Evolutionary dynamics and functional specialization of plant paralogs formed by whole and small-scale genome duplications

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3541-3551

  Carretero Paulet, Lorenzo ^a   Fares, Mario A ^a,b  

^a Universitat Politècnica de València   (Spain)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

functional specialization; gene duplication; small scale genome duplication; whole genome duplication

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CODON; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS POLLINATION; DIPLOIDY; GAMETOPHYTE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PARALOGY; PHYSCOMITRELLA; PHYSCOMITRELLA PATENS; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT GENETICS; POPULUS TRICHOCARPA; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SPOROPHYTE;

BASE SEQUENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CODON; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84867775180     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss162     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aharoni A, Gaidukov L, Khersonsky O, McQ Gould S, Roodveldt C, Tawfik DS. 2005. The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions. Nat Genet. 37:73-76.
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
3. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796-815.
4. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. (20 co-authors). 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25:25-29.
5. Bielawski JP, Yang Z. 2004. A maximum likelihood method for detecting functional divergence at individual codon sites, with application to gene family evolution. J Mol Evol. 59:121-132.
6. Blanc G, Hokamp K,Wolfe KH. 2003. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res. 13:137-144.
7. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004a. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 16: 1679-1691.
8. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004b. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667-1678.
9. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422:433-438.
10. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17: 540-552.
11. Conant GC,Wolfe KH. 2008. Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nat Rev Genet. 9:938-950.
12. Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, et al. (13 co-authors). 2006. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 16:738-749.
13. De Bodt S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2005. Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:591-597.
14. dos Reis M, Wernisch L. 2009. Estimating translational selection in eukaryotic genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 26:451-461.
15. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. 2005. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:14338-14343.
16. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134:341-352.
17. Duret L. 2002. Evolution of synonymous codon usage inmetazoans. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 12:640-649.
18. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
19. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan YL, Postlethwait J. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531-1545.
20. Francino MP. 2005. An adaptive radiation model for the origin of new gene functions. Nat Genet. 37:573-577.
21. Freeling M, Thomas BC. 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16:805-814.
22. Ganko EW, Meyers BC, Vision TJ. 2007. Divergence in expression between duplicated genes in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2298-2309.
23. Geisler-Lee J, O'Toole N, Ammar R, Provart NJ, Millar AH, Geisler M. 2007. A predicted interactome for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 145: 317-329.
24. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 11: 725-736.
25. Gu Z, Steinmetz LM, Gu X, Scharfe C, Davis RW, Li W-H. 2003. Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature 421:63-66.
26. Hakes L, Pinney JW, Lovell SC, Oliver SG, Robertson DL. 2007. All duplicates are not equal: the difference between small-scale and genome duplication. Genome Biol. 8:R209.
27. He X, Zhang J. 2005. Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169:1157-1164.
28. Innan H, Kondrashov F. 2010. The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat Rev Genet. 11: 97-108.
29. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 8: 275-282.
30. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J. 2005. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 110:462-467.
31. Li WH, Gu Z,Wang H, Nekrutenko A. 2001. Evolutionary analyses of the human genome. Nature 409:847-849.
32. Lynch M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
33. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
34. Lynch M, O'Hely M, Walsh B, Force A. 2001. The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. Genetics 159: 1789-1804.
35. Maere S, De Bodt S, Raes J, Casneuf T, Van Montagu M, Kuiper M, Van de Peer Y. 2005. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:5454-5459.
36. Moore RC, Purugganan MD. 2005. The evolutionary dynamics of plant duplicate genes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 8:122-128.
37. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Ohta T. 1973. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246:96-98.
39. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD. 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194-197.
40. Proost S, Van Bel M, Sterck L, Billiau K, Van Parys T, Van de Peer Y, Vandepoele K. 2009. PLAZA: a comparative genomics resource to study gene and genome evolution in plants. Plant Cell 21: 3718-3731.
41. Rensing SA, Ick J, Fawcett JA, Lang D, Zimmer A, Van de Peer Y, Reski R. 2007. An ancient genome duplication contributed to the abundance of metabolic genes in the moss Physcomitrella patens. BMC Evol Biol. 7:130.
42. Rensing SA, Lang D, Zimmer AD, et al. (70 co-authors). 2008. The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 319:64-69.
43. Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1281-1295.
44. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, VanMontagu MC, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:13627-13632.
45. Sterck L, Rombauts S, Jansson S, Sterky F, Rouze P, Van de Peer Y. 2005. EST data suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid. New Phytol. 167:165-170.
46. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
47. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290:2114-2117.
48. Xia X. 2007. An improved implementation of codon adaptation index. Evol Bioinform Online. 3:53-58.
49. Yang L, Gaut BS. 2011. Factors that contribute to variation in evolutionary rate among Arabidopsis genes. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 2359-2369.
50. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586-1591.
51. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2002. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 19:908-917.
52. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2008. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 25:568-579.
53. Zhang J. 2003. Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:292-298.
54. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z. 2005. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol. 22:2472-2479.
55. Zhi-Liang H, Bao J, Reecy J. 2008. CateGOrizer: a web-based program to batch analyze gene ontology classification categories. Online J Bioinformatics. 9:108-112.