Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2445-2455

  Barker, Michael S ^a,b   Kane, Nolan C ^a,b   Matvienko, Marta ^c   Kozik, Alexander ^c   Michelmore, Richard W ^c   Knapp, Steven J ^d   Rieseberg, Loren H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Asteraceae; Compositae; Duplicate gene retention; Genome evolution; Paleopolyploidy; Whole genome duplication

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; ASTERACEAE; BIODIVERSITY; CARDUEAE; CENTAUREA MACULOSA; CENTAUREA SOLSTITIALIS; CHICORY; CICHORIOIDEA; CYTOLOGY; DANDELION; ENDIVE; EOCENE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; GERBERA HYBRIDA; HELIANTHEAE; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; HELIANTHUS ARGOPHYLLUS; HELIANTHUS CILIARIS; HELIANTHUS EXILIS; HELIANTHUS PETIOLARIS; JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE; LACTUCA PERENNIS; LACTUCA SALIGNA; LACTUCA SERRIOLA; LACTUCA VIROSA; LETTUCE; MUTISIEAE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT GENETICS; POLYPLOIDY; SAFFLOWER; STRUCTURAL GENE; SUNFLOWER; TAXONOMY;

ASTERACEAE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, PLANT; POLYPLOIDY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ASTERACEAE; HELIANTHEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MUTISIEAE;

EID: 54149092976     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn187     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adams KL, Wendel JF. 2005. Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploid plants. Trends Genet. 21:539-543.
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
3. Aury J, Jaillon O, Duret L, et al. (43 co-authors). 2006. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature. 444:171-178.
4. Baldwin BG, Wessa BL, Panero JL. 2002. Nuclear rDNA evidence for major lineages of Helenioid Heliantheae (Compositae). Syst Bot. 27:161-198.
5. Benderoth M, Textor S, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J, Kroymann J. 2006. Positive selection driving diversification in plant secondary metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:9118-9123.
6. Berry ST, Leon AJ, Hanfrey CC, Challis P, Burkholz A, Barnes SR, Rufener GK, Lee M, Caligari PDS. 1995. Molecular marker analysis of Helianthus annuus L. 2. Construction of an RFLP linkage map for cultivated sunflower. Theor Appl Genet. 91:195-199.
7. Birchler JA, Veitia RA. 2007. The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell. 19:395-402.
8. Birney E, Thompson J, Gibson T. 1996. PairWise and SearchWise: finding the optimal alignment in a simultaneous comparison of a protein profile against all DNA translation frames. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:2730-2739.
9. Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH. 2003. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res. 13:137-144.
10. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004a. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell. 16:1679-1691.
11. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004b. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell. 16:1667-1678.
12. Blomme T, Vandepoele K, Bodt SD, Simillion C, Maere S, Peer YVD. 2006. The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution. Genome Biol. 7:R43.
13. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unraveling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 422:433.
14. Broholm SK, Tähtiharju S, Laitinen RAE, Albert VA, Teeri TH, Elomaa P. 2008. A TCP domain transcription factor controls flower type specification along the radial axis of the Gerbera (Asteraceae) inflorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:9117-9122.
15. Causier B, Castillo R, Zhou J, Ingram R, Xue Y, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Davies B. 2005. Evolution in action: following function in duplicated floral homeotic genes. Curr Biol. 15:1508-1512.
16. Chapman BA, Bowers JE, Feltus FA, Paterson AH. 2006. Buffering of crucial functions by paleologous duplicated genes may contribute cyclicality to angiosperm genome duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:2730-2735.
17. Chapman M, Leebens-Mack J, Burke J. 2008. Positive selection and expression divergence following gene duplication in the sunflower CYCLOIDEA gene family. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1260-1273.
18. Chaudhuri P, Marron JS. 1999. SiZer for exploration of structures in curves. J Am Stat Assoc. 94:807-823.
19. Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, et al. (13 co-authors). 2006. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 16:738-749.
20. De Bodt S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2005. Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:591-597.
21. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
22. Felsenstein J. 2008. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package). Version 3.68. Distributed by the author. Seattle (WA): Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington. Available from: http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/ phylip.
23. Freeling M, Thomas BC. 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16:805-814.
24. Funk V, Bayer R, Keeley S, et al. (12 co-authors). 2005. Everywhere but Antarctica: using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae. Biol Skr. 55:343-374.
25. Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC. 2007. Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell. 19:3403-3417.
26. Gentzbittel L, Vear F, Zhang Y, Bervillé A, Nicolas P. 1995. Development of a consensus linkage RFLP map of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet. 90:1079-1086.
27. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 11:725-736.
28. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 52:696-704.
29. Jaillon O, Aury J, Noel B, et al. (56 co-authors). 2007. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 449:463-467.
30. Jansen RK, Kim K-J. 1996. Implications of chloroplast DNA for the classification and phylogeny of the Asteraceae. In: Hind DJN, Beentje HJ, editors. Compositae Systematics: proceedings of the International Compositae Conference; Kew; 1994. Vol. 1. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. p. 317-339.
31. Jansen RK, Michaels HJ, Palmer JD. 1991. Phylogeny and character evolution in Asteraceae based on chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. Syst Bot. 16:98-115.
32. Jansen RK, Palmer JD. 1987. A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an ancient evolutionary split in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 84:5818-5822.
33. Jansen RK, Palmer JD. 1988. Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in the Mutisieae (Asteraceae). Am J Bot. 75:753-766.
34. Kim K, Choi K, Jansen RK. 2005. Two chloroplast DNA inversions originated simultaneously during the early evolution of the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Mol Biol Evol. 22:1783-1792.
35. Laitinen RAE, Immanen J, Auvinen P, et al. (11 co-authors). 2005. Analysis of the floral transcriptome uncovers new regulators of organ determination and gene families related to flower organ differentiation in Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae). Genome Res. 15:475-486.
36. Levin DA. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon. 24:35-43.
37. Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Ma B, Tromp J, Li M. 2002. PatternHunter: faster and more sensitive homology search. Bioinformatics. 18:440-445.
39. Maere S, Bodt SD, Raes J, Casneuf T, Montagu MV, Kuiper M, Peer YVD. 2005. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:5454-5459.
40. Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science. 264:421-424.
41. Mclachlan G, Peel D, Basford K, Adams P. 1999. The EMMIX software for the fitting of mixtures of normal and t-components. J Stat Softw. 4:2.
42. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA. 2004. Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:9903-9908.
43. Quackenbush J, Liang F, Holt I, Pertea G, Upton J. 2000. The TIGR gene indices: reconstruction and representation of expressed gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:141-145.
44. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.x.x. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org.
45. Rensing S, Ick J, Fawcett J, Lang D, Zimmer A, Peer YVD, Reski R. 2007. An ancient genome duplication contributed to the abundance of metabolic genes in the moss Physcomitrella patens. BMC Evol Biol. 7:130.
46. Robinson H. 1981. A revision of the tribal and subtribal limits of the Heliantheae (Asteraceae). Smithson Contrib Bot. 51:1-102.
47. Scannell DR, Byrne KP, Gordon JL, Wong S, Wolfe KH. 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature. 440:341-345.
48. Scannell DR, Frank AC, Conant GC, Byrne KP, Woolfit M, Wolfe KH. 2007. Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:8397-8402.
49. Schlueter JA, Dixon P, Granger C, Grant D, Clark L, Doyle JJ, Shoemaker RC. 2004. Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome. 47:868-876.
50. Schranz ME, Mitchell-Olds T. 2006. Independent ancient polyploidy events in the sister families Brassicaceae and Cleomaceae. Plant Cell. 18:1152-1165.
51. Sémon M, Wolfe KH. 2007. Consequences of genome duplication. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 17:505-512.
52. Seoighe C, Gehring C. 2004. Genome duplication led to highly selective expansion of the Arabidopsis thaliana proteome. Trends Genet. 20:461-464.
53. Smith E. 1975. The chromosome numbers of North American Coreopsis with phyletic interpretations. Bot Gaz. 136:78-86.
54. Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold.
55. Sterck L, Rombauts S, Jansson S, Sterky F, Rouze P, Peer YVD. 2005. EST data suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid. New Phytol. 167:165-170.
56. Stevens PF. 2008. Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 9, June 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
57. Tang H, Bowers JE, Wang X, Ming R, Alam M, Paterson AH. 2008. Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science. 320:486-488.
58. Taylor JS, Peer YVD, Meyer A. 2001. Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation. Trends Genet. 17:299-301.
59. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science. 290:2114-2117.
60. Wernersson R, Pedersen AG. 2003. RevTrans: multiple alignment of coding DNA from aligned amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3537-3539.
61. Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al. (30 co-authors). 2007. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D5-D12.
62. Yahara T, Kawahara T, Crawford DJ, Ito M, Watanabe K. 1989. Extensive gene duplications in diploid Eupatorium (Asteraceae). Am J Bot. 76:1247-1253.
63. Yang Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 13:555-556.
64. Yu J, Wang J, Lin W, et al. (117 co-authors). 2005. The genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications. PLoS Biol. 3:e38.
65. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol. 7:203-214.