Comparative genomics as a time machine: How relative gene dosage and metabolic requirements shaped the time-dependent resolution of yeast polyploidy

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3184-3193

  Conant, Gavin C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

gene dosage; metabolic flux; polyploidy; protein interaction network; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; transcriptional regulatory network

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA; FUNGAL PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DUPLICATE GENE; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL METABOLISM; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE PRODUCT; GENETIC MODEL; GENOMICS; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; TIME; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; WHOLE GENOME DUPLICATION; YEAST; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, DUPLICATE; GENES, FUNGAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84925003517     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu250     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Arrigo N, Barker MS. 2012. Rarely successful polyploids and their legacy in plant genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 15:140-146.
2. Aury JM, Jaillon O, Duret L, Noel B, Jubin C, Porcel BM, Segurens B, Daubin V, Anthouard V, Aiach N, et al. 2006. Global trends of wholegenome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444:171-178.
3. BekaertM, Edger PP, Pires JC, Conant GC. 2011. Two-phase resolution of polyploidy in the Arabidopsis metabolic network gives rise to relative followed by absolute dosage constraints. Plant Cell 23: 1719-1728.
4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat. 57:289-300.
5. Birchler JA, Veitia RA. 2012. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:14746-14753.
6. Blank LM, Lehmbeck F, Sauer U. 2005. Metabolic-flux and network analysis of fourteen hemiascomycetous yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 5: 545-558.
7. Brenchley R, Spannagl M, Pfeifer M, Barker GL, D'Amore R, Allen AM, McKenzie N, Kramer M, Kerhornou A, Bolser D, et al. 2012. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 491:705-710.
8. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2005. The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res. 15:1456-1461.
9. Charlesworth J, Eyre-Walker A. 2007. The other side of the nearly neutral theory, evidence of slightly advantageous back-mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:16992-16997.
10. Cherry JM, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz SA, Dwight SS, Hester ET, Jia Y, Juvik G, Roe T, Schroeder M, et al. 1998. SGD: Saccharomyces genome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:73-80.
11. Cliften P, Sudarsanam P, Desikan A, Fulton L, Fulton B, Majors J, Waterston R, Cohen BA. 2003. Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 301: 71-76.
12. Conant GC. 2010. Rapid reorganization of the transcriptional regulatory network after genome duplication in yeast. Proc Biol Sci. 277: 869-876.
13. Conant GC, Birchler JA, Pires JC. 2014. Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 19:91-98.
14. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. 2007. Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeast. Mol Syst Biol. 3:129.
15. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. 2008. Probabilistic cross-species inference of orthologous genomic regions created by whole-genome duplication in yeast. Genetics 179:1681-1692.
16. D'Hont A, Denoeud F, Aury JM, Baurens FC, Carreel F, Garsmeur O, Noel B, Bocs S, Droc G, Rouard M, et al. 2012. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 488:213-217.
17. Dagum L, Menon R. 1998. OpenMP: an industry standard API for shared-memory programming. IEEE Comput Sci Eng. 5:46-55.
18. De Smet R, Adams KL, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu MC, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2013. Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:2898-2903.
19. Dietrich FS, Voegeli S, Brachat S, Lerch A, Gates K, Steiner S, Mohr C, Pohlmann R, Luedi P, Choi S, et al. 2004. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304:304-307.
20. Duarte NC, Herrgard MJ, Palsson BØ. 2004. Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Res. 14:1298-1309.
21. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, Durrens P, Casaregola S, Lafontaine I, De Montigny J, Marck C, Neuveglise C, Talla E, et al. 2004. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430:35-44.
22. Edger PP, Pires JC. 2009. Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes. Chromosome Res. 17: 699-717.
23. Evangelisti AM, Conant GC. 2010. Nonrandom survival of gene conversions among yeast ribosomal proteins duplicated through genome doubling. Genome Biol Evol. 2:826-834.
24. Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2009. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:5737-5742.
25. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 17:368-376.
26. Felsenstein J, Churchill GA. 1996. A hidden markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 13: 93-104.
27. Freeling M. 2009. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 60:433-453.
28. Freeling M, Thomas BC. 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16:805-814.
29. Fusco D, Grassi L, Bassetti B, Caselle M, Cosentino Lagomarsino M. 2010. Ordered structure of the transcription network inherited from the yeast whole-genome duplication. BMC Syst Biol. 4:77.
30. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, Davis RW, Dujon B, Feldmann H, Galibert F, Hoheisel JD, Jacq C, Johnston M, et al. 1996. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274:546,563-567.
31. Gordon JL, Armisen D, Proux-Wera E, OhEigeartaigh SS, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2011. Evolutionary erosion of yeast sex chromosomes by mating-type switching accidents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108: 20024-20029.
32. Gordon JL, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2009. Additions, losses and rearrangements on the evolutionary route from a reconstructed ancestor to the modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000485.
33. Hahn MW. 2009. Distinguishing among evolutionary models for the maintenance of gene duplicates. J Hered. 100:605-617.
34. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, Danford TW, Hannett NM, Tagne JB, Reynolds DB, Yoo J, et al. 2004. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431:99-104.
35. Hittinger CT, Carroll SB. 2007. Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch. Nature 449:677-681.
36. Jeffers J, Reinders J. 2013. Intel Xeon Phi coprocessor high performance programming. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
37. Kellis M, Birren BW, Lander ES. 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428:617-624.
38. Kim T-Y, Ha CW, Huh W-K. 2009. Differential subcellular localization of ribosomal protein L7 paralogs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cells. 27:539-546.
39. Komili S, Farny NG, Roth FP, Silver PA. 2007. Functional specificity among ribosomal proteins regulates gene expression. Cell 131: 557-571.
40. Lewis PO. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol. 50:913-925.
41. Maere S, De Bodt S, Raes J, Casneuf T, Van Montagu M, Kuiper M, Van de Peer Y. 2005. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:5454-5459.
42. Mayfield-Jones D, Washburn JD, Arias T, Edger PP, Pires JC, Conant GC. 2013. Watching the grin fade: tracing the effects of polyploidy on different evolutionary time scales. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 24: 320-331.
43. Mayrose I, Zhan SH, Rothfels CJ,Magnuson-Ford K, Barker MS, Rieseberg LH, Otto SP. 2011. Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates. Science 333:1257.
44. Merico A, Sulo P, Piskur J, Compagno C. 2007. Fermentative lifestyle in yeastsbelonging totheSaccharomyces complex.FEBS J. 274:976-989.
45. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer.
46. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD. 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194-197.
47. Perez-Bercoff.A, McLysaght A, Conant GC. 2011. Patterns of indirect protein interactions suggest a spatial organization to metabolism. Mol Biosyst. 7:3056-3064.
48. Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S,Merico A, Compagno C. 2006. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet. 22:183-186.
49. Ptacek J, Devgan G, Michaud G, Zhu H, Zhu X, Fasolo J, Guo H, Jona G, Breitkreutz A, Sopko R, et al. 2005. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 438:679-684.
50. Qian W, He X, Chan E, Xu H, Zhang J. 2011. Measuring the evolutionary rate of protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108: 8725-8730.
51. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://cran.case.edu/web/packages/dplR/vignettes/timeseries-dplR.pdf.
52. Scannell DR, Byrne KP, Gordon JL, Wong S, Wolfe KH. 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440:341-345.
53. Scannell DR, Frank AC, Conant GC, Byrne KP, Woolfit M, Wolfe KH. 2007. Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:8397-8402.
54. Scannell DR,Wolfe KH. 2008. A burst of protein sequence evolution and a prolonged period of asymmetric evolution follow gene duplication in yeast. Genome Res. 18:137-147.
55. Schranz ME, Mohammadin S, Edger PP. 2012. Ancient whole genome duplications, novelty and diversification: the WGD Radiation Lag-Time Model. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 15:147-153.
56. Seoighe C, Wolfe KH. 1999. Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2:548-554.
57. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2012. Polyploidy and genome evolution. Heidelberg: Springer. p. 415.
58. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Chatr-Aryamontri A, Boucher L, Oughtred R, Livstone MS, Nixon J, Van Auken K, Wang X, Shi X, et al. 2011. The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D698-D704.
59. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 10:725-732.
60. van Hoek MJ, Hogeweg P. 2009. Metabolic adaptation after whole genome duplication. Mol Biol Evol. 26:2441-2453.
61. Veitia RA, Birchler JA. 2010. Dominance and gene dosage balance in health and disease: why levels matter!. J Pathol. 220:174-185.
62. Wang X,Wang H,Wang J, Sun R, Wu J, Liu S, Bai Y, Mun JH, Bancroft I, Cheng F, et al. 2011. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet. 43:1035-1039.
63. Wolfe KH, Shields DC. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708-713.
64. Zhu Y, Lin Z, Nakhleh L. 2013. Evolution after whole-genome duplication: a network perspective. G3 3:2049-2057.