: a burst of genome duplications at the end of the Cretaceous and the consequences for plant evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369: 20130353.
118. Vanneste, K., Van de Peer, Y., and Maere, S. (2013). Inference of genome duplications from age distributions revisited. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 177–190.
119. van Nimwegen, E. (2003). Scaling laws in the functional content of genomes. Trends Genet. 19: 479–484.
120. Vercruyssen, L., et al. (2014). ANGUSTIFOLIA3 binds to SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes to regulate transcription during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell 26: 210–229.
121. Vilella, A.J., Severin, J., Ureta-Vidal, A., Heng, L., Durbin, R., and Birney, E. (2009). EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication- aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res. 19: 327–335.
122. Wang, Y., Wang, X., Tang, H., Tan, X., Ficklin, S.P., Feltus, F.A., and Paterson, A.H. (2011). Modes of gene duplication contribute differently to genetic novelty and redundancy, but show parallels across divergent angiosperms. PLoS One 6: e28150.
123. Wapinski, I., Pfeffer, A., Friedman, N., and Regev, A. (2007). Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature 449: 54–61.
124. Wilkerson, M.D., and Hayes, D.N. (2010). ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics 26: 1572–1573.
125. Woodhouse, M.R., Tang, H., and Freeling, M. (2011). Different gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana transposed in different epochs and at different frequencies throughout the rosids. Plant Cell 23: 4241–4253.
126. Woods, S., Coghlan, A., Rivers, D., Warnecke, T., Jeffries, S.J., Kwon, T., Rogers, A., Hurst, L.D., and Ahringer, J. (2013). Duplication and retention biases of essential and non-essential genes revealed by systematic knockdown analyses. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003330.
127. Wu, Y.C., Rasmussen, M.D., Bansal, M.S., and Kellis, M. (2013). TreeFix: statistically informed gene tree error correction using species trees. Syst. Biol. 62: 110–120.
128. Yang, C., Zhao, L., Zhang, H., Yang, Z., Wang, H., Wen, S., Zhang, C., Rustgi, S., von Wettstein, D., and Liu, B. (2014). Evolution of physiological responses to salt stress in hexaploid wheat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 11882–11887.
129. Yang, Z. (1997). PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 555–556.
130. Yang, Z. (2007). PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1586–1591.
131. Yang, Z., and Nielsen, R. (2000). Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 32–43.
132. Yap, V.B., Lindsay, H., Easteal, S., and Huttley, G. (2010). Estimates of the effect of natural selection on protein-coding content. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 726–734.
133. Yona, A.H., Manor, Y.S., Herbst, R.H., Romano, G.H., Mitchell, A., Kupiec, M., Pilpel, Y., and Dahan, O. (2012). Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 21010–21015.
134. Zhang, J., and Yang, J.R. (2015). Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16: 409–420.