Inference of genome duplications from age distributions revisited

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 177-190

  Vanneste, Kevin ^a,b   Van De Peer, Yves ^a,b   Maere, Steven ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

duplicate age distribution; gene and genome duplication; KS saturation; simulated sequence evolution

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CANDIDA ALBICANS; CIONA INTESTINALIS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; KLUYVEROMYCES LACTIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SAMPLE SIZE; STOCHASTIC MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84871822072     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss214     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abbasi AA. 2010. Piecemeal or big bangs: correlating the vertebrate evolution with proposed models of gene expansion events. Nat Rev Genet. 11:166.
2. Anisimova M, Kosiol C. 2009. Investigating protein-coding sequence evolution with probabilistic codon substitution models. Mol Biol Evol. 26:255-271.
3. Arnaud MB, Costanzo MC, Skrzypek MS, Shah P, Binkley G, Lane C, Miyasato SR, Sherlock G. 2007. Sequence resources at the Candida Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D452-D456.
4. Aury JM, Jaillon O, Duret L, et al. (43 co-authors). 2006. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444:171-178.
5. Barker MS, Kane NC, Matvienko M, Kozik A, Michelmore RW, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH. 2008. Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the Compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years.Mol Biol Evol. 25:2445-2455.
6. Barker MS, Vogel H, Schranz ME. 2009. Paleopolyploidy in the Brassicales: analyses of the Cleome transcriptome elucidate the history of genome duplications in Arabidopsis and other Brassicales. Genome Biol Evol. 1:391-399.
7. Berg OG. 1999. Synonymous nucleotide divergence and saturation: effects of site-specific variations in codon bias and mutation rates. J Mol Evol. 48:398-407.
8. Birchler JA, Veitia RA. 2010. The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits, and evolution. New Phytol. 186:54-62.
9. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667-1678.
10. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422:433-438.
11. Brown WM, George M, Wilson AC. 1979. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 76:1967-1971.
12. Chaudhuri P, Marron J. 1999. SiZer for exploration of structures in curves. J Am Stat Assoc. 94:807-823.
13. Colbourne JK, Pfrender ME, Gilbert D, et al. (69 co-authors). 2011. The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex. Science 331:555-561.
14. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. 2007. Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeast. Mol Syst Biol. 3:129.
15. Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, et al. (13 co-authors). 2006. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 16:738-749.
16. De Bodt S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2005. Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:591-597.
17. Dehal P, Boore JL. 2005. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3:1700-1708.
18. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, et al. (67 co-authors). 2004. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430:35-44.
19. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
20. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. 2002. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 1575-1584.
21. Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2009. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-tertiary extinction event. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:5737-5742.
22. Fitch WM. 1967. Evidence suggesting a non-random character to nucleotide replacements in naturally occurring mutations. J Mol Biol. 26:499-507.
23. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, et al. (52 co-authors). 2011. Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D800-D806.
24. Freeling M. 2009. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 60:433-453.
25. Freeling M, Thomas BC. 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16:805-814.
26. Gao LZ, Innan H. 2004. Very low gene duplication rate in the yeast genome. Science 306:1367-1370.
27. Gojobori T. 1983. Codon substitution in evolution and the saturation of synonymous changes. Genetics 105:1011-1027.
28. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.Mol Biol Evol. 11:725-736.
29. Hakes L, Pinney JW, Lovell SC, Oliver SG, Robertson DL. 2007. All duplicates are not equal: the difference between small-scale and genome duplication. Genome Biol. 8:R209.
30. Hershberg R, Petrov DA. 2008. Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet. 42:287-299.
31. Hughes AL, Friedman R. 2003. 2R or not 2R: testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates. J Struct Funct Genomics. 3:85-93.
32. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Brunet F, et al. (61 co-authors). 2004. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431:946-957.
33. Jiao Y, Leebens-Mack J, Ayyampalayam S, et al. (24 co-authors). 2012. A genome triplication associated with early diversification of the core eudicots. Genome Biol. 13:R3.
34. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, et al. (17 co-authors). 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97-100.
35. Kellis M, Birren BW, Lander ES. 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428:617-624.
36. Kimura M. 1977. Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Nature 267:275-276.
37. Kristina Strandberg AK, Salter LA. 2004. A comparison of methods for estimating the transition:transversion ratio from DNA sequences. Mol Phylogen Evol. 32:495-503.
38. Li WH. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
39. Lin YS, Byrnes JK, Hwang JK, Li WH. 2006. Codon-usage bias versus gene conversion in the evolution of yeast duplicate genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:14412-14416.
40. Long MY, Thornton K. 2001. Gene duplication and evolution. Science 293:1551-1551.
41. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
42. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2003. The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes. J Struct Funct Genomics. 3:35-44.
43. Maere S, De Bodt S, Raes J, Casneuf T, Van Montagu M, Kuiper M, Van de Peer Y. 2005. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:5454-5459.
44. McKain MR, Wickett N, Zhang Y, Ayyampalayam S, McCombie WR, Chase MW, Pires JC, Depamphilis CW, Leebens-Mack J. 2012. Phylogenomic analysis of transcriptome data elucidates co-occurrence of a paleopolyploid event and the origin of bimodal karyotypes in Agavoideae (Asparagaceae). Am J Bot. 99:397-406.
45. Meyer A, Van de Peer Y. 2005. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). Bioessays 27:937-945.
46. Miyazawa S. 2011. Advantages of a mechanistic codon substitution model for evolutionary analysis of protein-coding sequences. PLoS One 6:e28892.
47. Morrison DA. 2008. How to summarize estimates of ancestral divergence times. Evol Bioinform Online. 4:75-95.
48. Muse SV, Gaut BS. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol. 11:715-724.
49. Naik PA, Shi P, Tsai CL. 2007. Extending the Akaike Information Criterion to mixture regression models. J Am Stat Assoc. 102: 244-254.
50. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
51. Panopoulou G, Poustka AJ. 2005. Timing and mechanism of ancient vertebrate genome duplications-the adventure of a hypothesis. Trends Genet. 21:559-567.
52. Perler F, Efstratiadis A, Lomedico P, Gilbert W, Kolodner R, Dodgson J. 1980. The evolution of genes-the chicken preproinsulin gene. Cell 20:555-566.
53. Pfeil BE, Schlueter JA, Shoemaker RC, Doyle JJ. 2005. Placing paleopolyploidy in relation to taxon divergence: a phylogenetic analysis in legumes using 39 gene families. Syst Biol. 54:441-454.
54. Proost S, Van Bel M, Sterck L, Billiau K, Van Parys T, Van de Peer Y, Vandepoele K. 2009. PLAZA: a comparative genomics resource to study gene and genome evolution in plants. Plant Cell 21:3718-3731.
55. Putnam NH, Butts T, Ferrier DE, et al. (37 co-authors). 2008. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453:1064-1071.
56. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 29: 467-501.
57. Rosenberg MS, Subramanian S, Kumar S. 2003. Patterns of transitional mutation biases within and among mammalian genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 20:988-993.
58. Sato Y, Nishida M. 2010. Teleost fish with specific genome duplication as unique models of vertebrate evolution. Environ Biol Fishes. 88: 169-188.
59. Schlueter JA, Dixon P, Granger C, Grant D, Clark L, Doyle JJ, Shoemaker RC. 2004. Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome 47:868-876.
60. Seo TK, Kishino H. 2009. Statistical comparison of nucleotide, amino acid, and codon substitution models for evolutionary analysis of protein-coding sequences. Syst Biol. 58:199-210.
61. Sherman DJ, Martin T, Nikolski M, Cayla C, Souciet JL, Durrens P. 2009. Genolevures: protein families and synteny among complete hemiascomycetous yeast proteomes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D550-D554.
62. Shi T, Huang H, Barker MS. 2010. Ancient genome duplications during the evolution of kiwifruit (Actinidia) and related Ericales. Ann Bot. 106:497-504.
63. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu MC, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:13627-13632.
64. Smith JM, Smith NH. 1996. Synonymous nucleotide divergence: what is "saturation"? Genetics 142:1033-1036.
65. Smith SA, Donoghue MJ. 2008. Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322:86-89.
66. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Bell CD, Paterson AH, Zheng C, Sankoff D, Depamphilis CW,Wall PK, Soltis PS. 2009. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am J Bot. 96:336-348.
67. Soltis DE, Burleigh JG. 2009. Surviving the K-T mass extinction: new perspectives of polyploidization in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:5455-5456.
68. Sterck L, Rombauts S, Jansson S, Sterky F, Rouze P, Van de Peer Y. 2005. EST data suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid. New Phytol. 167:165-170.
69. Sugino RP, Innan H. 2006. Selection for more of the same product as a force to enhance concerted evolution of duplicated genes. Trends Genet. 22:642-644.
70. Tang HB, Bowers JE, Wang XY, Paterson AH. 2010. Angiosperm genome comparisons reveal early polyploidy in the monocot lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:472-477.
71. Taylor JS, Raes J. 2004. Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annu Rev Genet. 38:615-643.
72. Van de Peer Y. 2004. Computational approaches to unveiling ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 5:752-763.
73. Van de Peer Y, Fawcett JA, Proost S, Sterck L, Vandepoele K. 2009. The flowering world: a tale of duplications. Trends Plant Sci. 14:680-688.
74. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 10:725-732.
75. Van de Peer Y, Maere S,Meyer A. 2010. 2R or not 2R is not the question anymore. Nat Rev Genet. 11:166.
76. Vandepoele K, De Vos W, Taylor JS, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y. 2004. Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:1638-1643.
77. Wakeley J. 1996. The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: new methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:158-162.
78. Wolfe KH, Shields DC. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708-713.
79. Yang Z. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586-1591.
81. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2000. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models.Mol Biol Evol. 17:32-43.
82. Yoo MJ, Chanderbali AS, Altman NS, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2010. Evolutionary trends in the floral transcriptome: insights from one of the basalmost angiosperms, the water lily Nuphar advena (Nymphaeaceae). Plant J. 64:687-698.
83. Yu J, Wang J, Lin W, et al. (98 co-authors). 2005. The genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications. PLoS Biol. 3:e38.
84. Zhai W, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Yang Z. Forthcoming 2012. Looking for Darwin in genomic sequences-validity and success of statistical methods. Mol Biol Evol., doi:10.1093/molbev/mss104.
85. Zhang LQ, Vision TJ, Gaut BS. 2002. Patterns of nucleotide substitution among simultaneously duplicated gene pairs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1464-1473.